Case: Parga v. Tulsa County

4:18-cv-00298 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: June 6, 2018

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Individuals incarcerated in the Tulsa jail sued Tulsa County, the Tulsa County Sheriff, fifteen Special Judges and a district court judge in challenging the constitutionality of the county's wealth-based pretrial detention system. On June 6, 2018, the four plaintiffs, represented by Civil Rights Corps, filed this class-action lawsuit in the Northern District of Oklahoma. The case was assigned to Judge Claire Eagan. The plaintiffs brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Declaratory Judgeme…

Individuals incarcerated in the Tulsa jail sued Tulsa County, the Tulsa County Sheriff, fifteen Special Judges and a district court judge in challenging the constitutionality of the county's wealth-based pretrial detention system. On June 6, 2018, the four plaintiffs, represented by Civil Rights Corps, filed this class-action lawsuit in the Northern District of Oklahoma. The case was assigned to Judge Claire Eagan. The plaintiffs brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Declaratory Judgement Act, alleging that defendants violated their Equal Protection, Due Process, and Sixth Amendment rights by depriving them of their fundamental right to pretrial liberty and failing to provide counsel at bail hearings. The plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctive relief preventing the defendants from assigning bail without inquiring as to whether criminal defendants can pay it. The plaintiffs also asked the court to permanently enjoin the defendants from denying the putative class-members the right to a speedy, individualized hearing with counsel.

The plaintiffs were each arrested and informed that they had to pay bail ranging from $500 to $50,000 in order to be released from jail before their hearing. They were not asked whether they could afford the bond; because none of them had the financial resources to post bail, they were held for up to 11 days before their hearing without access to legal counsel. The plaintiffs alleged that this "wealth-based detention scheme" jailed presumptively innocent people for at least a week before they are able to challenge their detention. Such a system, the plaintiffs contend, violates the the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.

The same day that the complaint was filed, the plaintiffs asked for the court to certify their class. The plaintiffs proposed class consisted of "all people who are or will be detained in the Tulsa County Jail because they are unable to pay a secured financial condition of release."

The Tulsa County Sheriff answered the complaint on August 3, 2018, and the defendant-judges moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. The defendant-judges argued that the plaintiffs failed to use available state court remedies, such as criminal appellate or habeas processes, that could provide relief. Additionally, the defendant-judges also argued that the plaintiffs failed to allege specific misconduct beyond the judges' lack of addressing bail at arraignments.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on October 22, 2018. However, on November 19, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' amended complaint, the plaintiffs' motion for class-certification, and the defendant-judges' motion to dismiss as moot. 2018 WL 6048016. The court found that the plaintiffs paid their bonds and were released from jail in the days following the original complaint and therefore no longer suffered an actual injury. The court also determined that the "capable of repetition, yet evading review" exception did not apply because these four plaintiffs were expected to comply with the law and therefore this injury was not expected to repeat with regards to these plaintiffs. Additionally, the Court found that the claims were not "inherently transitory."

On December 11, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider the court's judgment. The plaintiffs objected to the court's characterization of their claims. The plaintiffs argued that they did not challenge their pretrial detention per se, but rather challenged their pretrial detention without counsel and a hearing. The plaintiffs argued that this characterization fit the "inherently transitory" exception to mootness because the Court could not reasonably consider a class certification motion before any named plaintiffs’ individual claims became moot.

Judge Eagan agreed with the plaintiffs and, on March 15, 2019, granted their motion for reconsideration. 2019 WL 1231675. The court reinstated the plaintiff's amended complaint and motion for class certification, and also reinstated the defendant-judges' motion to dismiss.

With the case active again, the defendant-judges filed their answer on March 25, 2019, and responded in opposition the plaintiffs' motion for class certification on April 15. The defendants also moved to stay the proceedings until the Oklahoma Senate considered a bill that would require individualized considerations of the ability to pay bail. On May 9, Judge Eagan granted the motion until the end of the legislative session or until the bill was signed into law. On June 14, the stay was lifted as the legislative session had ended.

The defendant-judges again moved to dismiss the claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on December 10. The defendants argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing, since their pre-trial detention had ended and therefore they were no longer suffering an injury.

After engaging in settlement talks but failing to reach an agreement, the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. They contended that the COVID-19 pandemic altered the conditions of detention such that injunctive relief was required in order to prevent irreparable harm to people detained solely based on their inability to pay bail. Judge Eagan denied the plaintiffs' motion on May 11, finding that the preliminary relief was inappropriate given the lack of COVID cases in Tulsa County jails at that time and because a preliminary injunction would not solve the bail issue raised before the pandemic began. 2020 WL 2393855.

The plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on March 3, 2021, and Judge Eagan ordered that the pending motions based on the previous complaint were moot the following day. The defendants filed their motion to dismiss the complaint on March 31, 2021. The plaintiffs filed a response in opposition on May 5 and on May 6, the defendants filed a stipulation of dismissal for the Board of County Commissioners for the County of Tulsa.

On May 17, the court reassigned the case to Judge Stephen P Friot.

Summary Authors

Justin Hill (1/13/2021)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8212301/parties/feltz-v-regalado/


Judge(s)

Eagan, Claire None (Oklahoma)

Jayne, Jodi F. (Oklahoma)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Animashaun, Akeeb Dami (District of Columbia)

Downer, Ryan Chasce (District of Columbia)

Gaztambide−Arandes, Laura (District of Columbia)

Gerstein, Charles L. (District of Columbia)

Hamilton, Ruth Ellen Lando (Oklahoma)

Holt, Allison (District of Columbia)

Horowitz, Hayley (New York)

Iliadis, Vassi (California)

Judge(s)

Eagan, Claire None (Oklahoma)

Jayne, Jodi F. (Oklahoma)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Animashaun, Akeeb Dami (District of Columbia)

Downer, Ryan Chasce (District of Columbia)

Gaztambide−Arandes, Laura (District of Columbia)

Gerstein, Charles L. (District of Columbia)

Hamilton, Ruth Ellen Lando (Oklahoma)

Holt, Allison (District of Columbia)

Horowitz, Hayley (New York)

Iliadis, Vassi (California)

Karakatsanis, Alec (District of Columbia)

Kasdin, Phoebe Anne (Oklahoma)

Kisloff, Michelle A. (District of Columbia)

Saleh, Kristina Michelle (District of Columbia)

Twinem, Alexandria (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Hall, Kimberly Majors (Oklahoma)

Lawson, Stefanie E. (Oklahoma)

Moore, Erin (Oklahoma)

Pederson, Devan (Oklahoma)

Rea, James Griffin (Oklahoma)

Wilson, Douglas Allen (Oklahoma)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket [PACER]

Feltz v. Regalado

Oct. 13, 2021 Docket
2

Class Action Complaint

June 6, 2018 Complaint
32

First Amended Class Action Complaint

Parga v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa

Oct. 22, 2018 Complaint
40

Opinion and Order

Parga v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa

2018 WL 6048016

Nov. 19, 2018 Order/Opinion
158

Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Tulsa County Sheriff

April 3, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
191

Opinion and Order

Feltz v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa

2020 WL 2393855

May 11, 2020 Order/Opinion

Resources

Title Description External URL

Tulsa County, OK: Bail

Civil Rights Corps

On June 6, 2018, Civil Rights Corps filed a lawsuit in Tulsa, Oklahoma, challenging Tulsa County’s unconstitutional wealth-based pretrial detention system. Tulsa County uses a secured money bail sche… June 6, 2018 http://www.civilrightscorps.org/work/case/tulsa-county-ok-bail

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8212301/feltz-v-regalado/

Last updated May 20, 2022, 5:25 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link
1

CIVIL COVER SHEET by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Hamilton, Ruth) (Entered: 06/06/2018)

June 6, 2018 PACER
2

COMPLAINT against All Defendants (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1924730) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga, Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Hamilton, Ruth) (Entered: 06/06/2018)

June 6, 2018 RECAP
3

MOTION for Class Action Certification by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Hamilton, Ruth) (Entered: 06/06/2018)

June 6, 2018 PACER
4

MOTION for Attorney(s) Akeeb Dami Animashaun to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1924795) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (With attachments) (Hamilton, Ruth) Modified on 6/7/2018 to add filers not selected at filing (sac-qc, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 06/06/2018)

June 6, 2018 PACER
5

MOTION for Attorney(s) Charles Gerstein to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1924801) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (With attachments) (Hamilton, Ruth) (Entered: 06/06/2018)

June 6, 2018 PACER

NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: not all filers were selected; Correction: added Michael Parga, Christopher Wood as filers (Re: 4 MOTION for Attorney(s) Akeeb Dami Animashaun to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1924795) ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk)

June 7, 2018 PACER
6

MOTION for Attorney(s) Hayley Horowitz to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1925062) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (With attachments) (Hamilton, Ruth) (Entered: 06/07/2018)

June 7, 2018 PACER
7

ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (re Attys Akeeb Dami Animashaun, Charles Gerstein, and Hayley Horowitz for plaintiffs) ; granting 4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 06/07/2018)

June 7, 2018 PACER
8

SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to All Defendants (jln, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/11/2018)

June 11, 2018 PACER
9

MOTION for Attorney(s) Alec Karakatsanis to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1928961) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (With attachments) (Animashaun, Akeeb) (Entered: 06/19/2018)

June 19, 2018 PACER
10

ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (re Atty Alec Karakatsanis for plaintiffs) ; granting 9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 06/19/2018)

June 19, 2018 PACER
11

SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Tulsa County (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga, Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 06/25/2018)

June 25, 2018 PACER
12

SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Vic Regalado (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga, Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 06/25/2018)

June 25, 2018 PACER
13

SUMMONS Returned Executed re: William Musseman (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga, Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 06/25/2018)

June 25, 2018 PACER
14

SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Dawn Moody (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga, Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 06/25/2018)

June 25, 2018 PACER
15

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Douglas Allen Wilson on behalf of Vic Regalado [Note: Attorney Douglas Allen Wilson added to party Vic Regalado(pty:dft).] (Wilson, Douglas) (Entered: 07/09/2018)

July 9, 2018 PACER
16

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Vic Regalado (Wilson, Douglas) (Entered: 07/09/2018)

July 9, 2018 PACER
17

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan : It is hereby ordered that Defendant Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff, in his official capacity, is granted an additional 21 days to 8-8-2018 to file his answer or other pleading in response to plaintiffs' class action complaint ; granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (djh, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 07/09/2018)

July 9, 2018 PACER
18

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Stefanie Erin Lawson on behalf of Dawn Moody, William Musseman [Note: Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Dawn Moody(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party William Musseman(pty:dft).] (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 07/09/2018)

July 9, 2018 PACER
19

Unopposed MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearings/DeadlinesTO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Dawn Moody, William Musseman (Lawson, Stefanie) Modified on 7/10/2018 to change event(sac-qc, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 07/09/2018)

July 9, 2018 PACER
20

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that defendants Dawn Moody and William Musseman's unopposed motion to extend time is granted. Said defendants shall file their answer or other responsive pleading no later than 8/8/2018. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 8/8/2018); granting 19 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Settlement Deadline(s)/Conference (Re: 2 Complaint ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 07/10/2018)

July 10, 2018 PACER

NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: wrong event selected (Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Settlement Deadlines/Conference); Correction: changed event (Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearings/Deadlines) (Re: 19 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk)

July 10, 2018 PACER
21

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kimberly Majors Hall on behalf of Vic Regalado [Note: Attorney Kimberly Majors Hall added to party Vic Regalado(pty:dft).] (Hall, Kimberly) (Entered: 07/13/2018)

July 13, 2018 PACER
22

ANSWER (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Vic Regalado (Wilson, Douglas) (Entered: 08/03/2018)

Aug. 3, 2018 PACER
23

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Stefanie Erin Lawson on behalf of Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, J Anthony Miller, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith [Note: Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Terry H Bitting(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Tammy Bruce(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Owen Evens(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party James W Keeley(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party J Anthony Miller(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Kirsten Pace(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party April Seibert(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Clifford Smith(pty:dft).] (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 08/08/2018)

Aug. 8, 2018 PACER
24

MOTION to Dismiss by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Sarah Smith [Note: Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Sarah Smith(pty:dft).] (Lawson, Stefanie)On 10/19/2018 additional moving defendants Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Deborah Ludi Leitch, Millie Otey, and Clifford Smith added to motion per minute order [Dkt.#31](djh, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 08/08/2018)

Aug. 8, 2018 PACER
25

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood ; (Animashaun, Akeeb) (Entered: 08/29/2018)

Aug. 29, 2018 PACER
26

REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Sarah Smith ; (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 09/12/2018)

Sept. 12, 2018 PACER
27

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Stefanie Erin Lawson on behalf of Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Deborah Ludi Leitch, Millie Otey, Clifford Smith [Note: Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Martha Rupp Carter(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Stephen R Clark(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Theresa Dreiling(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Deborah Ludi Leitch(pty:dft), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Millie Otey(pty:dft).] (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 10/09/2018)

Oct. 9, 2018 PACER
28

First MOTION for Hearing by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 10/09/2018)

Oct. 9, 2018 PACER
29

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - that the motion for hearing 28 is denied without prejudice to refiling after ruling on the motion to dismiss 24 ; discovery is stayed pending that ruling; counsel for plaintiffs is directed to properly name and serve County defendant. ; denying 28 Motion for Hearing (Re: 11 Summons Returned Executed, 2 Complaint, 28 First MOTION for Hearing, 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) Modified on 10/10/2018 (pll, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 10/10/2018)

Oct. 10, 2018 PACER

NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: typographical error; Correction: correct text to read: that the motion for hearing 28 is denied without prejudice to refiling after ruling on the motion to dismiss 24 ; discovery is stayed pending that ruling; counsel for plaintiffs is directed to properly name and serve County defendant (Re: 29 Minute Order,,,,,, Ruling on Motion for Hearing,, ) (pll, Dpty Clk)

Oct. 10, 2018 PACER
30

JOINDER in Motion (Re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) by Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Deborah Ludi Leitch (Lawson, Stefanie) Modified on 10/19/2018 to correct event and remove filers selected in error (srt, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 10/18/2018)

Oct. 18, 2018 PACER

NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: wrong event (Motion to Amend); filers selected in error; Correction: corrected event (Joinder in Motion) and removed filers selected in error (Re: 30 JOINDER in Motion ) (srt, Dpty Clk)

Oct. 19, 2018 PACER
31

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan : It is hereby ordered that Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend the Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #30] is granted. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #24] is hereby amended without objection to add defendants Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Deborah Ludi Leitch, Millie Otey, and Clifford Smith as additional moving parties. ; granting 30 Joinder in Motion (Re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (djh, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/19/2018)

Oct. 19, 2018 PACER
32

First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, Vic Regalado, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Tulsa (Re: 2 Complaint ) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga, Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 10/22/2018)

Oct. 22, 2018 RECAP
33

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - 32 First Amended Complaint was filed at the Court's direction to correct name of first named defendant, Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa; 24 motion to dismiss remains under advisement and will be deemed a motion to dismiss 32 ., taking motion(s) under advisement (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, 29 Minute Order,,,,,, Ruling on Motion for Hearing,, 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 10/24/2018)

Oct. 24, 2018 PACER
34

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, Vic Regalado, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 10/24/2018)

Oct. 24, 2018 PACER
35

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - 34 is granted; response to 3 due 30 days following ruling on 24 . ; striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s); granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion (Re: 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification, 29 Minute Order,,,,,, Ruling on Motion for Hearing,, 24 MOTION to Dismiss, 33 Minute Order,,,,,, Taking Motion(s) Under Advisement,, ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 10/25/2018)

Oct. 25, 2018 PACER
36

First MOTION for Attorney(s) Ryan C. Downer to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1977061) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (With attachments) (Animashaun, Akeeb) (Entered: 10/31/2018)

Oct. 31, 2018 PACER
37

ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (re Atty R. Downer for plaintiffs); directing counsel to correct case caption on future pleadings. ; granting 36 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, ) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 11/01/2018)

Nov. 1, 2018 PACER
38

ANSWER (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, ) by Vic Regalado (Wilson, Douglas) (Entered: 11/02/2018)

Nov. 2, 2018 PACER
39

ANSWER (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, ) by Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa [Note: Attorney Douglas Allen Wilson added to party Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa(pty:dft).] (Wilson, Douglas) (Entered: 11/02/2018)

Nov. 2, 2018 PACER
40

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that moving defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 24) is declared moot. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification (Dkt. # 3) is declared moot. Plaintiffs' amended complaint (Dkt. # 32) is dismissed without prejudice as moot. ; finding as moot 24 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 3 Motion for Class Action Certification (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, ) (RGG, Chambers) Modified on 3/18/2019 - VACATED per 48 (sac-qc, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 11/19/2018)

Nov. 19, 2018 RECAP
41

JUDGMENT by Judge Claire V Eagan (JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL), dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: 40 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Dismiss,, Ruling on Motion for Class Action Certification, ) (RGG, Chambers) Modified on 3/18/2019 - VACATED per 48 (sac-qc, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 11/19/2018)

Nov. 19, 2018 PACER

***Civil Case Terminated (see document number 41 ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk)

Nov. 19, 2018 PACER
42

MOTION to Reconsider Order and Judgment Dismissing Case as Moot and Denying Class Certification Motion, MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment (Re: 40 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Dismiss,, Ruling on Motion for Class Action Certification, 41 Judgment,, Dismissing/Terminating Case ) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (With attachments) (Gerstein, Charles) (Entered: 12/11/2018)

Dec. 11, 2018 PACER
43

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: 42 MOTION to Reconsider Order and Judgment Dismissing Case as Moot and Denying Class Certification Motion MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment ) by Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado ; (Wilson, Douglas) (Entered: 01/02/2019)

Jan. 2, 2019 PACER
44

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion And Brief in Support (Re: 42 MOTION to Reconsider Order and Judgment Dismissing Case as Moot and Denying Class Certification Motion MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, Vic Regalado, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith ; (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 01/02/2019)

Jan. 2, 2019 PACER
45

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) by Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado [Note: Attorney Kimberly Majors Hall added to party Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa(pty:dft).] (Hall, Kimberly) (Entered: 01/03/2019)

Jan. 3, 2019 PACER
46

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; terminating attorney Kimberly Majors Hall ; granting 45 Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 01/04/2019)

Jan. 4, 2019 PACER
47

REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: 42 MOTION to Reconsider Order and Judgment Dismissing Case as Moot and Denying Class Certification Motion MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment ) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood ; (Gerstein, Charles) (Entered: 01/16/2019)

Jan. 16, 2019 PACER
48

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiffs' motion to alter or amend judgment or for relief from judgment (Dkt. # 42) is granted, the Opinion and Order (Dkt. # 40) and the Judgment of Dismissal (Dkt. # 41) are vacated, and this case is reopened. The amended complaint (Dkt. # 32), the motion for class certification (Dkt. # 3), and the motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 24) are reinstated. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 24) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Count One - The motion is granted as to defendants Tulsa County Special Judges Terry H. Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Owen Evens, James W. Keeley, J. Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Sarah Smith, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R. Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Deborah Ludi Leitch, Millie Otey, and Clifford Smith for lack of Article III standing. The motion is denied as to defendant Tulsa County District Judge William Musseman. Count Two - The motion is denied as to all defendants, subject to plaintiffs' limitation on the type of relief sought against defendant special judges only (i.e., declaratory relief only), as discussed herein. Count Three - The motion is granted as to all defendants. ; reopening case; vacating/setting aside order(s); reinstating document(s); granting 42 Motion to Reconsider; granting 42 Motion to Alter Order/Judgment (Re: 40 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Dismiss,, Ruling on Motion for Class Action Certification, 41 Judgment,, Dismissing/Terminating Case, 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification, 24 MOTION to Dismiss, 42 MOTION to Reconsider Order and Judgment Dismissing Case as Moot and Denying Class Certification Motion MOTION to Alter Order/Judgment, 32 Amended Complaint, ) (Documents Terminated: 41 Judgment,, Dismissing/Terminating Case, 40 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Dismiss,, Ruling on Motion for Class Action Certification, ) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 03/15/2019)

March 15, 2019 RECAP
49

ANSWER (Re: 32 Amended Complaint, ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 03/25/2019)

March 25, 2019 PACER
50

ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan, directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 4/25/2019) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 03/26/2019)

March 26, 2019 PACER
51

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion (Re: 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith ; (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 04/15/2019)

April 15, 2019 PACER
52

ADOPTION of (Re: 51 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion) (Re: 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification ) by Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado ; (Wilson, Douglas) Modified on 4/16/2019 to change text to reflect correct event and create link to 51 (sac-qc, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 04/15/2019)

April 15, 2019 PACER

NOTICE of Docket Entry Modification; Error: wrong event selected (Response in Opposition to Motion); Correction: changed text to reflect correct event (Adoption) and created link to 51 (Re: 52 Response in Opposition to Motion, ) (sac-qc, Dpty Clk)

April 16, 2019 PACER
53

ERRATA/CORRECTION (Re: 51 Response in Opposition to Motion, ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 04/16/2019)

April 16, 2019 PACER
54

First JOINT STATUS REPORT by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 04/25/2019)

April 25, 2019 PACER
55

MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 04/26/2019)

April 26, 2019 PACER
56

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Erin Morgan Moore on behalf of Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith [Note: Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Terry H Bitting(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Tammy Bruce(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Martha Rupp Carter(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Stephen R Clark(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Theresa Dreiling(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Owen Evens(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party James W Keeley(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Deborah Ludi Leitch(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party J Anthony Miller(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Dawn Moody(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party William Musseman(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Millie Otey(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Kirsten Pace(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party April Seibert(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Clifford Smith(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Sarah Smith(pty:dft).] (Moore, Erin) (Entered: 04/26/2019)

April 26, 2019 PACER
57

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - ACCELERATING DEADLINE - Plaintiffs' response to the motion 55 is accelerated and due 5/3/19; No Reply., setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 5/3/2019) (Re: 55 MOTION to Stay Proceedings ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 04/29/2019)

April 29, 2019 PACER
58

First REPLY to Response to Motion (Re: 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification ) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood ; (With attachments) (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 04/29/2019)

April 29, 2019 PACER
59

First RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion to Stay (Re: 55 MOTION to Stay Proceedings ) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood ; (With attachments) (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 05/03/2019)

May 3, 2019 PACER
60

ERRATA/CORRECTION (Re: 58 Reply to Response to Motion ) by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 05/07/2019)

May 7, 2019 PACER
61

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendants' motion (Dkt. # 55) to stay proceedings until the end of the current legislative session or until Senate Bill 252 is signed into law, whichever occurs first, is granted, and this matter is stayed. The parties shall file a notice in this Court within three (3) days of the end of the Oklahoma legislative session, or the signing into law of Senate Bill 252, whichever occurs first. The Court will enter a scheduling order when the stay is lifted. ; staying case; granting 55 Motion to Stay (Re: 55 MOTION to Stay Proceedings ) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 05/09/2019)

May 9, 2019 RECAP
62

NOTICE to the Court Pursuant to Doc 61 (Re: 61 Opinion and Order,,,,,, Staying Case,,, Ruling on Motion to Stay,, ) by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 05/28/2019)

May 28, 2019 PACER
63

MOTION to Lift Stay and enter scheduling order by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 06/13/2019)

June 13, 2019 PACER
64

ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that the motion to lift stay (Dkt. # 63) is granted, and the stay of proceedings (Dkt. # 61) is lifted. A scheduling conference is hereby set for June 24, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. Scheduling order will be entered afterward as appropriate. ; lifting the stay; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Scheduling Conference set for 6/24/2019 at 09:30 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan); granting 63 Motion to Lift Stay (Re: 61 Opinion and Order,,,,,, Staying Case,,, Ruling on Motion to Stay,, 63 MOTION to Lift Stay and enter scheduling order ) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 06/14/2019)

June 14, 2019 PACER
65

MOTION for Leave to Appear, in part, by telephone by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 06/18/2019)

June 18, 2019 PACER
66

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan Plaintiffs' motion for counsel to appear by telephone (Dkt. # 65) is GRANTED. Counsel wishing to appear by telephone at the scheduling conference, shall provide their individual telephone numbers (not a conferencing service call-in number) to the courtroom deputy, Camie Portilloz, 918-699-4713, no later than the close of business on June 21, 2019. The courtroom deputy will place the calls to counsel on the courtroom conference system ; granting 65 Motion for Leave to Appear (Re: 65 MOTION for Leave to Appear, in part, by telephone, 64 Order,,, Lifting the Stay,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Lift Stay,, ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/19/2019)

June 19, 2019 PACER
67

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by James Griffin Rea on behalf of Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado [Note: Attorney James Griffin Rea added to party Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa(pty:dft), Attorney James Griffin Rea added to party Vic Regalado(pty:dft).] (Rea, James) (Entered: 06/21/2019)

June 21, 2019 PACER
68

MINUTES of Proceedings - held before Judge Claire V Eagan: Scheduling Conference held on 6/24/2019 Phase I and II discovery deadlines scheduled, striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s) (Re: 3 MOTION for Class Action Certification ) (Court Reporter: Greg Bloxom) (crp, Dpty Clk) Modified on 5/8/2020 to remove extra page of pdf (crp, Dpty Clk). (Entered: 06/24/2019)

June 24, 2019 PACER
69

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan Motions for Joinder of Additional Parties deadline 7/15/19, Phase I Discovery deadline 9/24/19, Phase II Discovery deadline 1/24/20, setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Discovery due by 1/24/2020) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/24/2019)

June 24, 2019 PACER
70

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (SUPPLEMENT TO SCHEDULING ORDER), setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Dispositive Motions due by 2/14/2020) (Re: 69 Scheduling Order,, Setting/Resetting Scheduling Order Date(s), ) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/25/2019)

June 25, 2019 PACER
71

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) Ruth Hamilton by Richard Feltz, Tara O'Donley, Michael Parga, Christopher Wood (Hamilton, Ruth) (Entered: 08/14/2019)

Aug. 14, 2019 PACER
72

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kristina Michelle Saleh on behalf of Richard Feltz, Michael Parga [Note: Attorney Kristina Michelle Saleh added to party Richard Feltz(pty:pla), Attorney Kristina Michelle Saleh added to party Michael Parga(pty:pla).] (Saleh, Kristina) (Entered: 08/14/2019)

Aug. 14, 2019 PACER
73

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) Hayley Horowitz, Charles Gerstein, Ryan Downer, and Akeeb Dami Animashaun by Tara O'Donley, Christopher Wood (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 08/14/2019)

Aug. 14, 2019 PACER
74

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; terminating attorney Ruth Ellen Lando Hamilton ; granting 71 Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s) (Re: 71 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) Ruth Hamilton ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 08/15/2019)

Aug. 15, 2019 PACER
75

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (re plaintiffs Tara O'Donley and Christopher Wood) ; terminating attorney Charles Lewis Gerstein; Hayley Elizabeth Horowitz; Akeeb Dami Animashaun and Ryan Downer ; granting 73 Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s) (Re: 73 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) Hayley Horowitz, Charles Gerstein, Ryan Downer, and Akeeb Dami Animashaun ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 08/15/2019)

Aug. 15, 2019 PACER
76

MOTION to Dismiss Party Tara O'Donley and Christopher Wood and Brief in Support by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 09/12/2019)

Sept. 12, 2019 PACER
77

NOTICE of Change of Address by Akeeb Dami Animashaun by on behalf of Richard Feltz, Michael Parga (With attachments) (Animashaun, Akeeb) (Entered: 10/08/2019)

Oct. 8, 2019 PACER
78

MOTION for Attorney(s) Laura Gaztambide Arandes to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2119703) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga (With attachments) (Animashaun, Akeeb) (Entered: 10/09/2019)

Oct. 9, 2019 PACER
79

ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan (re Atty Laura Gaztambide Arandes for plaintiffs) ; granting 78 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 10/09/2019)

Oct. 9, 2019 PACER
80

MOTION to Refer/for Referal to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Conference by Terry H Bitting, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 10/15/2019)

Oct. 15, 2019 PACER
81

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan, referring motion(s) to Magistrate Judge Cleary (Re: 80 MOTION to Refer/for Referal to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Conference ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 10/16/2019)

Oct. 16, 2019 PACER
82

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary a telephone conference is scheduled for 11/8/2019 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel for Defendant, Stefanie Erin Lawson, is directed to arrange the conference call and contact the Courtroom Deputy at stephanie_cope@oknd.uscourts.gov and all counsel of the conference number, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary) (Re: 80 MOTION to Refer/for Referal to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Conference ) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (sdc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/29/2019)

Oct. 29, 2019 PACER
83

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney(s) Akeeb Dami Animashaun by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga (Animashaun, Akeeb) (Entered: 11/07/2019)

Nov. 7, 2019 PACER
84

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that attorney Akeeb Dami Animashaun is withdrawn as counsel for all plaintiffs in this matter. ; granting 83 Motion to Withdraw Attorney(s) (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 11/07/2019)

Nov. 7, 2019 PACER
85

MINUTES of Proceedings - held before Magistrate Judge Paul J Cleary: Motion Hearing held on 11/8/2019 ; striking/terminating deadline(s)/Hearing(s); granting 80 Motion to Refer/Referral (Re: 80 MOTION to Refer/for Referal to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Conference ) (Court Reporter: C1) (sdc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/08/2019)

Nov. 8, 2019 RECAP
86

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Laura Gaztambide Arandes on behalf of Richard Feltz, Michael Parga [Note: Attorney Laura Gaztambide Arandes added to party Richard Feltz(pty:pla), Attorney Laura Gaztambide Arandes added to party Michael Parga(pty:pla).] (Gaztambide Arandes, Laura) (Entered: 11/13/2019)

Nov. 13, 2019 PACER
87

SUGGESTION of Death as to Michael Parga by Terry H Bitting, Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa, Tammy Bruce, Martha Rupp Carter, Stephen R Clark, Theresa Dreiling, Owen Evens, James W Keeley, Deborah Ludi Leitch, J Anthony Miller, Dawn Moody, William Musseman, Millie Otey, Kirsten Pace, Vic Regalado, April Seibert, Clifford Smith, Sarah Smith (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 11/20/2019)

Nov. 20, 2019 RECAP
88

MOTION to Compel Depositions by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga (With attachments) (Horowitz, Hayley) (Entered: 12/05/2019)

Dec. 5, 2019 PACER
89

MOTION for Protective Order by Deborah Ludi Leitch (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 12/05/2019)

Dec. 5, 2019 PACER
90

MOTION for Protective Order by Bill Hiddle, David Guten [Note: Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party Bill Hiddle(pty:mov), Attorney Stefanie Erin Lawson added to party David Guten(pty:mov).] (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 12/06/2019)

Dec. 6, 2019 PACER
91

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Stefanie Erin Lawson on behalf of David Guten, Bill Hiddle (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 12/06/2019)

Dec. 6, 2019 PACER
92

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Erin Morgan Moore on behalf of David Guten, Bill Hiddle [Note: Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party David Guten(pty:mov), Attorney Erin Morgan Moore added to party Bill Hiddle(pty:mov).] (Moore, Erin) (Entered: 12/06/2019)

Dec. 6, 2019 PACER
93

ERRATA/CORRECTION (Re: 89 MOTION for Protective Order ) by Deborah Ludi Leitch (With attachments) (Lawson, Stefanie) (Entered: 12/06/2019)

Dec. 6, 2019 PACER
94

MOTION for Attorney(s) Alexandria Twinem to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2146125) by Richard Feltz, Michael Parga (With attachments) (Gaztambide Arandes, Laura) (Entered: 12/06/2019)

Dec. 6, 2019 PACER

State / Territory: Oklahoma

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Special Collection(s):

Fines/Fees/Bail Reform (Criminalization of Poverty)

COVID-19 (novel coronavirus)

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 6, 2018

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

People detained in jail without consideration of their ability to pay bail.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Civil Rights Corps

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

Tulsa County (Tulsa), County

Tulsa County Sheriff (Tulsa), County

Tulsa County Special Judges (Tulsa), County

Tulsa County District Court Judge (Tulsa), County

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Issues

Reproductive rights:

Fetus Identity

General:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Fines/Fees/Bail/Bond

Over/Unlawful Detention

Placement in detention facilities

COVID-19:

Mitigation Denied

Mitigation Requested

Release Denied

Release Requested