Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Thank you!

DONATE

Case: Casa de Maryland v. Trump

8:19-cv-02715 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Sept. 16, 2019

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is one of several brought nationwide by States, counties, and nonprofit organizations challenging the Trump administration's revised, final public charge rule, which expands the types of programs that the federal government will consider in public charge determinations to now also include previously excluded health, nutrition, and housing programs. District court judges from across the country granted preliminary injunctions enjoining the government from implementing the public charge…

This case is one of several brought nationwide by States, counties, and nonprofit organizations challenging the Trump administration's revised, final public charge rule, which expands the types of programs that the federal government will consider in public charge determinations to now also include previously excluded health, nutrition, and housing programs. District court judges from across the country granted preliminary injunctions enjoining the government from implementing the public charge rule but after multiple Circuit Courts and the Supreme Court issued stays of these injunctions, the public charge rule was implemented by the government on February 24, 2020. On February 2, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order calling for DHS to review agency actions related to the implementation of the public charge rule. A little over a month later on March 9, 2021, DHS officially abandoned the rule.

Casa de Maryland and two of its Members Sue Over the Public Charge Rule

On September 16, 2019, Casa de Maryland, a nonprofit immigrant rights organization serving over 100,000 members, and two of its members filed this suit in the United States District Court For The District Of Maryland. The plaintiffs, represented by Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP), sued Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as President of the United States, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its acting secretary in his official capacity, and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and its acting secretary in his official capacity, under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The plaintiffs sought declaration that the Department of Homeland Security’s Final Rule (the Rule) violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, and the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment and an order setting it aside. The plaintiffs also sought injunctive relief enjoining the defendants from implementing and enforcing the Rule. The case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day and then immediately reassigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm.

On August 14, 2019, the DHS published a revised, final public charge rule, which defines personal circumstances that affect the ability of individuals and their families to successfully enter the U.S. or acquire legal permanent resident status (i.e., get a green card). The final rule increases the types of programs that the federal government will consider in public charge determinations to now also include previously excluded health, nutrition, and housing programs. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that if an immigration officer finds that a person seeking a visa is likely to become a public charge, that person is “inadmissible.” Thus, an immigrant who uses non-cash benefits such as food stamps or Medicaid, or is deemed likely to receive them in the future, may be found more likely to be a public charge and inadmissible for purposes of a visa or green card application. According to a New York Times article, the new standards would directly affect about 1.2 million applicants annually, primarily immigrants from Africa and Latin America. The rule was initially set to be implemented on October 15, 2019.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs asserted four claims for relief. First, the plaintiffs claimed that the Rule was not in accordance with the plain meaning of public charge in the INA and that defendants acted beyond their statutory authority. The plaintiffs further contended that the Rule is arbitrary and capricious because it "departs from over a century of prior practice without adequate explanation for this change in policy" and defendants' proffered rationales are "not supported by the evidence in the record, and a pretext to conceal the true motivation for the policy change." The plaintiffs also proclaimed that the Rule violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, arguing that it is so vague that affected persons will "struggle to know how to accord their conduct to avoid adverse immigration consequences." Lastly, the plaintiffs contend that because "defendants’ promulgation of the Public Charge Rule was motivated at least in part by the Trump Administration’s intent to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, and national origin," the Rule violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Moreover, the plaintiffs asserted that the Rule will cause them and their members harm by producing a chilling effect that discourages eligible members from utilizing public benefits and requiring Casa de Maryland to allocate significant resources to combat this chilling effect.

On the same day, the plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction, seeking a nationwide injunction enjoining the defendants from implementing or enforcing the rule or, at the least, delaying its implementation date. The plaintiffs argued that they are likely to win on the merits of their APA and Constitutional claims, that they will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, and that the balance of equities and public interest weigh in favor of an injunction. In support of their request for a nationwide injunction, the plaintiffs contended that a nationwide scope is appropriate in order to ensure uniformity in immigration enforcement and to provide plaintiffs with complete redress.

On September 19, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint and a corrected motion for preliminary injunction, making minor formatting and substantive changes to both documents.

In their opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction filed on October 1, 2019, the defendants argued that the "plaintiffs provide no basis for turning their abstract policy disagreement with the Executive Branch into a sweeping overhaul of core immigration law principles." The defendants asserted that the individual plaintiffs and Casa de Maryland did not establish standing and that the "plaintiffs’ claims are even more sweeping and aggressive than those of other litigants challenging the Rule."

The District Court Grants a Nationwide Preliminary Injunction

Following a hearing on October 10, 2019, Judge Grimm issued an opinion and order granting the plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction on October 14, 2019. The order enjoined the defendants from enforcing the Rule nationwide and postponed the implementation of the Rule pending the resolution of this case. Judge Grimm concluded that a nationwide injunction was appropriate given the plaintiffs' likelihood of success on the merits, the irreparable harm they would face absent a nationwide injunction, and the need to have a uniform immigration law. 414 F.Supp.3d 760.

The defendants filed a motion for stay of injunction pending appeal to the Fourth Circuit on October 25, 2019. Defendants argued that they are likely to succeed on appeal because the plaintiffs lacked standing, did not fall within the zone of interests of the relevant statute, and the Rule is fully consistent with the INA and the APA. Defendants also contended that, because they would be "forced to grant lawful permanent residence (“LPR”) status to aliens likely to become public charges at any time under the Rule," they would suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a stay as their interest in "ensuring that 'aliens be self-reliant'" would be affected.

On October 30, 2019, the defendants filed an appeal of the order for preliminary injunction to the Fourth Circuit. The appeal was docketed on November 4, 2019 (Docket No. 19-2222).

On November 14, 2019, Judge Grimm issued an order denying the defendants' motion for stay pending appeal. Judge Grimm concluded that the defendants did not make a strong showing that they were likely to succeed on their appeal, that they did not establish irreparable injury in the absence of a stay, and that the defendants offered no arguments addressing why a stay would be in the public's best interest. 2019 WL 7565389.

The Fourth Circuit Stays the Injunction Pending Appeal

The next day, the defendants filed a motion for stay of the preliminary injunction pending appeal, rehashing the main arguments from their motion to stay in the district court. On December 9, 2019, a Fourth Circuit panel issued an order granting the motion to stay the injunction pending appeal without issuing an opinion explaining their reasoning. Circuit Judges J. Harvie Wilkinson III and Paul Niemeyer voted to grant the motion and Circuit Judge Pamela Harris voted to deny the motion.

On December 20, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Fourth Circuit's order granting stay of the preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs argued that it was inappropriate for the panel to grant the motion, and threaten to upend the status quo, with limited briefing and without oral argument. The plaintiffs further contended that should the Fourth Circuit grant the stay, "DHS’s new rule would go into effect in all or most of the country before any appellate court rules on the merits of the preliminary injunctions—causing irreparable harm to Appellees and to noncitizens around the country."

The plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on January 3, 2020, maintaining the claims and arguments as the first amended complaint and adding the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore as a plaintiff. The plaintiffs asserted that the immigrant communities of Baltimore will be harmed by the chilling effects caused by the Rule.

On January 14, 2020, after the defendants filed a response in opposition, the Fourth Circuit denied the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration, again without issuing an opinion explaining its rationale.

The Supreme Court Stays All Nationwide Injunctions Enjoining Implementation of the Public Charge Rule

On January 27, 2020, the Supreme Court issued orders staying a nationwide injunction in State of New York v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security and an injunction for the State of Illinois in Cook County, Illinois v. Wolf. Following these decisions, the defendants indicated that the Rule would be implemented and enforced starting February 24, 2020.

Defendants Move to Dismiss

On May 27, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. Defendants asserted that the complaint should be dismissed in full "[i]n light of the Supreme Court’s repeated stays of injunction, the Ninth Circuit’s detailed opinion on the Rule’s legality," and because the Rule does not violate the due process or equal protection clauses.

The Fourth Circuit Reverses the Preliminary Injunction

On August 5, a split Fourth Circuit panel (Circuit Judges Harvie Wilkinson III, Paul Niemeyer, and Robert King) issued an order and opinion denying the plaintiffs' preliminary injunction. 971 F.3d 220. Writing for the majority, Judge Wilkinson held that Casa lacked standing; that the plaintiffs were unlikely to win on the merits of their claims because the Rule was a permissible interpretation of "public charge;" and that a nationwide injunction was an overly broad remedy.

Judge King dissented. Citing a decision of the Seventh Circuit two months prior (962 F.3d 208), he disagreed on all points. He held that plaintiffs did have standing; that the plaintiffs were likely to win on the merits because the Rule is not a permissible interpretation of "public charge" given the statute and history; and that a nationwide injunction was an appropriate remedy given the circumstances.

In light of this decision, back in the district court, Judge Grimm back issued an order on August 7, directing the parties to supplement their briefings on the pending motion to dismiss.

The Reversal is Stayed Pending a Rehearing en banc

On September 15, the Fourth Circuit's order was stayed pending ruling on a petition to rehear the case en banc. That petition was granted on December 3, 2020, and oral arguments are scheduled to begin in March 2021.

President Biden Issues Executive Order to Review the Public Charge Rule

On February 2, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order calling for DHS to review agency actions related to the implementation of the public charge rule. The parties began conferring to determine how this would impact the litigation.

On March 1, 2021, the District Court denied the government's motion to dismiss without prejudice, noting that the motion would be subject to reinstatement once the administration reviewed the rule.

The Rule is Officially Abandoned and Vacated

On March 9, 2021, DHS formally abandoned the rule. The government voluntarily dismissed its appeal to the Seventh Circuit, lifting the stay of the Northern District of Illinois' November 2, 2020 decision that vacates the Public Charge Final Rule nationwide (Cook County v. Wolf). That same day, at all parties' requests, the Supreme Court dismissed the pending petition for Cook County, as well as similar petitions for the Ninth (City and County of San Francisco v. USCIS) and Second (New York v. DHS) Circuits.

On March 11, the Fourth Circuit issued an order granting the government's voluntary dismissal of its appeal. That same day, eleven state attorneys general, led by Ken Paxton of Texas, moved to intervene as defendants. They also moved to reconsider the dismissal. They filed similar intervention motions in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, as well as an emergency application to the Supreme Court to intervene on behalf of the government and stay the judgment from Cook County.

The Fourth Circuit denied the motion to intervene, as well as the motion to reconsider, on March 18.

As of April 15, 2021, the case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Aaron Gurley (3/12/2020)

Jack Kanarek (4/15/2021)

Related Cases

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, District of Maryland (2019)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attrorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16200088/parties/casa-de-maryland-inc-v-biden/


Judge(s)

Grimm, Paul William (Maryland)

King, Robert Bruce (South Carolina)

Niemeyer, Paul Victor (Maryland)

Wilkinson, J. Harvie III (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Backer, Jonathan L. (District of Columbia)

Davis, Andre Maurice (Maryland)

Geltzer, Joshua A. (District of Columbia)

Lewis, Jane Hannah (Maryland)

Marshak, Amy (District of Columbia)

McCord, Mary B. (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Grimm, Paul William (Maryland)

King, Robert Bruce (South Carolina)

Niemeyer, Paul Victor (Maryland)

Wilkinson, J. Harvie III (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Backer, Jonathan L. (District of Columbia)

Davis, Andre Maurice (Maryland)

Geltzer, Joshua A. (District of Columbia)

Lewis, Jane Hannah (Maryland)

Marshak, Amy (District of Columbia)

McCord, Mary B. (District of Columbia)

Sangree, Suzanne (Maryland)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Kolsky, Joshua (District of Columbia)

Lynch, Jason C. (District of Columbia)

Other Attorney(s)

Escoriaza, Phillip A. (District of Columbia)

Frisina, Christopher J (District of Columbia)

Lawrence, Paul J. (Washington)

Olowski, Lew (Maryland)

Peterson, Alanna E. (Washington)

Sweeney, Maureen A. (Maryland)

Waters, Edward T. (District of Columbia)

Zycherman, Lisa Beth (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

8:19-cv-02715

Docket [PACER]

Casa De Maryland, Inc. v. Trump

Feb. 19, 2021

Feb. 19, 2021

Docket
1

8:19-cv-02715

Complaint

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

Complaint
65

8:19-cv-02715

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Casa De Maryland, Inc. v. Trump

Oct. 14, 2019

Oct. 14, 2019

Order/Opinion
79

8:19-cv-02715

Letter Order

Nov. 14, 2019

Nov. 14, 2019

Order/Opinion
93

8:19-cv-02715

Second Amended Complaint

Jan. 3, 2020

Jan. 3, 2020

Complaint
114

8:19-cv-02715

0:19-02222

Opinion

CASA de Maryland, Inc. v. Trump

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Aug. 5, 2020

Aug. 5, 2020

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16200088/casa-de-maryland-inc-v-biden/

Last updated Nov. 29, 2022, 3:20 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8234006.), filed by Angel Aguiluz, Casa De Maryland, Inc., Monica Camacho Perez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons President Trump, # 3 Summons Acting Sec'y McAleenan, # 4 Summons DHS, # 5 Summons Acting Dir. Cuccinelli, # 6 Summons USCIS)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons President Trump

View on PACER

3 Summons Acting Sec'y McAleenan

View on PACER

4 Summons DHS

View on PACER

5 Summons Acting Dir. Cuccinelli

View on PACER

6 Summons USCIS

View on PACER

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

RECAP
2

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Joshua A. Geltzer (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8234319.) by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa De Maryland, Inc.(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
3

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Amy L. Marshak (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8234506.) by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc.(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

RECAP
4

MOTION for Permission to Omit Individual Plaintiffs' Home Addresses from Caption by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
5

Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Casa de Maryland, Inc. (Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

RECAP
6

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Table of Factors)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

1 Exhibit A - Table of Factors

View on PACER

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

RECAP
7

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc.(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
8

QC NOTICE: 1 Complaint, filed by Casa de Maryland, Inc., Monica Camacho Perez, Angel Aguiluz was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Summons. Summons were only provided for the named Defendants. If the defendant is either an agency of the United States or an office or employee of the United States, you must also serve both the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland. To correct this problem, file Summons using the civil event Supplemental located under "Other Filings" and then "Other Documents". (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
9

Summons Issued 60 days as to Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
10

[FILED IN ERROR] NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day. Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. or counsel for Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2018-04, which can be downloaded here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 9/30/2019. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 9/16/2019 (dg3s, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
11

[FILED IN ERROR] Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 9/16/2019. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 9/16/2019 (dg3s, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
12

NOTICE by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. Declaration of Attorney for Plaintiffs Jonathan Backer (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Escobar Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Aguiluz Declaration, # 3 Exhibit Camacho Declaration, # 4 Exhibit Historians' Comment, # 5 Exhibit APHA Comment, # 6 Exhibit Child Care Law Center Comment, # 7 Exhibit UnidosUS Comment, # 8 Exhibit States Comment, # 9 Exhibit Cities Comment, # 10 Exhibit Legal Aid of DC Comment)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

1 Exhibit Escobar Declaration

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Aguiluz Declaration

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit Camacho Declaration

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit Historians' Comment

View on PACER

5 Exhibit APHA Comment

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Child Care Law Center Comment

View on PACER

7 Exhibit UnidosUS Comment

View on PACER

8 Exhibit States Comment

View on PACER

9 Exhibit Cities Comment

View on PACER

10 Exhibit Legal Aid of DC Comment

View on PACER

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
13

Supplemental to 1 Complaint, filed by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. Summons Attorney General of the United States (Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

RECAP
14

Supplemental to 1 Complaint, filed by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. Summons U.S. Attorney for D. Md. (Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
15

Summons Issued 60 days as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(dg3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
16

LETTER ORDER REGARDING THE FILING OF MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/16/2019. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

RECAP
17

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Mary B. McCord (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8236476.) by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc.(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/16/2019)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER

Case Reassigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk)

Sept. 16, 2019

Sept. 16, 2019

PACER
18

PAPERLESS ORDER notifying counsel that I would like to schedule a conference call regarding the briefing of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction 6, and I will do so as soon as Defense counsel enters an appearance. Should Plaintiffs' counsel communicate with Defense counsel before then, he should inform the Court and provide the Court with Defense counsel's contact information so that I can schedule the call. Unless otherwise ordered on the call, Plaintiffs' reply will be due within seven days of the filing of Defendants' response. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/17/2019. (lmys, Chambers) (Entered: 09/17/2019)

Sept. 17, 2019

Sept. 17, 2019

PACER
19

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Joshua Geltzer. Directing attorney Joshua Geltzer to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 9/17/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/17/2019)

Sept. 17, 2019

Sept. 17, 2019

PACER
20

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Amy Marshak. Directing attorney Amy Marshak to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 9/17/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/17/2019)

Sept. 17, 2019

Sept. 17, 2019

PACER
21

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 17 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Mary McCord. Directing attorney Mary McCord to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 9/17/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/17/2019)

Sept. 17, 2019

Sept. 17, 2019

PACER
22

Correspondence re: Camacho Declaration [12-3] (Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/18/2019)

Sept. 18, 2019

Sept. 18, 2019

PACER
23

Correspondence re: Defense Counsel's Contact Information (Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/18/2019)

Sept. 18, 2019

Sept. 18, 2019

PACER
24

PAPERLESS ORDER re 22 Correspondence re Camacho Declaration. In light of the correction included in Plaintiffs' letter, Plaintiffs are directed to please file amended versions of the complaint, motion for preliminary injunction and supporting memorandum, and declaration from Ms. Camacho. Counsel is reminded of Local Rule 103.6 regarding amended pleadings, including filing a redline and clean copy of the amended pleadings. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/18/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 09/18/2019)

Sept. 18, 2019

Sept. 18, 2019

PACER
25

PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE on Friday September 20, 2019 at 11:30am AND DIRECTING Plaintiff's counsel to initiate the call to chambers or circulate a conference call number to the parties. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/19/2019. (ats, Chambers) (Entered: 09/19/2019)

Sept. 19, 2019

Sept. 19, 2019

PACER
26

NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Kolsky on behalf of Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Kolsky, Joshua) (Entered: 09/19/2019)

Sept. 19, 2019

Sept. 19, 2019

PACER
27

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Angel Aguiluz, Casa de Maryland, Inc., Monica Camacho Perez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Redline Original Complaint)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/19/2019)

1 Exhibit Redline Original Complaint

View on PACER

Sept. 19, 2019

Sept. 19, 2019

PACER
28

Corrected MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Table of Factors)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/19/2019)

1 Exhibit A - Table of Factors

View on PACER

Sept. 19, 2019

Sept. 19, 2019

RECAP
29

Supplemental by Monica Camacho Perez re 12 Corrected Camacho Declaration (Backer, Jonathan) Modified on 9/20/2019 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 09/19/2019)

Sept. 19, 2019

Sept. 19, 2019

PACER
30

Telephone Conference held on 9/20/2019 before Judge Paul W. Grimm. (FTR-4B) (ss5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/20/2019)

Sept. 20, 2019

Sept. 20, 2019

PACER
31

PAPERLESS ORDER memorializing today's conference call with counsel. Defendants will file a response to Plaintiffs' Corrected Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum 28 by October 1, 2019. The response may be up to 45 pages, not including exhibits. Defendants will then file a reply by October 7, 2019. A hearing is scheduled on this motion for October 10, 2019 at 2:30 pm. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/20/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 09/20/2019)

Sept. 20, 2019

Sept. 20, 2019

PACER
32

NOTICE of Appearance by Edward T Waters on behalf of Deans, Chairs, Scholars, American Academy of Nursing, American Public Health Association (Waters, Edward) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
33

Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by American Academy of Nursing, American Public Health Association, Deans, Chairs, Scholars (Waters, Edward) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
34

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Phillip A. Escoriaza (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8248873.) by American Academy of Nursing, American Public Health Association, Deans, Chairs, Scholars(Waters, Edward) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
35

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Christopher J. Frisina (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8248892.) by American Academy of Nursing, American Public Health Association, Deans, Chairs, Scholars(Waters, Edward) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
36

MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by American Academy of Nursing, American Public Health Association, Deans, Chairs, Scholars (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Proposed Amici Brief, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Waters, Edward) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

1 Attachment Proposed Amici Brief

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
37

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 34 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Phillip Escoriaza. Directing attorney Phillip Escoriaza to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 9/23/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
38

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 35 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Christopher Frisina. Directing attorney Christopher Frisina to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 9/23/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Sept. 23, 2019

Sept. 23, 2019

PACER
39

MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief by Amici Anti-Domestic Violence and Assault Orgs (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Amicus Brief of Nonprofit Anti-Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Organizations)(Sweeney, Maureen) (Entered: 09/26/2019)

1 Attachment Amicus Brief of Nonprofit Anti-Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault O

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2019

Sept. 26, 2019

PACER
40

NOTICE of Appearance by Maureen A Sweeney on behalf of Amici Anti-Domestic Violence and Assault Orgs (Sweeney, Maureen) (Entered: 09/26/2019)

Sept. 26, 2019

Sept. 26, 2019

PACER
41

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Alanna E. Peterson (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8259479.) by Amici Anti-Domestic Violence and Assault Orgs(Sweeney, Maureen) (Entered: 09/26/2019)

Sept. 26, 2019

Sept. 26, 2019

PACER
42

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Paul J. Lawrence (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8259491.) by Amici Anti-Domestic Violence and Assault Orgs(Sweeney, Maureen) (Entered: 09/26/2019)

Sept. 26, 2019

Sept. 26, 2019

PACER
43

MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief by Health Law Advocates (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Amicus Brief)(Zycherman, Lisa) (Entered: 09/26/2019)

1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Amicus Brief

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2019

Sept. 26, 2019

PACER
44

NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Beth Zycherman on behalf of Health Law Advocates (Zycherman, Lisa) (Entered: 09/26/2019)

Sept. 26, 2019

Sept. 26, 2019

RECAP
45

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 36 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief by the Deans, Chairs, and Scholars; the American Public Health Association; and the American Academy of Nursing. The amicus brief is accepted as filed. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/27/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 09/27/2019)

Sept. 27, 2019

Sept. 27, 2019

PACER
46

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 39 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief by Nonprofit Antidomestic Violence and Sexual Assault Organizations. The amicus brief is accepted as filed. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/27/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 09/27/2019)

Sept. 27, 2019

Sept. 27, 2019

PACER
47

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 43 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief by Health Law Advocates. The amicus brief is accepted as filed. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/27/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 09/27/2019)

Sept. 27, 2019

Sept. 27, 2019

PACER
48

PAPERLESS ORDER ADVISING PARTIES THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING will be held on October 10, 2019 at 2:00pm at the Baltimore Courthouse, 101 W. Lombard Street. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/30/2019. (ats, Chambers) (Entered: 09/30/2019)

Sept. 30, 2019

Sept. 30, 2019

PACER
49

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 41 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Alanna E Peterson. Directing attorney Alanna E Peterson to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 10/1/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/01/2019)

Oct. 1, 2019

Oct. 1, 2019

PACER
50

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 42 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Paul Lawrence. Directing attorney Paul Lawrence to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 10/1/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/01/2019)

Oct. 1, 2019

Oct. 1, 2019

PACER
51

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. As discussed in the September 20, 2019 conference call with parties, this motion is granted. Defendants are also afforded 45 pages for their response to Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See 31 . Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/1/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 10/01/2019)

Oct. 1, 2019

Oct. 1, 2019

PACER
52

RESPONSE in Opposition re 28 Corrected MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum filed by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.(Kolsky, Joshua) (Entered: 10/01/2019)

Oct. 1, 2019

Oct. 1, 2019

RECAP
53

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting 4 Motion for Permission to Omit Individual Plaintiffs' Home Addresses from Caption. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/1/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/02/2019)

Oct. 1, 2019

Oct. 1, 2019

PACER
54

PAPERLESS ORDER regarding Motion for Preliminary Injunction Briefing and Hearing. Given the limited amount of time available for the Court to rule on the pending motion for preliminary injunction before the effective date of the proposed new public charge rule, the Plaintiffs' reply brief will be limited to 25 pages, exclusive of table of contents, citations, affidavits, or exhibits. This is five more pages than Local Rule 105.3 permits. With regard to further briefing in this case, the page limits in Local Rule 105.3 will apply unless a motion to exceed these limits is filed and granted in advance of the filing of a memorandum. Page extension motions filed with a memorandum that exceeds the page limits in the local rules will not be granted. Further, counsel are cautioned to restrict their use of overly long, multiple page, single spaced footnotes, which impermissibly extend the page limits allowed in the local rules. In addition, to assist counsel in focusing their presentations at the hearing scheduled for October 10, 2019, counsel should be prepared to focus on their strongest arguments with respect to the four elements that must exist before a preliminary injunction may be granted, and be prepared to identify by CM/ECF and page number the factual support for their positions. In addition, counsel will confer before the hearing in an effort to see whether they can agree to the language of an appropriately narrow injunction, in the event that the court determines that the issuance of a preliminary injunction is appropriate. If they cannot agree, Plaintiffs and Defendants each shall provide the court with the language of an injunction that they propose, without further argument or citation of authority accompanying the proposed language. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/3/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 10/03/2019)

Oct. 3, 2019

Oct. 3, 2019

PACER
55

Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by Lew Olowski on behalf of Immigration Reform Law Institute(Olowski, Lew) (Entered: 10/03/2019)

Oct. 3, 2019

Oct. 3, 2019

PACER
56

MOTION for Leave to File Brief As Amicus Curiae by Immigration Reform Law Institute (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Brief of Amicus Curiae Immigration Reform Law Institute, # 2 Attachment Corporate Disclosure Statement, # 3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Olowski, Lew) (Entered: 10/03/2019)

1 Attachment Brief of Amicus Curiae Immigration Reform Law Institute

View on PACER

2 Attachment Corporate Disclosure Statement

View on PACER

3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 3, 2019

Oct. 3, 2019

PACER
57

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 56 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief by Immigration Reform Law Institute. The amicus brief is accepted as filed. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/3/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 10/03/2019)

Oct. 3, 2019

Oct. 3, 2019

PACER
58

PAPERLESS ORDER advising that in preparing for the hearing on October 10, 2019 regarding the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, counsel should be prepared to identify their strongest argument in support of each of the substantive issues that must be resolved in order for the court to rule on the motion, the two or three cases on which they principally rely to support their position for each issue, and the specific ECF filing and page number of the factual support in the record for their positions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/7/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 10/07/2019)

Oct. 7, 2019

Oct. 7, 2019

PACER
59

REPLY to Response to Motion re 28 Corrected MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum filed by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc..(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/07/2019)

Oct. 7, 2019

Oct. 7, 2019

RECAP
60

NOTICE by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. re 28 Corrected MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum Letter to the Court (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction)(Marshak, Amy) (Entered: 10/09/2019)

1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injuncti

View on PACER

Oct. 9, 2019

Oct. 9, 2019

PACER
61

RESPONSE re 54 Order,,,,,,, filed by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.(Kolsky, Joshua) (Entered: 10/10/2019)

Oct. 10, 2019

Oct. 10, 2019

PACER
62

NOTICE by American Academy of Nursing, American Public Health Association, Deans, Chairs, Scholars of Attorney Withdrawal (Frisina, Christopher) (Entered: 10/10/2019)

Oct. 10, 2019

Oct. 10, 2019

PACER
63

Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 10/10/2019 re 28 Corrected MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum filed by Casa de Maryland, Inc., Monica Camacho Perez, Angel Aguiluz before Judge Paul W. Grimm.(Court Reporter: Douglas Zweizig - 3C) (bus, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/10/2019)

Oct. 10, 2019

Oct. 10, 2019

PACER
64

NOTICE by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc. re 28 Corrected MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Supplemental Authority (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Order in New York v. DHS, # 2 Attachment Opinion in New York v. DHS, # 3 Attachment Order in Make the Road NY v. Cuccinelli, # 4 Attachment Opinion in Make the Road NY v. Cuccinelli, # 5 Attachment Opinion and Order in Washington v. DHS, # 6 Attachment Opinion and Order in California v. DHS et al.)(Marshak, Amy) (Entered: 10/11/2019)

1 Attachment Order in New York v. DHS

View on PACER

2 Attachment Opinion in New York v. DHS

View on PACER

3 Attachment Order in Make the Road NY v. Cuccinelli

View on PACER

4 Attachment Opinion in Make the Road NY v. Cuccinelli

View on PACER

5 Attachment Opinion and Order in Washington v. DHS

View on PACER

6 Attachment Opinion and Order in California v. DHS et al.

View on PACER

Oct. 11, 2019

Oct. 11, 2019

PACER
65

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting 28 Plaintiffs' Corrected Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/14/2019. (cs3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/14/2019)

Oct. 14, 2019

Oct. 14, 2019

RECAP
66

Correspondence re: Scope of Preliminary Injunction Order 65 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/16/2019)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 16, 2019

Oct. 16, 2019

PACER
67

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Angel Aguiluz, Casa de Maryland, Inc., Monica Camacho Perez. All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Supplement Receipt U.S. Att'y, # 3 Supplement Receipt U.S. Att'y Gen., # 4 Supplement USPS Tracking)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/18/2019)

1 Affidavit

View on PACER

2 Supplement Receipt U.S. Att'y

View on PACER

3 Supplement Receipt U.S. Att'y Gen.

View on PACER

4 Supplement USPS Tracking

View on PACER

Oct. 18, 2019

Oct. 18, 2019

PACER
68

REVISED ORDER Regarding Granting 28 Plaintiffs' Corrected Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/17/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/18/2019)

Oct. 18, 2019

Oct. 18, 2019

PACER
69

MOTION to Stay Preliminary Injunction by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit (Renaud Declaration))(Kolsky, Joshua) (Entered: 10/25/2019)

1 Exhibit (Renaud Declaration)

View on PACER

Oct. 25, 2019

Oct. 25, 2019

RECAP
70

PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING Pre-motion telephone conference on October 30, 2019 at 2:30pm. Counsel for the Defendant is DIRECTED to initiate the call to chambers or circulate a conference call number to the parties. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/28/2019. (ats, Chambers) (Entered: 10/28/2019)

Oct. 28, 2019

Oct. 28, 2019

PACER
71

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 10/10/19, before Judge Grimm. Court Reporter/Transcriber Douglas J. Zweizig, RDR, CRR, FCRR, Telephone number 410-962-4474 / douglas_zweizig@mdd.uscourts.gov. Total number of pages filed: 114. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained from the Court Reporter or through PACER. Redaction Request due 11/19/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/29/2019. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/27/2020.(dz, Court Reporter) (Entered: 10/29/2019)

Oct. 29, 2019

Oct. 29, 2019

PACER
72

Status Conference held on 10/30/2019 before Judge Paul W. Grimm. (ats, Chambers) (Entered: 10/30/2019)

Oct. 30, 2019

Oct. 30, 2019

PACER
73

PAPERLESS ORDER memorializing today's telephone conference. Plaintiffs will file a response to Defendants' Motion to Stay, ECF No. 69, by November 8, 2019. Defendants will file their notice of appeal by November 8, 2019, and their reply by November 15, 2019. With respect to an amended complaint, Counsel for Plaintiffs will consult with their clients and determine whether they will file an amended complaint by November 8, 2019. The parties will then confer and submit a joint status report by November 15, 2019, that will include a proposed schedule for filing an amended complaint, if applicable, a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss, and proposed page limits for the motion to dismiss briefing. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 10/30/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 10/30/2019)

Oct. 30, 2019

Oct. 30, 2019

PACER
74

NOTICE OF APPEAL by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (Kolsky, Joshua) (Entered: 10/30/2019)

Oct. 30, 2019

Oct. 30, 2019

PACER
75

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 74 Notice of Appeal. IMPORTANT NOTICE: To access forms which you are required to file with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit please go to http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov and click on Forms & Notices.(nu, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/31/2019)

Oct. 31, 2019

Oct. 31, 2019

PACER
76

USCA Case Number 19-2222 for 74 Notice of Appeal filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Donald J. Trump. Case Manager - Michael Radday (nu, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/04/2019)

Nov. 4, 2019

Nov. 4, 2019

PACER
77

RESPONSE in Opposition re 69 MOTION to Stay Preliminary Injunction filed by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc..(Marshak, Amy) (Entered: 11/08/2019)

Nov. 8, 2019

Nov. 8, 2019

PACER
78

NOTICE by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security re 69 MOTION to Stay Preliminary Injunction (Notice of Waiver of Reply and Hearing) (Kolsky, Joshua) (Entered: 11/08/2019)

Nov. 8, 2019

Nov. 8, 2019

PACER
79

LETTER ORDER Denying 69 Motion for Stay of Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/14/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/15/2019)

Nov. 14, 2019

Nov. 14, 2019

PACER
80

STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc.(Marshak, Amy) (Entered: 11/15/2019)

Nov. 15, 2019

Nov. 15, 2019

PACER
81

PAPERLESS ORDER APPROVING 80 Status Report as follows. Defendants may file their proposed motion to stay the proceedings in this Court pending the Fourth Circuit's resolution of the appeal of the preliminary injunction. Defendants will produce the administrative record by November 25, 2019. Defendants will file their motion to stay proceedings in this Court by November 26, 2019. Plaintiffs will file their opposition to the motion to stay proceedings by December 13, 2019. Defendants will file any reply in support of their motion to stay proceedings by December 20, 2019. The brief in support of the motion and the opposition are limited to 15 pages each, and the reply is limited to 10 pages, absent a request for additional pages and further order of this Court. Plaintiffs will file their Second Amended Complaint by December 20, 2019. If the Court denies the Defendants' motion to stay proceedings, Defendants will file their motion to dismiss within 21 of the date of such denial or January 22, 2019, whichever is later. Plaintiffs will file their opposition to the motion to dismiss 21 days after Defendants file their motion to dismiss. Defendants will file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss 14 days after Plaintiffs file their opposition. If any of these deadlines fall on a weekend or holiday, the deadline will be the following business day. The motion to dismiss will be limited to 25 pages, but Defendants may seek additional pages if necessary in light of the changes made in the Second Amended Complaint. The opposition will have the same page limit as the motion to dismiss. The reply will be limited to 12 pages or half of the length of the moving brief, whichever is greater. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/18/2019. (pk3s, Chambers) (Entered: 11/18/2019)

Nov. 18, 2019

Nov. 18, 2019

PACER
82

NOTICE of Appearance by Jason C Lynch on behalf of All Defendants (Lynch, Jason) (Entered: 11/25/2019)

Nov. 25, 2019

Nov. 25, 2019

PACER
83

NOTICE by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security of Filing of Lengthy Document (Lynch, Jason) Modified on 12/10/2019 (Lengthy Exhibit Received and placed in shelf/ other copy sent to Chambers )(heps, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 11/26/2019)

Nov. 26, 2019

Nov. 26, 2019

PACER
84

MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security(Lynch, Jason) (Entered: 11/26/2019)

Nov. 26, 2019

Nov. 26, 2019

PACER
85

NOTICE by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security of Order from Ninth Circuit Staying Preliminary Injunctions (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Order from Ninth Circuit Staying Preliminary Injunctions)(Lynch, Jason) (Entered: 12/06/2019)

1 Exhibit A - Order from Ninth Circuit Staying Preliminary Injunctions

View on PACER

Dec. 6, 2019

Dec. 6, 2019

PACER
86

LETTER ORDER Scheduling a Telephone Conference call on December 18, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/9/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/09/2019)

Dec. 9, 2019

Dec. 9, 2019

RECAP
87

PAPERLESS ORDER ADVISING COUNSEL: The telephone conference on December 18, 2019 WILL BEGIN AT 4:30PM. The conference call number provided in the Court's letter order at ECF No. 86 and ECF No. 35 will be used.. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/9/2019. Associated Cases: 8:19-cv-02715-PWG, 8:19-cv-02851-PWG(ats, Chambers) (Entered: 12/09/2019)

Dec. 9, 2019

Dec. 9, 2019

PACER
88

ORDER of USCA granting motion for stay pending appeal as to 74 Notice of Appeal filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Donald J. Trump (nu, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/10/2019)

Dec. 9, 2019

Dec. 9, 2019

PACER
89

RESPONSE in Opposition re 84 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc..(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/10/2019)

Dec. 10, 2019

Dec. 10, 2019

PACER
90

Consent MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order re 81 Order,,,,,,, by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc.(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/18/2019)

Dec. 18, 2019

Dec. 18, 2019

PACER
91

LETTER ORDER memorializing yesterday's telephone conference and Granting 90 Consent Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/19/2019. Associated Cases: 8:19-cv-02715-PWG, 8:19-cv-02851-PWG(heps, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/19/2019)

Dec. 19, 2019

Dec. 19, 2019

PACER
92

REPLY to Response to Motion re 84 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.(Lynch, Jason) (Entered: 01/03/2020)

Jan. 3, 2020

Jan. 3, 2020

PACER
93

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Angel Aguiluz, Casa de Maryland, Inc., Monica Camacho Perez, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Redline First Amended Complaint)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/03/2020)

1 Exhibit Redline First Amended Complaint

View on PACER

Jan. 3, 2020

Jan. 3, 2020

PACER
94

NOTICE by Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Kevin K. McAleenan, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security of Second Circuit Order Denying Stay of Nationwide Preliminary Injunctions (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Second Circuit Order)(Lynch, Jason) (Entered: 01/08/2020)

1 Exhibit A - Second Circuit Order

View on PACER

Jan. 8, 2020

Jan. 8, 2020

PACER
95

NOTICE of Appearance by Suzanne Sangree on behalf of MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE (Sangree, Suzanne) (Entered: 01/08/2020)

Jan. 8, 2020

Jan. 8, 2020

PACER
96

ORDER of USCA denying motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc as to 74 Notice of Appeal filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Donald J. Trump (nu, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/14/2020)

Jan. 14, 2020

Jan. 14, 2020

PACER
97

ORDER of USCA denying motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc as to 74 Notice of Appeal filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Donald J. Trump (nu, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/15/2020)

Jan. 14, 2020

Jan. 14, 2020

PACER
98

NOTICE by Angel Aguiluz, Monica Camacho Perez, Casa de Maryland, Inc., MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE of Order from Supreme Court Staying SDNY Preliminary Injunctions (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Order from Supreme Court Staying SDNY Preliminary Injunctions)(Backer, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/28/2020)

1 Exhibit A - Order from Supreme Court Staying SDNY Preliminary Injunctions

View on PACER

Jan. 28, 2020

Jan. 28, 2020

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Maryland

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 16, 2019

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A non-profit organization serving immigrants in Maryland and two of its members. In a second amended complaint, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore were added as plaintiffs.

Plaintiff Type(s):

City/County Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Donald J. Trump, Federal

U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General:

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Discrimination-basis:

Immigration status

Race discrimination

Medical/Mental Health:

Medical care, general

Benefit Source:

DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals)

Food stamps/SNAP

Medicaid

Immigration/Border:

Visas - criteria

Visas - procedures

National Origin/Ethnicity:

Hispanic