Case: Henderson v. Gromek

2:13-cv-01645 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Nov. 19, 2013

Closed Date: 2014

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 19, 2013, an African-American school teacher filed this lawsuit in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff sued under the Declaratory Judgment Act against a Pittsburgh police officer on the grounds of an unlawful arrest and detainment of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, represented by the ACLU, asked for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging that the officer violated his First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment Rights when the officer detained…

On November 19, 2013, an African-American school teacher filed this lawsuit in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff sued under the Declaratory Judgment Act against a Pittsburgh police officer on the grounds of an unlawful arrest and detainment of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, represented by the ACLU, asked for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging that the officer violated his First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment Rights when the officer detained the plaintiff for 12 hours and pursued false charges against the plaintiff because the plaintiff criticized the officer's unsafe driving. In addition, the plaintiff alleged that the officer violated his First Amendment right to be from retaliation of expressive conduct when the officer placed the plaintiff and another observer in handcuffs when they attempted to record the interaction with the officer.

The charges that were brought against the plaintiff were dropped and the city of Pittsburgh reached a settlement, acknowledging the improper actions of the officer. According to the ACLU, the settlement included the police acknowledging the public's right to video tape police officers, regular meetings between police and members of the community, and damages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $52,500.

Summary Authors

Daniel Fryer (11/4/2015)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13162759/parties/henderson-v-gromek/


Judge(s)

Mitchell, Robert C. (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Campbell, Bryan (Pennsylvania)

Downey, Glen (Pennsylvania)

Love, James H. (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Defendant

Genard, Allison N. (Pennsylvania)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:13-cv-01645

Docket [PACER]

Nov. 19, 2014

Nov. 19, 2014

Docket
1

2:13-cv-01645

Complaint

Nov. 19, 2013

Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint
12

2:13-cv-01645

Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution

March 13, 2014

March 13, 2014

Order/Opinion
16

2:13-cv-01645

Order for Statistical Closing

Nov. 19, 2014

Nov. 19, 2014

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13162759/henderson-v-gromek/

Last updated Aug. 22, 2026, 5:04 a.m.

Docket for: HENDERSON v. GROMEK
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
1 Nov. 19, 2013

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
2 Nov. 20, 2013

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
3 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 3, 2014

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
5 Jan. 3, 2014

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
6 Jan. 6, 2014

Initial Local Rule 16.1 Scheduling Order

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
7 March 5, 2014

Stipulation Selecting ADR process

RECAP
8 March 5, 2014

Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting

RECAP
8 March 5, 2014

Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Policing

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 19, 2013

Closing Date: 2014

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

African-American teacher falsely arrested and detained

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Jonathan Gromek

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Freedom of speech/association

Unreasonable search and seizure

Other Dockets:

Western District of Pennsylvania 2:13-cv-01645

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Provide antidiscrimination training

Amount Defendant Pays: 52,500

Issues

General/Misc.:

Aggressive behavior

Search policies

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Over/Unlawful Detention (facilities)

Restraints (physical)

Policing:

Excessive force

Recommended Citation