Case: Franciscan Alliance, LLC v. Burwell

7:16-cv-00108 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Aug. 23, 2016

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 23, 2016, religiously-affiliated health organizations and five states (Texas, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Kentucky, and Kansas) filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The plaintiffs sued the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Secretary under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act claiming violations of these Acts, as well as their First, Fifth, Tenth, and Eleventh Amendment rights. The plaintiffs claimed that new regulations promulgated by HHS, which redefined the word "sex" to include gender identity, stereotypes, and termination of pregnancy, required health care providers to provide health programs and procedures which "violate[d] their medical judgment" and "their deeply held religious beliefs" (including performing/referring transition procedures, discussing transition procedures as current standards of care, using appropriate gender-transition affirming language, providing sex-specific facilities based on gender identity, etc.).

The plaintiffs, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. Specifically, the plaintiffs asked the court to declare the regulations invalid, enjoin enforcement of the regulations, and award actual and nominal damages as well as the costs of the action and attorneys' fees.

On September 16, 2016, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and the River City Gender Alliance (collectively, "putative intervenors") moved to intervene as defendants. On October 21, 2016, the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and, in the alternative, a preliminary injunction. On November 1, 2016, District Judge Reed O'Connor denied the putative intervenors' motion to stay preliminary injunction proceedings pending resolution of the motion to intervene.

A hearing was held on December 20, 2016, and Judge O'Connor granted the preliminary injunction on December 31, 2016, on the grounds that "the regulation violate[d] the Administrative Procedure Act ('APA') by contradicting existing law and exceeding statutory authority, and the regulation likely violate[d] the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ('RFRA') as applied to Private Plaintiffs." The court did not consider the motions for summary judgment at the hearing. 227 F.Supp.3d 660.

The defendants moved to stay the court's preliminary injunction, but the stay was denied on January 24, 2017. Judge O'Connor also found that the putative intervenors could not intervene as of right because it was yet unclear whether the defendants would adequately represent the putative intervenors' interests; he deferred ruling on the putative intervenors' request for permissive intervention. 2017 WL 2964088.

On January 30, 2017, the putative intervenors filed an interlocutory appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On June 30, 2017, a panel of the Fifth Circuit, per curiam, dismissed the appeal because the district court had not ruled on the putative intervenors' motion for permissive intervention and therefore had not conclusively resolved the intervention issue.

On May 2, 2017, while the putative intervenors' appeal to the Fifth Circuit was pending, the defendants filed a motion for voluntary remand and stay, arguing that HHS should be given the opportunity to reconsider the regulation at issue in this case, which would conserve the resources of both parties and the court. On July 10, 2017, Judge O'Connor declined to remand the case, but imposed a stay of all proceedings while HHS reconsidered the regulation. He also ordered the defendants to file a status report on or before August 4, 2017, identifying any rulemaking proceedings initiated with respect to the challenged regulation. Furthermore, he clarified that the December 31, 2016, preliminary injunction order would be unaffected by the stay and would remain in full force and effect throughout the stay.

On August 4, 2017, the defendants filed a status report indicating that "a draft of a proposed rule is going through the clearance process within the Executive Branch." On August 16, 2017, Judge O'Connor ordered the defendants to file another status report on or before October 16, 2017, and every 60 days thereafter. After multiple additional status reports, the parties filed a joint motion to lift the stay on December 17, 2018, which Judge O'Connor granted.

The parties resumed litigating the case, with the ACLU of Texas and River City Gender Alliance renewing their motion to intervene on February 1, 2019 and the plaintiffs renewing their motions for summary judgment on February 4. On March 21, 2019, the plaintiff State of Wisconsin requested an order from the court dismissing it from the case because it "no longer [had] an interest in pursuing its claims." Litigation among the remaining parties continued.

HHS filed a notice of proposed rule-making that proposed to amend the HHS regulations implementing Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. § 18116. Shortly after, the defendants filed a motion renewing their request that the Court postpone ruling on the plaintiffs’ summary judgment motions to allow HHS the opportunity to amend the regulations. They argued that "the proposed rule, if finalized in relevant part, would likely moot this case and Plaintiffs [would] not be harmed in the interim because the relevant parts of the current regulations are presently enjoined nationwide." The amended regulation would not include a definition of "sex" for purposes of discrimination on the basis of sex, but instead would incorporate the meaning as defined by Title IX.

After a motion hearing on September 16, 2019, Judge O'Connor issued an opinion on October 15, 2019 that (1) granted the ACLU of Texas and the River City Gender Alliance's motion to intervene; (2) granted in part the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment and permanent injunction; (3) severed the plaintiffs' APA and RFRA claims from their Title VII, Spending Clause, First Amendment, Tenth Amendment, and Eleventh Amendment claims; and (4) adopted the reasoning from the December 31, 2016 order granting preliminary injunction in holding that the rule violated the APA and RFRA. The court vacated and remanded the rule for further consideration. 414 F. Supp. 3d 928. The court later went on to amend the judgment on November 21, clarifying that only the portion of the rule challenged in this litigation was vacated and remanded.

On January 21, 2020, the plaintiffs appealed the October 15 ruling to the Fifth Circuit, challenging the order granting in part and denying in part the motion for summary judgment. Additionally, they challenged the November 21 amendment to the judgment.

In an April 22, 2021 per curiam opinion, the Fifth Circuit found that key developments since filing of the appeal—including an amended regulation that had since been released by HHS, as well as the Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County holding that Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination included gender identity—prevented them from reaching the merits of the appeal. In addition, two district courts had ordered preliminary injunctions against the amended regulation, reinstating parts of the 2016 regulation, as a result of the Bostock decision. The Department of Justice had also issued guidance to federal agencies on how to apply Bostock's definition of sex discrimination to Title IX. The appellate court remanded the case and ordered the parties to file a joint status report detailing how they believed the case should proceed. The parties then filed a joint status report, in which the plaintiffs stated their intent to seek judgment as a matter of law.

The plaintiffs again sought a permanent injunction, but the defendants argued that the case was moot as a result of the promulgation of the amended rule in 2020. On August 16, 2021, the court granted the permanent injunction on the basis that the plaintiffs’ only two options if the injunction was not granted were either to defy the law or violate their religious beliefs. The defendants appealed this decision.

On August 26, 2022, the Fifth Circuit held that the plaintiffs’ APA claim was mooted by the 2020 amended rule, which effectively granted the relief that the plaintiffs sought by vacating the 2016 rule’s prohibition of discrimination on the basis of pregnancy termination and gender identity. The appellate court found that there was no other relief the court could grant for the APA claim beyond the relief provided by the amended rule. The Fifth Circuit affirmed the rest of the district court’s judgment thereby upholding the permanent injunction. The defendants argument had implied that there was a difference between bringing a suit against a statute versus the agency that enforced it. Defendants argued that plaintiffs could not seek injunctive relief against a statute because they had no standing to sue a statute. The court said that this argument was false because bringing a suit against an agency is equivalent to bringing a suit against the statute that gave the agency the power to act. The court also held that it was within the district court's power to grant relief that wasn't asked for by plaintiffs as long as it did not prejudice defendants, which did not occur here because the defendants had the opportunity to argue that the proposed relief was improper. 47 F.4th 368.

On September 29, 2022, the court administratively closed the portions of the plaintiffs' claims that had previously been stayed, including those arising under Title VII, the Spending Clause, the First Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, and the Eleventh Amendment.

On December 23, 2022, the plaintiffs moved for attorneys’ fees in the District Court, arguing that, as the prevailing parties in a suit under RFRA, they were entitled to recover fees and expenses under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part on July 11, 2023. In awarding fees, a court determines both the reasonableness of the rates requested and the hours spent litigating the case. The court adopted as reasonable the majority of plaintiffs’ fee and hour calculations, but declined to award fees for the time plaintiffs’ counsel spent litigating to oppose the intervention of the ACLU and River City Gender Alliance as defendants. The court reduced the fees by five percent after finding that a portion of the fees were “block billings” and lacked sufficient detail. It also declined to enhance or reduce the reward based on factors set out in Johnson v. Ga. Highway Express, Inc. In total, the court awarded the plaintiffs $2,203,053.32 for 3,197.25 hours worked.

As of January 1, 2024, the 60-day window to appeal had lapsed with no further action. The plaintiffs' stayed claims had not been resolved, however, and could be reopened in the future. The case was otherwise administratively closed.

	Document
7:16-cv-00108	Docket [PACER] Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. Burwell	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 Docket
1 7:16-cv-00108	Complaint Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. Burwell	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 Complaint
21 7:16-cv-00108	First Amended Complaint Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. Burwell	Oct. 17, 2016	Oct. 17, 2016 Complaint
62 7:16-cv-00108	Order Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. Burwell	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016 Order/Opinion 227 F.Supp.3d 660
69 7:16-cv-00108	Order Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. Burwell	Jan. 24, 2017	Jan. 24, 2017 Order/Opinion 2017 WL 2964088
105 7:16-cv-00108	Order	July 10, 2017	July 10, 2017 Order/Opinion 2017 WL 3616652
126 7:16-cv-00108	Order	Dec. 17, 2018	Dec. 17, 2018 Order/Opinion
175 7:16-cv-00108	Memorandum Opinion and Order	Oct. 15, 2019	Oct. 15, 2019 Order/Opinion 414 F.Supp.3d 928
197 20-10093	Opinion of USCA Franciscan Alliance, LLC v. Becerra U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit	April 22, 2021	April 22, 2021 Order/Opinion 843 Fed.Appx. 662
206 7:16-cv-00108	Memorandum Opinion and Order Franciscan Alliance, LLC v. Becerra	Aug. 16, 2021	Aug. 16, 2021 Order/Opinion

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Nebraska, State of, Speciality Physicians of illinois, LLC, Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. Bevin, Christian Medical and Dental Society, Kansas, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Texas, State of, Wisconsin State of. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-7816698) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Cover Sheet Supplement, # 3 Additional Page(s) Notice of Related Case) (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 08/23/2016) 1 Cover Sheet View on RECAP 2 Cover Sheet Supplement View on RECAP 3 Additional Page(s) Notice of Related Case View on RECAP	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 RECAP
1	COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Nebraska, State of, Speciality Physicians of illinois, LLC, Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. Bevin, Christian Medical and Dental Society, Kansas, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Texas, State of, Wisconsin State of. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-7816698) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Cover Sheet Supplement, # 3 Additional Page(s) Notice of Related Case) (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 08/23/2016) 1 Cover Sheet View on PACER 2 Cover Sheet Supplement View on PACER 3 Additional Page(s) Notice of Related Case View on PACER	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 PACER
2	New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (plp) (Entered: 08/23/2016)	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 PACER
2	New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (plp) (Entered: 08/23/2016)	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 PACER
3	Summons issued as to Sylvia Burwell, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (plp) (Entered: 08/23/2016)	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 PACER
3	Summons issued as to Sylvia Burwell, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (plp) (Entered: 08/23/2016)	Aug. 23, 2016	Aug. 23, 2016 PACER
4	CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Christian Medical and Dental Society, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 08/26/2016)	Aug. 26, 2016	Aug. 26, 2016 RECAP
4	CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Christian Medical and Dental Society, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 08/26/2016)	Aug. 26, 2016	Aug. 26, 2016 PACER
5	SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sylvia Burwell ; served on 8/30/2016. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 09/02/2016)	Sept. 2, 2016	Sept. 2, 2016 RECAP
5	SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sylvia Burwell ; served on 8/30/2016. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 09/02/2016)	Sept. 2, 2016	Sept. 2, 2016 PACER
6	SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; served on 8/30/2016. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 09/02/2016)	Sept. 2, 2016	Sept. 2, 2016 RECAP
6	SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; served on 8/30/2016. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 09/02/2016)	Sept. 2, 2016	Sept. 2, 2016 PACER
10	ANSWER to 1 Complaint,,,,, filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 RECAP
10	ANSWER to 1 Complaint,,,,, filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 PACER
11	CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance. (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 RECAP
11	CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance. (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 PACER
7	MOTION to Intervene filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order). Party American Civil Liberties Union of Texas added.Attorney Rebecca L Robertson added to party American Civil Liberties Union of Texas (pty:intvd), Attorney Rebecca L Robertson added to party River City Gender Alliance(pty:intvd) (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016) 1 Proposed Order View on RECAP	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 RECAP
7	MOTION to Intervene filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order). Party American Civil Liberties Union of Texas added.Attorney Rebecca L Robertson added to party American Civil Liberties Union of Texas (pty:intvd), Attorney Rebecca L Robertson added to party River City Gender Alliance(pty:intvd) (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 PACER
8	Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance re 7 MOTION to Intervene (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 RECAP
8	Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance re 7 MOTION to Intervene (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 PACER
9	Appendix in Support filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance re 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 RECAP
9	Appendix in Support filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance re 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/16/2016)	Sept. 16, 2016	Sept. 16, 2016 PACER
12	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 7 MOTION to Intervene filed by Christian Medical and Dental Society, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC (Goodrich, Luke) (Entered: 10/03/2016)	Oct. 3, 2016	Oct. 3, 2016 RECAP
12	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 7 MOTION to Intervene filed by Christian Medical and Dental Society, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC (Goodrich, Luke) (Entered: 10/03/2016)	Oct. 3, 2016	Oct. 3, 2016 PACER
13	SUMMONS Returned Executed. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 RECAP
13	SUMMONS Returned Executed. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 PACER
14	SUMMONS Returned Executed. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 PACER
14	SUMMONS Returned Executed. (Nimocks, Austin) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 PACER
15	ORDER: It is ORDERED that counsel for the putative intervenors, James Esseks and Rebecca Robertson, file briefing explaining why they are opposed to Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time 12 on or before October 7, 2016. Should Plaintiffs find it necessary to reply, they must do so on or before October 10, 2016. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 10/5/2016) (skg) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 RECAP
15	ORDER: It is ORDERED that counsel for the putative intervenors, James Esseks and Rebecca Robertson, file briefing explaining why they are opposed to Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time 12 on or before October 7, 2016. Should Plaintiffs find it necessary to reply, they must do so on or before October 10, 2016. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 10/5/2016) (skg) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 PACER
16	Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance re 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 7 MOTION to Intervene, 15 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 RECAP
16	Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, River City Gender Alliance re 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 7 MOTION to Intervene, 15 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, (Robertson, Rebecca) (Entered: 10/05/2016)	Oct. 5, 2016	Oct. 5, 2016 PACER
17	REPLY filed by Christian Medical and Dental Society, Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. Bevin, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC, State of Kansas, State of Nebraska, State of Texas, State of Wisconsin re: 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 7 MOTION to Intervene (Goodrich, Luke) (Entered: 10/06/2016)	Oct. 6, 2016	Oct. 6, 2016 RECAP
17	REPLY filed by Christian Medical and Dental Society, Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. Bevin, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC, State of Kansas, State of Nebraska, State of Texas, State of Wisconsin re: 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 7 MOTION to Intervene (Goodrich, Luke) (Entered: 10/06/2016)	Oct. 6, 2016	Oct. 6, 2016 PACER
18	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam Anderson Grogg on behalf of Sylvia Burwell, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Grogg, Adam) (Entered: 10/07/2016)	Oct. 7, 2016	Oct. 7, 2016 PACER
18	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam Anderson Grogg on behalf of Sylvia Burwell, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Grogg, Adam) (Entered: 10/07/2016)	Oct. 7, 2016	Oct. 7, 2016 PACER
19	RESPONSE filed by Sylvia Burwell, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services re: 7 MOTION to Intervene (Grogg, Adam) (Entered: 10/07/2016)	Oct. 7, 2016	Oct. 7, 2016 RECAP
19	RESPONSE filed by Sylvia Burwell, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services re: 7 MOTION to Intervene (Grogg, Adam) (Entered: 10/07/2016)	Oct. 7, 2016	Oct. 7, 2016 PACER
20	ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion toIntervene. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 10/7/2016) (trt) (Entered: 10/07/2016)	Oct. 7, 2016	Oct. 7, 2016 RECAP
20	ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion toIntervene. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 10/7/2016) (trt) (Entered: 10/07/2016)	Oct. 7, 2016	Oct. 7, 2016 PACER

Case: Franciscan Alliance, LLC v. Burwell

7:16-cv-00108 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Case Summary

Related Cases

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details