Case: National Urban League v. Ross

5:20-cv-05799 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Aug. 18, 2020

Closed Date: April 22, 2021

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 18, 2020, a coalition of cities, counties, Indian tribes, advocacy organizations, and individuals represented by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, the Brennan Center for Justice, and the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP sued the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Department”), the Department Secretary, the U.S. Census Bureau (“Bureau”), and the Bureau Director in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated the U.S. Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by abandoning the Bureau’s COVID-19 plans and pursuing a “rush plan” that would truncate 2020 Census timelines, undercount communities of color, and produce inaccurate census results. The plaintiffs asked the Court to declare the rush plan unconstitutional under the Enumeration Clause and unlawful under the APA; to vacate the rush plan and reinstate the Covid-19 Plan; and to enjoin the defendants from implementing the rush plan or otherwise interfering with the Covid-19 plan. The case was assigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh.

This case was brought amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, which severely disrupted the 2020 Census by suspending operations and creating significant delays in counting processes. In response, the Bureau implemented a COVID-19 plan delaying operations timelines to give the Bureau enough time to ensure the quality and accuracy of 2020 Census data. The COVID-19 plan extended the deadline for reporting state population totals to the President from December 31, 2020 to April 30, 2021, and the deadline for reporting redistricting numbers to the states from March 31, 2020 to July 31, 2021.

Then, on August 3, 2020, the Secretary of Commerce and the Census Bureau Director abruptly reversed course and announced that the Bureau would abandon the COVID-19 plan and adopt a rush plan. The rush plan required states to comply with the original 2020 Census deadlines, forcing them to complete 7.5 months of data collection and processing work in roughly half the time. The Bureau’s about-face was criticized by census experts, who concluded that the rush plan would significantly undermine the quality of the 2020 Census by undercounting communities of color, especially undocumented immigrants.

In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that (1) the Bureau violated its duty under the Enumeration Clause to make census-related decisions that “bear a reasonable relationship to the accomplishment of an actual enumeration of the population,” and (2) the Bureau’s decision to abandon its COVID-19 plans and pursue the rush plan was arbitrary and capricious under the APA because the Bureau did not adequately explain its decision, and (3) the explanation the Bureau provided was pretextual. In sum, the plaintiffs argued that the Bureau abandoned the COVID-19 plan and pursued the rush plan in a thinly veiled attempt to exclude undocumented people from the state population totals used to apportion the U.S. House of Representatives, which would result in a more favorable post-Census apportionment for the Republican Party.

On September 5, 2020, the Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order, enjoining the Bureau from implementing the rush plan until the court conducted a hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. 2020 WL 5291452. On September 17, 2020, the Court extended the order up to seven days or until the Court ruled on the plaintiffs’ motion, whichever came first, in part because the defendants failed to produce the administrative record pursuant to a court order. 2020 WL 5578931. In the meantime, Louisiana and Mississippi moved to intervene in the case, arguing that the states had significant protectable interests in the matter that were not adequately represented by the parties. The states also warned that the plaintiffs aimed to “pad the census count in certain jurisdictions.” The plaintiffs opposed the states’ motion to intervene on October 7, 2020.

In a 78-page ruling on September 24, 2020, the Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, holding that the rush plan was likely arbitrary and capricious; that plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm without an injunction; that the balance of hardships tipped sharply in plaintiffs’ favor; and that a preliminary injunction was in the public interest. 489 F. Supp. 3d 939. The injunction order stayed the rush plan deadlines for completing data collection and for reporting total state population totals and enjoined the defendants from implementing them.

The next day, September 25, 2020, the Court denied the federal government’s motion to stay the Court’s order pending appeal in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The government appealed to the Ninth Circuit, requesting an immediate administrative stay and filing an emergency motion to stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal. On September 30, 2020, in a partial ruling on the government’s appeal, the Ninth Circuit denied the government’s request for an immediate administrative stay because it would have “upended, rather than preserved” the status quo. 2020 WL 5815054.

While the parties awaited the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the government’s emergency motion to stay, the district court issued a clarifying order addressing numerous allegations of defendants’ noncompliance with the original temporary restraining order and the preliminary injunction. 491 F. Supp. 3d 572. In the October 1, 2020, order, the Court specified the scope of the injunction and ordered tailored relief to ensure defendants complied with it. This relief included direct text messages from the Bureau Director to all Bureau employees informing them of the injunction and the new census deadlines, as well as a sworn affidavit from the Bureau Director declaring that the Bureau was complying with the injunction order. Finally, the Court denied as moot plaintiffs’ September 30, 2020, motion to compel and for sanctions for defendants’ noncompliance with court orders, and plaintiffs’ September 30, 2020, motion for a temporary restraining order pending the Court’s ruling on plaintiff’s motion to compel and for sanctions.

One week later, on October 7, 2020, the Ninth Circuit granted in part and denied in part the government’s emergency motion to stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal, holding that the government was entitled to a stay to the extent that the district court enjoined it from abiding by existing statutory deadlines but was not entitled to a stay regarding the implementation of the rush plan. 977 F.3d 770. Under this order, the census count had to continue until October 31, 2020.

The government appealed to the Supreme Court, which stayed the injunction on October 13, 2020, pending the disposition of the government’s Ninth Circuit appeal and the government’s petition for writ of certiorari. 141 S. Ct. 18. This stay allowed the Census Bureau to cease its counting operations in accordance with the rush plan.

The defendants generally concluded field operations for the census on October 15, 2020.

The plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on October 27, 2020. The amended complaint was filed to in an effort to show why the recent litigation developments required expedited resolution on the merits. Because the new census plan cut in half the amount of time for conducting the decennial census, the plaintiffs argued that only expedited permanent relief could ensure a fair, accurate, and complete 2020 census.

President Joe Biden was elected President of the United States in November 2020. On January 15, 2021, the parties filed a joint case management statement, in which the parties requested a 21-day state of the case in order to let the Biden Administration assess the case. The parties subsequently requested additional stays as they worked toward resolution of the case, and the court granted these requests.

On April 22, 2021, the court granted a proposed stipulation order for dismissal. The order stated that the census would not include any information on citizenship or immigration status. It also provided that the Census Bureau would continue its data processing with an anticipated end-date of April 30, 2021. The Census Bureau also agreed to provide metrics to gauge the reliability of the census data that had been collected. Finally, the defendants agreed to pay $1,500,000 in attorneys' fees and $150,000 in costs.

	Document
5:20-cv-05799	Docket [PACER]	April 28, 2021	April 28, 2021 Docket
1 5:20-cv-05799	Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 Complaint
61 5:20-cv-05799	First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief	Sept. 1, 2020	Sept. 1, 2020 Complaint
84 5:20-cv-05799	Order Granting Motion for Temporary Restraining Order	Sept. 5, 2020	Sept. 5, 2020 Order/Opinion
142 5:20-cv-05799	Order Extending Temporary Restraining Order for Defendants' Partial Production of the Administrative Record	Sept. 17, 2020	Sept. 17, 2020 Order/Opinion
204 5:20-cv-05799	Notice of Motion and Motion to Intervene by States of Louisiana and Mississippi	Sept. 23, 2020	Sept. 23, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
208 5:20-cv-05799	Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Stay and Preliminary Injunction	Sept. 24, 2020	Sept. 24, 2020 Order/Opinion
212 5:20-cv-05799	Order Denying Motion to Stay Pending Appeal	Sept. 25, 2020	Sept. 25, 2020 Order/Opinion
27 20-16868	Order U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	Sept. 30, 2020	Sept. 30, 2020 Order/Opinion
288 5:20-cv-05799	Order Re: Clarification of Stay and Preliminary Injunction	Oct. 1, 2020	Oct. 1, 2020 Order/Opinion

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0971-14828740) against Steven Dillingham, Wilbur L. Ross, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. Filed byCity of Los Angeles, California, Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of Salinas, California, Rodney Ellis, League of Women Voters, City of San Jose, California, Harris County, Texas, National Urban League, Adrian Garcia, King County, Washington. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huseny, Sadik) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 RECAP
2	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14829876.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Wolf, Thomas) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
3	Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/1/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020)	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
4	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14830168.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Percival, Kelly) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
5	First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Wendy Weiser ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14830320.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service certificate of good standing)(Weiser, Wendy) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate/Proof of Service certificate of good standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
6	SUA SPONTE Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Case 5:20-cv-05799 NC with 5:20-cv-05167 LHK and 5:20-cv-05169 LHK. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/18/2020. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020)	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 RECAP
7	Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/11/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020)	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
8	Proposed Summons. (Huseny, Sadik) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020)	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
9	NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Mark Bauer on behalf of Plaintiffs National Urban League; League of Women Voters; Black Alliance for Just Immigration; Harris County, Texas; King County, Washington; City of San Jose, California; Rodney Ellis and Adrian Garcia (Bauer, Steven) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020)	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 RECAP
10	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Richard P. Bress ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14832247.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Bress, Richard) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
11	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Melissa Arbus Sherry ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14832288.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Sherry, Melissa) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
12	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Anne W. Robinson ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14832323.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Robinson, Anne) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
13	NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Danielle Lankenau on behalf of Plaintiffs National Urban League; League of Women Voters; Black Alliance for Just Immigration; Harris County, Texas; King County, Washington; City of San Jose, California; Rodney Ellis and Adrian Garcia (Lankenau, Shannon) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020)	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
14	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Tyce R. Walters ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14832361.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Walters, Tyce) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
15	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Genevieve P. Hoffman ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14832370.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Hoffman, Genevieve) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
16	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Gemma Donofrio ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14832380.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Donofrio, Gemma) (Filed on 8/18/2020) (Entered: 08/18/2020) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
	~Util - Case Assigned by Intake	Aug. 18, 2020	Aug. 18, 2020 PACER
17	NOTICE of Appearance by Jon Greenbaum (Greenbaum, Jon) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
18	Summons Issued as to Steven Dillingham, Wilbur L. Ross, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
19	ORDER GRANTING 2 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Thomas P. Wolf Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020). (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
20	ORDER GRANTING 4 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Kelly M. Percival Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
21	ORDER GRANTING 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Wendy Weiser Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
22	ORDER GRANTING 10 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Richard P. Bress representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
23	ORDER GRANTING 11 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Melissa Arbus Sherry Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
24	ORDER GRANTING 12 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Anne W. Robinson Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
25	ORDER GRANTING 14 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Tyce R. Walters Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
26	ORDER GRANTING 15 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Genevieve P. Hoffman Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
27	ORDER GRANTING 16 APPLICATION of Attorney Gemma Donofrio Pro Hac Vice representing Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) (Entered: 08/19/2020)	Aug. 19, 2020	Aug. 19, 2020 PACER
28	ORDER RELATING CASES by Judge Lucy H. Koh. The Court RELATES Case No. 5:20-cv-05799-NC, National Urban League et al v. Ross et al, to Case Nos. 5:20-cv-05167-LHK, City of San Jose, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al, and 5:20-cv-05169 LHK, State of California, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al. The Clerk shall reassign National Urban League et al v. Ross et al to Judge Lucy H. Koh. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2020) (Entered: 08/21/2020)	Aug. 21, 2020	Aug. 21, 2020 PACER
29	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 8/21/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2020) (Entered: 08/21/2020) 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording View on PACER	Aug. 21, 2020	Aug. 21, 2020 PACER
30	SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of Los Angeles, California, Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of Salinas, California, Rodney Ellis, League of Women Voters, City of San Jose, California, Harris County, Texas, National Urban League, Adrian Garcia, King County, Washington. Steven Dillingham served on 8/20/2020, answer due 10/19/2020; Wilbur L. Ross served on 8/20/2020, answer due 10/19/2020; U.S. Census Bureau served on 8/20/2020, answer due 10/19/2020; U.S. Department of Commerce served on 8/20/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (Bauer, Steven) (Filed on 8/21/2020) (Entered: 08/21/2020)	Aug. 21, 2020	Aug. 21, 2020 PACER
31	Order Requiring Appearance and Setting Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/21/2020. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2020) (Entered: 08/21/2020)	Aug. 21, 2020	Aug. 21, 2020 PACER
	Order	Aug. 21, 2020	Aug. 21, 2020 PACER
32	CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Per 31 Order, an Initial Case Management Conference is SET for 8/26/2020 at 2:00 PM. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lhk Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at lhkcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 8/25/2020 at 12:00pm noon PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020) (Entered: 08/24/2020)	Aug. 24, 2020	Aug. 24, 2020 PACER
33	NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel D. Mauler on behalf of Defendants (Mauler, Daniel) (Filed on 8/24/2020) (Entered: 08/24/2020)	Aug. 24, 2020	Aug. 24, 2020 PACER
	Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing	Aug. 24, 2020	Aug. 24, 2020 PACER
34	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14856733.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Rosenberg, Ezra) (Filed on 8/25/2020) (Entered: 08/25/2020) 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing View on PACER	Aug. 25, 2020	Aug. 25, 2020 PACER
35	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Preliminary Injunction Briefing Schedule, Page Counts, and Defendants' Response to Complaint filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of Los Angeles, California, City of Salinas, California, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Sadik Huseny, # 2 Proposed Order)(Huseny, Sadik) (Filed on 8/25/2020) (Entered: 08/25/2020) 1 Declaration of Sadik Huseny View on PACER 2 Proposed Order View on PACER	Aug. 25, 2020	Aug. 25, 2020 PACER
36	MOTION to Stay and, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City of Los Angeles, California, City of Salinas, California, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. Motion Hearing set for 9/17/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 9/8/2020. Replies due by 9/15/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of John Thompson, # 3 Declaration of D. Sunshine Hillygus, Ph.D., # 4 Declaration of Dr. Thomas A. Louis, # 5 Declaration of Andrew J. Westall, # 6 Declaration of Maria de la Luz Garcia, # 7 Declaration of Umair A. Shah, # 8 Declaration of Adrian Garcia, # 9 Declaration of Jared R. Briggs, # 10 Declaration of Paul Wilden, # 11 Declaration of Elizabeth Soto, # 12 Declaration of Monica Gurmilan, # 13 Declaration of Dwight Dively, # 14 Declaration of Nana Gyamfi, # 15 Declaration of Celina Stewart, # 16 Declaration of Jeri Green, # 17 Declaration of Rodney Ellis)(Huseny, Sadik) (Filed on 8/25/2020) Modified on 10/5/2020 (lhklc3, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/25/2020) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER 2 Declaration of John Thompson View on RECAP 3 Declaration of D. Sunshine Hillygus, Ph.D. View on RECAP 4 Declaration of Dr. Thomas A. Louis View on RECAP 5 Declaration of Andrew J. Westall View on PACER 6 Declaration of Maria de la Luz Garcia View on PACER 7 Declaration of Umair A. Shah View on PACER 8 Declaration of Adrian Garcia View on PACER 9 Declaration of Jared R. Briggs View on PACER 10 Declaration of Paul Wilden View on PACER 11 Declaration of Elizabeth Soto View on PACER 12 Declaration of Monica Gurmilan View on PACER 13 Declaration of Dwight Dively View on PACER 14 Declaration of Nana Gyamfi View on PACER 15 Declaration of Celina Stewart View on PACER 16 Declaration of Jeri Green View on PACER 17 Declaration of Rodney Ellis View on PACER	Aug. 25, 2020	Aug. 25, 2020 RECAP
37	Declaration of Sadik Huseny in Support of 36 MOTION to Stay and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed byBlack Alliance For Just Immigration, City of Los Angeles, California, City of Salinas, California, City of San Jose, California, Rodney Ellis, Adrian Garcia, Harris County, Texas, King County, Washington, League of Women Voters, National Urban League. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15)(Related document(s) 36 ) (Huseny, Sadik) (Filed on 8/25/2020) (Entered: 08/25/2020) 1 Exhibit 1 View on PACER 2 Exhibit 2 View on PACER 3 Exhibit 3 View on PACER 4 Exhibit 4 View on PACER 5 Exhibit 5 View on PACER 6 Exhibit 6 View on PACER 7 Exhibit 7 View on PACER 8 Exhibit 8 View on PACER 9 Exhibit 9 View on PACER 10 Exhibit 10 View on PACER 11 Exhibit 11 View on RECAP 12 Exhibit 12 View on PACER 13 Exhibit 13 View on PACER 14 Exhibit 14 View on PACER 15 Exhibit 15 View on PACER	Aug. 25, 2020	Aug. 25, 2020 PACER

Case: National Urban League v. Ross

5:20-cv-05799 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Case Summary

Related Cases

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details