Case: Gumm v. Jacobs

5:15-cv-00041 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

Filed Date: Feb. 12, 2015

Closed Date: May 22, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On February 12, 2015, a prisoner in the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison (GDCP) filed this lawsuit, pro se, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Georgia. The plaintiff sued Georgia prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that by holding him in solitary confinement for five years in poor conditions they had violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to procedural and substantive due process as well as state regulations. He sought injunctive relief enjoining …

On February 12, 2015, a prisoner in the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison (GDCP) filed this lawsuit, pro se, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Georgia. The plaintiff sued Georgia prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that by holding him in solitary confinement for five years in poor conditions they had violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to procedural and substantive due process as well as state regulations. He sought injunctive relief enjoining the state from keeping him solitary confinement, declaratory relief, damages for physical, mental, and emotional consequences stemming from his confinement, and court fees.

The plaintiff’s problems at GDCP began in 2010 when, while incarcerated, he was charged with attempting to escape and destruction of state property. Investigating officers recommended that the charges be dropped, but the plaintiff was nonetheless brought to disciplinary court and was found guilty of both charges. On administrative appeal, the convictions were expunged from the plaintiff's record. For the next five years, however, he was kept in a Special Management Unit (SMU, solitary confinement) and segregated from the general prison population. Despite a prison policy enacted in 2013 stating that inmates in the SMU should be returned to the general population after four consecutive status reviews showing good behavior, after eight status reviews recommending and approving of transfer out of the SMU, he remained in solitary confinement without explanation; the grievances he submitted to prison officials regarding his placement were not addressed.

The complaint also detailed substandard conditions and mistreatment in the Unit, including inadequate food and medical care and a total lack of recreational or educational opportunities. At the time the plaintiff filed his complaint, he remained in the Special Management Unit with his status there marked "indefinite."

Procedural History

On May 18, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. The motion indicated that prison officials had temporarily eliminated access to legal services for his unit due to budget restrictions; it asked that defendants be compelled to allow him the same access to legal research services that the general prison population received. On June 16, U.S. District Judge Marc T. Treadwell adopted Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s recommendation to deny the motion because the plaintiff failed to show he faced irreparable injury or was likely to succeed on the merits. 2015 WL 13869065.

In the meantime, on June 4, defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint, arguing that the statute of limitations had passed, that plaintiff had failed to exhaust administrative procedures, that he failed to state a claim, and that defendants were immune from liability. The court stayed discovery while it considered the motion. On March 31, 2016, Judge Treadwell denied the motion to dismiss with respect to all claims regarding plaintiffs' confinement in the period after August 2013, when GDCP made policy changes requiring inmates to be removed from the SMU after four positive status hearings. However, Judge Treadwell granted the motion to dismiss with respect to all claims regarding plaintiffs' confinement prior to that period. Judge Treadwell also granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint from February 2015 to include additional due process and Eighth Amendment claims. 2016 WL 1266950.

On September 1, 2016, the court briefly stayed this case along with a number of other cases relating to SMU placement that were also filed pro se in order to determine whether the cases should be consolidated. The court appointed the plaintiff counsel from the Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR) on October 17, 2016, and discovery commenced in December 2016.

On March 11, 2017, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, this time represented by counsel from SCHR. The amended complaint greatly expanded the scope of the case, seeking class certification covering not just the named plainitff but everyone in the SMU and providing more detail about the extremely restrictive and isolating nature of GDCP's SMU. It alleged not only that the prison had failed to meaningfully assess the plaintiff's status in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment but also that the conditions of confinement in the unit violated the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, the Complaint claimed that the use of solitary confinement, grossly disproportionate punishment, and inadequate food constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The complaint sought to certify a class of all inmates who were in or would be placed in GDCP's SMU.

On March 20, 2017 another prisoner moved to intervene in the case. The prisoner had been in solitary confinement at GDCP and was then moved to a similar unit at Georgia State Prison ("GSP"). Judge Treadwell denied the motion to intervene on September 15, 2017 because the other prisoner was ineligible for "in forma pauperis" status under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s Three Strikes provision and in any event had no right to intervene. 2017 WL 4102742. On October 2, the prisoner appealed the denial to the U.S. Court of Appeals, but his appeal was dismissed for failure to pay filing fees.

The plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction on July 5, 2018, asking the court to order GDCP to allow all prisoners in SMU at least three hours of out-of-cell time daily, and to establish within thirty days plans to meaningfully increase programming for prisoners in SMU and to identify and move prisoners in SMU who suffered from mental illness. Plaintffs also amended the motion for class certification on July 13, 2018. The court took no action on these motions, but the parties entered settlement negotiations alongside continued discovery.

On December 21, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of the class and a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement proposed various measures to improve the confinement conditions at the GDCP, including regular opportunities for outdoor and indoor out-of-cell time, as well as access to the library and other educational resources.

On January 17, 2019, Judge Treadwell granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A fairness hearing was set for April 30, 2019. 2019 WL 479506. On February 5, 2019, Judge Treadwell denied the pending motions for preliminary injunction and class certification because the final approval of the settlement agreement would make these motions moot. Judge Treadwell also stated that if the settlement agreement were not approved, the plaintiffs could reinstate these motions.

Settlement

On May 7, 2019, Judge Treadwell issued an order certifying the settlement class and adopting the settlement agreement, which will remain in force for three years. The settlement agreement contains a range of provisions: a minimum of four hours outside cells each day Monday - Friday; access to tablet devices with games, books, and other educational materials; ability to request materials from the prison library and mobile book carts; out-of-cell programming and classes; and access to the same food, hygiene items, laundry and barbering services as the general prison population. The settlement also establishes a 24-month limit on confinement in the SMU and revised procedures for determining assignment to the SMU. The agreement provides for monitoring meetings every nine months, limited access to SMU records, yearly visits to SMU by class counsel, training for staff at GDCP, and confidential communications and meetings between class members and class counsel. Defendants agreed to pay $425,000 in attorneys' fees, which were granted by the court in a separate order on July 30, 2019. The court retains jurisdiction until the agreement expires on May 7, 2022. 2019 WL 2017497.


5:15-cv-00041	Docket [PACER]	June 9, 2020	June 9, 2020 Docket
1 5:15-cv-00041	Complaint	Feb. 12, 2015	Feb. 12, 2015 Complaint
15 5:15-cv-00041	Order and Recommendation Gumm v. Chatman	May 22, 2015	May 22, 2015 Magistrate Report/Recommendation
35 5:15-cv-00041	Order Gumm v. Chatman	March 31, 2016	March 31, 2016 Order/Opinion 2016 WL 1266950
73 5:15-cv-00041	Second Amended Complaint Gumm v. Ward	March 11, 2017	March 11, 2017 Complaint
100 5:15-cv-00041	Report and Recommendation	July 20, 2017	July 20, 2017 Magistrate Report/Recommendation
104 5:15-cv-00041	Notice of Appeal Baker v. Jacobs	Oct. 2, 2017	Oct. 2, 2017 Pleading / Motion / Brief
121 5:15-cv-00041	Order Gumm v. Sellers	Nov. 21, 2017	Nov. 21, 2017 Order/Opinion
207-1 5:15-cv-00041	Settlement Agreement Regarding the Special Management Unit	Dec. 21, 2018	Dec. 21, 2018 Settlement Agreement
256 5:15-cv-00041	Final Order and Permanent Injunction Gumm v. Ford	May 7, 2019	May 7, 2019 Order/Opinion 2019 WL 2017497

ECF Number	Date	Description	Link
1	Feb. 12, 2015	COMPLAINT against All Defendants,filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Envelope)(ans) (Entered: 02/12/2015) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	Clearinghouse
2	Feb. 12, 2015	MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ans) (Entered: 02/12/2015)	RECAP
3	Feb. 12, 2015	ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (ans) (Entered: 02/12/2015)	RECAP
4	Feb. 12, 2015	Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM (ans) (Entered: 02/12/2015)	RECAP
5	Feb. 23, 2015	Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope)(ans) (Entered: 02/23/2015) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
6	March 18, 2015	ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and ORDER for service to be made on all four defendants Ordered by US Magistrate Judge CHARLES H WEIGLE on 03/18/15 (ans) (Entered: 03/18/2015)	RECAP
7	March 19, 2015	USM285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 USM285 - Bruce Chapman, # 2 USM285 - Rodney McCloud, # 3 USM285 - William Powell)(ans) (Entered: 03/19/2015) 1 USM285 - Bruce Chapman View on PACER 2 USM285 - Rodney McCloud View on PACER 3 USM285 - William Powell View on PACER	RECAP
8	March 23, 2015	USM285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL. (ans) (Entered: 03/23/2015)	RECAP
9	April 17, 2015	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM (ans) (Entered: 04/17/2015)	RECAP
10	April 20, 2015	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to RICK JACOBS, USM285 Process Receipt and Return EXECUTED for RICK JACOBS. (ans) (Entered: 04/20/2015)	RECAP
11	May 4, 2015	MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint Filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ans) (Entered: 05/04/2015) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
12	May 7, 2015	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER on behalf of BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL Attorney SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER added to party BRUCE CHAPMAN(pty:dft), Attorney SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER added to party RICK JACOBS(pty:dft), Attorney SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER added to party RODNEY MCCLOUD(pty:dft), Attorney SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER added to party WILLIAM POWELL(pty:dft) (TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 05/07/2015)	RECAP
13	May 18, 2015	MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(wks) Modified on 5/22/2015 to modify text from MOTION to Compel Defendants to Provide Plaintiff With Access to the Courts to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (ans). (Entered: 05/18/2015) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
14	May 22, 2015	WAIVER OF Reply by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL. (TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 05/22/2015)	RECAP
15	May 22, 2015	REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM (), ORDER GRANTING 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 05/21/15. (ans) (Entered: 05/22/2015)	Clearinghouse
16	June 4, 2015	MOTION to Dismiss by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL filed by SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER. (Attachments: # 1 Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss, # 2 Affidavit Attachment 1 - Affidavit of Darryl Reid, # 3 Attachment A - Statewide Grievance Procedure, # 4 Attachment B - Grievance No. 61526, # 5 Attachment C - Grievance No. 80062, # 6 Attachment D - Grievance No. 93578, # 7 Attachment E - Grievance No. 94478, # 8 Attachment F - Grievance No. 94882, # 9 Attachment G - Grievance No. 96085, # 10 Attachment H - Grievance No. 96440, # 11 Attachment I - Grievance No. 115289, # 12 Attachment J - Grievance No. 124508, # 13 Attachment K - Grievance No. 137685, # 14 Attachment L - Grievance No. 18771). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 06/04/2015) 1 Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss View on RECAP 2 Affidavit Attachment 1 - Affidavit of Darryl Reid View on PACER 3 Attachment A - Statewide Grievance Procedure View on PACER 4 Attachment B - Grievance No. 61526 View on PACER 5 Attachment C - Grievance No. 80062 View on PACER 6 Attachment D - Grievance No. 93578 View on PACER 7 Attachment E - Grievance No. 94478 View on PACER 8 Attachment F - Grievance No. 94882 View on PACER 9 Attachment G - Grievance No. 96085 View on PACER 10 Attachment H - Grievance No. 96440 View on PACER 11 Attachment I - Grievance No. 115289 View on PACER 12 Attachment J - Grievance No. 124508 View on PACER 13 Attachment K - Grievance No. 137685 View on PACER 14 Attachment L - Grievance No. 18771 View on PACER	RECAP
17	June 4, 2015	MOTION to Stay Discovery by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL filed by SUSAN ELIZABETH TEASTER. (Attachments: # 1 Brief In Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 06/04/2015) 1 Brief In Support View on PACER 2 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	RECAP
18	June 5, 2015	ORDER granting 17 Motion to Stay. Ordered by U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H. WEIGLE on 6/5/15. (aob) (Entered: 06/05/2015)	RECAP
19	June 5, 2015	ORDER for Response to Motion re: 16 MOTION to Dismiss. Ordered by U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H. WEIGLE on 6/5/15. (aob) (Entered: 06/05/2015)	RECAP
20	June 16, 2015	ORDER ADOPTING 15 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/16/2015. (tlh) (Entered: 06/16/2015)	RECAP
21	June 25, 2015	Supplement/Amendment to COMPLAINT against BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL, filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope)(ggs) (Entered: 06/25/2015) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
22	June 25, 2015	RESPONSE filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM re 16 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Cover Letter, # 3 Envelope)(ggs) (Entered: 06/25/2015) 1 Memorandum in Support View on PACER 2 Cover Letter View on PACER 3 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
23	July 13, 2015	RESPONSE in Opposition/Objection to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint re 21 Supplement to Complaint (TEASTER, SUSAN) Modified on 7/13/2015 (ggs). (Entered: 07/13/2015)	RECAP
24	July 13, 2015	REPLY to Response filed by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL re 16 MOTION to Dismiss (TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 07/13/2015)	RECAP
25	July 23, 2015	WITHDRAWAL of Claim re 21 Supplement/Amendment to Complaint by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope)(ggs) (Entered: 07/23/2015) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
26	Nov. 16, 2015	MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint Filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Amended Complaint, # 2 Cover Letter, # 3 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) (Entered: 11/16/2015) 1 Amended Complaint View on PACER 2 Cover Letter View on PACER 3 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
27	Dec. 3, 2015	RESPONSE filed by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL re 26 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint (TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 12/03/2015)	RECAP
28	Dec. 21, 2015	MEMORANDUM in Support filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM re: 26 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(ggs) (Entered: 12/21/2015) 1 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
29	Jan. 22, 2016	REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by WILLIAM POWELL, RICK JACOBS, BRUCE CHAPMAN, RODNEY MCCLOUD, 26 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. It is R ECOMMENDED that the Defendants Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is further RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Motion to Amend be GRANTED, with regard to Plaintiffs due process claims against Defendants Bishop, Logan, and Williams, and DENIED with regard to Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims, including all claims againstDefendant Washington. It is further RECOMMENDED that service be ordered on June Bishop, Rufus Logan, Dwayne Williams. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 1/22/2016. (ggs)	RECAP
30	Jan. 25, 2016	MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) (Entered: 01/25/2016) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
31	Feb. 5, 2016	OBJECTION to 29 Report and Recommendations filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope)(ggs) (Entered: 02/05/2016) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
32	Feb. 8, 2016	OBJECTION to 29 Report and Recommendations filed by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL (TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 02/08/2016)	RECAP
33	Feb. 22, 2016	RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed by BRUCE CHAPMAN, RICK JACOBS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL in re: 31 Report and Recommendations (TEASTER, SUSAN) (Entered: 02/22/2016)	RECAP
34	March 4, 2016	PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM in re: 32 Report and Recommendations (Attachments: # 1 Cover Letter, # 2 Envelope)(ggs) (Entered: 03/04/2016) 1 Cover Letter View on PACER 2 Envelope View on PACER	RECAP
35	March 31, 2016	ORDER ADOPTING as modified 29 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 26 Motion for Leave to File; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 16 Motion to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that service be made on Margaret Washington, June Bishop, Rufus Logan, and Dwayne Williams and that they file an Answer or such other response as may be appropriate under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/31/2016. (tlh)	Clearinghouse
36	March 31, 2016	AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM. (Attachments: # 1 Verificaton, # 2 Exhibit A - disciplinary Appeal Form (3/1/10), # 3 Exhibit B - SMU Program 90 Day Review Form (12/10/12), # 4 Exhibit C - SMU Program 90 Day Review Form( 4/8/13), # 5 Exhibit D - SMU Program 90 Day Review Form (7/31/13), # 6 Exhibit E - SMU Tier III Program Assignment Memo (8/1/12), # 7 Exhibit F - SMU Tier III Program 90 Day Review Form (1/7/14), # 8 Exhibit G - SMU Tier III Program 90 Day Review Form (7/29/14), # 9 Exhibit H - SMU Tier III Program 90 DAy Review Form (10/28/14), # 10 Exhibit I - SMU Tier III Program 90 Day Reivew Form (1/21/15), # 11 Exhibit J - Warden's/Superintendent's Grievance Response (1/29/2015), # 12 Exhibit K - The GDC Inmate Affairs and Ombudsman Unit's Response to Complaint Letter to Southern Cetner for Human Rights (8/18/11))(ggs) (Entered: 03/31/2016) 1 Verificaton View on PACER 2 Exhibit A - disciplinary Appeal Form (3/1/10) View on PACER 3 Exhibit B - SMU Program 90 Day Review Form (12/10/12) View on PACER 4 Exhibit C - SMU Program 90 Day Review Form( 4/8/13) View on PACER 5 Exhibit D - SMU Program 90 Day Review Form (7/31/13) View on PACER 6 Exhibit E - SMU Tier III Program Assignment Memo (8/1/12) View on PACER 7 Exhibit F - SMU Tier III Program 90 Day Review Form (1/7/14) View on PACER 8 Exhibit G - SMU Tier III Program 90 Day Review Form (7/29/14) View on PACER 9 Exhibit H - SMU Tier III Program 90 DAy Review Form (10/28/14) View on PACER 10 Exhibit I - SMU Tier III Program 90 Day Reivew Form (1/21/15) View on PACER 11 Exhibit J - Warden's/Superintendent's Grievance Response (1/29/2015) View on PACER 12 Exhibit K - The GDC Inmate Affairs and Ombudsman Unit's Response to Complai View on PACER	RECAP
37	March 31, 2016	USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for JUNE BISHOP (ggs) (Entered: 03/31/2016)	RECAP
38	March 31, 2016	USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for RUFUS LOGAN (ggs) (Entered: 03/31/2016)	RECAP
39	March 31, 2016	USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for DWAYNE WILLIAMS (ggs) (Entered: 03/31/2016)	RECAP
40	March 31, 2016	USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for MARGARET WASHINGTON (ggs) (Entered: 03/31/2016)	RECAP

Case: Gumm v. Jacobs

5:15-cv-00041 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

Case Summary

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Docket

Docket for: GUMM v. JACOBS

Case Details