Case: O.A. v. Trump

1:18-cv-02718 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Nov. 20, 2018

Closed Date: Dec. 3, 2023

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 20, 2018, a group of asylum seekers challenged the federal government’s latest asylum policy, which prohibited people who enter the United States along the southern border somewhere other than a designated port of entry from obtaining asylum. Specifically, the plaintiffs challenged an interim final rule promulgated on November 9, 2018, declaring all those subject to a presidential proclamation concerning the southern border ineligible for asylum. The plaintiffs also challenged the "Presidential Proclamation Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern Border of the United States,” which then President Trump signed the same day, blocking the entry of all people entering the United States without inspection at the southern border. The plaintiffs alleged violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Act. Represented by the National Immigrant Justice Center, Human Rights First, and private counsel, they sought declaratory and injunctive relief. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and assigned to Magistrate Judge Randolph D. Moss.

The plaintiffs were six non-citizens who entered the United States seeking asylum. Two were a father and daughter who fled Honduras to escape a gang threatening to kill them, fearing the local police would not be willing to protect them. Another fled from Mexico, seeking safety from her gang-affiliated partner, who repeatedly beat her and threatened to kill her. A fourth plaintiff was an unaccompanied minor from Honduras who sought to escape a credible fear of murder from his father—a police officer who abused him—and from a gang that the plaintiff refused to join on moral grounds. Another two plaintiffs were a mother and her son from Honduras seeking asylum to escape the violence and threat of death posed by her husband. None had been granted asylum.

The plaintiffs argued that federal law allowed non-citizens to seek asylum regardless of their immigration status or how they entered the United States. Further, federal law established procedural safeguards that aimed to give asylum seekers a fair review process during removal proceedings. The plaintiffs also argued that under treaty obligations, the United States could not deny asylum on the basis of where the non-citizen entered the country. But the government’s new rule, part of its broader “zero-tolerance” policy on immigration, “shutter[ed] access to the asylum system for thousands of men, women, and children that the Administration concedes are likely to have meritorious asylum claims.” Faced with even longer wait times at the border, the complaint argued, that asylum seekers already in dangerous situations and with scarce financial resources were thus left seriously vulnerable to violence from criminal organizations near the border.

At the same time the complaint was filed, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order, to be followed by a preliminary injunction enjoining implementation and enforcement of the rule and the proclamation.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs, as did a group of seven United States senators.

On December 17, 2018, the court held a hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and consolidated the case with S.M.S.R. v. Trump, designating this case as the lead case. On December 21, the court decided to hold the motion in abeyance.

On December 18, 2018, the S.M.S.R. v. Trump plaintiffs filed an amended complaint listing seven additional asylum seekers as plaintiffs. At the same time, the plaintiffs in this case also filed an amended complaint seeking certification of a class consisting of all persons who had crossed the southern border since November 10, 2018, and had either gone into hiding to avoid detection, presented outside a port of entry and been detained, or presented and been released pending further immigration proceedings.

On December 26, 2018, the defendants filed a motion to stay all briefing deadlines in light of the lapse in appropriations to the Department of Justice caused by the federal government shutdown. The court, however, denied this motion.

On January 4, 2019, the plaintiffs in both cases filed motions for summary judgment and class certification. The defendants filed a cross motion for summary judgment on February 25, 2019. Oral argument on these pending motions was scheduled for May 29, 2019.

On August 2, 2019, the court granted in part the plaintiffs’ summary judgment and class certification motions, denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denied as moot the plaintiffs’ earlier motion for a temporary restraining order. 404 F.Supp.3d 109. The court held that the rule challenged by the plaintiffs was “unlawful” within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court also found both the plaintiffs’ argument for an injunction and the defendants’ argument against the injunction unpersuasive; as a practical matter, it would be impossible to vacate the challenged rule with respect to the organizational plaintiffs without vacating the rule entirely. As such, the court agreed to vacate the rule but declined the plaintiffs’ request to enforce the requested injunction. As to the class certification, the court found that, here, the class certification requirements of numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation were met. All members of the proposed class faced the same potential loss of the right to seek asylum and sought invalidation of the interim final rule.

On September 30, 2019, the defendants appealed the case. Oral argument was held in December 2020. Then, on February 2, 2021, President Biden issued the Executive Order on Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework to Address the Causes of Migration, to Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and to Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a per curiam order the following day asking the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the mootness of the appeal in light of the executive order. A few days after receiving the supplemental briefs, the D.C. Circuit filed another order holding the case in abeyance as the new Biden administration worked to implement its own immigration policies. The administration was instructed to file status reports every 60 days.

Over the next few months, the Biden administration worked to strengthen the U.S. asylum system and end many Trump-era policies, including Remain in Mexico and Title 42. In October 2023, the U.S. government filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the case. This motion was granted, and the district court dismissed the case on December 3, 2023. This case is now closed.

	Document
1 1:18-cv-02718	Complaint	Nov. 20, 2018	Nov. 20, 2018 Complaint
40 1:18-cv-02718	Amended Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	Dec. 18, 2018	Dec. 18, 2018 Complaint
39 1:18-cv-02718	Amended Class Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	Dec. 18, 2018	Dec. 18, 2018 Complaint
92 1:18-cv-02718 18-02838	Memorandum Opinion	Aug. 2, 2019	Aug. 2, 2019 Order/Opinion 404 F.Supp.3d 109

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
61	NOTICE concerning lapse in funding and other cases by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER re Telephone Conference,, Order, (Attachments: # 1 Notice in 18-18274, # 2 Notice in 17-17436)(Reuveni, Erez) (Entered: 01/28/2019) 1 Notice in 18-18274 View on PACER 2 Notice in 17-17436 View on PACER	Jan. 28, 2019	Jan. 28, 2019 RECAP
	MINUTE ORDER: Given that funding has been restored for the Department of Justice, it is hereby ORDERED that the stay in this case is lifted. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and submit a joint status report, on or before Friday, February 1, 2019, that includes a proposed briefing schedule taking into account the duration of the lapse in appropriations. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/28/2019. (lcrdm1, )	Jan. 28, 2019	Jan. 28, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 2/1/2019. (kt)	Jan. 28, 2019	Jan. 28, 2019 PACER
62	Joint STATUS REPORT by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER. (Reuveni, Erez) (Entered: 02/01/2019)	Feb. 1, 2019	Feb. 1, 2019 RECAP
	MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' joint status report, Dkt. 62, it is hereby ORDERED that the government shall serve a certified administrative record on Plaintiffs on or before February 18, 2019; the government shall file its opposition and cross-motion on or before February 25, 2019; Plaintiffs shall file their opposition and reply on or before March 18, 2019; and the government shall file its final reply on or before March 29, 2019. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 2/3/2019. (lcrdm1, )	Feb. 3, 2019	Feb. 3, 2019 PACER
63	NOTICE by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Reuveni, Erez) (Entered: 02/04/2019) 1 Exhibit View on PACER	Feb. 4, 2019	Feb. 4, 2019 RECAP
64	ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Notice of Electronic Filing by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Index - Administrative Record, # 2 Exhibit EOIR Certification - Administrative Record, # 3 Exhibit DHS Certification - Administrative Record, # 4 Exhibit Administrative Record)Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-02718-RDM, 1:18-cv-02838-RDM(Gray, Kathryne) (Entered: 02/15/2019) 1 Exhibit Index - Administrative Record View on PACER 2 Exhibit EOIR Certification - Administrative Record View on PACER 3 Exhibit DHS Certification - Administrative Record View on PACER 4 Exhibit Administrative Record View on PACER	Feb. 15, 2019	Feb. 15, 2019 PACER
65	Memorandum in opposition to re (52 in 1:18-cv-02718-RDM, 52 in 1:18-cv-02718-RDM) MOTION to Certify Class MOTION for Summary Judgment, (51 in 1:18-cv-02718-RDM, 51 in 1:18-cv-02718-RDM) MOTION to Certify Class MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts Response to Plaintiffs' Statements of Facts)Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-02718-RDM, 1:18-cv-02838-RDM(Darrow, Joseph) (Entered: 02/25/2019) 1 Statement of Facts Response to Plaintiffs' Statements of Facts View on PACER	Feb. 25, 2019	Feb. 25, 2019 RECAP
66	Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts Response to Plaintiffs' Statements of Facts)(Darrow, Joseph) (Entered: 02/25/2019) 1 Statement of Facts Response to Plaintiffs' Statements of Facts View on PACER	Feb. 25, 2019	Feb. 25, 2019 RECAP
67	SEALED DOCUMENT filed by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER re 65 Memorandum in Opposition,, 66 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Darrow, Joseph) (Entered: 02/25/2019)	Feb. 25, 2019	Feb. 25, 2019 PACER
68	SEALED DOCUMENT filed by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER re 65 Memorandum in Opposition,, 66 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Darrow, Joseph) (Entered: 02/25/2019)	Feb. 25, 2019	Feb. 25, 2019 PACER
69	SEALED DOCUMENT filed by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER re 65 Memorandum in Opposition,, 68 Sealed Document,, 66 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Darrow, Joseph) (Entered: 02/26/2019)	Feb. 26, 2019	Feb. 26, 2019 PACER
70	Consent MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief in Support of Federal Defs by IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Proposed Amicus Brief, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-02718-RDM, 1:18-cv-02838-RDM(Joseph, Lawrence) (Entered: 03/13/2019) 1 Memorandum in Support Proposed Amicus Brief View on PACER 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order View on PACER	March 13, 2019	March 13, 2019 RECAP
71	AMICUS BRIEF by IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE. (ztd) (Entered: 03/15/2019)	March 15, 2019	March 15, 2019 RECAP
	Order on Motion for Leave to File	March 15, 2019	March 15, 2019 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the consent motion of the Immigration Reform Law Institute for leave to file brief as amicus curiae, Dkt. 70, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The brief, Dkt. [70-1], shall be deemed filed. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 3/15/2019. (lcrdm1, )	March 15, 2019	March 15, 2019 PACER
72	REPLY to opposition to motion re 52 MOTION to Certify Class MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by A.J.A.C., A.J.E.A.M., C.S.C.C., CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION, K.P.P.V., L.C.V.R, N.A.G.A., R.D.P.V., R.G.G., R.S.P.S., REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, INC., S.M.S.R., Y.A.L.P.. (Bernick, Justin) (Entered: 03/18/2019)	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019 RECAP
73	REPLY to opposition to motion re 51 MOTION to Certify Class MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by A.V., C.A., D.S., G.Z., K.S., O.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts Reply Supporting Statement of Material Facts)(Hentoff, Thomas) (Entered: 03/18/2019) 1 Statement of Facts Reply Supporting Statement of Material Facts View on PACER	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019 RECAP
74	Memorandum in opposition to re 66 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by A.J.A.C., A.J.E.A.M., C.S.C.C., CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION, K.P.P.V., L.C.V.R, N.A.G.A., R.D.P.V., R.G.G., R.S.P.S., REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, INC., S.M.S.R., Y.A.L.P.. (See Docket Entry 72 to view document). (znmw) (Entered: 03/19/2019)	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019 PACER
75	Memorandum in opposition to re 66 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by A.V., C.A., D.S., G.Z., K.S., O.A.. (See Docket Entry 73 to view document). (znmw) (Entered: 03/19/2019)	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019 PACER
	Memorandum in opposition to motion	March 19, 2019	March 19, 2019 PACER
76	REPLY to opposition to motion re (66 in 1:18-cv-02718-RDM) Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, NTAs for L.V.C.R. & C.S.C.C., # 2 Exhibit B, NTAs for R.G.G. & N.A.G.A., # 3 Exhibit C, Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Reply Concerning Statement of Material Facts)(York, Thomas) (Entered: 03/29/2019) 1 Exhibit A, NTAs for L.V.C.R. & C.S.C.C. View on PACER 2 Exhibit B, NTAs for R.G.G. & N.A.G.A. View on PACER 3 Exhibit C, Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Reply Concerning Statement of Mater View on PACER	March 29, 2019	March 29, 2019 RECAP
77	NOTICE of Change of Address by Elizabeth Hagerty (Hagerty, Elizabeth) (Entered: 04/29/2019)	April 29, 2019	April 29, 2019 RECAP
	.Order	May 8, 2019	May 8, 2019 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: The Court intends to hear oral argument on the parties' pending motions at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 21 on either May 29, 2019, or May 31, 2019. The Court requests that the parties be prepared to appear at these times, and will notify the parties regarding which day to appear as soon as possible. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 5/8/2019. (lcrdm1, )	May 8, 2019	May 8, 2019 PACER
	.Order	May 13, 2019	May 13, 2019 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall appear for oral argument on their pending motions on May 29, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 21. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 5/13/2019. (lcrdm1, )	May 13, 2019	May 13, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Hearings	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Hearings: Motion Hearing set for 5/29/2019, at 9:30 AM, in Courtroom 21, before Judge Randolph D. Moss. (kt)	May 14, 2019	May 14, 2019 PACER
	.Order	May 21, 2019	May 21, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Deadlines	May 21, 2019	May 21, 2019 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: Local Rule 7(h) provides that no Statement of Material Facts is necessary in cases in which judicial review is based solely on the administrative record. LCvR 7(h)(2). Because the parties have taken positions as to justiciability that rely on facts outside of the administrative record, however, this is not such a case. See, e.g., Chesapeake Climate Action Network v. Export-Import Bank of the U.S., 78 F. Supp. 3d 208, 217 (D.D.C. 2015) ("Although judicial review of agency action is typically confined to the administrative record, where there is not sufficient evidence of standing in the record because the question was not before the agency, plaintiffs may submit extra-record evidence to establish standing."). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Government shall file a response to Plaintiffs' statements of material facts not in dispute, Dkt. 51-1; Dkt. 52-2, on or before May 28, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 5/21/2019. (lcrdm1, )	May 21, 2019	May 21, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Deadlines: Government's Response due by 5/28/2019, at 2:00 PM. (kt)	May 21, 2019	May 21, 2019 PACER
	.Order	May 24, 2019	May 24, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Deadlines	May 24, 2019	May 24, 2019 PACER
	MINUTE ORDER: In light of the parties' discussion of Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), it is hereby ORDERED that the Government shall file any updated information regarding the Notices to Appear ("NTA") and/or notices of hearing dates for each of the Plaintiffs on or before May 28, 2019. The Court notes that for Plaintiffs D.R., P.R., G.R., L.C.V.R., C.S.C.C., R.G.G., N.A.G.A., K.P.P.V., R.D.P.V., A.J.E.A.M., and Y.A.L.P., the Government has not submitted documentation of notices of hearing dates, although it asserts that "each individual Plaintiff who was issued an NTA has also received a notice of hearing date." Dkt. 66 at 39. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 5/24/2019. (lcrdm1, )	May 24, 2019	May 24, 2019 PACER
	Set/Reset Deadlines: The Government shall file any updated information regarding the Notices to Appear ("NTA") and/or notices of hearing dates for each of the Plaintiffs on or before 5/28/2019. (kt)	May 24, 2019	May 24, 2019 PACER
78	SEALED DOCUMENT filed by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JOHN LAFFERTY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, JAMES MCHENRY, KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER re Order,, Order,,,, (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A (D.S. & C.A. Hearing Notices), # 2 Exhibit Ex. B (Decl. of Burgus), # 3 Exhibit Ex. C (G.Z. Hearing Notices), # 4 Exhibit Ex. D - Decl. of Hale, # 5 Exhibit Ex. E D.R. Hearing Notices, # 6 Exhibit Ex. F Decl. of Johnson, # 7 Exhibit Ex. G P.R. Hearing Notices, # 8 Exhibit Ex. H G.R. Hearing Notices and Other Documents, # 9 Exhibit Ex. I NTA for A.V., # 10 Exhibit Ex. J S.M.S.R. and R.S.P.S. Worksheets and Hearing Notices, # 11 Exhibit Ex. K - L.V.C.R. and C.S.C.C. Worksheets and Hearing Notices, # 12 Exhibit Ex. L R.G.G. and N.A.G.A. Hearing Notices, # 13 Exhibit Ex. M - A.J.E.A.M. Worksheet and Hearing Notices, # 14 Exhibit Ex. N - K.P.P.V. and R.D.P.V. Worksheet and Hearing Notices, # 15 Exhibit Ex. O Y.A.L.P. Hearing Notices)(Gray, Kathryne) (Entered: 05/28/2019)	May 28, 2019	May 28, 2019 PACER
	~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines	May 29, 2019	May 29, 2019 PACER
	Motion Hearing	May 29, 2019	May 29, 2019 PACER

Case: O.A. v. Trump

1:18-cv-02718 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Case Summary

Related Cases

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Docket

Case Details