Case: Amador v. Baca

2:10-cv-01649 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: March 5, 2010

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 5, 2010, two female former inmates who were imprisoned in the Century Regional Detention Facility ("CRDF"), a Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department ("LASD") facility, filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Represented by a civil rights law firm, the plaintiffs sued the LASD under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs alleged violations of their Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, as well as their equivalents under the California Constitution. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that CRDF female inmates were routinely subjected to degrading strip and body cavity searches at the CRDF without probable cause or individualized suspicion.

On October 22, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion to certify class. On February 28, 2011, the LASD moved to dismiss this suit, claiming that the plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their claims as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"). The complaint was amended on January 28, 2011, to add five additional former and current CRDF inmates as named plaintiffs. However, on December 27, 2011, District Judge Stephen V. Wilson moved this case to the inactive calendar, pending the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, 132 S.Ct. 1510 (2012), another case involving strip searches, which Judge Wilson believed could affect the viability of relevant precedent.

On April 2, 2012, the Supreme Court decided in Florence that if a prisoner was about to be housed in a jail's general population, no individualized suspicion was required, no matter how minor the arrest offense. Following this decision, on December 19, 2012, Judge Wilson issued an order moving this case back to the active calendar. In addition, Judge Wilson denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that the LASD did not demonstrate sufficient grievance procedures as required by the PLRA. Judge Wilson also determined that the court would rule on the plaintiffs' motion to certify class after the defendants filed their motion for summary judgment. 2012 WL 12878313, C.D. Cal. However, on January 9, 2013, after the plaintiffs requested the court reconsider its decision to defer ruling on the pending motion to certify class, Judge Wilson issued a new order allowing the plaintiffs to re-file their motion to certify class in light of evidence gathered during discovery.

On June 10, 2013, the plaintiffs re-filed their motion to certify class. On March 12, 2014, Judge Wilson granted the plaintiff's request for class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2), but denied their request for class certification under Rule 23(b)(3) (299 F.R.D. 618). The court also allowed the plaintiffs to file a renewed motion to certify a damages class on the issue on liability pursuant to Rule 23(c)(4).

On May 19, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a renewed motion to certify class, requesting that the court certify a Rule 23(c)(4) liability class. In addition, the plaintiffs requested that the court reconsider its denial of the plaintiffs' request for Rule 23(b)(3) class certification. As an alternative to this Rule 23(b)(3) reconsideration, the plaintiffs requested that the court certify subclasses under Rule 23(c)(4) on the basis of differing conditions of abuse, privacy, sanitation, and weather during the alleged illegal strip searches. On December 18, 2014, Judge Wilson issued an order granting a Rule 23(c)(4) issue class for the purpose of liability, as well as subclass certification. However, the court denied the plaintiffs' request for Rule 23(b)(3) class certification and all other subclass certifications. 2014 WL 10044904.

On November 18, 2016 (2016 WL 8904537, C.D. Cal.), the court certified an additional two classes as (c)(4) issue classes, despite not certifying the (c)(4) classes in a July 26, 2016 order (2016 WL 6804910, C.D.Cal.). These new classes consisted of a class consisting of women who experienced simultaneous searches and a class consisting of women who experienced one-line-at-a-time searches. 2016 WL 8904537, C.D. Cal.

The plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on December 2, 2016, and a fourth amended complaint on December 19.

On June 7, 2017, the court issued an order regarding summary judgment motions from both parties. The court granted the defendants' motion, dismissing claims of liability against individual defendants acting as individuals due to qualified immunity. The court also granted the plaintiff's motion, finding that because the defendants had not provided evidence to establish why they conducted searches in the manner that they did when alternatives existed, the plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment rights were violated. 2017 WL 9472901, C.D. Cal.

The parties then engaged in mediation. The plaintiffs submitted a preliminary settlement agreement for $53 million on July 16, 2019, but Judge Wilson did not approve this settlement in a September 23, 2019 hearing. His objection to the settlement centered on the creation of a $3 million fund to finance contracts with Los Angeles-based nonprofit organizations and for-profit groups to “develop a strengthened model of gender-responsive policy and operational practice at all LASD facilities that house female inmates.” He said that since there was a potential for many claimants to come forward demanding compensation in this case, such a fund should not be established unless there is money left over once all members of the class seeking compensation come forward.

The plaintiffs submitted an amended settlement agreement for the same amount, but removing the fund, on October 31, 2019. Judge Wilson granted preliminary approval to this settlement on November 7, and set a fairness hearing for July 20, 2020, once class members could reasonably be notified.

On January 6, 2020, the third party class administrator began sending notices to the class of 94,857 members.

On March 6, 2020, a member of the class, filing pro se, objected to the approval of the preliminary settlement agreement, arguing the settlement recovery was “miniscule.” The class member opted out of the settlement proceeds, but declined to opt out of class membership. The objector proposed that the class administrator should calculate the damages for each class member and allow them another opt-out period once they learned their damages amount.

As of July 6, 2020, the administrator received almost 40,000 claims and approved 25,528, an “especially high claims rate for this area of class litigation.” In this light, the court granted final approval of the settlement in an August 11, 2020 opinion. Judge Wilson awarded plaintiffs’ counsel the standard 25 percent fee award, resulting in $13,250,000 in fees and $379,839 in costs. He evaluated the objecting class member’s concerns and found the settlement to be fair nonetheless. 2020 WL 5628938.

The court declared the objecting class member an opt-out on August 26, 2020. On September 10, 2020, the objector filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit. In response, the class action plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on October 1. The court summarily granted the motion on February 12, 2021. 2021 WL 1037119. The objector petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari and was denied on October 4, 2021. 142 S.Ct. 109.

	Document
2:10-cv-01649	Docket [PACER]	March 25, 2020	March 25, 2020 Docket
1 2:10-cv-01649	Class Action Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 Complaint
109 2:10-cv-01649	Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief	Jan. 28, 2011	Jan. 28, 2011 Complaint
170 2:10-cv-01649	In Chambers Order Re: Motion to Dismiss	Dec. 19, 2012	Dec. 19, 2012 Order/Opinion
173 2:10-cv-01649	In Chambers Order Re: Motion to Compel and Motion for Class Certification	Jan. 9, 2013	Jan. 9, 2013 Order/Opinion
232 2:10-cv-01649	Order Re: Motion for Class Certification	March 12, 2014	March 12, 2014 Order/Opinion 299 F.R.D. 618
263 2:10-cv-01649	Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Class Certification	Dec. 18, 2014	Dec. 18, 2014 Order/Opinion 2014 WL 10044904
327 2:10-cv-01649	Order Granting Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Class Certification	Nov. 18, 2016	Nov. 18, 2016 Order/Opinion 2016 WL 8904537
334 2:10-cv-01649	Fourth Amended Class Action Complaint for Damages	Dec. 19, 2016	Dec. 19, 2016 Complaint
361 2:10-cv-01649	Civil Minutes - General [In Chambers Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment]	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2017 Order/Opinion 2017 WL 9472901

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
	Summons Issued	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 PACER
1	COMPLAINT against Defendants Leroy D. Baca(individually), Leroy D. Baca(in his official capacity), John H. Clark, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell(individually), Timothy Cornell(in his official capacity), County of Los Angeles, Does 1 through 10, Sammy Jones(individually), Sammy Jones(in his official capacity), Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman.(Filing fee $ 350: PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Lorna Mallyon, Mary Amador.(ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/10/2010: # 1 Summons) (ds). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/10/2010: # 2 Notice of Assignment, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet) (ds). (Entered: 03/08/2010) 1 Summons View on PACER 2 Notice of Assignment View on PACER 3 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 Clearinghouse
	21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants Leroy D. Baca(individually), Leroy D. Baca(in his official capacity), John H. Clark, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell(individually), Timothy Cornell(in his official capacity), County of Los Angeles, Does, Sammy Jones(individually), Sammy Jones(in his official capacity), Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. (ghap)	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 PACER
2	CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (ghap) (ds). (Entered: 03/08/2010)	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 PACER
3	NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. Related Case(s): CV 06-1135 SVW (CTx). (ghap) (ds). (Entered: 03/08/2010)	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 PACER
4	ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 06-01135 SVW (CTx). Case transferred from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 10-01649 SVW (RC).Signed by Judge Stephen V. Wilson (rn) (Entered: 03/23/2010)	March 23, 2010	March 23, 2010 PACER
5	NEW CASE ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, (pj) (Entered: 03/24/2010)	March 24, 2010	March 24, 2010 PACER
6	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Amador, upon Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department served on 3/18/2010, answer due 4/8/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cathelyn Camacho, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons returned. (Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 04/05/2010)	April 5, 2010	April 5, 2010 PACER
7	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Amador, upon Defendant Leroy D. Baca(individually) served on 3/18/2010, answer due 4/8/2010; Leroy D. Baca(in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2010, answer due 4/8/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cathelyn Comacho, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 04/05/2010)	April 5, 2010	April 5, 2010 PACER
8	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Amador, upon Defendant Timothy Cornell(individually) served on 3/19/2010, answer due 4/9/2010; Timothy Cornell(in his official capacity) served on 3/19/2010, answer due 4/9/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gary Morgan, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 04/06/2010)	April 6, 2010	April 6, 2010 PACER
9	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Amador, upon Defendant John H. Clark served on 3/19/2010, answer due 4/9/2010; John H. Clark served on 3/19/2010, answer due 4/9/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Brossoit, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 04/06/2010)	April 6, 2010	April 6, 2010 PACER
10	Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Mary Amador. as to Sammy Jones(individually), Sammy Jones(in his official capacity). (Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 04/06/2010)	April 6, 2010	April 6, 2010 PACER
11	FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendants Leroy D. Baca(individually), Leroy D. Baca(in his official capacity), Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.(Beach, Paul) (Entered: 04/14/2010)	April 14, 2010	April 14, 2010 PACER
12	NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Leroy D. Baca(individually), Leroy D. Baca(in his official capacity), Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, identifying Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Captain John H. Clark, and Timothy Cornell. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 04/14/2010)	April 14, 2010	April 14, 2010 PACER
13	FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Timothy Cornell(individually) answer now due 4/30/2010; John H. Clark answer now due 4/30/2010; Timothy Cornell(in his official capacity) answer now due 4/30/2010; John H. Clark answer now due 4/30/2010, filed by Defendants Timothy Cornell(individually); John H. Clark; Timothy Cornell(in his official capacity); John H. Clark.(Beach, Paul) (Entered: 04/14/2010)	April 14, 2010	April 14, 2010 PACER
14	NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants John H. Clark, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell(individually), Timothy Cornell(in his official capacity), identifying Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Captain John H. Clark, and Timothy Cornell. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 04/14/2010)	April 14, 2010	April 14, 2010 PACER
15	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lorna Mallyon, Mary Amador, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 3/18/2010, answer due 4/8/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gilffer Valle, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons returned. (Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 04/16/2010)	April 16, 2010	April 16, 2010 PACER
16	FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 4/30/2010, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Beach, Paul) (Entered: 04/16/2010)	April 16, 2010	April 16, 2010 PACER
17	NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, identifying County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Captain John H. Clark, and Timothy Cornell. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 04/16/2010)	April 16, 2010	April 16, 2010 PACER
18	ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 JURY DEMAND. filed by DEFENDANTS Leroy D. Baca(individually), John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell(individually), County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.(Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 04/30/2010)	April 30, 2010	April 30, 2010 PACER
19	CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS Leroy D. Baca(individually), John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell(individually), County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, (Lee, Daniel) (Entered: 04/30/2010)	April 30, 2010	April 30, 2010 PACER
20	ORDER RE: STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Status Conference set for 6/7/2010 03:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. See Order for specific details. (im) (Entered: 05/03/2010)	May 3, 2010	May 3, 2010 PACER
21	Joint STIPULATION to Continue Status Conference from June 7 to June 14 filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 05/12/2010) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER	May 12, 2010	May 12, 2010 PACER
22	ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, having reviewed the Stipulation to Continue 21, Status Conference currently set for 6/7/10 at 3:00 pm is hereby continued to 6/14/2010 01:30 PM. (ir) (Entered: 05/14/2010)	May 14, 2010	May 14, 2010 PACER
23	MINUTES: DEFENDANTS' FURTHER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF INDIVIDUAL ISSUES 121 (Fld 04/12/10); DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 66 (fld 01/18/08); PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 136 (fld 05/14/10); NEW CASE STATUS CONFERENCE: Hearing held. The motions are submitted. Order to issue.Judge Stephen V. Wilson Court Reporter: Margaret Babykin. (ir) (Entered: 06/18/2010)	June 14, 2010	June 14, 2010 PACER
24	EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME to File Motion for Class Certification filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Proposed Order)(Litt, Barrett) (Entered: 06/21/2010) 1 Exhibit "A" View on PACER 2 Proposed Order View on PACER	June 21, 2010	June 21, 2010 PACER
25	DECLARATION of Paul J. Estuar re EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME to File Motion for Class Certification 24 filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (Estuar, Paul) (Entered: 06/21/2010)	June 21, 2010	June 21, 2010 PACER
26	CIVIL TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Jury Trial set for 1/18/2011 9:00 AM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Pretrial Conference set for 1/10/2011 3:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Counsel preparing for trial before this Court shall comply with this Order. Non-compliance will be subject to sanctions. (im) (Entered: 06/22/2010)	June 22, 2010	June 22, 2010 PACER
27	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER SETTING TRIAL & PRETRIAL DATES held before Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Court sets the following dates, in the above-entitled matter: Jury Trial set for 1/18/2011 9:00 AM, Pretrial Conference set for 1/10/2011 3:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (im) (Entered: 06/22/2010)	June 22, 2010	June 22, 2010 PACER
28	Opposition to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME to File Motion for Class Certification 24 filed by Defendants Leroy D. Baca, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 06/22/2010)	June 22, 2010	June 22, 2010 PACER
29	NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jin S Choi counsel for Defendants Leroy D. Baca, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Adding Jin S. Choi as attorney as counsel of record for Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Captain John H. Clark, and Timothy Cornell for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Leroy D. Baca, Captain John H. Clark, and Timothy Cornell (Choi, Jin) (Entered: 06/24/2010)	June 24, 2010	June 24, 2010 PACER
30	ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: It Is Hereby Ordered that Plaintiffs be relieved of the requirement to file a class certification motion within 90 days of service of the Complaint under Local Rule 23-3. It Is Further Ordered that Plaintiffs have ninety (90) days from the date of this Order to file a Motion for Class Certification. Re: 24 Ex Parte Application for Enlargement of Time to File Motion for Class Certification. (mg) (Entered: 07/02/2010)	July 2, 2010	July 2, 2010 PACER
31	EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Deposition of Lindsay Lohan Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Order Permitting the Taking of Prisoner Lindsay Lohans Deposition While Incarcerated; Declarations of Donald W. Cook, Mary Amador and Jane Does; Memorandum of Points Authorities filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Leave to Depose Witness Lindsay Lohan While Incarcerated)(Cook, Donald) (Entered: 07/26/2010) 1 Proposed Order Granting Leave to Depose Witness Lindsay Lohan While Incarcerated View on PACER	July 26, 2010	July 26, 2010 PACER
32	OPPOSITION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Deposition of Lindsay Lohan Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Order Permitting the Taking of Prisoner Lindsay Lohans Deposition While Incarcerated; Declarations of Donald W. Cook, Mary Amador and Jane Does; Memorand 31 filed by Defendants Leroy D. Baca, Leroy D. Baca, John H. Clark, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell, Timothy Cornell, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 07/27/2010)	July 27, 2010	July 27, 2010 PACER
33	PROOF OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER PERMITTING THE TAKING OF PRISONER LINDSAY LOHANS DEPOSITION WHILE INCARCERATED OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Deposition of Lindsay Lohan Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Order Permitting the Taking of Prisoner Lindsay Lohans Deposition While Incarcerated; Declarations of Donald W. Cook, Mary Amador and Jane Does; Memorand 31 served on 7/26/10. (Cook, Donald) (Entered: 07/27/2010)	July 27, 2010	July 27, 2010 PACER
34	PROOF OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING THE DEPOSITION OF NON-PARTY INMATE LINDSAY LOHAN re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Deposition of Lindsay Lohan Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Order Permitting the Taking of Prisoner Lindsay Lohans Deposition While Incarcerated; Declarations of Donald W. Cook, Mary Amador and Jane Does; Memorand 31 filed by Defendants Leroy D. Baca, Leroy D. Baca, John H. Clark, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell, Timothy Cornell, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 07/27/2010)	July 27, 2010	July 27, 2010 PACER
35	REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Deposition of Lindsay Lohan Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Order Permitting the Taking of Prisoner Lindsay Lohans Deposition While Incarcerated; Declarations of Donald W. Cook, Mary Amador and Jane Does; Memorand 31 filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (Cook, Donald) (Entered: 07/27/2010)	July 27, 2010	July 27, 2010 PACER
36	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman: denying 31 Ex Parte Application to Compel Deposition and Order Denying Without Prejudice Defendants' Request for Sanctions. See minute order for details. (jy) (Entered: 07/27/2010)	July 27, 2010	July 27, 2010 PACER
37	EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Ex Parte Application to Compel Deposition 36 filed by Plaintiffs Mary Amador, Lorna Mallyon. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Reconsideration of 7/27/10 Discovery Order and Permitting the Taking of Prisoner Lindsay Lohans Deposition While Incarcerated)(Cook, Donald) (Entered: 07/28/2010) 1 Proposed Order Granting Reconsideration of 7/27/10 Discovery Order and Permittin View on PACER	July 28, 2010	July 28, 2010 PACER
38	Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Ex Parte Application to Compel Deposition 36 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Ex Parte Application to Compel Deposition 36 37 filed by Defendants Leroy D. Baca, Leroy D. Baca, John H. Clark, John H. Clark, Timothy Cornell, Timothy Cornell, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. (Beach, Paul) (Entered: 07/29/2010)	July 29, 2010	July 29, 2010 PACER

Case: Amador v. Baca

2:10-cv-01649 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Case Summary

Related Cases

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Docket

Case Details