Filed Date: Dec. 17, 2014
Closed Date: 2015
Clearinghouse coding complete
On December 17, 2014, two street musicians filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Saugatuck, Michigan. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU, sought injunctive relief and compensatory damages, claiming that the City's application of the Saugatuck Public Entertainment Ordinance (Ordinance) to the plaintiffs was unconstitutional. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that criminalizing the act of playing music on a public sidewalk without a permit is a prior restraint on expression that violates the First Amendment. The plaintiffs also claimed that the Ordinance violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as it does not provide them with fair notice that the Ordinance, which prohibits performances on the streets of Saugatuck without a permit, applies to individual street musicians.
On March 27, 2015, upon stipulation and consent of the parties, the Court (Judge Robert J. Jonker) entered an order:
Summary Authors
Robert Lake (6/1/2015)
Rachel Carpman (10/25/2018)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7537288/parties/waechter-v-saugatuck-city-of/
Jonker, Robert James (Michigan)
Allen, Marc S. (Michigan)
Aukerman, Miriam (Michigan)
Moss, Kary L. (Michigan)
Bogren, Michael S. (Michigan)
Jonker, Robert James (Michigan)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7537288/waechter-v-saugatuck-city-of/
Last updated June 30, 2023, 3:16 a.m.
State / Territory: Michigan
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Dec. 17, 2014
Closing Date: 2015
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Plaintiffs are two private individuals who wish to play music on the public sidewalks of Saugatuck and accept tips from passersby.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Amount Defendant Pays: $45,000
Order Duration: 2015 - None
Issues
General: