Case: Watlington v. City of McCrory

2:17-cv-00002 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: Jan. 5, 2017

Closed Date: 2017

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On January 5, 2017, two residents of the City of McCrory that were living in a trailer worth approximately $1500, filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Plaintiffs, represented by Equal Justice Under Law and private counsel, sued the City of McCrory and its Police Chief under 42 U.S.C §1983. The plaintiffs alleged that the City’s Trailer-Banishment Ordinance—which forbid anyone from residing in a home or trailer worth le…

On January 5, 2017, two residents of the City of McCrory that were living in a trailer worth approximately $1500, filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Plaintiffs, represented by Equal Justice Under Law and private counsel, sued the City of McCrory and its Police Chief under 42 U.S.C §1983. The plaintiffs alleged that the City’s Trailer-Banishment Ordinance—which forbid anyone from residing in a home or trailer worth less than $7500—violated both the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The plaintiffs sought both monetary and injunctive relief.

That same day, the plaintiffs also moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the City from enforcing the ordinance.

The next day, the Court (Judge D. P. Marshall Jr.) scheduled a hearing on the temporary restraining order, but in an answer filed that same week, the City promised not to enforce the ordinance against anyone and to immediately submit a replacement ordinance to the City Council. In response, the Court found the claim for preliminary injunctive relief moot, and it stayed the case to allow the City to alter the ordinance at issue.

On January 10th, the City Council passed a new ordinance, removing the challenged provision and establishing a new one that contained no reference to the value of one’s home or trailer. The defendants then moved to dismiss the case, but on May 23, the Court found that the plaintiffs still had a viable claim for compensatory damages based on any harm suffered during the months the ordinance was in effect. The defendants again moved to dismiss the claim but the Court found the plaintiffs had sufficiently stated a claim based on lost wages and transportation expenses totaling $800.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on June 16, 2017, seeking monetary relief and permanent injunctive relief to stop the City from passing a similar ordinance in the future. The defendants filed a counterclaim alleging that the plaintiffs' trailer was a public nuisance.

The parties reached a private settlement, and the Court granted a voluntary motion to dismiss both parties claims on November 30, 2017. According to Stephanie Storey, spokeswoman for Equal Justice, the settlement totaled just over $20,000. We have no further information on the litigation, and the case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Chris Pollack (1/27/2019)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5576375/parties/watlington-v-mccrory-arkansas-city-of/


Judge(s)

Marshall, Denzil Price Jr. (Alaska)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Coulter, John D (Arkansas)

Ramaswamy, Rebecca R. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Adams, Jenna (Arkansas)

Mosley, Michael Allen (Arkansas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:17-cv-00002

Docket [PACER]

Nov. 30, 2017

Nov. 30, 2017

Docket
1

2:17-cv-00002

Complaint

Jan. 5, 2017

Jan. 5, 2017

Complaint
22

2:17-cv-00002

Order

May 23, 2017

May 23, 2017

Order/Opinion
25

2:17-cv-00002

Amended Complaint

June 16, 2017

June 16, 2017

Complaint
31

2:17-cv-00002

Order

Aug. 3, 2017

Aug. 3, 2017

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5576375/watlington-v-mccrory-arkansas-city-of/

Last updated June 2, 2026, 1:25 a.m.

Docket for: Watlington v. McCrory Arkansas, City of
ECF Number Date Description Link
2 Jan. 5, 2017

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiffs. (alm) (Entered: 01/06/2017)

PACER
3 Jan. 5, 2017

BRIEF IN SUPPORT of their 2 Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiffs. (alm) (Entered: 01/06/2017)

PACER
1 Jan. 6, 2017

Complaint

RECAP
4 Jan. 6, 2017

Order Setting Hearing on Motion

RECAP
5 Jan. 9, 2017

NOTICE by All Plaintiffs re 4 Order Setting Hearing on Motion, (Coulter, John) (Entered: 01/09/2017)

PACER
6 Jan. 9, 2017

(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Embedded motion for extension of time, No. 5 , granted. Plaintiffs have until 5:00 p.m. today to give notice to Chief Hatch. Confirmation of the notice due by noon tomorrow. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/9/2017. (slb) (Entered: 01/09/2017)

PACER
Jan. 9, 2017

Order

7 Jan. 10, 2017

NOTICE by All Plaintiffs re 5 Notice (Other), 6 Order, 4 Order Setting Hearing on Motion, to McCrory Mayor Fowler and Police Chief Paul Hatch (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Fax Confirmations)(Coulter, John) (Entered: 01/10/2017)

PACER
8 Jan. 10, 2017

RESPONSE to Motion re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Defendants. (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 01/10/2017)

PACER
9 Jan. 10, 2017

NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Allen Mosley on behalf of All Defendants (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 01/10/2017)

PACER
10 Jan. 11, 2017

REPLY to Response to Motion re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Plaintiffs. (Coulter, John) (Entered: 01/11/2017)

PACER
11 Jan. 11, 2017

NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna Adams on behalf of Paul Hatch, McCrory Arkansas, City of (Adams, Jenna) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2017: # 1 Main Document − Correct (submitted 1/11/2017)) (jak). (Entered: 01/11/2017)

PACER
12 Jan. 11, 2017

ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 2 Watlington and Hollaway's motion for a TRO. The case isn't moot; but the request for stop-gap injunctive relief is. The 1/12/2017 hearing is cancelled and the case is stayed until 2/24/2017. Joint status report due by 2/15/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/11/2017. (jak)

RECAP
13 Jan. 11, 2017

STATUS REPORT by Paul Hatch, McCrory Arkansas, City of. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Adams, Jenna) (Entered: 01/11/2017)

PACER
14 Jan. 11, 2017

NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re 11 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in error (editable image file). The correct document was added to docket entry 11 based on the attached correspondence. (jak) (Entered: 01/11/2017)

PACER
15 Jan. 13, 2017

ORDER: Defendant's 13 status report noted. The stay is lifted. The prompt amendment of the ordinance moots the request for injunctive relief; the 2 motion for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. The Court extends the Defendants' time to answer or file a Rule 12(b) motion until 2/17/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/13/2017. (jak)

RECAP
16 Feb. 7, 2017

MOTION to Dismiss by Paul Hatch, McCrory Arkansas, City of (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 02/07/2017)

PACER
18 Feb. 21, 2017

RESPONSE in Opposition re 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lindsey Hollaway, David Watlington. (Telfeyan, Phil) (Entered: 02/21/2017)

PACER
19 Feb. 22, 2017

MOTION for Leave to File Reply to Motion to Dismiss by Paul Hatch, McCrory Arkansas, City of (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 02/22/2017)

PACER
20 Feb. 22, 2017

(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Unopposed motion, No. 19 , granted. Reply due by 3 March 2017. In the future, any movant may reply within seven calendar days of the response. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/22/2017. (slb) (Entered: 02/22/2017)

PACER
Feb. 22, 2017

Order on Motion for Leave to File

21 March 2, 2017

REPLY to Response to Motion re 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Paul Hatch, McCrory Arkansas, City of. (Adams, Jenna) (Entered: 03/02/2017)

PACER
22 May 23, 2017

ORDER denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss. Any amended complaint is due by 6/23/2017. If none is filed, the Court will, on its own, dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/23/2017. (kdr)

RECAP
23 June 5, 2017

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Paul Hatch, McCrory Arkansas, City of (Adams, Jenna) (Entered: 06/05/2017)

PACER
24 June 6, 2017

(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Motion, No. 23 , granted. The City and Hatch need not answer or respond further until fourteen calendar days after Watlington and Hollaway file any amended complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/6/2017. (slb) (Entered: 06/06/2017)

PACER
June 6, 2017

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

25 June 16, 2017

Amended Complaint

RECAP
26 June 22, 2017

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by All Defendants (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 06/22/2017)

PACER
27 June 22, 2017

BRIEF IN SUPPORT re 25 Amended Complaint filed by All Defendants. (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 06/22/2017)

PACER
28 July 6, 2017

RESPONSE in Opposition re 26 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by All Plaintiffs. (Telfeyan, Phil) (Entered: 07/06/2017)

PACER
29 July 7, 2017

REPLY to Response to Motion re 26 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by All Defendants. (Mosley, Michael) (Entered: 07/07/2017)

PACER
30 July 11, 2017

Initial Scheduling Order

RECAP
31 Aug. 3, 2017

ORDER denying 26 Motion. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/3/2017. (jak)

RECAP
32 Aug. 7, 2017

Counterclaim

RECAP
33 Aug. 11, 2017

REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Lindsey Hollaway, David Watlington. (Telfeyan, Phil) (Entered: 08/11/2017)

PACER
34 Aug. 16, 2017

Scheduling Order

RECAP
35 Aug. 28, 2017

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by All Plaintiffs (Telfeyan, Phil) (Entered: 08/28/2017)

PACER
36 Aug. 28, 2017

MEMORANDUM of points and authorities re 32 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim, 35 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by All Plaintiffs.

PACER
38 Sept. 7, 2017

(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Defendants' motion, No. 37 , granted. The counterclaim, No. 32 at pp. 17−18, is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the counterclaim, No. 35, is denied without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/7/2017. (slb) (Entered: 09/07/2017)

PACER
Sept. 7, 2017

Order on Motion to Dismiss

39 Nov. 30, 2017

MOTION to Dismiss by All Plaintiffs (Telfeyan, Phil) (Entered: 11/30/2017)

PACER
40 Nov. 30, 2017

ORDER granting 39 Motion to dismiss. The Court congratulates the parties on their settlement. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/30/2017. (jak)

RECAP
41 Nov. 30, 2017

JUDGMENT: The amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/30/2017. (jak)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Arkansas

Case Type(s):

Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

Special Collection(s):

Fines/Fees/Bail Reform (Criminalization of Poverty)

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 5, 2017

Closing Date: 2017

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two residents of the City of McCrory living in mobile home worth approximately $1500, suing on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Equal Justice Under Law

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

City

City of McCrory

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Arkansas 2:17-cv-00002

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Voluntary Dismissal

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief request withdrawn/mooted

Amount Defendant Pays: 20,000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Fines/Fees/Bail/Bond

Housing

Poverty/homelessness

Affected Race(s):

Race, unspecified

Recommended Citation