Case: Alcantara v. Archambeault

3:20-cv-00756 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Filed Date: April 21, 2020

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

COVID-19 Summary: This is a habeas petition brought on behalf of medically vulnerable immigration detainees confined in two detention centers in California. The plaintiffs were granted a temporary restraining order and released from detention on April 30, 2020. The motion for preliminary injunctions for both subclasses were denied on May 26 and July 22. The parties engaged in discovery as well as settlement discussions throughout late 2020 and 2021, and the case is currently stayed.This is a cl…

This is a class action lawsuit regarding the immediate release of medically vulnerable immigration detainees from two immigration detention centers during the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 21, 2020, numerous immigration detainees filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The plaintiffs sued the Acting Secretary for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the senior warden and an officer at Otay Mesa Detention Center (OMDC), Field Office Director at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Calexico Assistant Field Office Director, Deputy Director of ICE, and Facility Administrator at the Imperial Regional Detention Facility (IRDF) for writs of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C § 2241. Specifically, they alleged violations of their Fifth Amendment right to due process by subjecting them to heightened risk of contracting COVID-19. Represented by private counsel and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of San Diego and Imperial Counties, the plaintiff sought writs of habeas corpus for immediate release of medically vulnerable detainees, or alternatively injunctive relief or a temporary restraining order ordering the immediate release, as well as declaratory relief and attorneys' fees. The case was assigned to Judge Dana M. Sabraw.

The plaintiffs alleged that in the Spring of 2020, outbreaks of COVID-19 at the detention facilities escalated and that ODMC had the highest number of confirmed cases out of any ICE facility in the country. They argued that the staff failed to take appropriate preventative measures, such as by failing to allow for social distancing in the barracks, dining, bathing, or recreation areas.

On the same day the petition was filed, the plaintiffs also filed motions for a temporary restraining order and for class certification. The plaintiffs requested a class-wide temporary restraining order directing the defendants to immediately release the Otay Mesa Medically Vulnerable subclass from custody , which included "all civil immigration detainees incarcerated at the Otay Mesa Detention Center who are age 45 or over or who have medical conditions that place them at heightened risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19." The plaintiffs also proposed an Imperial Class of "all civil immigration detainees incarcerated at the Imperial Regional Detention Facility" and an Imperial Medically Vulnerable Subclass of "all civil immigration detainees incarcerated at the Imperial Regional Detention Facility who are age 45 or over or who have medical conditions that place them at heightened risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19."

On April 30, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order, declaring that the conditions of confinement at OMDC were unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment. The court provisionally granted the OMDC Subclass and ordered the defendants to identify subclass members and immediately release them in a manner that comported with public health guidelines. On May 1, the court issued an order granting in part the class certification, modifying and provisionally certifying the Otay Mesa Medically Vulnerable subclass as "all civil immigration detainees incarcerated at the Otay Mesa Detention Center who are age 60 or over or who have medical conditions that place them at heightened risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19 as determined by CDC guidelines." The court also confirmed its issuance of the temporary restraining order set forth in the April 30 order.

On May 4, 2020, the defendants filed a motion to amend or correct the order granting the temporary restraining order, contending that the court addressed the plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits after it declared that the conditions of confinement were unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment and erred in provisionally granting the Subclass. They requested that the court correct the April 30 order to clarify that it did not issue a ruling on the merits but rather found a likelihood of success on the merits. The court granted the defendants' motion in part, specifically correcting the language of the April 30 order to state that it found a likelihood of success on the merits.

In a May 11 supplemental briefing, the plaintiffs argued that, because they could continue to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim, the temporary restraining order should be converted to a preliminary injunction. However, on May 26, the court denied this request for a preliminary injunction, finding that the defendants instituted a number of new policies and practices to address the spread of COVID-19 at OMDC (such as suspending new admissions, screening all persons entering the facility, posting educational resources, increasing sanitation, providing masks to detainees, and requiring employees to wear personal protective equipment), had identified subclass members, and that most subclass members were being housed in units with no positive cases. The court thus found that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the due process claim.

On June 12, the plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction and writs of habeas corpus and to provisionally certify the IRDF class and subclass. Specifically, the plaintiffs requested that the court order the defendants to release all members of the IRDF subclass, reduce the population at the facility to allow for social distancing, and create a plan to protect those remaining (including implementing testing, social distancing, and cleaning protocols and providing personal hygiene and protective materials).

On July 22, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and motion for class certification. The court held that IRDF had no active COVID-19 cases and thus, unlike OMDC, the plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits.

On August 10, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss and a joint motion to decertify the OMDC subclass, both of which the court denied on October 19.

On August 28, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from the May 26 order or, in the alternative, for preliminary injunction to establish a dispute resolution process regarding the OMDC subclass. The court denied this motion on November 12, stating that the plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits. 2020 WL 6684940. The court stated that even though OMDC had resumed accepting new individuals, including individuals who had tested positive for COVID-19, that was not sufficient to warrant relief in light of the precautions being taken at OMDC. Furthermore, the court decided that although the plaintiffs' assertion that these new admissions were being housed with members of the OMDC subclass was potentially concerning, it was unclear whether it was actually happening.

On April 15, 2021 the parties filed a joint motion to extend all case deadlines so that they could engage in confidential settlement discussions. Through the late spring and summer of 2021, the parties continued settlement discussions. On July 12, the parties filed a joint motion to stay the case for 90 days, which the court granted on July 16. At the end of this period, the parties moved to extend the stay, which the court granted on October 14.

	Document
3:20-cv-00756 3:20-cv-00618 3:20-cv-00947 3:20-cv-00782	Docket [PACER]	Oct. 14, 2021	Oct. 14, 2021 Docket
1 3:20-cv-00756	Complaint-Class Action and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 Complaint
2 3:20-cv-00756	Plaintiff-Petitioners' Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Subclass-Wide Emergency Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and Writ of Habeas Corpus	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
1-2 3:20-cv-00756	Plaintiff-Petitioners' Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
38 3:20-cv-00756	Order Granting Plaintiff-Petitioners' Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Subclass-wide Temporary Restraining Order	April 30, 2020	April 30, 2020 Order/Opinion
41 3:20-cv-00756	Order (1) Granting in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and (2) Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Subclass-wide Emergency Temporary Restraining Order	May 1, 2020	May 1, 2020 Order/Opinion 106 Fed.R.Serv.3d 931
54 3:20-cv-00756	Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Warden Larose's Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration	May 6, 2020	May 6, 2020 Order/Opinion
77 3:20-cv-00756	Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction	May 26, 2020	May 26, 2020 Order/Opinion 462 F.Supp.3d 1073
83 3:20-cv-00756	Plaintiff-Petitioners' Notice of Motion and Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Writ of Habeas Corpus	June 12, 2020	June 12, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
106 3:20-cv-00756	Order (1) Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and (2) Denying without Prejudice Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification	July 22, 2020	July 22, 2020 Order/Opinion 2020 WL 4201665

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Gregory J. Archambeault, James Dobson, Jesus Reyna, Christopher J. LaRose, Sixto Marrero, Matthew T. Albence, Chad Wolf, filed by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna, Mary Doe, (Filing fee $5 - receipt number ACASDC-13772781 [paid $400.00 for complaint, confirmed petition]) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Notice of Motion for Class Certification, # 3 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 4 Declaration Bardis Vakili In Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 5 Declaration of Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, # 6 Declaration of Yasmani Osorio Reyna, # 7 Declaration f Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, # 8 Declaration of Mary Doe, # 9 Declaration of Dorien Ediger-Seto, # 10 Declaration of Luis Gonzalez, # 11 Declaration of Elizabeth Lopez, # 12 Declaration of Kate Clark, # 13 Declaration of Brendan Cassidy, # 14 Declaration of Dr. Joseph J. Amon, # 15 Declaration f Dr. Katherine C. McKenzie, # 16 Declaration f Dr. Jonathan L. Golob)The new case number is 3:20-cv-756-GPC-AHG. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Langarica, Monika)(jms)(jrd) (Entered: 04/21/2020) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER 2 Notice of Motion for Class Certification View on RECAP 3 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Class Certification View on PACER 4 Declaration Bardis Vakili In Support of Motion for Class Certification View on PACER 5 Declaration of Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara View on PACER 6 Declaration of Yasmani Osorio Reyna View on PACER 7 Declaration f Maria Flor Calderon Lopez View on PACER 8 Declaration of Mary Doe View on PACER 9 Declaration of Dorien Ediger-Seto View on PACER 10 Declaration of Luis Gonzalez View on PACER 11 Declaration of Elizabeth Lopez View on PACER 12 Declaration of Kate Clark View on PACER 13 Declaration of Brendan Cassidy View on PACER 14 Declaration of Dr. Joseph J. Amon View on PACER 15 Declaration f Dr. Katherine C. McKenzie View on RECAP 16 Declaration f Dr. Jonathan L. Golob View on RECAP	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 RECAP
2	MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities In support of Ex Parte Application for TRO, # 2 Declaration of Monika Y. Langarica in support of motion for Emergency Temporary)(jms)(jrd) (Entered: 04/21/2020) 1 Memo of Points and Authorities In support of Ex Parte Application for TRO View on PACER 2 Declaration of Monika Y. Langarica in support of motion for Emergency Temporary View on PACER	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 RECAP
3	MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna. (jms)(jrd) (Entered: 04/21/2020)	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 PACER
4	NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna of case(s): 20cv618-BAS-RBB, 20cv658-LAB-MSB, 20cv679-H-BLM, 20cv682-LAB-MDD. (jms)(jrd) (Entered: 04/21/2020)	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 RECAP
5	NOTICE of Appearance by Bardis Vakili on behalf of Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Flor Calderon Maria Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna (Vakili, Bardis)Attorney Bardis Vakili added to party Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara(pty:pet), Attorney Bardis Vakili added to party Mary Doe(pty:pet), Attorney Bardis Vakili added to party Flor Calderon Maria Lopez(pty:pet), Attorney Bardis Vakili added to party Yasmani Osorio Reyna(pty:pet) (jms). (Entered: 04/21/2020)	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 PACER
6	NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Robin Grano on behalf of Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Flor Calderon Maria Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna (Grano, Kimberly)Attorney Kimberly Robin Grano added to party Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara(pty:pet), Attorney Kimberly Robin Grano added to party Mary Doe(pty:pet), Attorney Kimberly Robin Grano added to party Flor Calderon Maria Lopez(pty:pet), Attorney Kimberly Robin Grano added to party Yasmani Osorio Reyna(pty:pet) (jms). (Entered: 04/21/2020)	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 PACER
7	NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Paul Markovitz on behalf of Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Flor Calderon Maria Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna (Markovitz, Jonathan)Attorney Jonathan Paul Markovitz added to party Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara(pty:pet), Attorney Jonathan Paul Markovitz added to party Mary Doe(pty:pet), Attorney Jonathan Paul Markovitz added to party Flor Calderon Maria Lopez(pty:pet), Attorney Jonathan Paul Markovitz added to party Yasmani Osorio Reyna(pty:pet) (jms). (Entered: 04/21/2020)	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 PACER
8	NOTICE of Appearance by John David Loy on behalf of Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Flor Calderon Maria Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna (Loy, John)Attorney John David Loy added to party Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara(pty:pet), Attorney John David Loy added to party Mary Doe(pty:pet), Attorney John David Loy added to party Flor Calderon Maria Lopez(pty:pet), Attorney John David Loy added to party Yasmani Osorio Reyna(pty:pet) (jms). (Entered: 04/21/2020)	April 21, 2020	April 21, 2020 PACER
9	MOTION to File Documents Under Seal (With attachments)(Grano, Kimberly) (aef). (Entered: 04/22/2020)	April 22, 2020	April 22, 2020 PACER
10	SEALED LODGED Proposed Document re: 9 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Seal is granted. (Grano, Kimberly) (aef). (Entered: 04/22/2020)	April 22, 2020	April 22, 2020 PACER
11	MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel is no longer assigned. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Dana M. Sabraw for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv756 DMS (AHG).(no document attached) (jcj) (Entered: 04/23/2020)	April 23, 2020	April 23, 2020 PACER
	Order of Judge Transfer	April 23, 2020	April 23, 2020 PACER
12	NOTICE of Supplemental Facts and Authorities by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Langarica, Monika) (aef). (Entered: 04/23/2020)	April 23, 2020	April 23, 2020 RECAP
13	ORDER Requesting Response. Defendants-Respondents shall file a response on or before 12:00 noon on April 27, 2020. A hearing on the motions, if necessary, shall be scheduled after receipt of Defendants' response. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/24/2020.(aef) (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
	Pro Hac Vice Approved - Clerk	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
14	ORDER Setting Hearing and Providing Guidance on Further Briefing. Defendants shall file their responsive brief on or before May 8, 2020, and Plaintiffs shall file their reply on or before May 15, 2020. The Court will hear argument on the Otay Mesa Medically Vulnerable Subclass on April 28, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. Argument on the motion for class certification of the other groups will be heard on May 22, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Both arguments will be telephonic, and the Court will provide the dial information to Counsel in advance of the hearing. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/24/2020.(aef) (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
15	Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13790571.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Struck, Daniel) (rmc). (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
16	Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13790616.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Love, Rachel) (rmc). (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
17	Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13790639.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Acedo, Nicholas) (rmc). (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
18	Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13790689.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Lee, Jacob) (rmc). (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
19	PRO HAC APPROVED: Daniel P Struck appearing for Respondent Christopher J. LaRose (no document attached) (rmc) (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
20	PRO HAC APPROVED: Rachel Love appearing for Respondent Christopher J. LaRose (no document attached) (rmc) (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
21	PRO HAC APPROVED: Jacob Brady Lee appearing for Respondent Christopher J. LaRose (no document attached) (rmc) (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
22	PRO HAC APPROVED: Nicholas D. Acedo appearing for Respondent Christopher J. LaRose (no document attached) (rmc) (Entered: 04/24/2020)	April 24, 2020	April 24, 2020 PACER
23	RESPONSE in Opposition re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Matthew T. Albence, Gregory J. Archambeault, James Dobson, Jesus Reyna, Chad Wolf. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declaration Kelley Beckhelm, # 3 Declaration Dr. Philip Farabaugh)(Bettwy, Samuel) (jms). (Entered: 04/27/2020) 1 Exhibit View on RECAP 2 Declaration Kelley Beckhelm View on RECAP 3 Declaration Dr. Philip Farabaugh View on RECAP	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 RECAP
24	MOTION to File Documents Under Seal (Bettwy, Samuel) (anh). (Entered: 04/27/2020)	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 RECAP
25	SEALED LODGED Proposed Document re: 24 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Seal is granted. (Bettwy, Samuel) (anh). (Entered: 04/27/2020)	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 PACER
26	RESPONSE in Opposition re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Christopher J. LaRose. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of LaRose (with Index and Attachments 01-14 (Part 1), # 2 Attachments 15-24 to Declaration of LaRose (Part 2), # 3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of K. Ivens (with Index and Attachments 01-02), # 4 Certificate of Service)(Struck, Daniel) (aef). (Entered: 04/27/2020) 1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of LaRose (with Index and Attachments 01-14 (Part 1) View on PACER 2 Attachments 15-24 to Declaration of LaRose (Part 2) View on PACER 3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of K. Ivens (with Index and Attachments 01-02) View on PACER 4 Certificate of Service View on PACER	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 PACER
27	RESPONSE in Opposition re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Motion for Class Certification Re: Otay Mesa Subclass filed by Christopher J. LaRose. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Struck, Daniel) (aef). (Entered: 04/27/2020) 1 Proof of Service View on RECAP	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 RECAP
28	NOTICE of Appearance of Matthew M. Mahoney as Counsel of Record for Respondent Warden LaRose by Matthew Miguel Mahoney on behalf of Warden LaRose (Mahoney, Matthew)Attorney Matthew Miguel Mahoney added to party Warden LaRose(pty:res) (jms). (Entered: 04/27/2020)	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 PACER
29	NOTICE of Joinder by Matthew T. Albence, Gregory J. Archambeault, James Dobson, Jesus Reyna, Chad Wolf re 27 Response in Opposition to Motion, 26 Response in Opposition to Motion, (Church, Rebecca) (jms). (Entered: 04/27/2020)	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 RECAP
30	NOTICE of Joinder by Christopher J. LaRose re 25 Sealed Lodged Proposed Document, 23 Response in Opposition to Motion, (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Struck, Daniel) (jms). (Entered: 04/27/2020)	April 27, 2020	April 27, 2020 PACER
31	REPLY to Response to Motion re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna. (Langarica, Monika) (jms). (Entered: 04/28/2020)	April 28, 2020	April 28, 2020 RECAP
	Motion Hearing	April 28, 2020	April 28, 2020 PACER
32	SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Mary Doe, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna re 31 Reply to Response to Motion Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Joseph J. Amon in suport of Reply to Defendants' Response to Emergency Motion for TRO. (Langarica, Monika) (jms). (Entered: 04/28/2020)	April 28, 2020	April 28, 2020 RECAP
33	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dana M. Sabraw: Motion Hearing held on 4/28/2020 re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Mary Doe, Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara, Maria Flor Calderon Lopez, Yasmani Osorio Reyna. All counsel appeared telephonically. (Court Reporter/ECR Lee Ann Pence). (Plaintiff Attorney Bardis Vakili, Monika Langarica). (Defendant Attorney Samuel Bettwy, Rebecca Church). (For Warden LaRose: Dan Struck, Nicholas Acevedo, Jacob Lee, Rachel Love).(no document attached) (jak) (Entered: 04/28/2020)	April 28, 2020	April 28, 2020 PACER
34	SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Respondent Christopher J. LaRose re 27 Response in Opposition to Motion for Class Certification Re: Otay Mesa Subclass. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Struck, Daniel) (aef). (Entered: 04/29/2020) 1 Proof of Service View on PACER	April 29, 2020	April 29, 2020 PACER
35	ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference for 4/30/2020 10:00 AM before Judge Dana M. Sabraw. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/29/2020.(sjt) (Entered: 04/29/2020)	April 29, 2020	April 29, 2020 RECAP
36	RESPONSE re 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 34 Supplemental Briefing filed by Adrian Rodriguez Alcantara. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Jacqueline Ramos)(Langarica, Monika) (aef). (Entered: 04/30/2020) 1 Declaration Jacqueline Ramos View on RECAP	April 29, 2020	April 29, 2020 RECAP
37	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dana M. Sabraw: Status Conference held on 4/30/2020. All parties appeared telephonically. Court to issue order. Further Status Conference set for 5/4/2020 12:00 PM in Courtroom 13A before Judge Dana M. Sabraw.(Court Reporter/ECR Lee Ann Pence). (Petitioner Attorney Bardis Vakili, Monika Langarica). (Respondent Attorney Samuel Bettwy, Rebecca Church, Daniel Struck, Nicholas Acedo, Jacob Lee Rachel Love). (Dr. Sherri Malakavo, Acting Director Otay Mesa Detention Center).(no document attached) (jak) (Entered: 04/30/2020)	April 30, 2020	April 30, 2020 PACER

Case: Alcantara v. Archambeault

3:20-cv-00756 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Case Summary

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Docket

Case Details