Case: Hedgepeth v. Davis
1:15-cv-00067 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Filed Date: Feb. 9, 2015
Closed Date: 2015
Clearinghouse coding complete
Case Summary
On February 9, 2015, the orders in Searcy v. Strange and Strawser v. Strange in this Clearinghouse, took effect: the ban on same-sex marriage was now illegal in Alabama, according to the federal courts. However, the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Roy Moore, strongly disagreed. He had sent an order to probate judges and state employees, threatening them with legal action by the governor, if they issued or recognized same-sex marriage licenses. The chief justice claimed that the federal court orders bound only the Alabama Attorney General and his employees and no one else.
Alabama's probate judges faced competing orders: the federal court's would allow same-sex marriage, but the chief justice's would not. The result was legal chaos. Some probate judges followed the federal court order and issued same-sex marriage licenses but most probate judges refused and many ceased issuing marriage licenses entirely, including the Mobile County Probate Court.
On February 9, 2015, the attorneys in Searcy v. Davis filed this lawsuit, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on behalf of same-sex couples who were denied marriage licenses that day in Mobile County. The defendants were the Alabama Governor, Attorney General, Chief Justice, and various Mobile County officials. Plaintiffs claimed that their Fourteenth Amendment rights were being violated and they requested an emergency injunction commanding the defendants to issue marriage licenses.
On February 10, 2015, the District Court (Judge Callie V. S. Granade) denied the plaintiffs' request for immediate relief but invited them to participate in a preliminary injunction hearing, in Strawser, in two days time. On February 24, 2015, Judge Granade dismissed the Mobile County officials from the case, granting the stipulation for dismissal filed by plaintiffs and the county officials.
In response to the Strawser litigation, the plaintiffs eventually received their marriage licenses. As a result, on March 26, 2015, Judge Granade granted their motion to dismiss: the claims against the governor were dismissed with prejudice; but the claims against the attorney general and the chief justice would be dismissed without prejudice unless they filed an objection before April 2, which the chief justice did.
On April 2, 2015, Chief Justice Moore requested that the claims against him be dismissed with prejudice. On June 16, Moore withdrew his request to dismiss with prejudice, stating that the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss was sufficient. As a result of this concession, Judge Granada dismissed the plaintiffs' complaints against Chief Justice Moore without prejudice on June 22, 2015.
The case is now closed.
Summary Authors
David Hamstra (4/8/2015)
Virginia Weeks (2/19/2018)
Related Cases
Searcy v. Bentley, Southern District of Alabama (2014)
Strawser v. Strange, Southern District of Alabama (2014)
Hathcote v. Green, Northern District of Alabama (2015)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4127677/parties/hedgepeth-v-robert-bentley/
Agricola, Algert Swanson Jr. (Alabama)
Boardman, Mark S. (Alabama)
Byrne, David Bryson Jr. (Alabama)
Carr, Clay Richard (Alabama)
Agricola, Algert Swanson Jr. (Alabama)
Byrne, David Bryson Jr. (Alabama)
Druhan, Joseph Michael Jr. (Alabama)
Escalona, Prim Formby (Alabama)
Fridy, Matthew David (Alabama)
Goldthwaite, Mary Arrington (Alabama)
Hagmaier, Jason Kirk (Alabama)
Howell, Laura Elizabeth (Alabama)
McElvy, James Douglas (Alabama)
McGowin, Anne Elizabeth (Alabama)
Messick, Misty Shawn (Alabama)
Satterwhite, Harry V. (Alabama)
Shattuck, Roland Cooper (Alabama)
Tietig, Lisa Kuhlman (Alabama)
Truelove, Justin Kurt (Alabama)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4127677/hedgepeth-v-robert-bentley/
Last updated Aug. 22, 2026, 5:08 a.m.
Docket for: Hedgepeth v. Robert Bentley
Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Public Benefits/Government Services
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Feb. 9, 2015
Closing Date: 2015
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Same-sex couples denied marriage licenses in Mobile County, Alabama
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
State
State of Alabama
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Other Dockets:
Southern District of Alabama 1:15-cv-00067
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed
Relief Granted:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Content of Injunction:
Preliminary relief request withdrawn/mooted
Issues
General/Misc.:
Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)
Discrimination Basis:
LGBTQ+:
Case Summary of Hedgepeth v. Davis, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/14443/ (last updated 2/19/2018).