Case: Abrams v. Chapman

2:20-cv-11053 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: April 29, 2020

Closed Date: Oct. 20, 2020

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

COVID-19 Summary: This is a class action brought on behalf of all prisoners of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief that would require MDOC to adhere to CDC COVID-19 guidelines. However, after the Sixth Circuit vacated a similar injunction in another case, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss this case.On April 29, 2020, prisoners of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Easter…

COVID-19 Summary: This is a class action brought on behalf of all prisoners of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief that would require MDOC to adhere to CDC COVID-19 guidelines. However, after the Sixth Circuit vacated a similar injunction in another case, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss this case.


On April 29, 2020, prisoners of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) brought this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Represented by the Michigan State Law School Civil Rights Clinic and private counsel, the plaintiffs sued MDOC and the wardens of several MDOC facilities. Suing under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the plaintiffs alleged violations of their Eighth Amendment rights. Specifically, they claimed that MDOC's inadequate response to the COVID-19 pandemic constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The case was assigned to Judge Mark A. Goldsmith and Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen.

The next day, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order requiring the defendants to take additional precautions against COVID-19, including: social distancing, personal protective equipment, soap and sanitizer, quarantine and isolation for those with symptoms, adequate health care, and testing. The plaintiffs also filed a motion to certify a class that would include "all inmates who currently are, or who in the future will be, incarcerated in the MDOC's custody, at its different prisons, and who are subjected to MDOC's policies and practices regarding COVID-19." This class represented over 37,000 individuals.

On May 4, the plaintiffs moved for a permanent injunction as well as a temporary restraining order, seeking the same relief as they did in the initial motion. The defendants filed a response on May 12.

After the Sixth Circuit's decision in Wilson v. Williams, found here in the Clearinghouse, the parties entered into an agreement. In Williams, the Court of Appeals held that federal prison officials had taken reasonable steps to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 and, therefore, the Eighth Amendment rights of the prisoners in that case had not been violated. In light of this decision, the plaintiffs here agreed to withdraw their motion for a temporary restraining order and motion to certify the class, and the case was stayed pending any outcome of an appeal in Wilson. The plaintiffs also agreed to dismiss the case if the Wilson decision was not appealed, reversed, or modified.

The Wilson decision stood. So, on October 20, 2020, the court entered a stipulated order dismissing this case, which is now closed.

Summary Authors

Caitlin Kierum (7/20/2020)

Timothy Leake (10/20/2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17112642/parties/abrams-v-glass/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Barkman, Cori E. (Michigan)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Braman, Melinda (Michigan)

Bush, Jeremy (Michigan)

Chapman, Willis (Michigan)

Draus, Paul (Michigan)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:20-cv-11053

Docket

Abrams v. Glass

Oct. 20, 2020

Oct. 20, 2020

Docket
1

2:20-cv-11053

Complaint for Class Certification and for Temporary Restraining Order and Permanent Injunction

April 29, 2020

April 29, 2020

Complaint
2

2:20-cv-11053

Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Injunctive Relief and Brief in Support

April 30, 2020

April 30, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
7 & 7-1 to 7-23

2:20-cv-11053

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

April 30, 2020

April 30, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
22 & 22-1 to 22-40

2:20-cv-11053

Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Injunctive-Relief and Brief in Support

May 4, 2020

May 4, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
27 & 27-1 to 27-14

2:20-cv-11053

Defendants' Response Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Injunctive Relief (with Index of Exhibits and Exhibit A to Exhibit M)

May 12, 2020

May 12, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
27-15 to 27-29

2:20-cv-11053

Exhibit N to Exhibit BB [of ecf 27 Defendants' Response Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Injunctive Relief]

May 12, 2020

May 12, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
30 & 30-1 to 30-31

2:20-cv-11053

Plaintiffs' Reply Brief to Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction

May 18, 2020

May 18, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
41

2:20-cv-11053

Emergency Motions for Expedited Evidentiary Hearing and Brief in Support

May 30, 2020

May 30, 2020

Pleading / Motion / Brief
44

2:20-cv-11053

Order Requiring Response to Emergency Motions (Dkts. 41, 42), Granting Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief (Dkt. 32), and Granting in Part Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply (Dkt. 35)

June 1, 2020

June 1, 2020

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17112642/abrams-v-glass/

Last updated Dec. 16, 2024, 10:50 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Michigan

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

COVID-19 (novel coronavirus)

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 29, 2020

Closing Date: Oct. 20, 2020

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Putative Class: All inmates who currently are, or who in the future will be, incarcerated in the MDOC's custody, at its different prisons, and who are subjected to MDOC's policies and practices regarding COVID-19

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Michigan Department of Corrections, State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Bathing and hygiene

Conditions of confinement

Sanitation / living conditions

Totality of conditions

COVID-19:

Mitigation Denied

Mitigation Requested

Release Denied

Release Requested

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding (General)