Case: Henry v. Hulett

3:12-cv-03087 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Filed Date: March 20, 2012

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 31, 2011, female prisoners at an Illinois women’s prison were strip searched as part of a training exercise for new guards. Several of the prisoners filed this putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The plaintiffs sued the Illinois Department of Corrections, Lincoln Correctional Center, and Logan Correctional Center under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Represented by civil rights attorneys Loevy a…

On March 31, 2011, female prisoners at an Illinois women’s prison were strip searched as part of a training exercise for new guards. Several of the prisoners filed this putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The plaintiffs sued the Illinois Department of Corrections, Lincoln Correctional Center, and Logan Correctional Center under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Represented by civil rights attorneys Loevy and Loevy, they sought damages, costs and attorney’s fees, punitive damages, and injunctive relief against three types of defendants: Members of the correctional facility tactical unit, who escorted the plaintiffs to the area where the searches were conducted, correctional officers who conducted the searches, and members of the Illinois Department of Corrections administration. The complaint alleged that the strip searches were conducted in a way that violated the Fourth and Eighth Amendments. Specifically, they claimed that the strip searches were unnecessary, demeaning, dehumanizing, and humiliating.

The plaintiffs had to stand naked in a line with 8-10 other inmates in a room with other inmates and guards who were not conducting the searches. The prisoners who were menstruating had to remove their menstrual products, they were not given new ones, and many got blood on themselves, their clothes, and the floor. The prisoners had to stand barefoot and naked on a floor covered in menstrual blood, raise their breasts, lift their hair, turn around, bend over, spread their buttocks and vaginas, and cough.

The case was assigned to Judge Richard Mills. On October 21, 2014 Judge Mills granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. 2014 WL 5349870 (C.D. Ill. 2014). Judge Mills certified the two classes. Class I included all individuals subjected to the March 31, 2011 strip search at Lincoln Correctional Center. Class II included all women who are incarcerated at Logan Correctional Center and all women who will be incarcerated at Logan Correctional Center in the future. Lincoln Correctional Center was converted to an all-male prison and the majority of inmates were sent to Logan Correctional Center.

On April 14, 2016 the district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the Fourth Amendment claim, holding that a visual inspection of a prisoner did not constitute an unreasonable search. 2016 WL 11265636 (C.D. Ill. 2016). The district court denied summary judgment on the Eighth Amendment claim and that claim went to trial.

A jury trial was held before Judge Mills on November 14-18, 2016. On November 21, 2016, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants, finding that the searches had not been intended to humiliate or conducted to gain sexual gratification. Judge Mills entered the verdict for the defendants on November 22, 2016. The plaintiffs appealed; they did not contest the jury verdict against them on the Eighth Amendment claim but appealed to the Seventh Circuit to reinstate the Fourth Amendment claim. (Docket No. 16-04234).

On November 30, 2017, the case was argued in front of a panel of three judges: Circuit Judge Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge Daniel A. Manion, and District Judge John Z. Lee (sitting by designation). On July 16, 2019, the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion affirming the decision of the District Court that granted summary judgment to the defendants. Judge Lee dissented, arguing that whether or not the Fourth Amendment applied depended on whether the prisoners had a reasonable expectation of privacy, not on whether guards or the prisoners themselves conducted the searches. 930 F.3d 836 (7th Cir. 2019).

Rehearing en banc was granted December 18, 2019. 788 Fed. Appx. 387 (Mem). On May 14, 2020 the case was argued en banc via Zoom.

On August 11, 2020 the en banc Seventh Circuit reversed the previous panel’s ruling. In an opinion by Circuit Judge Amy J. St. Eve, the court held that “the Fourth Amendment protects a right to bodily privacy for convicted prisoners, albeit in a significantly limited way, including during visual inspections.” 969 F.3d 769, 774. The Seventh Circuit then remanded the case back to District Court for further proceedings on the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims. Judge Easterbrook, who wrote the reversed panel opinion in this case, filed a dissent, arguing that convicted prisoners have no rights under the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 788.

After remand, preparations for trial continued. On August 19, 2021, Judge Mills denied a motion for dismissal by members of the tactical unit and prison administrators on qualified immunity grounds and transferred the case to Judge Sue E. Myerscough. Judge Myerscough ordered parallel mediation for a possible settlement to begin on September 9, 2021.

Preparations for trial continued, and on May 23, 2022 a number of defendants reinstated after the 7th Circuit decision requested leave to file for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. These defendants were all correctional officers or members of the correctional facility tactical unit. Jury selection began on May 31, 2022. The same day, plaintiffs requested the dismissal of five defendant tactical unit members and correctional officers. Defendants did not contest this motion and Judge Myerscough dismissed them from the case. The IDOC administrators, one tactical unit member, and one correctional officer remained in the case.   

On June 7, 2022, the jury found the prison administrators and a tactical unit member liable for violating the individual plaintiffs’ 4th Amendment rights. Specifically, the liable defendants were found to have directly participated in the search, that they failed to intervene in an unconstitutional search, and that they bore supervisory liability for the search. This liability also extended to the certified class of plaintiffs. The jury did not find any liability for the correctional officer. In addition to determining liability for both the individual plaintiffs and the class of plaintiffs as a whole, the jury awarded $20,000 in compensatory damages and a further $5,500 in punitive damages to each named plaintiff. The punitive damages were imposed only on the IDOC administrators. 

Upon receipt of the jury verdict, the defendants requested that Judge Myerscough either enter a directed verdict in their favor by way of qualified immunity or a holding that the issues at hand had been litigated in the initial phase of trial. Alternatively, the defendants requested that she hold a new trial for the same reasons. Judge Myerscough denied this motion on October 25, 2022, in an opinion noting that every issue presented in the directed verdict motion had previously been forfeited or had been agreed to by plaintiffs. Judge Myerscough concluded that allowing a directed verdict or a new trial would be unfair to the plaintiffs, as the plaintiffs had built their trial strategy on the basis of these forfeitures and agreements.  Defendants filed a request with Judge Myerscough for interlocutory appeal of these issues as well as a stay of proceedings. Judge Myerscough denied the defendants’ request for an interlocutory appeal and stay of proceedings on January 4, 2023. She noted that a stay pending appeal would increase cost to plaintiffs and would unreasonably extend timeline, effectively shrinking the class by those eligible dying or not realizing their eligibility for compensation due to temporal distance from the events. 

On January 9, 2023, the parties met for a settlement conference. Two months later, on March 20, the case was reassigned to Judge Colleen R. Lawless, who had been recently appointed to the federal bench.

Later that year, on August 11, the plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a class action settlement agreement. Under the agreement, individual class members who were subject to the 2011 strip search would receive about $7,535, with class representatives and people who testified or appeared in order to testify receiving additional incentives, up to a total of $119,000 for all incentive awards combined. Furthermore, class counsel could move for attorneys' fees, as long as the overall payment by defendants was no greater than $3 million. Any money that the defendants paid to the class that did not go to class members would go to the Illinois Prison Project of Restore Justice and Chicago Legal Advocacy for Incarcerated Mothers as cy pres funds. The court would retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement.

The court granted the motion for preliminary approval three days later, but final approval for the settlement requires a future fairness hearing.

As of October 2, 2023, the case was ongoing.

Summary Authors

Sabrina Glavota (5/20/2020)

Jonah Hudson-Erdman (10/7/2020)

Micah Pollens-Dempsey (10/2/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4248545/parties/throgmorton-v-reynolds/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Ainsworth, Russell R (Illinois)

Andrews, Seth (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Atchison, Michael (Illinois)

Attorney, OIL-DCS Trial (Illinois)

Aumann, Thomas Jon (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other
Attorney for Defendant

Atchison, Michael (Illinois)

Attorney, OIL-DCS Trial (Illinois)

Aumann, Thomas Jon (Illinois)

Bagby, Jennifer Kristine (Illinois)

Barnes, Deborah L (Illinois)

Bautista, Laura K. (Illinois)

Bell, Alexandria Lyubov (Illinois)

Benson, Victoria Rose (Illinois)

Bildtsen, Ann M (Illinois)

Bish, Suzanne E. (Illinois)

Boley, Todd Alexander (Illinois)

Brannon, Christine (Illinois)

Brennan, Terry M. (Illinois)

Bronte, Patricia Ann (Illinois)

Buell, Katelin B (Illinois)

Burgess, James Lawrence (Illinois)

Butler, Michael (Illinois)

Campbell, Rhonda Lisa (Illinois)

Caplan, Gary S (Illinois)

Carter, Ashley B (Illinois)

Cassidy, Terence John (Illinois)

Clark-Joseph, Mary Kaitlyn (Illinois)

Colbert, Brent J (Illinois)

Cook, Andrea Elizabeth (Illinois)

Cook, Lisa A. (Illinois)

Cooksey, Jason T. (Illinois)

Coordinator, Litigation (Illinois)

Corrigan, Terence J. (Illinois)

Counsel, Bureau of (Illinois)

Crown, Allen Robert (Illinois)

Ditzler, Megan Ann (Illinois)

Dominguez, E Carlos (Illinois)

Donohue, Michael J. (Illinois)

Eaton, Dylan Alexander (Illinois)

Emery, Ellen Kornichuk (Illinois)

Fanning, Robert L. (Illinois)

Feinstein, Wendy West (Illinois)

Flowers, Suyon (Illinois)

Friedman, Linda Debra (Illinois)

Fritz, Lucy E. (Illinois)

Gainer, Brian Patrick (Illinois)

Gerarde, Thomas R. (Illinois)

Gilbert, Jennifer Schoen (Illinois)

Gillespie, Bradley D (Illinois)

Glenn, David M (Illinois)

Habeas, US Attorney (Illinois)

Hammer, Angela Lynn (Illinois)

Henretty, Lyle Kevin (Illinois)

Heygood, Michael Everett (Illinois)

Higgerson, Christopher L. (Illinois)

Hunn, Jeffrey A. (Illinois)

Jebson, Scott J. (Illinois)

Jeffrey, Donald Eldridge (Illinois)

Johnson, Benjamin M (Illinois)

Johnson, Kristin Berger (Illinois)

Kennedy, T Michael (Illinois)

Knight, Jody (Illinois)

Kosztya, Ashley Caroline (Illinois)

LA-CV, Assistant 2241-194 (Illinois)

Levy, Richard Bruce (Illinois)

Lockhart, Lynnette Nefertiti (Illinois)

Lopez, Tracey Whitney (Illinois)

Lutzke, Jennifer M (Illinois)

Madison, Siobhan K (Illinois)

Mathevosian, Rina Michelle (Illinois)

Mathison, James D. (Illinois)

Mbaye, Lesley Berson (Illinois)

McCahill, Mary Elizabeth (Illinois)

McNaught, Karen L. (Illinois)

Merin, Mark E. (Illinois)

Miller, Charles (Illinois)

Mogbana, Ifeanyichukwu C. (Illinois)

Morehead, Sarah K (Illinois)

Mott, Writer (Illinois)

Newell, C. Burt (Illinois)

Notz, Jane Elinor (Illinois)

Nowicki, Frank P. (Illinois)

O'Boyle, Erin L (Illinois)

Pai, Anil (Illinois)

Partridge, Kerry Franklin (Illinois)

Patel, Ayesha (Illinois)

Patel, Hinal Akshay (Illinois)

Patterson, Jill (Illinois)

Phillips, Austin Ross (Illinois)

Phillips, Helen Eckert (Illinois)

Qualls, Daniel H (Illinois)

Richie, Leigh Jourdain (Illinois)

Rodriguez, Juanita B. (Illinois)

Rosen, Jeff Wayne (Illinois)

Rosen, Arlene Marcia (Illinois)

Rule, Katherine E. (Illinois)

Rupcich, Joseph N. (Illinois)

Sanchez, Thomas E. (Illinois)

Satoh, Reiko (Illinois)

Sheffield, Carlton Frederick (Illinois)

Silverberg, Steven Mark (Illinois)

Smith, Colleen R (Illinois)

Spangler, Samantha Sue (Illinois)

Spiegel, Patricia L. (Illinois)

Steimel, Emma Dorothy (Illinois)

Stoppy, Lynn Merle (Illinois)

Strom, Steven R. (Illinois)

Tamul, Matthew (Illinois)

Tran, Trang Q (Illinois)

Voss, Ana H (Illinois)

Warden, Warden (Illinois)

Weber, Stephanie Judith (Illinois)

Wee, Christine Keeyeh (Illinois)

Weigand, Jason Joseph (Illinois)

West, J Kevin (Illinois)

Windle, Nicholas Rudolph (Illinois)

Workman, Robin G (Illinois)

Zarmi, David (Illinois)

Zwilling, Arlene S. (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:12-cv-03087

Docket [PACER]

Throgmorton v. Reynolds

Sept. 11, 2019

Sept. 11, 2019

Docket

16-04234

Docket [PACER]

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

May 14, 2020

May 14, 2020

Docket
1

3:12-cv-03087

Complaint

Throgmorton v. Reynolds

March 20, 2012

March 20, 2012

Complaint
83

3:12-cv-03087

Sixth Amended Complaint

Throgmorton v. Hulett

March 31, 2014

March 31, 2014

Complaint
87

3:12-cv-03087

Opinion

Throgmorton v. Reynolds

Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

Order/Opinion

2014 WL 2014

122

3:12-cv-03087

Order

Throgmorton v. Reynolds

April 14, 2016

April 14, 2016

Order/Opinion

2016 WL 2016

181

3:12-cv-03087

Judgment in a Civil Case

Throgmorton v. Reynolds

Nov. 22, 2016

Nov. 22, 2016

Order/Opinion
38

16-04234

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

July 16, 2019

July 16, 2019

Order/Opinion

930 F.3d 930

51-2

16-04234

Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors and Scholars of Sexual Violence, ACLU, Just Detention International, Roderick and Solange Macarthur Justice Center, Uptown People’s Law Center, & Women’s Prison Association in Support of Petition for Reh'g En Banc

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Aug. 20, 2019

Aug. 20, 2019

Pleading / Motion / Brief

16-04234

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Aug. 11, 2020

Aug. 11, 2020

Order/Opinion

969 F.3d 969

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4248545/throgmorton-v-reynolds/

Last updated April 23, 2024, 3 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Lincoln Correctional Center Former Assistant Warden REYNOLDS, Lincoln Correctional Officer ANDERSON, Lincoln Correctional Officer CRAIG, Lincoln Correctional Officer DALLAS, Lincoln Correctional Officer DOWDY, Lincoln Correctional Officer EDMONSON, Lincoln Correctional Officer JOHNSON, Lincoln Correctional Officer KRUDUP, Lincoln Correctional Officer LEONETTI, Lincoln Correctional Officer PFEIFFER, Lincoln Correctional Officer SLATER, Unknown Illinois Department of Corrections Employees ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0753-1335037.), filed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Arthur Loevy Attorney Appearance, # 3 Jon Loevy Attorney Appearance, # 4 Michael Kanovitz Attorney Appearance, # 5 Rachel Steinback Attorney Appearance, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Summons, # 9 Summons, # 10 Summons, # 11 Summons, # 12 Summons, # 13 Summons, # 14 Summons, # 15 Summons, # 16 Summons)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/20/2012)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Arthur Loevy Attorney Appearance

View on PACER

3 Jon Loevy Attorney Appearance

View on PACER

4 Michael Kanovitz Attorney Appearance

View on PACER

5 Rachel Steinback Attorney Appearance

View on PACER

6 Summons

View on PACER

7 Summons

View on PACER

8 Summons

View on PACER

9 Summons

View on PACER

10 Summons

View on PACER

11 Summons

View on PACER

12 Summons

View on PACER

13 Summons

View on PACER

14 Summons

View on PACER

15 Summons

View on PACER

16 Summons

View on PACER

March 20, 2012

March 20, 2012

Clearinghouse
2

Summonses Issued as to Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, and Slater. Original Summonses mailed to Plaintiffs' Attorneys for service. (MJ, ilcd) (Entered: 03/21/2012)

March 21, 2012

March 21, 2012

PACER
3

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Anderson served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
4

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Craig served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
5

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Dallas served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
6

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Dowdy served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
7

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Edmonson served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
8

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Johnson served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
9

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Krudup served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
10

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Leonetti served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
11

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Pfeiffer served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
12

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Reynolds served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
13

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. Slater served on 4/13/2012, answer due 5/4/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012)

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

PACER
14

Partial ANSWER to 1 Complaint,,,, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater.(Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 06/11/2012)

June 11, 2012

June 11, 2012

PACER
15

MOTION to Dismiss Count III by Defendants Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater. Responses due by 6/28/2012 (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 06/11/2012)

June 11, 2012

June 11, 2012

PACER
16

MEMORANDUM in Support re 15 MOTION to Dismiss Count III filed by Defendants Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater. (Rupcich, Joseph) (Entered: 06/11/2012)

June 11, 2012

June 11, 2012

PACER

Order on Motion to Dismiss

June 22, 2012

June 22, 2012

PACER
17

AMENDED COMPLAINT against Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater, Unknown Illinois Department of Corrections Employees, filed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton.(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 06/22/2012)

June 22, 2012

June 22, 2012

RECAP
18

RESPONSE to Motion re 15 MOTION to Dismiss Count III filed by Plaintiffs Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 06/22/2012)

June 22, 2012

June 22, 2012

PACER

TEXT ORDER: Before the Court is the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count III (d/e 15 ). In the Motion, the Defendants argued that Count III of the Complaint (d/e 1 ) - Indemnfication - is barred by sovereign immunity. Following the filing of the Motion to Dismiss, the Plaintiffs filed a two-count First Amended Complaint (d/e 17 ) that omits the claim for indemnification. In addition, the Plaintiffs have filed a Response to the Motion to Dismiss (d/e 18 ), in which they (1) note the filing of the First Amended Complaint, and (2) request that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss Count III as moot. In light of these developments, the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count III (d/e 15 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 06/22/2012. (VM, ilcd)

June 22, 2012

June 22, 2012

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Defendants are directed to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 17 on or before 7/12/2012. (LB, ilcd)

June 28, 2012

June 28, 2012

PACER

Order

June 28, 2012

June 28, 2012

PACER

Notice of Hearing

July 5, 2012

July 5, 2012

PACER
19

ANSWER to 17 Amended Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater.(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 07/05/2012)

July 5, 2012

July 5, 2012

RECAP

NOTICE OF HEARING: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Wednesday, 8/15/2012, at 2:00 PM by telephone (court will place call) before Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 8/13/2012. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(E) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB, ilcd)

July 5, 2012

July 5, 2012

PACER
20

DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 08/13/2012)

Aug. 13, 2012

Aug. 13, 2012

PACER
21

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Erin L O'Boyle on behalf of Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater (O'Boyle, Erin) (Entered: 08/15/2012)

Aug. 15, 2012

Aug. 15, 2012

PACER
22

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore: Scheduling Conference held on 8/15/2012. Parties are reminded of their option to consent to proceed before US Magistrate Judge. See attached form. Written Scheduling Order to follow. (LB, ilcd) (Entered: 08/15/2012)

Aug. 15, 2012

Aug. 15, 2012

PACER
23

SCHEDULING ORDER: Attorneys Michael Kanovitz, Rachel Steinback, and Erin O'Boyle present by telephone for Rule 16 conference; Same held at 2:00 PM on 8/15/2012; SCHEDULING TIME LIMITS ORDERED: Initial Disclosures due by 8/27/2012. Class and collective certification discovery due by 11/15/2012. Motion for class certification to be filed by 1/15/2013, response by 2/15/2013, and any reply by 3/1/2013. Additional deadlines, including merit discovery, damages discovery, merit expert discovery, and dispositive motions deadline, final pretrial and trial settings will be set after the Court's ruling on any motions for certification. See written order entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 8/15/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Mediation Memorandum, # 2 Courtroom Technology Brochure) (LB, ilcd) (Entered: 08/15/2012)

1 Mediation Memorandum

View on PACER

2 Courtroom Technology Brochure

View on PACER

Aug. 15, 2012

Aug. 15, 2012

PACER
24

MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Unopposed) by Plaintiffs Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 9/10/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 08/23/2012)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

Aug. 23, 2012

Aug. 23, 2012

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint Joining One Additional Party 24 ALLOWED without objection. Clerk directed to file the Second Amended Complaint [24-1] instanter. All Defendants to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by 9/10/2012. Entered on 8/24/2012. (MJ, ilcd)

Aug. 24, 2012

Aug. 24, 2012

PACER

Order on Motion for Leave to File

Aug. 24, 2012

Aug. 24, 2012

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines

Aug. 24, 2012

Aug. 24, 2012

PACER
25

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater, Unknown Illinois Department of Corrections Employees, Melody Hulett, filed by Patricia Phillips, Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton. (MJ, ilcd) (Entered: 08/24/2012)

Aug. 24, 2012

Aug. 24, 2012

PACER

Set Deadlines: All Defendants to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by 9/10/2012 per Judge Cudmore's 8/24/2012 Text Order. (MJ, ilcd)

Aug. 24, 2012

Aug. 24, 2012

PACER
26

Summons Issued as to Melody Hulett. Original mailed to attorney for service. (MJ, ilcd) (Entered: 08/28/2012)

Aug. 28, 2012

Aug. 28, 2012

PACER
27

ANSWER to 25 Amended Complaint, Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 25] by Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater.(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 09/06/2012)

Sept. 6, 2012

Sept. 6, 2012

RECAP
28

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton, Patricia Phillips. Melody Hulett served on 9/10/2012, answer due 10/1/2012. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 09/14/2012)

Sept. 14, 2012

Sept. 14, 2012

PACER
29

ANSWER to 25 Amended Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Melody Hulett.(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 10/02/2012)

Oct. 2, 2012

Oct. 2, 2012

PACER
30

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Defendants Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Melody Hulett, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater. Responses due by 11/26/2012 (Fanning, Robert) (Entered: 11/07/2012)

Nov. 7, 2012

Nov. 7, 2012

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Motion for Enlargement of Time to Complete Discovery 30 ALLOWED. Discovery extended to 12/7/2012. The Court also extends the deadline for motion for class certification to 2/1/2013, response by 3/1/2013, and any reply by 3/15/2013. (LB, ilcd)

Nov. 8, 2012

Nov. 8, 2012

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery

Nov. 8, 2012

Nov. 8, 2012

PACER
31

MOTION Clarify Scheduling Order by Plaintiffs Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 11/29/2012 (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 11/08/2012)

Nov. 8, 2012

Nov. 8, 2012

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Motion to Clarify 31 ALLOWED in that the Court grants Defendants until 12/7/2012 in which to respond to Plaintiffs' discovery requests and extends the discovery cutoff date to 12/17/2012. (LB, ilcd)

Nov. 9, 2012

Nov. 9, 2012

PACER

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Nov. 9, 2012

Nov. 9, 2012

PACER
32

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Agreed) by Plaintiffs Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 1/2/2013 (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 12/12/2012)

Dec. 12, 2012

Dec. 12, 2012

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Agreed Motion to Extend Fact Discovery 32 ALLOWED. The Court extends the class-related fact discovery cutoff to 2/8/2013, and resets the deadline for Plaintiffs' motion for class certification to 3/1/2013, response by 4/1/2013, and any reply by 4/15/2013. (LB, ilcd)

Dec. 13, 2012

Dec. 13, 2012

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery

Dec. 13, 2012

Dec. 13, 2012

PACER

Order on Motion for Leave to File

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

PACER
33

MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Unopposed) by Plaintiffs Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 3/18/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A -- Third Amended Complaint)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

1 Exhibit A -- Third Amended Complaint

View on PACER

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint 33 ALLOWED without objection. Clerk to file Third Amended Complaint [33-1] forthwith. Defendants to answer or otherwise plead by 3/15/2013. Entered on 2/28/2013. (MJ, ilcd)

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

PACER
34

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton, Patricia Phillips, and Jacqueline Hegwood. (MJ, ilcd) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

PACER
35

MOTION to Certify Class by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 3/18/2013 (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/01/2013)

March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

PACER
36

MEMORANDUM in Support re 35 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Excerpt Pasley Dep Pages, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Group Declarations, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Interrogatory Response)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/01/2013)

1 Exhibit 1 - Excerpt Pasley Dep Pages

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2 - Group Declarations

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 3 - Interrogatory Response

View on PACER

March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

PACER
37

Exhibit re 36 Memorandum in Support of Motion, (Amended Exhibit 1) by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/01/2013)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

PACER
38

Summons Issued as to Bender, Boch, M Brooks, Brown, Butler, Dilley, Deborah Hatfield, Hinton, Johner, Johnson(Lincoln Correctional Officer), Eddie Jones, Kenney, Killam, Krull, Last, Mathias, Alan Pasley, Rickord, Spaniol, Van Middlesworth, Warden. Originals mailed to attorney. (MJ, ilcd) (Entered: 03/07/2013)

March 7, 2013

March 7, 2013

PACER
39

ANSWER to 34 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Melody Hulett, Johnson(Lincoln Correctional Officer), Krudup, Leonetti, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater.(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2013)

March 12, 2013

March 12, 2013

PACER
40

MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 4/12/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/26/2013)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

March 26, 2013

March 26, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Complaint 40 ALLOWED. Clerk directed to file Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Complaint [40-1] attached to motion. Defendants to answer or otherwise plead by 4/10/2013. Entered on 3/27/13. (ME, ilcd)

March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

PACER

Order on Motion for Leave to File

March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

PACER
41

FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Delores Henry, Beverly Thogmorton, Patricia Phillips, Jacqueline Hegwood.(ME, ilcd) (Entered: 03/27/2013)

March 27, 2013

March 27, 2013

PACER
42

Summons Issued as to Renee Hatfield and returned to Plaintiffs counsel to effectuate service. (ME, ilcd) (Entered: 03/28/2013)

March 28, 2013

March 28, 2013

PACER
43

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Lincoln Correctional Officer Bender on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
44

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Boch on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
45

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Brooks on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
46

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Brown on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
47

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Butler on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
48

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Dilley on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
49

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Hinton on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
50

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Johner on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
51

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Johnson on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
52

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Jones on 3/26/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
53

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Kenney on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
54

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Killam on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
55

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Krull on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
56

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Last on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
57

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Mathias on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
58

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Pasley on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
59

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Rickord on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
60

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Spaniol on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
61

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Van Middlesworth on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
62

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Warden on 3/13/13, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 03/29/2013)

March 29, 2013

March 29, 2013

PACER
63

RESPONSE to Motion re 35 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Defendants Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Melody Hulett, Johnson, Krudup, Leonetti, Alan Pasley, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Robert Patterson)(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 04/01/2013)

1 Affidavit of Robert Patterson

View on PACER

April 1, 2013

April 1, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER BY RICHARD MILLS, U.S. District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Defendants' Response to Motion for Class Certification, 63, and has reviewed same. Plaintiffs are directed to file a Reply on or before April 12, 2013. Entered on 4/2/2013. (MJ, ilcd)

April 2, 2013

April 2, 2013

PACER

Order

April 2, 2013

April 2, 2013

PACER
64

ANSWER to 41 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Anderson, Craig, Dallas, Dowdy, Edmonson, Melody Hulett, Johnson(Lincoln Correctional Officer), Krudup, Leonetti, Alan Pasley, Pfeiffer, Reynolds, Slater.(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

April 5, 2013

April 5, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER BY RICHARD MILLS, U.S. District Judge: The Plaintiffs' Unopposed Oral Motion to Extend the Deadline for Filing a Reply Brief to the Defendants' Response to the Motion for Class Certification is ALLOWED. The deadline for the Reply is hereby extended from April 12, 2013, to April 15, 2013. Entered on 4/12/2013. (MJ, ilcd)

April 12, 2013

April 12, 2013

PACER

Order

April 12, 2013

April 12, 2013

PACER
65

REPLY to Response to Motion re 35 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/15/2013)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

April 15, 2013

April 15, 2013

PACER
66

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Renee Hatfield on 4/5/2013, filed by Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 04/17/2013)

April 17, 2013

April 17, 2013

PACER
67

ANSWER to 41 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Bender, Boch, Butler, Dilley, Renee Hatfield, Hinton, Johner, Eddie Jones, Kenney, Killam, Krull, Last, Mathias, Rickord, Spaniol, Van Middlesworth, Warden.(Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 05/13/2013)

May 13, 2013

May 13, 2013

PACER
68

ORDER by U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE RICHARD MILLS: Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (d/e 35 ) is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. Entered on 7/29/2013. (MJ, ilcd) (Entered: 07/29/2013)

July 29, 2013

July 29, 2013

PACER
69

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Unopposed) by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 9/26/2013 (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 09/09/2013)

Sept. 9, 2013

Sept. 9, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time 69 ALLOWED: Close of class certification fact discovery set 11/15/2013; deadline for Plaintiffs to amend complaint set 11/25/2013; Plaintiff's motion for class certification to be filed by 12/9/2013. (LB, ilcd)

Sept. 10, 2013

Sept. 10, 2013

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery

Sept. 10, 2013

Sept. 10, 2013

PACER
70

MOTION for Order for Preservation of Evidence by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 11/29/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 11/12/2013)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

Nov. 12, 2013

Nov. 12, 2013

PACER
71

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Unopposed) by Plaintiffs Jacqueline Hegwood, Delores Henry, Patricia Phillips, Beverly Thogmorton. Responses due by 11/29/2013 (Steinback, Rachel) (Entered: 11/12/2013)

Nov. 12, 2013

Nov. 12, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Unopposed Motion for Entry of Preservation Order 70 ALLOWED as the Plaintiff advises the motion is unopposed. The Court orders Logan Correctional Center and the Illinois Department of Corrections to preserve any and all evidence within their custody and control that pertains to the 10/31/2013 cadet training exercise, including but not limited to any video recordings depicting shakedowns of inmate cells, strip searches of inmates, and/or interactions between cadets, corrections officers, prison administrators and inmates, and all inmate grievances and/or other written complaints. (LB, ilcd)

Nov. 18, 2013

Nov. 18, 2013

PACER

Order on Motion

Nov. 18, 2013

Nov. 18, 2013

PACER

TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time 71 ALLOWED in that: Close of class certification fact discovery extended to 1/10/2014; Deadline for Plaintiffs to amend complaint extended to 1/20/2014; and, Plaintiff's motion for class certification to be filed by 2/3/2014. (LB, ilcd)

Nov. 18, 2013

Nov. 18, 2013

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Post-WalMart decisions on class certification

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 20, 2012

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

prisoners at a women's prison in Illinois

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Loevy & Loevy

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Illinois Department of Corrections, State

Lincoln Correctional Center, State

Logan Correctional Center, State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Unreasonable search and seizure

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Issues

General/Misc.:

Search policies

Strip search policy

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Assault/abuse by non-staff (facilities)

Assault/abuse by staff (facilities)

Reproductive rights:

Reproductive health care (including birth control, abortion, and others)