Case: Dunn v. City of Los Angeles

2:20-cv-00420 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Jan. 15, 2020

Closed Date: June 6, 2022

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about the ability of a person with a disability to access the City of Los Angeles’ Administrative Citation Enforcement program, which is an alternative to court prosecutions for minor offenses, and primarily affects those that are homeless, disabled and/or indigent. On January 15, 2020, the non-profit Community Action Program, CANGRESS, on behalf of an individual plaintiff, filed this lawsuit the U.S. District Court, Western District of California. The plaintiff sued the City of …

This is a case about the ability of a person with a disability to access the City of Los Angeles’ Administrative Citation Enforcement program, which is an alternative to court prosecutions for minor offenses, and primarily affects those that are homeless, disabled and/or indigent.

On January 15, 2020, the non-profit Community Action Program, CANGRESS, on behalf of an individual plaintiff, filed this lawsuit the U.S. District Court, Western District of California. The plaintiff sued the City of Los Angeles under Section 1983 for violations of the 14th Amendment and under Title II of the ADA because he was unable to access the ACE program due to his disabilities and due to his lack of access to and inability to use the internet. Plaintiff relied on a Monell claim to establish the city's liability. He was represented by Disability Rights California. The case was assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee.

On June 3, 2022, the parties notified the court that they entered into a settlement agreement. Per the terms of the settlement agreement, the city agreed to void plaintiff's ACE citation, including all assessed fees and late payment penalties. The city committed to revise forms to make clear that the availability of reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities and various other administrative changes to make the program more accessible both in person and online.  

The case was dismissed with prejudice on June 6, 2022.

Summary Authors

NDRN (12/26/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16699277/parties/larry-dunn-v-city-of-los-angeles/


Judge(s)

Aenlle-Rocha, Fernando Lazoro (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Alarcon, Monique Amanda (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Dermer, Gabriel Seth (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

2:20-cv-00420

Civil Rights Complaint

Jan. 15, 2020

Jan. 15, 2020

Complaint
4

2:20-cv-00420

Civil Rights Complaint

Jan. 15, 2020

Jan. 15, 2020

Complaint
13

2:20-cv-00420

Order re: Stipulation to Permit Plaintiffs to File an Amended Complaint No Later Than April 13, 2020 [12]

March 13, 2020

March 13, 2020

Order/Opinion
13

2:20-cv-00420

Order re: Stipulation to Permit Plaintiffs to File an Amended Complaint No Later Than April 13, 2020 [12]

March 13, 2020

March 13, 2020

Order/Opinion
62-1

2:20-cv-00420

Settlement Agreement and General Relase

June 3, 2022

June 3, 2022

Settlement Agreement

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16699277/larry-dunn-v-city-of-los-angeles/

Last updated July 13, 2026, 5:17 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 15, 2020

Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)

RECAP
2 Jan. 15, 2020

Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)

RECAP
3 Jan. 15, 2020

Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties

RECAP
4 Jan. 15, 2020

Amended Complaint/Petition

RECAP
5 Jan. 16, 2020

Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form

RECAP
6 Jan. 16, 2020

Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form

RECAP
7 Jan. 16, 2020

Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only

RECAP
8 Jan. 22, 2020

Summons Request

RECAP
9 Jan. 24, 2020

Summons Issued

RECAP
10 Feb. 5, 2020

Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)

RECAP
11 March 11, 2020

Miscellaneous Document

RECAP
12 March 13, 2020

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Amend

RECAP
13 March 13, 2020

Order

RECAP
14 April 7, 2020

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

RECAP
15 April 13, 2020

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Amend

RECAP
16 April 15, 2020

Order

RECAP
17 May 13, 2020

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Amend

RECAP
18 May 14, 2020

Order

RECAP
19 June 11, 2020

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 6/18/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for la ck of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter i s being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the defendant(s); or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

RECAP
20 June 18, 2020

Amended Complaint/Petition

RECAP
21 June 19, 2020

Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form

RECAP
22 June 25, 2020

Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)

RECAP
23 June 29, 2020

Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form

RECAP
24 June 30, 2020

Order

RECAP
25 July 6, 2020

Text Only Scheduling Notice

RECAP
July 7, 2020

Text Only Scheduling Notice

26 July 23, 2020

Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)

RECAP
27 July 23, 2020

Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties

RECAP
28 July 24, 2020

Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only

RECAP
29 Aug. 12, 2020

Stipulation to Continue

RECAP
30 Aug. 14, 2020

Order

RECAP
31 Oct. 1, 2020

Miscellaneous Document

RECAP
32 Oct. 2, 2020

Stipulation to Continue

RECAP
33 Oct. 6, 2020

Order

RECAP
34 Dec. 7, 2020

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 7/24/2020, the Court set a Scheduling Conference 28 . As required by the Court's 7/24/2020 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, couns el are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. To date, a Joint Rule 26(f) Report has not been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties show cause in writing no later than 12/14/2020, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to c ooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response. Failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. The scheduling conference on 12/11/2020 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

RECAP
35 Dec. 11, 2020

Response

RECAP
36 Dec. 14, 2020

Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held

RECAP
37 Dec. 29, 2020

Chief District Judge Transferring Case

RECAP
38 Feb. 12, 2021

Status Report

RECAP
39 Feb. 23, 2021

Order

RECAP
40 Feb. 24, 2021

Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only

RECAP
Feb. 24, 2021

Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only

41 March 12, 2021

Status Report

RECAP
42 March 19, 2021

Order

RECAP
43 March 26, 2021

Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan

RECAP
44 March 29, 2021

Scheduling Order

RECAP
45 April 2, 2021

Text Only Scheduling Notice

RECAP
April 2, 2021

Text Only Scheduling Notice

46 April 19, 2021

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

RECAP
47 April 19, 2021

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

RECAP
48 April 20, 2021

Proof of Service (subsequent documents)

RECAP
49 April 22, 2021

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

RECAP
50 April 30, 2021

Striking Electronically Filed Documents (G-106)

RECAP
51 May 5, 2021

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

RECAP
52 Dec. 29, 2021

Stipulation to Continue

RECAP
53 Jan. 3, 2022

Order

RECAP
54 Jan. 26, 2022

Text Only Scheduling Notice

RECAP
Jan. 26, 2022

Text Only Scheduling Notice

55 Feb. 4, 2022

Miscellaneous Document

RECAP
56 Feb. 7, 2022

Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form

RECAP
57 Feb. 8, 2022

Order

RECAP
58 April 8, 2022

Status Report

RECAP
59 April 18, 2022

Text Only Scheduling Notice

RECAP
April 19, 2022

Text Only Scheduling Notice

60 May 6, 2022

Status Report

RECAP
61 May 9, 2022

Text Only Scheduling Notice

RECAP
May 9, 2022

Text Only Scheduling Notice

62 June 3, 2022

Settlement Agreement

1 Exhibit Settlement Agreement signed

View on RECAP

2 Proposed Order re Dismissal on Settlement

View on PACER

RECAP
63 June 6, 2022

Order

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Disability Rights

Criminal Justice (Other)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 15, 2020

Closing Date: June 6, 2022

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

individual plaintiff and non profit organization

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Other Dockets:

Central District of California 2:20-cv-00420

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Conditional Dismissal

Issues

Disability and Disability Rights:

Disability, unspecified

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Recommended Citation