Case: State of California v. Trump

4:19-cv-00872 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Feb. 18, 2019

Closed Date: Aug. 2, 2023

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 2018, President Donald Trump asked Congress to appropriate $5.7 billion for construction of a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. On February 14, 2019, Congress denied that request and instead appropriated only $1.375 billion. Although President Trump signed this appropriations bill, he simultaneously declared a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, and directed the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and the Treasury to reallocate military and other funds in order to bui…

Five days later, on February 18, 2019, several states, including the State of California, responded by filing this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeking to prevent construction of the wall. They sued the president, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of the Treasury under the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4332), the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. §§701–706), the All Writs Act (28 U.S.C. §1651), and the Declaratory Judgments Act (28 U.S.C. §2201), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.

The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU, ACLU of Northern California, and ACLU of Texas, argued that the president’s attempt to fund the wall using the National Emergencies Act was a constitutional violation. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive authority to control appropriations. Although Congress gave the president some authority under the National Emergencies Act, the plaintiffs argued that the Act was never intended to allow the president to circumvent explicit appropriations decisions of Congress. His actions were therefore a violation of the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

Statutorily, the plaintiffs argued that funding the wall was an inappropriate use of the National Emergencies Act because (a) there was no national emergency; (b) the border wall was not a military construction project, as required by the Act; and (c) the border wall was not “necessary to support…the armed forces.”

Finally, they alleged that the president and the defendant departments were violating the National Environmental Policy Act because they failed to review the environmental impacts of the border wall construction project.

The case was assigned to Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., who ordered it related to Sierra Club v. Trump on March 6, 2019.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 18, 2019. On April 4, they moved for a preliminary injunction, seeking to prevent construction along certain stretches of the border (Yuma Sector Projects 1 and 2, and El Paso Sector Project 1). The United States House of Representatives filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs, and was permitted to present arguments at the preliminary injunction hearing held on May 17, 2019. On May 24, 2019, the court granted the preliminary injunction, prohibiting the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and the Treasury from taking any action to build the wall using certain reallocated military funds. The injunction applied only to two of the three sectors requested by the plaintiffs (Yuma Sector Project 1 and El Paso Sector Project 1). 379 F. Supp. 3d 883.

On May 29, 2019, the government appealed the preliminary injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit and moved for the district court to stay the injunction pending appeal--a motion that the district court denied the following day. Also on May 29, the plaintiffs moved for a supplemental preliminary injunction, seeking to prevent construction along four additional stretches of the border (El Centro Project 1 and Tucson Sector Projects 1, 2, and 3).

In June 2019, both parties moved for partial summary judgment. On June 28, the court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and partially granted the plaintiffs.’ It declared that the defendants’ use of certain military funds to build the wall in the disputed sectors was unlawful and issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from using those funds to build in those sectors. The court certified its judgment for immediate appeal, but declined to stay the injunction pending appeal. 2019 WL 2715422. The following week, on July 3, the Ninth Circuit denied the defendants’ motion to stay the injunction, finding that the defendants failed to demonstrate that they were likely succeed on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims, that the equitable balances of harm did not warrant a stay, and that the public interest weighed against staying the injunction. 929 F.3d 670.

Later that month, on July 26, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States overruled the district court and the Ninth Circuit, granting a stay of the injunction pending completion of the appeal in the Ninth Circuit. 140 S.Ct. 1.

The plaintiffs sought summary judgment on some issues on October 11, 2019. Like the June 28, 2019 ruling, the issues in dispute here regarded the legality of reallocating funds for wall construction; however, this motion dealt with a different source of funds, and covered more segments of the border. The government similarly moved for summary judgment on October 25, 2019. The House of Representatives again filed a brief in support of the plaintiffs, and was again allowed to present argument. A hearing on summary judgment took place on November 20, 2019, after which the court granted partial summary judgment to the plaintiffs on December 11, 2019, denying the government’s motion. Like on June 28, 2019, it ruled that it was unlawful for the government to use certain reallocated funds for construction on the disputed border segments, and issued a permanent injunction. However, unlike in June, the district court immediately stayed its injunction pending appeal, citing the Supreme Court’s July 26 ruling.

On December 30, 2019, the Ninth Circuit denied the plaintiffs’ motion to lift the stay, also citing the Supreme Court’s ruling. It further explained that since, in El Paso County v. Trump, 407 F. Supp. 3d 655 (W.D. Tex. 2019), the Western District of Texas had issued a nationwide injunction on December 10, 2019, which covered the sections of wall at issue in this case, lifting the stay would have no practical effect.

On February 5, 2020, the plaintiffs dismissed their claims regarding border wall funding reallocated from yet another source (the Treasury Forfeiture Fund). In light of this dismissal, the court sought to close the case, since all of the plaintiffs’ claims had been resolved by summary judgment or voluntary dismissal. The parties jointly requested that the case remain open: although the claims regarding fiscal year 2019’s appropriations had been resolved, they expected that similar disputes would arise regarding fiscal year 2020’s budget. The fiscal year 2020 dispute, however, was assigned to another case, California v. Trump, filed by the plaintiffs on February 28, 2020 (docket number 4:20-cv-01563. The two cases were ordered related on March 4, 2020.

On June 26, 2020, the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court’s June 28, 2019 ruling, including the permanent injunction. However, due to the Supreme Court’s July 26, 2019 order, the injunction remained stayed until the government’s appeal to the Supreme Court was either decided or rejected. The Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for writ of certiorari on October 19, 2020, but on June 11, 2021, the petitioners filed a motion to vacate and remand: President Biden issued a Proclamation terminating the declaration of a national emergency at the southern border, pausing construction and obligation of funds for border wall projects, and directing various Executive Branch agencies to develop a plan for redirection of funds concerning the southern border wall. The parties agreed to stay further proceedings in the district court cases to allow the defendants to develop the plan called for by the President’s Proclamation.

President Biden announced that taxpayer dollars would no longer be diverted to construct a border wall, ordering the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security to immediately pause work on the border-wall construction and to develop a plan redirecting the funds that were previously allocated to construct the southern border wall. On July 2, 2021, the Supreme Court remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit with instructions to direct the district courts to vacate its judgments.

On June 13, 2023, the district issued an order acknowledging the parties’ efforts to reach a settlement and directed them to file a joint status report addressing the status of the parties’ settlement discussions and, if necessary, any further proceedings in these cases. The parties never filed this joint status report, and instead began filing motions to dismiss the claims in the weeks following this order. On June 22, 2023, the district court dismissed with prejudice the State of Virginia’s claims against the defendants. On July 17, 2023, the district court dismissed with prejudice all claims except the State of Wisconsin’s claims against the defendants. On August 2, 2023, the district court dismissed with prejudice the State of Wisconsin’s claims against the defendants, thereby rendering all of the cases closed.

show full summary

Summary Authors

Mackenzie Walz (3/17/2019)

Gregory Marsh (7/10/2020)

Rebecca Fisher (11/18/2020)

Rita Elfarissi (3/28/2024)

Sierra Club v. Trump, Northern District of California (2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14557409/parties/state-of-california-v-biden/

Judge(s)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Adams, Matthew Gordon (California)

Badat, Mohammed A (New York)

Barbero, Megan (District of Columbia)

Battles, Benjamin Daniel (California)

Bernstein, Richard D. (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Gilliam, Haywood Stirling Jr. (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bolton, Jonathan R. (California)

Campion, Jacob (Minnesota)

Cayaban, Michael P. (California)

Cho, Michelle Young (California)

Chuang, Christine (California)

Colangelo, Matthew B. (District of Columbia)

DeFever, Jeanne Nicole (Oregon)

Donatti, David A. (Texas)

Dunlap, Jeffery Paul (Maryland)

Feigenbaum, Jeremy (New Jersey)

Ferguson, Andrew N. (California)

Garcia, Matthew L. (New Mexico)

Glubiak, Zachary Ryland (California)

Hafetz, Jonathan L (New Jersey)

Herman, Susan P. (Maine)

Jadwat, Omar C. (New York)

Johnson-Karp, Gabe (California)

Jones, Brittany Marie (Virginia)

Kallen, Michelle S. (Virginia)

Kantor, Henry (Oregon)

Ladin, Dror (New York)

Lee, Mollie M. (California)

Leslie, Heather Colleen (California)

Lyons, David J. (Delaware)

Maestas, Tania (New Mexico)

McCabe, Gavin Geraghty (California)

Meyer, Amanda (New York)

Narayan, Sanjay (California)

Ochoa, Edward Henry (California)

Olson, Eric (Colorado)

Restuccia, B. Eric (Michigan)

Rush, Caleb Andrew (Illinois)

Segura, Andre (Texas)

Shamsi, Hina (New York)

Sherman, Lee Isaac (California)

Smith, Gloria Diantha (California)

Smith, Janelle M. (California)

Stern, Heidi Parry (Nevada)

Stevenson, Shannon Wells (California)

Sun, Christine Patricia (California)

Talla, Vasudha (California)

Taylor, Abigail (California)

Wadsworth, Clyde James (Hawaii)

Zafar, Noor (New York)

Zahradka, James F. II (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Burnham, James M (District of Columbia)

Grant, Eric (District of Columbia)

Warden, Andrew Irwin (District of Columbia)

Westmoreland, Rachael (District of Columbia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Adams, Matthew Gordon (California)

Badat, Mohammed A (New York)

Barbero, Megan (District of Columbia)

Battles, Benjamin Daniel (California)

Bernstein, Richard D. (District of Columbia)

Bilford, Brian Jeffrey (California)

Boyle, Joseph Andrew (District of Columbia)

Chapple, Margaret (California)

Chun, Brian H (California)

Conrad, Mark R. (California)

Daughety, Samuel Franklin (District of Columbia)

Dollan, Matthew R. (New York)

Duggan, Jessica L (California)

Espiritu, Nicholas David (California)

Evans, David W (California)

Garfield, Howard Michael (California)

Goitein, Elizabeth (District of Columbia)

Golden-Krasner, Noah Marc (California)

Hartnett, Kathleen R (California)

Hoffmann, Keith David (California)

Hussein, Shaimaa M. (New York)

Joseph, Lawrence J (District of Columbia)

Khandeshi, Sparsh S (California)

Koh, Harold H. (Connecticut)

Kolodin, Zachary J. F. (New York)

Lafayette, Gary T (California)

Letter, Douglas (District of Columbia)

Luoma, Jeffrey (California)

Lusk, Jennie (California)

Mancino, Richard (New York)

Mangi, Adeel Abdullah (New York)

Nakatsuji, Robert Tadao (California)

Rees, Joshua Owen (Arizona)

Richardson, James Everett (California)

Rodman, Lindsay Lyon (New York)

Schaeffer, Suzanne Rebecca (District of Columbia)

Singh, David Ramraj (California)

Sisney, Benjamin Paul (California)

Smith, Rachel Elizabeth (California)

Spector, Phillip Michael (Maryland)

Sullivan, Justin James (California)

Sun, Christine Patricia (California)

Sydow, Nicholas (California)

Tyler, Robert Henry (California)

Wang, Cecillia D (California)

Winthrop, Douglas Andrew (California)

Wright, Christian Douglas (California)

Wydra, Elizabeth B. (District of Columbia)

Young, Michaele Nicole Turnage (District of Columbia)

Zalesin, Steven Alan (New York)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
4:19-cv-00872 4:20-cv-01494 4:19-cv-00892	Docket [PACER]	April 29, 2020	April 29, 2020 Docket
4:20-cv-01494 4:19-cv-00892	Docket [PACER] Sierra Club v. Trump	June 5, 2020	June 5, 2020 Docket
4:19-cv-00872 4:20-cv-01494 4:19-cv-00892 0:19-16102 0:19-17501 0:19-16300 0:19-00060 0:20-00138	Docket [PACER] Sierra Club v. Trump et al	Oct. 26, 2020	Oct. 26, 2020 Docket
1 4:19-cv-00872	Complaint	Feb. 18, 2019	Feb. 18, 2019 Complaint
47 4:19-cv-00872	First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	March 13, 2019	March 13, 2019 Complaint
71 4:19-cv-00872	Consent Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of the United States House of Representatives as Amicus Curiae	April 12, 2019	April 12, 2019 Pleading / Motion / Brief
165 4:19-cv-00872	Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction	May 24, 2019	May 24, 2019 Order/Opinion 379 F.Supp.3d 928
185 4:19-cv-00872	Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Denying Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Certifying Judgment for Appeal	June 28, 2019	June 28, 2019 Order/Opinion 2019 WL 2715421
186 4:19-cv-00872	Judgment	June 28, 2019	June 28, 2019 Order/Opinion
257 4:19-cv-00872	Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment	Dec. 11, 2019	Dec. 11, 2019 Order/Opinion 407 F.Supp.3d 869

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Access to Justice: Sierra Club v. Trump Constitutional Accountability Center	Sierra Club v. Trump was a challenge to the Trump Administration’s diversion of funds that Congress appropriated for other purposes in order to construct a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico.	Oct. 4, 2021	Oct. 4, 2021 https://www.theusconstitution.org/...

show / hide resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14557409/state-of-california-v-biden/

Last updated March 19, 2024, 3:04 a.m.

Change selected docket

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13100729.). Filed byState of New York, State of Minnesota, State of Colorado, State of California, Dana Nessel, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of New Jersey, State of Delaware, State of Nevada, State of Hawaii, Commonwealth of Virginia. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 2/18/2019) Modified on 2/19/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 2/19/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/18/2019) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on RECAP	Feb. 18, 2019	Feb. 18, 2019 Clearinghouse
2	Proposed Summons. (Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 2/18/2019) (Entered: 02/18/2019)	Feb. 18, 2019	Feb. 18, 2019 RECAP
	Electronic Filing Error	Feb. 18, 2019	Feb. 18, 2019 PACER
	Electronic filing error. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: 1 Complaint, filed by State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of Hawaii, D ana Nessel, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of California, State of New Jersey, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois, State of Oregon, State of Maryland, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Colorado Not a Civil Miscellaneous Case (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2019)	Feb. 18, 2019	Feb. 18, 2019 PACER
	Electronic filing error. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: 1 Complaint, filed by State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of Hawaii, D ana Nessel, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of California, State of New Jersey, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois, State of Oregon, State of Maryland, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Colorado Attorney Lee Isaac Sherman does not represent all plaintiffs just the State of California Only. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2019)	Feb. 18, 2019	Feb. 18, 2019 PACER
3	Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/5/2019. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 PACER
4	MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13101792.) filed by State of New Mexico. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Maestas, Tania) (Filed on 2/19/2019) Modified on 2/20/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
5	Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/21/2019 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/19/19. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
6	Summons Issued as to Department of Defense, David Bernhardt, Mark T. Esper, Steven T. Mnuchin, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Patrick M. Shanahan, Richard V. Spencer, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States of America, Heather Wilson, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney's Office. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
7	MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13102243.) filed by State of Maine. (Herman, Susan) (Filed on 2/19/2019) Modified on 2/20/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
8	ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting 4 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
9	MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13102823.) filed by State of Minnesota. (Campion, Jacob) (Filed on 2/19/2019) Modified on 2/20/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
10	NOTICE of Appearance by Gavin Geraghty McCabe (McCabe, Gavin) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
11	Application for Refund, Receipt Number 26FGOHCE by Commonwealth of Virginia, Dana Nessel, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Oregon. (Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
12	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13103252.) filed by State of Colorado. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Olson, Eric) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
13	NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Phillip Cayaban (Cayaban, Michael) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
14	ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting 7 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 PACER
15	ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting 9 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 PACER
16	ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting 12 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 PACER
17	NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb Andrew Rush (Rush, Caleb) (Filed on 2/19/2019) (Entered: 02/19/2019)	Feb. 19, 2019	Feb. 19, 2019 RECAP
18	CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by State of California.. (Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 2/20/2019) (Entered: 02/20/2019)	Feb. 20, 2019	Feb. 20, 2019 RECAP
19	CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2019) (Entered: 02/20/2019)	Feb. 20, 2019	Feb. 20, 2019 PACER
20	NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Chuang on behalf of Plaintiff State of California (Chuang, Christine) (Filed on 2/20/2019) (Entered: 02/20/2019)	Feb. 20, 2019	Feb. 20, 2019 RECAP
21	ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 2/20/19. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2019) (Entered: 02/20/2019)	Feb. 20, 2019	Feb. 20, 2019 RECAP
22	NOTICE of Appearance by Edward Henry Ochoa as Counsel for Plaintiff State of California (Ochoa, Edward) (Filed on 2/20/2019) (Entered: 02/20/2019)	Feb. 20, 2019	Feb. 20, 2019 RECAP
23	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13107289.) filed by State of New York. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Colangelo, Matthew) (Filed on 2/20/2019) (Entered: 02/20/2019)	Feb. 20, 2019	Feb. 20, 2019 PACER
24	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13110536.) filed by State of New York. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Meyer, Amanda) (Filed on 2/21/2019) (Entered: 02/21/2019)	Feb. 21, 2019	Feb. 21, 2019 PACER
25	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13110771.) filed by State of Delaware. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Lyons, David) (Filed on 2/21/2019) (Entered: 02/21/2019)	Feb. 21, 2019	Feb. 21, 2019 PACER
26	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13111002.) filed by State of Nevada. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Stern, Heidi) (Filed on 2/21/2019) (Entered: 02/21/2019)	Feb. 21, 2019	Feb. 21, 2019 PACER
27	Refund Status re 11 Application for Refund, APPROVED. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2019) (Entered: 02/21/2019)	Feb. 21, 2019	Feb. 21, 2019 PACER
28	NOTICE of Appearance by James F. Zahradka, II on behalf of Plaintiff State of California (Zahradka, James) (Filed on 2/21/2019) (Entered: 02/21/2019)	Feb. 21, 2019	Feb. 21, 2019 PACER
29	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13113196.) filed by Commonwealth of Virginia. (Attachments: # 1 Good Standing Certificate)(Jones, Brittany) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019) 1 Good Standing Certificate View on PACER	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 PACER
	Electronic Filing Error	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 PACER
	Electronic filing error. REMINDER TO COUNSEL: In the future, please be sure that the case number is correctly reflected on your documents as 4:19-cv-00872- HSG . Re: 28 Notice of Appearance filed by State of California (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) Modified on 2/22/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 PACER
30	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Colangelo, Matthew.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 RECAP
31	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 24 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Meyer, Amanda. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 RECAP
32	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 25 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Lyons, David. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 RECAP
33	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Stern, Heidi. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 RECAP
34	CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for May 21, 2019, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by May 14, 2019. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:19-cv-00872-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 PACER
35	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 29 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Jones, Brittany.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 RECAP
36	NOTICE of Appearance by Janelle M. Smith on behalf of Plaintiff State of California (Smith, Janelle) (Filed on 2/22/2019) (Entered: 02/22/2019)	Feb. 22, 2019	Feb. 22, 2019 RECAP
37	RE-FILED AT DOCKET NO. 39 ** MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13120842.) filed by State of Oregon. (DeFever, Jeanne) (Filed on 2/25/2019) Modified on 2/27/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/25/2019)	Feb. 25, 2019	Feb. 25, 2019 RECAP
38	MOTION to Relate Case Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3-12(b) filed by Sierra Club, Southern Border Communities Coalition. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Cecillia D. Wang, # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Cecillia D. Wang, # 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Cecillia D. Wang, # 4 Proposed Order, # 5 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Wang, Cecillia) (Filed on 2/26/2019) (Entered: 02/26/2019) 1 Declaration of Cecillia D. Wang View on PACER 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Cecillia D. Wang View on PACER 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Cecillia D. Wang View on PACER 4 Proposed Order View on PACER 5 Certificate/Proof of Service View on PACER	Feb. 26, 2019	Feb. 26, 2019 RECAP
39	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13120842.) Filing fee previously paid on 02/25/2019 filed by State of Oregon. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Kantor, Henry) (Filed on 2/26/2019) (Entered: 02/26/2019)	Feb. 26, 2019	Feb. 26, 2019 PACER
40	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13134628.) filed by State of Maryland. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Dunlap, Jeffrey) (Filed on 3/1/2019) (Entered: 03/01/2019)	March 1, 2019	March 1, 2019 PACER
41	NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Colleen Leslie as Counsel for Plaintiffs (Leslie, Heather) (Filed on 3/1/2019) (Entered: 03/01/2019)	March 1, 2019	March 1, 2019 PACER
42	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Kantor, Henry. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2019) (Entered: 03/04/2019)	March 4, 2019	March 4, 2019 RECAP
43	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 40 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Jeffrey Paul Dunlap. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2019) (Entered: 03/04/2019)	March 4, 2019	March 4, 2019 RECAP
44	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13144599.) filed by Dana Nessel. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Restuccia, B. Eric) (Filed on 3/5/2019) (Entered: 03/05/2019)	March 5, 2019	March 5, 2019 PACER
45	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 38 Motion to Relate Case Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3-12(b) Re Case No. 19-cv-0892-KAW. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019) (Entered: 03/06/2019)	March 6, 2019	March 6, 2019 RECAP
46	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 44 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Restuccia, B. Eric. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2019) (Entered: 03/06/2019)	March 6, 2019	March 6, 2019 RECAP
47	AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants. Filed byState of Minnesota, State of Colorado, State of California, State of Illinois, State of Maryland, State of Nevada, State of New York, Commonwealth of Virginia, Dana Nessel, State of Maine, State of Connecticut, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of New Jersey, State of Delaware, State of Hawaii, State of Wisconsin, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Vermont, State of Rhode Island. (Zahradka, James) (Filed on 3/13/2019) (Entered: 03/13/2019)	March 13, 2019	March 13, 2019 Clearinghouse
48	Proposed Summons. (Zahradka, James) (Filed on 3/13/2019) (Entered: 03/13/2019)	March 13, 2019	March 13, 2019 RECAP
49	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13170489.) filed by State of Wisconsin. (Johnson-Karp, Gabe) (Filed on 3/14/2019) (Entered: 03/14/2019)	March 14, 2019	March 14, 2019 PACER
	Electronic Filing Error	March 14, 2019	March 14, 2019 PACER
	Electronic filing error. The 48 Proposed Summons will not be issued as to the same Defendants listed on the summons issued at docket number 6, unless those summons' are returned unexecuted. Also, the Clerk's Office will issue a maximum of 3 summons'. Either list all defendants on three summons' or list any additional defendants as an attachment to the proposed summons. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019)	March 14, 2019	March 14, 2019 PACER
50	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13174333.) filed by State of Rhode Island. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letters of Good Standing)(Sullivan, Justin) (Filed on 3/15/2019) (Entered: 03/15/2019)	March 15, 2019	March 15, 2019 PACER
51	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Johnson-Karp, Gabe. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019) (Entered: 03/18/2019)	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019 RECAP
52	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 50 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Sullivan, Justin. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019) (Entered: 03/18/2019)	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019 RECAP
53	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13182042.) filed by State of Vermont. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Battles, Benjamin) (Filed on 3/19/2019) (Entered: 03/19/2019)	March 19, 2019	March 19, 2019 PACER
54	AFFIDAVIT by State of California. (Zahradka, James) (Filed on 3/28/2019) (Entered: 03/28/2019)	March 28, 2019	March 28, 2019 RECAP
55	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 53 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Battles, Benjamin. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) (Entered: 04/02/2019)	April 2, 2019	April 2, 2019 RECAP
56	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13233071.) filed by Commonwealth of Massachusetts. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Taylor, Abigail) (Filed on 4/4/2019) (Entered: 04/04/2019)	April 4, 2019	April 4, 2019 PACER
57	ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To enlarge page limits in support of motion for injunctive relief filed by State of California. Responses due by 4/18/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of Lee Sherman, # 3 Notice of Motion & Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 4 Proposed Order, # 5 Appendix of Declarations re: TFF, # 6 Appendix of Declarations re: Environmental, # 7 Request for Judicial Notice, # 8 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 4/4/2019) (Entered: 04/04/2019) 1 View on RECAP 2 View on RECAP 3 View on RECAP 4 View on RECAP 7 View on RECAP 8 View on RECAP	April 4, 2019	April 4, 2019 RECAP
58	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 57 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To enlarge page limits in support of motion for injunctive relief. Plaintiff States shall immediately file a Motion for Preliminary Injunction up to 35 pages in length on the docket. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019) (Entered: 04/08/2019)	April 8, 2019	April 8, 2019 RECAP
59	MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, Dana Nessel, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin. Motion Hearing set for 5/9/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 4/18/2019. Replies due by 4/25/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Appendix re Environmental Harms, # 3 Appendix re TFF Harms, # 4 Request for Judicial Notice and Exhibits 1-50, # 5 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 4/8/2019) (Entered: 04/08/2019)	April 8, 2019	April 8, 2019 RECAP
60	MOTION to Shorten Time to Hear Plaintiff States' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by State of California. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of Lee I. Sherman, # 3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 4/8/2019) (Entered: 04/08/2019) 1 Proposed Order View on RECAP 2 Declaration of Lee I. Sherman View on RECAP 3 Certificate/Proof of Service View on RECAP	April 8, 2019	April 8, 2019 RECAP
61	CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that counsel must re-notice not re- file the 59 motion for preliminary injunction. Hearing date of May 9, 2019, is vacated. Response is due April 22nd and reply is due April 29th. Counsel is directed to check the Court's scheduling notes before re-noticing the motion for a new hearing date. May 9th was not the Court's next available hearing date when this motion was e-filed. If the motion to shorten time is granted, the Court will advance the briefing and/or the hearing date. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019) (Entered: 04/09/2019)	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 PACER
	~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 PACER
	Clerk's Notice	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 PACER
	Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 PACER
62	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 56 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Taylor, Abigail. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019) (Entered: 04/09/2019)	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 RECAP
63	ORDER by Hon Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. SETTING the following briefing and hearing schedule for Plaintiffs' 59 Motion for Preliminary Injunction: responses are due by April 25, 2019; replies are due by May 2, 2019; a hearing is scheduled for May 17, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiffs' 60 Motion to Shorten Time is DENIED AS MOOT in light of this order. Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to serve Defendants with this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019) (Entered: 04/09/2019)	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 PACER
	Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 59 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, See Docket No. 63 : Responses due by 4/25/2019; Replies due by 5/2/2019; and Motion Hearing set for 5/17/2019 10:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019)	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 PACER
64	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by State of California re [ECF Doc. 63] (Ochoa, Edward) (Filed on 4/10/2019) Modified on 4/11/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/10/2019)	April 10, 2019	April 10, 2019 RECAP
	Order on Motion to Shorten Time	April 10, 2019	April 10, 2019 PACER
	Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings	April 10, 2019	April 10, 2019 PACER
65	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by State of California re 47 Amended Complaint,, (Zahradka, James) (Filed on 4/10/2019) (Entered: 04/10/2019)	April 10, 2019	April 10, 2019 RECAP
66	NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Irwin Warden on behalf of Defendants (Warden, Andrew) (Filed on 4/10/2019) (Entered: 04/10/2019)	April 10, 2019	April 10, 2019 RECAP
67	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Order Extending Page Limits For Preliminary Injunction Briefs, Staying Defendants' Response to the Amended Complaints, and Staying Initial Case Management Activity filed by Department of Defense, David Bernhardt, Mark T. Esper, Steven T. Mnuchin, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Patrick M. Shanahan, Richard V. Spencer, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States of America, Heather Wilson, and all Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Warden, Andrew) (Filed on 4/10/2019) Modified on 4/11/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/10/2019) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER	April 10, 2019	April 10, 2019 RECAP
68	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (Docket Nos. 67 in case 4:19-cv-00872-HSG and 42 in case 4:19-cv-00892-HSG) Stipulation For Order Extending Page Limits For Preliminary Injunction Briefs, Staying Defendants' Response to the Amended Complaints, and Staying Initial Case Management Activity. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2019) (Entered: 04/11/2019)	April 11, 2019	April 11, 2019 RECAP
69	First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13252197.) filed by State of New Jersey. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Good Standing)(Feigenbaum, Jeremy) (Filed on 4/11/2019) (Entered: 04/11/2019)	April 11, 2019	April 11, 2019 PACER
70	NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas N. Letter (Letter, Douglas) (Filed on 4/12/2019) (Entered: 04/12/2019)	April 12, 2019	April 12, 2019 PACER
71	Consent MOTION to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by United States House of Representatives. Responses due by 4/26/2019. Replies due by 5/3/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Amicus Brief)(Letter, Douglas) (Filed on 4/12/2019) (Entered: 04/12/2019) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER 2 Exhibit Amicus Brief View on RECAP	April 12, 2019	April 12, 2019 Clearinghouse
72	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 71 Consent Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief. Houses counsel is directed to file the amicus curiae brief on the docket in this matter. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2019) (Entered: 04/15/2019)	April 15, 2019	April 15, 2019 RECAP
73	Brief of Amicus Curiae filed byUnited States House of Representatives. (Letter, Douglas) (Filed on 4/15/2019) (Entered: 04/15/2019)	April 15, 2019	April 15, 2019 RECAP
74	Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for Relief from Automatic Referral to the ADR Multi-Option Program re 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, filed by State of California and all Defendants. Responses due by 4/23/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 4/19/2019) Modified on 4/22/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/19/2019)	April 19, 2019	April 19, 2019 PACER
	Electronic Filing Error	April 22, 2019	April 22, 2019 PACER
	Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Document also listed case number 4:19-cv-892-HSG. If it is intended to be applied to the other case number, please e-file in that case also. If the document is not applicable to that case, DO NOT include that case number on the document. [err102] Re: 74 Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO THE ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM re 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, filed by State of California (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019)	April 22, 2019	April 22, 2019 PACER
75	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 69 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Feigenbaum, Jeremy. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019) (Entered: 04/22/2019)	April 22, 2019	April 22, 2019 RECAP
76	ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (Docket Nos. 74 in case 4:19-cv-00872-HSG and 48 in case 4:19-cv-00892-HSG) Joint Administrative Motion for Relief from Automatic Referral to the ADR Multi-Option Program. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019) (Entered: 04/22/2019)	April 22, 2019	April 22, 2019 RECAP
77	NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Evans (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/24/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 RECAP
78	RE-FILED AS DOCKET NO. 85 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by David W. Evans on behalf of John Bellinger, III, Richard Bernstein, Peter Keisler, Carter Phillips, Christopher Shays, Stanley Twardy, Christine Todd Whitman. (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/26/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 PACER
79	RE-FILED AS DOCKET NO. 86 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by David W. Evans on behalf of John Bellinger, III, Richard Bernstein, Peter Keisler, Carter Phillips, Christopher Shays, Stanley Twardy, Christine Todd Whitman. (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/26/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 PACER
80	RE-FILED AS DOCKET NO. 88 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by David W. Evans on behalf of John Bellinger, III, Richard Bernstein, Peter Keisler, Carter Phillips, Christopher Shays, Stanley Twardy, Christine Todd Whitman. (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/26/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 PACER
81	*DISREGARD, RE-FILED AS DOCKET NO. 84 * MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Consent Motion For Leave filed by John Bellinger, III, Richard Bernstein, Peter Keisler, Carter Phillips, Christopher Shays, Stanley Twardy, Christine Todd Whitman. Motion Hearing set for 5/17/2019 10:00 AM before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 5/7/2019. Replies due by 5/14/2019. (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/24/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 PACER
82	DISREGARD, RE-FILED AS DOCKET NO. 84 * EXHIBITS re 81 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Consent Motion For Leave Amicus Memorandum In Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prelimary Injunction filed byJohn Bellinger, III, Richard Bernstein, Peter Keisler, Carter Phillips, Christopher Shays, Stanley Twardy, Christine Todd Whitman. (Related document(s) 81 ) (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/24/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 RECAP
83	*DISREGARD, RE-FILED AS DOCKET NO. 84 * Proposed Order re 81 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Consent Motion For Leave Proposed Order Granting Consent Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of Christopher Shays, et al. by John Bellinger, III, Richard Bernstein, Peter Keisler, Carter Phillips, Christopher Shays, Stanley Twardy, Christine Todd Whitman. (Evans, David) (Filed on 4/23/2019) Modified on 4/24/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/23/2019)	April 23, 2019	April 23, 2019 RECAP
	Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]. Correct Event is "Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice." Event can be found under Civil Events > Motions a nd Related Filings > Motions - General > Pro Hac Vice. The attorney requesting to appear pro hac vice must also file their own Motion using their own ECF login .Please re-file in its entirety. Re: 78 Amicus Curiae Appearance filed by Stanley Twardy, Carter Phillips, Peter Keisler, Christine Todd Whitman, Richard Bernstein, Christopher Shays, John Bellinger, III, 80 Amicus Curiae Appearance filed by Stanley Twardy, Carter Phillips, Peter Keisler, Christine Todd Whitman, Richard Bernstein, Christopher Shays, John Bellinger, III, 79 Amicus Curiae Appearance filed by Stanley Twardy, Carter Phillips, Peter Keisler, Christine Todd Whitman, Richard Bernstein, Christopher Shays, John Bellinger, III. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2019)	April 24, 2019	April 24, 2019 PACER
	Electronic Filing Error	April 24, 2019	April 24, 2019 PACER

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 18, 2019

Closing Date: Aug. 2, 2023

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State of New York, State of Minnesota, State of Colorado, State of California, Dana Nessel, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of New Jersey, State of Delaware, State of Nevada, State of Hawaii, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin, Commonwealth of Virginia, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Sierra Club, and the Southwest Border Communities Coalition

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU National (all projects)

ACLU Affiliates (any)

ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project

ACLU of Northern California

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants