Filed Date: April 9, 2018
Closed Date: June 23, 2020
Clearinghouse coding complete
On April 9, 2018, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed this complaint against defendant U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). EPIC alleged that ICE had failed to timely respond to its FOIA request for records concerning "ICE’s purchase and use of mobile forensics devices and technology." EPIC sought injunctive relief under FOIA so as to have the responsive records released. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.
EPIC argued that one of ICE's law enforcement activities was "conducting warrantless electronic device searches 'without individualized suspicion,'" and that such searches have increased at the border. EPIC contended that such searches included text messages, private emails, contact lists, photographs, and other personal information. In order to conduct such searches, the complaint stated that ICE entered into contracts with mobile forensic technology providers, such as Cellebrite, which provided the technology for accessing the desired information on electronic devices. EPIC argued that "ICE’s data retrieval techniques for mobile devices pose significant threats to privacy" by allowing ICE to gather personal information without suspicion or a warrant. Further, EPIC argued, it was not clear what happens to this gathered information after it was in ICE's possession.
A joint status report filed on July 12, 2018 indicated that the government would start producing records on a rolling basis within a month. A September status report indicated that the production and its review were ongoing. A November status report indicated the production was complete and that EPIC was reviewing it.
The March 2019 joint status report stated that EPIC had identified several issues in dispute, to which ICE agreed to review the withholdings to resolve or narrow the issues in dispute. After ICE provided the requested documents, EPIC notified it that there were still issues in dispute.
As of the November 2019 status report, ICE had provided EPIC with 60 pages of reprocessed documents that were representative of the issues in dispute. The parties continued to work to resolve issues in the document production without court intervention. In February 2020, the parties notified the court that they had resolved all outstanding issues with the document production and were working towards a settlement on attorneys' fees and costs.
The parties reached an agreement on attorneys' fees and costs in early June 2020. On June 23, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal, and the court dismissed the case. The documents produced by ICE can be found on EPIC's site, here. This case is closed.
Summary Authors
Virginia Weeks (11/15/2018)
Aaron Gurley (11/21/2019)
Emily Kempa (3/5/2021)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6358162/parties/electronic-privacy-information-center-v-us-immigration-and-customs/
Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen (District of Columbia)
Butler, Alan (District of Columbia)
Chang, William (District of Columbia)
Coles-Huff, Doris Denise (District of Columbia)
Rogers, Joshua L (District of Columbia)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6358162/electronic-privacy-information-center-v-us-immigration-and-customs/
Last updated Dec. 17, 2024, 9:53 a.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: District of Columbia
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Trump Administration 1.0 & 2.0 FOIA cases
Trump Administration 1.0: Challenges to the Government
Key Dates
Filing Date: April 9, 2018
Closing Date: June 23, 2020
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is a nonprofit organization that has a goal of highlighting for the public issues related to privacy and civil rights. EPIC's work includes oversight and analysis of government activities.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552
Constitutional Clause(s):
Unreasonable search and seizure
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Immigration/Border: