Case: Isby-Israel v. Wynn

2:12-cv-00116 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: May 15, 2012

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 15, 2020, the plaintiffs, inmates at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, filed a complaint pro se in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, claiming that their indefinite solitary detention in the Secure Housing Unit (SHU) violated their rights. They sued the Indiana Department of Corrections (IDOC), which runs the facility, under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201. They sought declaratory judgment, a permanent injunction, a temporary r…

On May 15, 2020, the plaintiffs, inmates at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, filed a complaint pro se in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, claiming that their indefinite solitary detention in the Secure Housing Unit (SHU) violated their rights. They sued the Indiana Department of Corrections (IDOC), which runs the facility, under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201. They sought declaratory judgment, a permanent injunction, a temporary restraining order, damages, and costs.

Specifically, they alleged that the defendants placed them in the SHU for over five years without committing an identifiable infraction, and stayed in the facility for indefinite periods. As a result, they claimed that they were denied access to the facility's exercise yard and law library, had their mail searched, and were denied in-person visitation with their families. In addition, they alleged that the guards at the facility hindered their ability to make this claim by forcing them into a burdensome grievance process that they claimed they worked within. They alleged that this led to intense emotional distress. They claimed that this treatment violated the Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection and substantive and procedural due process clause. In addition, the defendants invoked the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), saying that their treatment violated the basic rights laid out in these treaties.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on July 5. They added a First Amendment violation due to the guards' refusal to let the plaintiffs discuss their case or make their claims in court and a Sixth Amendment violation blocking access to legal counsel and the courts. After receipt of this amended complaint, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson issued an order dismissing parts of the complaint without prejudice on September 10, 2012 (2012 WL 3966363, S.D.Ind.). She dismissed the claims relating to the grievance process, saying that the inmates' access to the process fulfilled the requirements for due process, and the international law claims, since treaty law alone does not create a cause of action in the United States. She also removed the extra plaintiffs from the suit. She allowed the Eighth Amendment and substantive due process claims related to indefinite detention to continue. The plaintiff submitted a statement of revised complaints reflecting the Judge's statement on September 24; this was treated as the complaint going forward.

The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff's due process claims on September 23, 2014. After discovery, the plaintiff's disciplinary history showed a pattern of violent behavior and non-cooperation with prison staff, which Judge Magnus-Stinson showed to be sufficient to justify his stay in SHU in an entry granting summary judgment on the issue on June 24, 2014 (2014 WL 2866197, S.D.Ind.). Discovery also demonstrated that the facility regularly conducted administrative reviews every 30 days and reviews where the plaintiff could state his case every 90 days. Judge Magnus-Stinson said that this was more than the due process clause requires of inmates. The defendants did not seek summary judgment on the Eighth Amendment claim, and asked the plaintiff to show cause that the claim had not been abandoned, which he did on August 11, 2014.

The defendants never filed another summary judgment motion, and a bench trial on the Eighth Amendment issue occurred in July 2015. The plaintiff was now represented by counsel. On September 25, 2015 (2015 WL 5672702, S.D.Ind.), Judge Magnus-Stinson ruled in the defendants' favor, saying that, while she was concerned about the length of time the plaintiff was in solitary confinement, which now totaled over eight years, he has regularly been given avenues to get out of solitary confinement and chose not to take them. In addition, she ruled that the lighting, access to food and clothing, and communication with outside counsel did not violate the Eighth Amendment. The plaintiff moved to appeal on October 15, 2015.

On February 6, 2017, the defendants in the original trial moved to dismiss the appeal, noting that one of the plaintiff's separate appeals surrounding a refusal to provide him with Kosher meals was dismissed on February 3 and the facts in that case were nearly identical to this one. For the appeal, the plaintiff retained private counsel. In an opinion dated May 10, 2017 (856 F.3d 508, 7th Cir.), an appeals panel composed of Judges Diane Wood, Joel Flaum, and William Conley upheld the District Court's decision on the Eighth Amendment claim, reiterating Judge Magnus-Stinson's reasoning. However, the panel reversed and remanded Judge Magnus-Stinson's grant of summary judgment on the due process claim, noting that for a stay this long in the SHU, more process may be needed than brief statements on the outcomes of 30-day reviews.

Upon remand, a bench hearing with Judge Magnus-Stinson was set for September 24, 2018. On December 19, 2018, Judge Magnus-Stinson released an opinion ruling that the defendants violated the plaintiff's due process rights because the periodic reviews of his continued detention in SHU were "perfunctory" and continued to punish him for acts years ago instead of providing new offenses each time. She also noted a discrepancy in previous statements from the defendants; initially, during summary judgment motions, she was told that 30-day reviews are sufficient due process, but, during this hearing, the defendants claimed that the real reviews were the 90-day ones, which, theoretically, would allow the 30-day reviews to be surface-level. Judge Magnus-Stinson granted $314,000 in compensatory damages and a total of $22,500 in punitive damages spread across multiple defendant-employees in the IDOC.

In addition, she granted the plaintiff's claim of injunctive relief and directed the defendants to draw up a plan for the plaintiff's release from SHU; when created, the plaintiff would have 14 days to contest it. On January 4, 2019, the defendants provided the plan, which would move the plaintiff to a general population cell immediately but mandated that the plaintiff participate in a SHU release program for permanent integration into general population. The plaintiff filed a motion contesting this plan two weeks later, saying that the program could extend indefinitely based on assessments of his behavior, and he hoped a more expeditious SHU release plan could be found. On March 4, 2019, Judge Magnus-Stinson approved the defendant's plan, since it immediately moved him out of SHU, the point of the initial injunction.

This closed the case in District Court. However, the defendants appealed the final decision to circuit court on April 2, 2019. All proceedings in the case were stayed on March 20, 2020, with the circuit court asking for an update on the status of mediation by May 20, 2020. No update has been filed, likely due to COVID concerns; the case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Ellen Aldin (5/22/2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attrorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4958366/parties/isby-israel-v-lemmon/


Judge(s)

Dinsmore, Mark. J. (Indiana)

Flaum, Joel Martin (Illinois)

Magnus-Stinson, Jane Elizabeth (Indiana)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Hill, Curtis T. Jr. (Indiana)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Arthur, David A. (Indiana)

Other Attorney(s)

Active

Active

Active

Judge(s)

Dinsmore, Mark. J. (Indiana)

Flaum, Joel Martin (Illinois)

Magnus-Stinson, Jane Elizabeth (Indiana)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Hill, Curtis T. Jr. (Indiana)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Arthur, David A. (Indiana)

Other Attorney(s)

Kelley, Daniel R. (Indiana)

Kile-Maxwell, Emily A. (Indiana)

Rauch, Jason (Indiana)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:12-cv-00116

Docket

Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

Docket
1

2:12-cv-01116

Complaint

Isby-Israel v. Lemmon

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

Complaint

2:12-cv-00116

Entry Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Further Proceedings

Isby-Israel v. Lemmon

2012 WL 3966363

Sept. 10, 2012

Sept. 10, 2012

Order/Opinion
16

2:12-cv-00116

Plaintiff's Statement of Remaining Claims

Isby-Israel v. Lemmon

Sept. 24, 2012

Sept. 24, 2012

Complaint
65

2:12-cv-00116

Entry Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Further Proceedings

2014 WL 2866197

June 24, 2014

June 24, 2014

Order/Opinion
135

2:12-cv-00116

Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law

Isby-Israel v. Lemmon

2015 WL 5672702

Sept. 25, 2015

Sept. 25, 2015

Order/Opinion
856 F.3d 508

15-03334

Opinion

Isby v. Brown

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

856 F.3d 508

May 10, 2017

May 10, 2017

Order/Opinion
274

2:12-cv-00116

Findings and Order

Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Order/Opinion
279

2:12-cv-00116

Submission of Proposed Plan for Removal from Restrictive Status Housing

Jan. 4, 2019

Jan. 4, 2019

Internal memorandum
293

2:12-cv-00116

Entry Approving Proposed Plan for Injunctive Relief and Retaining Jurisdiction Over Action

March 4, 2019

March 4, 2019

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4958366/isby-israel-v-lemmon/

Last updated Aug. 8, 2022, 3:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN, filed by AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Cover letter)(MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

1 Cover letter for case

View on PACER

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

PACER
2

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

PACER
3

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

PACER
4

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

PACER
5

REQUEST (Plaintiff's First) for Production of Documents, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL.(MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

PACER
6

REQUEST (Plaintiff's First) for Admissions, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL.(MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

PACER
7

MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MSD) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

May 16, 2012

May 16, 2012

PACER
8

DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (JKS) (Entered: 05/24/2012)

May 23, 2012

May 23, 2012

PACER
9

CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (JKS) (Entered: 05/24/2012)

May 23, 2012

May 23, 2012

PACER
10

Entry Discussing Selected Matters - granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/13/2012. (RSF) (Entered: 06/13/2012)

June 13, 2012

June 13, 2012

RECAP
11

AMENDED COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN, filed by AARON ISBY-ISRAEL.(JKS) (Entered: 07/05/2012)

July 5, 2012

July 5, 2012

PACER
12

Entry Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The 26-page amended complaint is subject to the screening requirement of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915A(b). Any claims thought to be brought by plaintiff Aaron Isby-Israel on behalf of other inmates are dismissed without prejudice. The claim that the defendants interfered with the grievance process in order to prevent the plaintiff from filing a lawsuit is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Any claims based on international law are dismissed. The plaintiff shall have through October 1, 2012, in which to file a statement of remaining claims. The statement of remaining claims should identify the circumstances associated with the alleged violation of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and Due Process rights and for each such alleged violation, identify what role any of the defendants played in personally causing the alleged violation. If the plaintiff intended to advance additional claims he should restate such claims in his statement of remaining claims. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/10/2012.(RSF) Modified on 9/11/2012 (RSF). (Entered: 09/11/2012)

Sept. 10, 2012

Sept. 10, 2012

RECAP
13

**REDOCKETED AS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT - SEE DOCKET ENTRY 16 ** RESPONSE / Statement of Remaining Claims re 12 Entry Directing Further Proceedings, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (JKS) Modified on 11/15/2012 (RSF). (Entered: 09/25/2012)

Sept. 24, 2012

Sept. 24, 2012

PACER
16

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by AARON ISBY-ISRAEL.(RSF) (Entered: 11/15/2012)

Sept. 24, 2012

Sept. 24, 2012

PACER
14

Entry Discussing Remaining Claims And Directing Further Proceedings - The statement of remaining claims filed on September 24, 2012, is understood to be the operative pleading in this action. The clerk is directed to redocket that statement 13 as the second amended complaint. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants Bruce Lemmon, James Wynn, Stanley Knight, Richard Brown, Jack Hendrix, Jerry Snyder, Beverly Gilmore, Julie Snider and Dusty Russell in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the second amended complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (See Entry.) Copies mailed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/15/2012.(RSF) (Entered: 11/15/2012)

Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

PACER
15

NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, upon 1) Bruce Lemmon, 2) James Wynn, 3) Stanley Knight, 4) Richard Brown, 5) Jack Hendrix, 6) Jerry Snyder, 7) Beverly Gilmore, 8) Julie Snider and 9) Dusty Russell. (RSF) (Entered: 11/15/2012)

Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

PACER
17

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed JERRY SNYDER waiver sent on 11/15/2012, signed on 11/20/12. (RSF) (Entered: 12/06/2012)

Dec. 6, 2012

Dec. 6, 2012

PACER
18

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed BEVERLY GILMORE waiver sent on 11/15/2012, signed on 11/20/12. (RSF) (Entered: 12/06/2012)

Dec. 6, 2012

Dec. 6, 2012

PACER
19

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed JULIE SNIDER waiver sent on 11/15/2012, signed on 11/20/12. (RSF) (Entered: 12/06/2012)

Dec. 6, 2012

Dec. 6, 2012

PACER
20

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed RICHARD BROWN waiver sent on 11/15/2012, signed on 12/4/12. (RSF) (Entered: 12/06/2012)

Dec. 6, 2012

Dec. 6, 2012

PACER
21

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed DUSTY RUSSELL waiver sent on 11/15/2012, signed on 11/26/12. (RSF) (Entered: 12/06/2012)

Dec. 6, 2012

Dec. 6, 2012

PACER
22

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed BRUCE LEMMON waiver sent on 11/15/2012, signed on 12/11/12. (RSF) (Entered: 12/14/2012)

Dec. 14, 2012

Dec. 14, 2012

PACER
23

NOTICE of Appearance by Grant E. Helms on behalf of Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER. (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 01/14/2013)

Jan. 14, 2013

Jan. 14, 2013

PACER
24

First MOTION for Extension of Time to February 11, 2013, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Mot. for Initial Extension of Time)(Helms, Grant) (Entered: 01/14/2013)

1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Mot. for Initial Extension of T

View on PACER

Jan. 14, 2013

Jan. 14, 2013

PACER
25

NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Arthur on behalf of Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER. (Arthur, David) (Entered: 01/14/2013)

Jan. 14, 2013

Jan. 14, 2013

PACER
26

ORDER granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 2/11/2013. (copy to plaintiff via US Mail) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/15/2013. (SMD) (Entered: 01/15/2013)

Jan. 15, 2013

Jan. 15, 2013

PACER
27

Brief / SUPPLEMENTAL Complaint, filed by AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (JKS) (Entered: 01/29/2013)

Jan. 28, 2013

Jan. 28, 2013

PACER
28

Defendants' ANSWER to 16 Amended Complaint And Affirmative Defenses, filed by RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER.(Helms, Grant) (Entered: 02/11/2013)

Feb. 11, 2013

Feb. 11, 2013

PACER
29

MOTION to Strike Supplemental Complaint, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER. (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 02/11/2013)

Feb. 11, 2013

Feb. 11, 2013

PACER
30

RESPONSE in Opposition re 29 MOTION to Strike Supplemental Complaint, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (JKS) (Entered: 02/21/2013)

Feb. 21, 2013

Feb. 21, 2013

PACER
31

Entry Discussing Motion to Strike Supplemental Complaint - The defendants' motion to strike supplemental complaint 29 is granted. The operative pleading in this action remains the "second amended complaint" filed on September 24, 2012. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/27/2013. (RSF) (Entered: 03/27/2013)

March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

PACER
32

Entry Directing Further Proceedings - The defendants shall have through April 29, 2013, in which to either 1) file a dispositive motion in support of their affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit, or 2) withdraw that affirmative defense. If such a motion is filed, the plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days in which to respond. The defendants shall then have fifteen (15) days in which to reply. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/27/2013.(RSF) (Entered: 03/27/2013)

March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

PACER
33

RESPONSE / Objection to the Court's 31 Order on Motion to Strike Supplemental Complaint, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(JKS) (Entered: 04/10/2013)

1 Envelope

View on PACER

April 9, 2013

April 9, 2013

PACER
34

Entry Directing Re-Issuance of Process - The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to re-issue and serve process on defendants James Wynn, Stanley Knight, and Jack Hendrix in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the second amended complaint (docket 16), applicable forms and this Entry. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/10/2013.(RSF) (Entered: 04/10/2013)

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

PACER
35

SECOND NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, upon 1) James Wynn, 2) Stanley Knight, and 3) Jack Hendrix. (RSF) Modified on 4/10/2013 (RSF). (Entered: 04/10/2013)

April 10, 2013

April 10, 2013

PACER
36

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed JACK HENDRIX waiver sent on 4/10/2013, signed on 4/12/13. (RSF) (Entered: 04/16/2013)

April 16, 2013

April 16, 2013

PACER
38

MOTION For Relief From Order of Sua Sponte Dismissal and Improper Substitution of Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(JKS) (Entered: 04/22/2013)

1 Envelope

View on PACER

April 19, 2013

April 19, 2013

PACER
37

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed - STANLEY KNIGHT waiver sent on 4/10/2013, signed on 4/17/13. (RSF) (Entered: 04/22/2013)

April 22, 2013

April 22, 2013

PACER
39

NOTICE of Appearance by Grant E. Helms on behalf of Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 04/29/2013)

April 29, 2013

April 29, 2013

PACER
40

NOTICE of Withdrawal of Exhaustion Defense, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 04/29/2013)

April 29, 2013

April 29, 2013

PACER
41

Entry Concerning Selected Matters - The plaintiff's request to vacate the ruling of March 27, 2013 [Dkt. 33], striking the supplemental complaint, is denied. Plaintiff's "motion for relief from order of sua sponte dismissal and improper substitution of amended complaint" [Dkt. 38] is denied. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/22/2013. (RSF) (Entered: 05/22/2013)

May 22, 2013

May 22, 2013

RECAP
42

ENTRY LIFTING PARTIAL STAY AND SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE - The defendants have withdrawn their affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The partial stay imposed on March 27, 2013, is lifted. Discovery due by 7/26/2013. (See Entry for additional dates and information.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/22/2013.(RSF) (Entered: 05/22/2013)

May 22, 2013

May 22, 2013

PACER
43

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, filed by Defendants STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Helms, Grant) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 14, 2013

June 14, 2013

PACER
44

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 43 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, filed by Defendants STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON. (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

June 14, 2013

June 14, 2013

PACER
45

MOTION to Stay Discovery, filed by Defendants STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Helms, Grant) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 14, 2013

June 14, 2013

PACER
46

Entry Concerning Selected Matters - The motion to stay discovery filed by defendants Lemmon and Knight [dkt. 45] is granted to the extent that discovery is stayed as to them until a ruling is made on the motion to dismiss. The plaintiff shall have through July 15, 2013, in which to respond to the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Lemmon and Knight. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/20/2013. (RSF) (Entered: 06/20/2013)

June 20, 2013

June 20, 2013

PACER
47

MOTION for Clarification, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(JD) (Entered: 06/24/2013)

1 Envelope

View on PACER

June 21, 2013

June 21, 2013

PACER
48

Entry Concerning Objection to E-Filing Program - The plaintiff's motion for clarification [dkt. 47] is granted to the extent that the Court has confirmed that plaintiff's participation in the E-Filing Program is mandatory and is denied to the extent that his objection to the E-Filing Program is overruled. Additionally, the Court finds nothing in the plaintiff's objection that would support an exception to his participation. The clerk shall also docket this Entry in 1:13-mc-0056-RLY. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2013. (RSF) (Entered: 06/26/2013)

June 26, 2013

June 26, 2013

PACER
49

MOTION for Leave to File AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint, # 2 Envelope)(JKS) (Entered: 06/27/2013)

1 Amended Complaint

View on PACER

2 Envelope

View on PACER

June 26, 2013

June 26, 2013

PACER
50

Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Motion for Leave and Amended Complaint, filed by AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. Copy/Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (JKS) (Entered: 06/27/2013)

1 Envelope

View on PACER

June 26, 2013

June 26, 2013

PACER
51

Entry Concerning Selected Matters - The unopposed motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by defendants Lemmon and Knight [dkt. 43] is granted for the reasons set forth in the motion. The plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint [dkt. 49] is denied. The plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint [dkt. 49] is denied. The deadline to file dispositive motions is extended through September 23, 2013. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/30/2013. (RSF) (Entered: 07/31/2013)

July 30, 2013

July 30, 2013

PACER
52

MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Beverley Gilmore, # 2 OIS Conduct Summary)(Helms, Grant) (Entered: 09/23/2013)

1 Affidavit Beverley Gilmore

View on PACER

2 OIS Conduct Summary

View on PACER

Sept. 23, 2013

Sept. 23, 2013

PACER
53

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 09/23/2013)

Sept. 23, 2013

Sept. 23, 2013

PACER
54

NOTICE of LR 56-1 Summary Judgment Practice, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 09/23/2013)

Sept. 23, 2013

Sept. 23, 2013

PACER
55

Statement of Disputed and Undisputed Material Facts re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL c/s. (MAC) (Entered: 10/11/2013)

Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

PACER
56

RESPONSE (Motion) in Opposition re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL c/s. (MAC) (Entered: 10/11/2013)

Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

PACER
57

MEMORANDUM of Law in support of RESPONSE in Opposition re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL c/s. (MAC) (Entered: 10/11/2013)

Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

PACER
58

AFFIDAVIT in Support of Response in Opposition to Motion re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(MAC) (Entered: 10/11/2013)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

PACER
59

REPLY in Support of Motion re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Helms, Grant) (Entered: 10/24/2013)

Oct. 24, 2013

Oct. 24, 2013

PACER
60

Surreply c/s re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (DW) (Entered: 10/31/2013)

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

PACER
61

MOTION to Disqualify Presiding Judge c/s, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (DW) (Entered: 11/07/2013)

Nov. 7, 2013

Nov. 7, 2013

PACER
62

ENTRY - denying 61 Motion to disqualify judge because there is no basis for recusal from this case. The clerk shall include a copy of the docket sheet with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. The docket reflects that the plaintiff's surreply was filed on October 31, 2013. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/14/2013. (RSF) (Entered: 11/14/2013)

Nov. 14, 2013

Nov. 14, 2013

PACER
63

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Helms, Grant) (Entered: 05/16/2014)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

May 16, 2014

May 16, 2014

PACER
64

ORDER granting 63 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney Grant E. Helms withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/19/2014. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (NMT) (Entered: 05/19/2014)

May 19, 2014

May 19, 2014

PACER
65

Entry Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Further Proceedings - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff's due process claim [dkt. 52] is granted. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. This ruling leaves pending the Eighth Amendment claim. The parties shall have through July 23, 2014, in which to propose a schedule for resolving this matter, whether by settlement, trial or further dispositive motion. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/24/2014. (RSF) (Entered: 06/24/2014)

June 24, 2014

June 24, 2014

RECAP
66

ENTRY DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE - In the Entry of June 24, 2014, the parties were given a July 23, 2014, deadline to propose a schedule for resolving the remaining Eighth Amendment claim in this action. Neither party has complied with this directive. The plaintiff shall have through August 19, 2014, in which to show cause why the Court should not dismiss the Eighth Amendment claim as having been abandoned. Failure to show cause will result in the dismissal of the action with prejudice and the issuance of final judgment consistent with the 65 Entry of June 24, 2014, granting summary judgment to the defendants on the plaintiff's due process claim. Copy mailed via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/5/2014. (ADH) (Entered: 08/05/2014)

Aug. 5, 2014

Aug. 5, 2014

PACER
67

MOTION to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (DW) (Entered: 08/12/2014)

Aug. 11, 2014

Aug. 11, 2014

PACER
68

MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit for Entry of Default)(DW) (Entered: 08/12/2014)

1 Affidavit for Entry of Default

View on PACER

Aug. 11, 2014

Aug. 11, 2014

PACER
69

MOTION to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (JKS) (Entered: 08/14/2014)

Aug. 14, 2014

Aug. 14, 2014

PACER
70

ENTRY - The plaintiff has responded to the order to show cause issued on August 5, 2014. The plaintiff has not abandoned his Eighth Amendment claim. The plaintiff's 67 motion to show cause is granted to the extent that the order to show cause is discharged. the plaintiff's 68 motion for entry of default is denied because the defendants are not in default. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/14/2014. (ADH) (Entered: 08/14/2014)

Aug. 14, 2014

Aug. 14, 2014

PACER
71

***PLEASE DISREGARD - DISCHARGED AT 74 *** ENTRY DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE AND COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER - In the Entry of June 24, 2014, the parties were given through July 23, 2014, in which to propose a schedule for resolving the remaining Eighth Amendment claim. No party responded to the Court's order. The plaintiff has explained that he received the Entry of June 24, 2014, after the deadline had passed. The defendants have neither complied with the Entry nor provided an explanation for that failure. The defendants shall now have through August 20, 2014, in which to 1) show cause why they have failed to comply with the June 24, 2014, Entry, and 2) comply with the directions in Part IV. B. of the June 24, 2014, Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/14/2014. (ADH) Modified on 8/22/2014 (RSF). (Entered: 08/14/2014)

Aug. 14, 2014

Aug. 14, 2014

PACER
72

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 69 Motion. The plaintiff's second motion to show cause, filed on August 14, 2014, is denied as duplicative of the motion he filed on August 11, 2014. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/14/2014. (ADH) (Entered: 08/15/2014)

Aug. 14, 2014

Aug. 14, 2014

PACER
73

RESPONSE to court's order to show cause and for proposed schedule for resolving this matter, re 71 Order to Show Cause, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Arthur, David) (Entered: 08/19/2014)

Aug. 19, 2014

Aug. 19, 2014

PACER
74

ENTRY - The defendants' order to show cause is discharged. The defendants shall have additional time, through October 7, 2014, in which to take the plaintiff's deposition. The defendants shall then have through November 26, 2014, in which to file an additional motion for summary judgment addressing the plaintiff's claim of deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution. No enlargements of these deadlines will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/22/2014.(RSF) (Entered: 08/22/2014)

Aug. 22, 2014

Aug. 22, 2014

PACER
75

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE DEFENDANTS, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. c/s. (ADH) (Main Document 75 replaced on 9/2/2014) (ADH). (Entered: 09/02/2014)

Aug. 28, 2014

Aug. 28, 2014

PACER
76

ENTRY - The defendants shall have through September 16, 2014, in which to respond to the plaintiff's motion to depose defendants. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/8/2014. (ADH) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

Sept. 8, 2014

Sept. 8, 2014

PACER
77

NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Arthur on behalf of Defendants JACK HENDRIX, JAMES WYNN. (Arthur, David) (Entered: 09/15/2014)

Sept. 15, 2014

Sept. 15, 2014

PACER
78

MOTION for Extension of Time to file answer to second amended complaint, filed by Defendants JACK HENDRIX, JAMES WYNN. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Answer, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Arthur, David) (Entered: 09/15/2014)

1 Exhibit Proposed Answer

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 15, 2014

Sept. 15, 2014

PACER
79

RESPONSE in Opposition re 75 MOTION to depose defendants, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN. (Arthur, David) (Entered: 09/15/2014)

Sept. 15, 2014

Sept. 15, 2014

PACER
80

ORDER granting Defendants' 78 Motion for Extension of Time. Wynn and Hendrix may file and serve a signed and dated version of the answer tendered with their motion within 10 days of the date of this order. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/16/2014. (AH) (Entered: 09/16/2014)

Sept. 16, 2014

Sept. 16, 2014

PACER
81

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Leave to Depose Defendants. The plaintiff has not explained why his written interrogatories were insufficient to obtain needed information or why he could not have served requests for admissions under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for leave to depose defendants is denied to the extent he seeks leave to take depositions without having to incur the costs. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/16/2014. (AH) (Main Document 81 replaced on 9/16/2014) (AH). (Entered: 09/16/2014)

Sept. 16, 2014

Sept. 16, 2014

RECAP
82

ANSWER to 16 Amended Complaint, filed by JACK HENDRIX, JAMES WYNN.(Arthur, David) (Entered: 09/16/2014)

Sept. 16, 2014

Sept. 16, 2014

PACER
83

MOTION in Opposition to Belated Answer of Defendants WYNN and HENDRIX, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. c/s. (AH) (Entered: 09/19/2014)

Sept. 19, 2014

Sept. 19, 2014

PACER
84

ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion in opposition to the belated answer filed by defendants Hendrix and Wynn seeks a default judgment. Although the Court acknowledges the plaintiff's objection to the late answer, no prejudice has resulted and the defendants are not in default. Accordingly, the plaintiff's objection is overruled and his motion for a default judgment [dkt. 83] is denied. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/23/2014. (RSF) (Entered: 09/23/2014)

Sept. 23, 2014

Sept. 23, 2014

PACER
85

MOTION to take Judicial Notice, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. c/s. (AH) (Entered: 09/23/2014)

Sept. 23, 2014

Sept. 23, 2014

PACER
86

ENTRY - denying 85 Motion to take judicial notice. It is not the plaintiff's nor the Court's decision to make as to whether defendant Gilmore shall remain represented by the Indiana Attorney General's office. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/24/2014. (RSF) (Entered: 09/24/2014)

Sept. 24, 2014

Sept. 24, 2014

PACER
87

MOTION to Appoint Counsel to take Deposition of the Defendants, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. c/s. (AH) (Entered: 10/09/2014)

Oct. 9, 2014

Oct. 9, 2014

PACER
88

ENTRY - denying 87 plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel to take depositions of the defendants, filed on October 9, 2014, has been considered. [Dkt. 87.] The plaintiff's earlier motion to take depositions without incurring the costs thereof was denied in the Entry of September 16, 2014. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/17/2014. (RSF) (Entered: 10/17/2014)

Oct. 17, 2014

Oct. 17, 2014

PACER
89

NOTICE that no summary judgment motion will be filed, filed by Defendants RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX, BRUCE LEMMON, DUSTY RUSSELL, JULIE SNIDER, JERRY SNYDER, JAMES WYNN (Arthur, David) (Entered: 11/26/2014)

Nov. 26, 2014

Nov. 26, 2014

PACER
90

TRIAL SETTING AND NOTICE OF FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/26/2015 at 9:00 AM in room #307, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Jury Trial set for 7/27/2015 at 9:00 AM in room #307, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Parties are further reminded to review the undersigned's Practices and Procedures, available on the internet at http://www.insd.uscourts.gov/sites/insd/files/Courtroom%20Procedures%20JMS.pdf.Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/7/2015.(RSF) Modified on 1/8/2015 - copy to plaintiff via US Mail (RSF). (Entered: 01/07/2015)

Jan. 7, 2015

Jan. 7, 2015

PACER
91

Entry Requesting Appearance of Counsel Pursuant to Local Rule 4-6 - Mr. Kenneth T. Roberts is requested to represent the plaintiff in the above action. This representation shall continue until final judgment is entered unless otherwise modified by written order. The Court requests that Mr. Roberts enter his appearance at his earliest convenience. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/14/2015. (AH) (Entered: 01/14/2015)

Jan. 14, 2015

Jan. 14, 2015

PACER
92

NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth T. Roberts on behalf of Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Roberts, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/21/2015)

Jan. 21, 2015

Jan. 21, 2015

PACER
93

NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Lenkowsky on behalf of Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (Lenkowsky, Adam) (Entered: 01/21/2015)

Jan. 21, 2015

Jan. 21, 2015

PACER
94

SCHEDULING ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 5/11/2015 at 09:00 AM in room #257, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. **SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS** Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/22/2015. (AH) (Entered: 01/23/2015)

Jan. 22, 2015

Jan. 22, 2015

PACER
95

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (RSF) (Entered: 03/11/2015)

March 10, 2015

March 10, 2015

PACER
96

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed Pro Se by Plaintiff AARON ISBY-ISRAEL. (AH) (Entered: 03/16/2015)

March 16, 2015

March 16, 2015

PACER
97

ORDER denying 95 Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and Injunction. The plaintiff's motion for emergency temporary restraining order and injunction [dkt. 95] is denied because he has not shown that he will experience irreparable harm without a preliminary injunction. Finally, the plaintiff is now represented by counsel, who was recruited at his request, and he should direct future concerns through counsel. Future pro se filings may be stricken. **SEE ORDER** Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/16/2015. (AH) Modified on 3/17/2015 (AH). (Entered: 03/17/2015)

March 16, 2015

March 16, 2015

PACER
98

ORDER denying 96 Motion for TRO and denying 96 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The plaintiff has shown no irreparable harm and he has not shown that he is likely to succeed on the merits. Such claims do not belong in this action. It is even doubtful whether the mail at issue constitutes legal mail. Petitioner is reminded he is represented by counsel and any future pro se filings may be stricken. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/17/2015. (AH) (Entered: 03/17/2015)

March 17, 2015

March 17, 2015

PACER
99

ORDER to Make Inmate Available - ORDERED to make Aaron Isby-Israel available to participate in a telephonic settlement conference at the time and date specified in this Order. Wabash Valley Correctional Facility has provided the call-in number to the Court. Inmate: Aaron Isby-Israel DOC # 892219 Date: May 11, 2015 Time: 9:00 a.m. [EST] Expected Duration of Court Proceeding: 3 hours. Copy sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 3/17/2015.(AH) (Entered: 03/18/2015)

March 17, 2015

March 17, 2015

PACER
100

**RESCINDED PER 107 ** SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/26/2015 at 09:00 AM in room #307, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. **SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DETAILS** Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/17/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(AH) Modified on 6/1/2015 (AH). (Entered: 04/17/2015)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 3

View on PACER

April 17, 2015

April 17, 2015

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Indiana

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Solitary confinement

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 15, 2012

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Inmate at Wabash Valley Correctional Facility held in a long-term solitary confinement unit.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Indiana Department of Corrections, State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Freedom of speech/association

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 336,500

Content of Injunction:

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Issues

Reproductive rights:

Fetus Identity

General:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Administrative segregation

Assault/abuse by staff

Bathing and hygiene

Classification / placement

Conditions of confinement

Disciplinary procedures

Disciplinary segregation

Food service / nutrition / hydration

Law library access

Mail

Recreation / Exercise

Sanitation / living conditions

Solitary confinement/Supermax (conditions or process)

Visiting

Type of Facility:

Government-run