Case: Meade v. Bonin

2:20-cv-01455 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Filed Date: May 14, 2020

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about due process violation under the 14th amendment based on a judge potentially steering defendants towards using ankle monitors by a company he has financial and political ties to. On May 14, 2020, two criminal defendants who were ordered to wear ankle monitors in Judge Paul A. Bonin’s court, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The plaintiffs, represented by Institute for Justice, sued Judge Bonin and the ankle monitoring compan…

This is a case about due process violation under the 14th amendment based on a judge potentially steering defendants towards using ankle monitors by a company he has financial and political ties to. On May 14, 2020, two criminal defendants who were ordered to wear ankle monitors in Judge Paul A. Bonin’s court, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The plaintiffs, represented by Institute for Justice, sued Judge Bonin and the ankle monitoring company, ETOH Monitoring, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants violated their right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment by not disclosing his financial and political ties to the ankle monitoring company. The plaintiffs sought class-action certification, attorney fees and costs, and declaratory and injunctive relief that would make Judge Bonin disclose his relationship with ETOH monitoring to defendants when ordering their use, stop ETOH Monitoring from providing services to Judge Bonin without their relationship being disclosed, and to have ETOH disgorge and return or cancel fees collected. The case was assigned to Judge Carl J. Barbier.

The plaintiffs claimed that Judge Bonin unconstitutionally required or steered defendants in his court house into ankle monitoring service agreements and their significant fees with ETOH monitoring service. They claimed that Judge Bonin maintained a private and professional relationship with the two owners of ETOH monitoring. The plaintiffs claimed that the owners of ETOH monitoring donated or loaned $10,000 to Judge Bonin’s various judicial electoral campaigns. According to the plaintiffs, since 2017, Judge Bonin required the use of ETOH monitoring for those ordered to have an ankle monitor, and required fees paid before release from probation or as precondition to not being jailed. They further contend that ETOH regularly sent Judge Bonin a status report highlighting individuals to check in on, not because they violated their probation, but because they were behind on payments.

A 2018 report from Court Watch NOLA found that Judge Bonin, out of the five New Orleans Judges who received a financial campaign contribution from an ankle monitoring company, was the only one who required a defendant to wear an ankle monitor.

On July 14, 2020, both Judge Bonin and defendant ETOH filed a motion to dismiss the case against them for failure to state a claim that could be remedied as they are not a state actor. On August 23, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the claims against Judge Bonin. 

On September 4, 2020, Presiding Judge Barbier denied the ETOH's remaining motion to dismiss on the basis that ETOH Monitoring is a state actor under the “public function” test which makes their action remediable. 2020 WL 5311351.


On Jun 30, 2021, ETOH filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. On September 10, the court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court argued that the plaintiffs failed to prove a sufficient institutional incentive or individual bias through their pleadings, which is required under a Due Process challenge. 

On October 4, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a motion to appeal to the Fifth Circuit. The appellants argued that the district court erroneously dismissed their due process claim. They claim the district court’s dismissal was erroneous because the plaintiffs had adequately alleged the appearance and reality of interested-decision making, and that they had adequately pleaded an institutional due process claim, given that ETOH could benefit from each of Judge Bonin’s decisions. Multiple organizations, including the Cato Institute and MacArthuer Justice Center, submitted amicus curiae briefs. 

On February 10, 2022, appelle Judge Bonin filed a partial dismissal of the appeal, asking the court to dismiss him from the appeal. On February 15, 2022, the Fifth Circuit granted Judge Bonin’s partial dismissal of appeal, and the appeal remained pending as to all other parties. 

On August 2, 2022, Fifth Circuit Judges Richman, Wiener, and Willett heard oral arguments in this case. According to the docket, it appears that between August 2022 and August 2024, there were no updates in the appeal. In August and September 2024, the appellants filed supplemental authorities to which the appellee filed its response in October 2024.

As of November 24, 2024, the appeal is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Ariella Stafanson (10/9/2020)

Nicole Brigstock (11/30/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17166134/parties/meade-v-bonin/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:20-cv-01455

Docket [PACER]

Sept. 4, 2020

Sept. 4, 2020

Docket
1

2:20-cv-01455

Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

May 14, 2020

May 14, 2020

Complaint
7

2:20-cv-01455

First Amended Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

May 27, 2020

May 27, 2020

Complaint
39

2:20-cv-01455

Order & Reasons

Sept. 4, 2020

Sept. 4, 2020

Order/Opinion

2020 WL 5311351

72

2:20-cv-01455

Order & Reasons

Sept. 10, 2021

Sept. 10, 2021

Order/Opinion

2021 WL 4133506

73

2:20-cv-01455

Judgment

Sept. 10, 2021

Sept. 10, 2021

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17166134/meade-v-bonin/

Last updated June 2, 2026, 3 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Paul A. Bonin, ETOH Monitoring, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-8304166) filed by Hakeem Meade. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons for Paul A. Bonin, # 3 Summons for ETOH Monitoring, LLC)Attorney William Brock Most added to party Hakeem Meade(pty:pla).(Most, William) (Entered: 05/14/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons for Paul A. Bonin

View on PACER

3 Summons for ETOH Monitoring, LLC

View on PACER

May 14, 2020

May 14, 2020

RECAP
2

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for William R. Maurer (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8304169) by Hakeem Meade. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration in Support, # 3 Certificate of Good Standing, # 4 Consent to Electronic Filing)(Most, William) (Entered: 05/14/2020)

May 14, 2020

May 14, 2020

3

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jaba Tsitsuashvili (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-8304170) by Hakeem Meade. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Certificate of Good Standing, # 4 Consent to Electronic Filing)(Most, William) (Entered: 05/14/2020)

May 14, 2020

May 14, 2020

4

Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (aj) (Entered: 05/15/2020)

May 15, 2020

May 15, 2020

5

Summons Issued as to Paul A. Bonin, ETOH Monitoring, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(pp) (Entered: 05/15/2020)

May 15, 2020

May 15, 2020

6

ORDER granting 2 and 3 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to William R. Maurer and Jaba Tsitsuashvili for the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 5/15/20. # 1 Pro Hac Vice Notice) (cg). (Entered: 05/15/2020)

May 15, 2020

May 15, 2020

Initial Case Assignment

May 15, 2020

May 15, 2020

7

First AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants filed by Hakeem Meade, Marshall Sookram.Attorney William R. Maurer added to party Marshall Sookram(pty:pla).(Maurer, William) (Entered: 05/27/2020)

May 27, 2020

May 27, 2020

RECAP
8

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to ETOH Monitoring, LLC on 5/15/2020, answer due 7/14/2020. (Maurer, William) (Entered: 06/10/2020)

June 10, 2020

June 10, 2020

9

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Paul A Bonin on 5/15/2020, answer due 7/14/2020. (Maurer, William) (Entered: 06/13/2020)

June 13, 2020

June 13, 2020

10

MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(1) by Paul A Bonin. Motion(s) will be submitted on 8/12/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Notice of Submission, # 3 Request for Oral Argument)Attorney Joshua Simon Force added to party Paul A Bonin(pty:dft).(Force, Joshua) (Entered: 07/14/2020)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on PACER

2 Notice of Submission (Civil Only)

View on PACER

3 Request for Oral Argument

View on PACER

July 14, 2020

July 14, 2020

11

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Paul A Bonin. Motion(s) will be submitted on 8/12/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Notice of Submission, # 3 Request for Oral Argument)(Force, Joshua) (Entered: 07/14/2020)

July 14, 2020

July 14, 2020

12

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by ETOH Monitoring, LLC. Motion(s) will be submitted on 8/12/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Notice of Submission)Attorney Leonard Louis Levenson added to party ETOH Monitoring, LLC(pty:dft).(Levenson, Leonard) (Entered: 07/14/2020)

1

View on RECAP

July 14, 2020

July 14, 2020

13

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record by ETOH Monitoring, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Attorney Christian Wayne Helmke added to party ETOH Monitoring, LLC(pty:dft).(Helmke, Christian) (Entered: 07/14/2020)

July 14, 2020

July 14, 2020

14

Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Paul A Bonin regarding 10 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(1). (cg) (Entered: 07/15/2020)

July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

15

Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Paul A Bonin regarding 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (cg) (Entered: 07/15/2020)

July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

16

Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), 10 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(1); For future reference, "Request for Oral Argument" must be a separate entry. Clerk took correct action. (cg) (Entered: 07/15/2020)

July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

17

Request/Statement of Oral Argument by ETOH Monitoring, LLC regarding 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Levenson, Leonard) (Entered: 07/15/2020)

July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

18

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for Attorney Christian Wayne Helmke for ETOH Monitoring, LLC. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/15/2020. (cwa) (Entered: 07/15/2020)

July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk

July 15, 2020

July 15, 2020

19

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Continue and Reset Submission Date for Defendants' Pending Motions to Dismiss by Hakeem Meade, Marshall Sookram. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Maurer, William) (Entered: 07/22/2020)

July 22, 2020

July 22, 2020

20

ORDER granting 19 MOTION to Continue. The submission date for Defendants' pending Motions to Dismiss (Rec. Docs. 10, 11, 12) is CONTINUED to August 26, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss is CONTINUED to August 26, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/23/20.(cg) (Entered: 07/23/2020)

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

21

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification by Hakeem Meade, Marshall Sookram. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Maurer, William) (Entered: 08/06/2020)

Aug. 6, 2020

Aug. 6, 2020

22

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/11/2020. (cwa) (Entered: 08/11/2020)

Aug. 11, 2020

Aug. 11, 2020

23

RESPONSE to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), 10 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(1) . (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Tsitsuashvili, Jaba) (Entered: 08/18/2020)

Aug. 18, 2020

Aug. 18, 2020

24

RESPONSE to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Tsitsuashvili, Jaba) (Main Document 24 replaced on 8/26/2020) (cg). (Entered: 08/18/2020)

Aug. 18, 2020

Aug. 18, 2020

25

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File To File Omnibus Reply Brief In Further Support of His Motions to Dismiss by Paul A Bonin. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Pleading Reply Brief)(Force, Joshua) (Entered: 08/23/2020)

Aug. 23, 2020

Aug. 23, 2020

26

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Paul A. Bonin by All Plaintiffs. (Tsitsuashvili, Jaba) (Entered: 08/23/2020)

Aug. 23, 2020

Aug. 23, 2020

27

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that oral argument on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Rec. Docs. 10-12) set for August 26, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. is CANCELED. The motions will be considered on the briefs unless the Court instructs the parties otherwise. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/24/20.(cg) (Entered: 08/24/2020)

Aug. 24, 2020

Aug. 24, 2020

28

DEFICIENT: Amendment/Supplement to Document by All Plaintiffs re 24 Response to Motion Praecipe (Attachments: # 1 Replacement Page)(Maurer, William) Modified on 8/25/2020 (cg). (Entered: 08/24/2020)

Aug. 24, 2020

Aug. 24, 2020

29

STRICKEN: NOTICE by All Plaintiffs Letter to Court. (Maurer, William) Modified on 8/25/2020 (cg). (Entered: 08/24/2020)

Aug. 24, 2020

Aug. 24, 2020

RECAP
30

Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re 29 Notice - Letter to Court. Letters are not accepted in the court record and should not be filed into the record. This should be sent directly to Chambers. (cg) (Entered: 08/25/2020)

Aug. 25, 2020

Aug. 25, 2020

31

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Amend 24 Response to Motion by Hakeem Meade, Marshall Sookram. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Pleading, # 2 Proposed Order)(Maurer, William) Modified event and text on 8/26/2020 (cg). (Entered: 08/25/2020)

Aug. 25, 2020

Aug. 25, 2020

32

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Paul A. Bonin's pending Motions (Rec. Docs. 10, 11, 25) are DENIED AS MOOT. (See Rec. Doc. 26). Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/25/20. (cg) (Entered: 08/25/2020)

Aug. 25, 2020

Aug. 25, 2020

33

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum by ETOH Monitoring, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Pleading)(Levenson, Leonard) (Entered: 08/25/2020)

Aug. 25, 2020

Aug. 25, 2020

NOTICE OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENT: re 28 Amendment/Supplement to Document. Reason(s) of deficiency: **Leave of court is required to file this document. A Motion for Leave to Amend/Substitute Documents must filed to change any record that is already on the docket.** For corrective information, see section(s) D18 on http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/cmecf/Deficiency/deficiency.htm Attention: Document must be refiled in its entirety within seven(7) calendar days; otherwise, it may be stricken by the court without further notice. Deficiency remedy due by 9/1/2020. (cg)

Aug. 25, 2020

Aug. 25, 2020

Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk

Aug. 25, 2020

Aug. 25, 2020

34

ORDER granting 31 Motion for Leave to File Amended Response. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/26/20. (cg) (Entered: 08/26/2020)

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

35

ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/26/20. (cg) (Entered: 08/26/2020)

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

36

REPLY to Response to Motion filed by ETOH Monitoring, LLC re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (cg) (Entered: 08/26/2020)

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

37

FILED IN ERROR-- SEE REC DOC. 24 FOR CORRECTED DOCUMENT---Amendment/Supplement to Document by All Plaintiffs re 24 Response to Motion (Maurer, William) Modified on 8/26/2020 (cg). (Entered: 08/26/2020)

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

38

Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re 37 Amendment/Supplement to Document. Filing of this document was not necessary. When the Judge granted the amended document be replaced, the clerk had already replaced the image for Document 24 with the corrected version. Document 24 is now corrected and no further action is needed. (cg) (Entered: 08/26/2020)

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

39

ORDER AND REASONS denying 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/4/20. (cg)

Sept. 4, 2020

Sept. 4, 2020

RECAP
40

Answer to Amended Complaint

Oct. 12, 2020

Oct. 12, 2020

41

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings AND Order

Feb. 5, 2021

Feb. 5, 2021

42

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings AND Order

March 2, 2021

March 2, 2021

43

Scheduling Order

1 Pretrial Notice Form

View on RECAP

March 24, 2021

March 24, 2021

RECAP
44

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings AND Order

May 20, 2021

May 20, 2021

45

Discovery Conference

May 24, 2021

May 24, 2021

46

Protective Order

June 1, 2021

June 1, 2021

47

Protective Order

June 2, 2021

June 2, 2021

48

Protective Order

June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

RECAP
49

Appeal/Review of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court

June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

50

Declaration

June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

51

Response/Memorandum in Opposition to Motion

1 Exhibit "A"

View on PACER

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

RECAP
52

Substitute

June 24, 2021

June 24, 2021

53

Extension of Time to File Document

June 24, 2021

June 24, 2021

54

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

June 25, 2021

June 25, 2021

55

Order on Motion to Substitute

June 25, 2021

June 25, 2021

56

Enroll as Counsel of Record

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 28, 2021

June 28, 2021

57

Order on Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record

June 29, 2021

June 29, 2021

58

Judgment on the Pleadings

June 30, 2021

June 30, 2021

59

Extension of Time to File Document

July 1, 2021

July 1, 2021

60

~Util - Terminate Motions AND Order Setting/Resetting Hearing on Motion

July 2, 2021

July 2, 2021

61

Order on Motion for Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court

July 7, 2021

July 7, 2021

62

Response/Memorandum in Opposition to Motion

1 Appendix

View on PACER

Aug. 3, 2021

Aug. 3, 2021

63

Leave to File Document

1 Proposed Pleading

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 10, 2021

Aug. 10, 2021

64

Order on Motion for Leave to File

Aug. 11, 2021

Aug. 11, 2021

65

Reply to Response to Motion

Aug. 11, 2021

Aug. 11, 2021

66

Certify Class

Aug. 20, 2021

Aug. 20, 2021

67

Declaration

Aug. 20, 2021

Aug. 20, 2021

68

Declaration

Aug. 20, 2021

Aug. 20, 2021

69

Declaration

Aug. 20, 2021

Aug. 20, 2021

70

Seal Document

Aug. 20, 2021

Aug. 20, 2021

71

Order on Motion to Seal Document

Aug. 23, 2021

Aug. 23, 2021

72

ORDER AND REASONS granting 58 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ETOH's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Rec. Doc. 58) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/10/21. (cg)

Sept. 10, 2021

Sept. 10, 2021

RECAP
73

Judgment

Sept. 10, 2021

Sept. 10, 2021

RECAP
74

Notice of Appeal

Oct. 5, 2021

Oct. 5, 2021

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Oct. 14, 2021

Oct. 14, 2021

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Oct. 15, 2021

Oct. 15, 2021

USCA Case Number

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Oct. 25, 2021

Oct. 25, 2021

79

Appeal Transcript Request

Oct. 29, 2021

Oct. 29, 2021

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Nov. 4, 2021

Nov. 4, 2021

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Nov. 16, 2021

Nov. 16, 2021

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Jan. 4, 2022

Jan. 4, 2022

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Jan. 25, 2022

Jan. 25, 2022

Electronic Record on Appeal Access Granted

Feb. 11, 2022

Feb. 11, 2022

85

USCA JUDGMENT issued as mandate on 7/22/2025 as to [74] Notice of Appeal filed by Hakeem Meade, Marshall Sookram. IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. USCA judge name: Wiener, Richman, and Willett. (Attachments: (1) USCA Opinion, (2) USCA Transmittal Letter) (amj)

1 USCA Opinion

View on RECAP

2 USCA Transmittal Letter

View on RECAP

July 22, 2025

July 22, 2025

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Louisiana

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 14, 2020

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two criminal defendants who were ordered to wear ankle monitors in Judge Paul A. Bonin’s court.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Institute for Justice

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

ETOH Monitoring

State

Judge Paul A. Bonin

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Louisiana 2:20-cv-01455

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 21-30620

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conflict of interest

Courts

Fines/Fees/Bail/Bond

Recommended Citation