Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Thank you!

DONATE

Case: United States v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

3:21-cv-08735 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Nov. 10, 2021

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 10, 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Uber in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by charging wait time fees for passengers that needed more than two minutes to get into a car. There are various disability-based reasons for which a passenger needs more than two minutes, such as needing time to break down a wheelchair and put it in the car. The DOJ sought (1) a declaratory judgment decla…

On November 10, 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Uber in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by charging wait time fees for passengers that needed more than two minutes to get into a car. There are various disability-based reasons for which a passenger needs more than two minutes, such as needing time to break down a wheelchair and put it in the car. The DOJ sought (1) a declaratory judgment declaring that Uber violated Title III of the ADA by failing to reasonably modify its wait time fee policy for passengers with disabilities, (2) injunctive relief prohibiting them from engaging in this type of discrimination in addition to modifying its policies and training to comply with the ADA, and (3) monetary damages, including compensatory damages for emotional distress and other injuries, and a civil penalty. This case was first assigned to District Judge Donna M. Ryu and then reassigned to District Judge William Alsup on November 26, 2021.

Uber filed a motion to dismiss on January 14, 2022, which was promptly denied by the Court on April 13, 2022.

On July 18, 2022, the DOJ announced that the parties had reached a multi-million-dollar settlement and the case was dismissed on July 28, 2022. The settlement required Uber to pay $500,000 to compensate DOJ Complainants, $1,738,500 to compensate Uber Complainants, and a $50,000 civil penalty to the United States. These claims will be handled by an independent Fund Administrator, who will give each complainant notice for payment. Uber also agreed to waive time-based fees for all Uber riders who certify that they need more time to get in an Uber because of their disability, and make refunds available for anyone who is charged a wait time fee because of their disability. Though Uber cannot require a user to disclose a specific medical diagnosis, provide medical documentation, or sign a medical release, it may require a description of the general nature of a rider’s disability. To advertise this, Uber agreed to make a description of the Waiver Program available on the Uber app, their U.S. website, and as part of an onboarding email for new riders in the United States. To support this program, Uber also agreed to provide mandatory training to all current members of Uber’s Accessibility and Disability Team describing the changes. 

Under the settlement agreement, the court will retain jurisdiction for enforcement purposes until July 15, 2024.

Summary Authors

Kathleen Lok (9/22/2022)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

3:21-cv-08735

Complaint

United States of America v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

Complaint
35

3:21-cv-08735

Order

April 13, 2022

April 13, 2022

Order/Opinion
46-1

3:21-cv-08735

Settlement Agreement Between The United States and Uber Technologies, Inc.

July 28, 2022

July 28, 2022

Settlement Agreement

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60861969/united-states-v-uber-technologies-inc/

Last updated Oct. 11, 2022, 10:27 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies, Inc.. Filed byUnited States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeVito, David) (Filed on 11/10/2021) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

Clearinghouse
2

Proposed Summons. (DeVito, David) (Filed on 11/10/2021) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

PACER
3

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/24/2021. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2021) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

PACER
4

NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J Faiella (Faiella, Matthew) (Filed on 11/10/2021) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

PACER
5

NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Golabek-Goldman (Golabek-Goldman, Sarah) (Filed on 11/10/2021) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

PACER
6

NOTICE of Appearance by Cheryl Rost (Rost, Cheryl) (Filed on 11/10/2021) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

PACER

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

PACER
7

Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies, Inc.. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2021) (Entered: 11/12/2021)

Nov. 12, 2021

Nov. 12, 2021

PACER
8

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2021) (Entered: 11/12/2021)

Nov. 12, 2021

Nov. 12, 2021

RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Knight (Knight, David) (Filed on 11/22/2021) (Entered: 11/22/2021)

Nov. 22, 2021

Nov. 22, 2021

PACER
10

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United States of America.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(DeVito, David) (Filed on 11/24/2021) (Entered: 11/24/2021)

1 Certificate/Proof of Service

View on PACER

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

RECAP
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Aisen Vittor on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc., (Vittor, Joshua) (Filed on 11/24/2021) (Entered: 11/24/2021)

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

RECAP
12

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent No Corporate Parent and No Publicly Held Corporation Owns 10% or More of Its Stock for Uber Technologies, Inc.. (and Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons), (Vittor, Joshua) (Filed on 11/24/2021) (Entered: 11/24/2021)

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

PACER
13

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Uber Technologies, Inc... (Vittor, Joshua) (Filed on 11/24/2021) (Entered: 11/24/2021)

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

RECAP
14

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2021) (Entered: 11/24/2021)

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

PACER

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

PACER
15

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 11/26/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2021) (Entered: 11/26/2021)

1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording

View on PACER

Nov. 26, 2021

Nov. 26, 2021

PACER
16

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by United States of America. Service waived by Uber Technologies, Inc. waiver sent on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022. (Rost, Cheryl) (Filed on 11/30/2021) (Entered: 11/30/2021)

Nov. 30, 2021

Nov. 30, 2021

PACER
17

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline for Joint Site Inspection filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Vittor, Joshua) (Filed on 12/23/2021) (Entered: 12/23/2021)

Dec. 23, 2021

Dec. 23, 2021

RECAP
18

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 17 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR JOINT SITE INSPECTION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2021) Modified on 12/23/2021 (whalc1, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 12/23/2021)

Dec. 23, 2021

Dec. 23, 2021

RECAP
19

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number BCANDC-16752025.) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Schoenfeld, Alan) (Filed on 12/27/2021) (Entered: 12/27/2021)

Dec. 27, 2021

Dec. 27, 2021

PACER
20

ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting 19 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2021) (Entered: 12/27/2021)

Dec. 27, 2021

Dec. 27, 2021

PACER
21

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16752964.) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Adegbile, Debo) (Filed on 12/27/2021) (Entered: 12/27/2021)

Dec. 27, 2021

Dec. 27, 2021

PACER
22

ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting 21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022) (Entered: 01/07/2022)

Jan. 7, 2022

Jan. 7, 2022

PACER
23

NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Elizabeth Schuller (Schuller, Megan) (Filed on 1/14/2022) (Entered: 01/14/2022)

Jan. 14, 2022

Jan. 14, 2022

PACER
24

MOTION to Dismiss filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2022 08:00 AM before Judge William Alsup. Responses due by 1/28/2022. Replies due by 2/4/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Adegbile, Debo) (Filed on 1/14/2022) (Entered: 01/14/2022)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Jan. 14, 2022

Jan. 14, 2022

RECAP
25

CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING 24 MOTION TO DISMISS FROM 2/24/2022 TO 3/10/2022 AT 8:00AM: Motion Hearing reset for 3/10/2022 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Opposition due by 2/4/2022. Reply due by 2/11/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) 24 MOTION to Dismiss .(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2022) (Entered: 01/24/2022)

Jan. 24, 2022

Jan. 24, 2022

PACER

~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND Clerk's Notice

Jan. 24, 2022

Jan. 24, 2022

PACER
26

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Permitting a Joint Site Inspection and Settlement Meeting by Video Conference, filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Schoenfeld, Alan) (Filed on 1/26/2022) (Entered: 01/26/2022)

Jan. 26, 2022

Jan. 26, 2022

PACER
27

ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting 26 Stipulation Permitting a Joint Site Inspection and Settlement Meeting by Video Conference. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2022) (Entered: 01/26/2022)

Jan. 26, 2022

Jan. 26, 2022

RECAP
28

OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byUnited States of America. (DeVito, David) (Filed on 2/4/2022) (Entered: 02/04/2022)

Feb. 4, 2022

Feb. 4, 2022

Clearinghouse
29

REPLY (re 24 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byUber Technologies, Inc.. (Adegbile, Debo) (Filed on 2/11/2022) (Entered: 02/11/2022)

Feb. 11, 2022

Feb. 11, 2022

RECAP
30

CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING 24 MOTION TO DISMISS FROM 3/10/2022 TO SPECIALLY SET DATE 4/6/2022 AT 10:00AM: Hearing re 24 MOTION to Dismiss is specially reset for 4/6/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.), (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2022) (Entered: 03/04/2022)

March 4, 2022

March 4, 2022

PACER

~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND Clerk's Notice

March 4, 2022

March 4, 2022

PACER
31

Notice of Need for Mediation by Cheryl Rost (Rost, Cheryl) (Filed on 3/15/2022) (Entered: 03/15/2022)

March 15, 2022

March 15, 2022

PACER

CASE REFERRED to Mediation. The deadline to complete the mediation is June 14, 2022. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2022)

March 16, 2022

March 16, 2022

PACER

Case Referred to Mediation

March 16, 2022

March 16, 2022

PACER
32

ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Hon. Nandor Vadas (Ret.) as Mediator. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2022) (Entered: 03/22/2022)

March 22, 2022

March 22, 2022

RECAP
33

CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING HEARING RE 24 MOTION TO DISMISS FROM 4/6/2022 TO SPECIALLY SET DATE 4/13/2022 AT 1:30PM: Hearing re 24 MOTION to Dismiss is specially reset for 4/13/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Hearing will be conducted in person. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022) (Entered: 03/24/2022)

March 24, 2022

March 24, 2022

PACER

~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND Clerk's Notice

March 24, 2022

March 24, 2022

PACER
34

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William Alsup: Motion Hearing re 24 MOTION to Dismiss held on 4/13/2022. Oral arguments made and heard. 24 Motion to Dismiss is denied, without prejudice, for the reasons as stated on the record. Start of discovery is effective as of today. Court sets trial for 11/7/2022. Court to issue Case Management Scheduling Order. Total Time in Court: 44 minutes. Court Reporter: Debra Pas. Plaintiff Attorney: David Knight, Matthew Faiella, David DeVito. Defendant Attorney: Alan Schoenfeld. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 4/13/2022) (Entered: 04/13/2022)

April 13, 2022

April 13, 2022

PACER
35

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE 24 MOTION TO DISMISS. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2022) (Entered: 04/13/2022)

April 13, 2022

April 13, 2022

Clearinghouse

Order on Motion to Dismiss AND Motion Hearing AND ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings

April 13, 2022

April 13, 2022

PACER

Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings AND Motion Hearing

April 13, 2022

April 13, 2022

PACER

~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND Motion Hearing

April 13, 2022

April 13, 2022

PACER
36

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/2/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 11/7/2022 07:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Amended Pleadings due by 5/31/2022. Close of Fact Discovery due by 8/31/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2022. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 4/13/2022. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2022) (Entered: 04/14/2022)

April 14, 2022

April 14, 2022

RECAP
37

TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 4/13/2022 before Judge William Alsup by United States of America, for Court Reporter Debra Pas. (Rost, Cheryl) (Filed on 4/14/2022) (Entered: 04/14/2022)

April 14, 2022

April 14, 2022

PACER
38

TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 4/13/2022 before Judge William Alsup by Uber Technologies, Inc., for Court Reporter Debra Pas. (Schoenfeld, Alan) (Filed on 4/14/2022) (Entered: 04/14/2022)

April 14, 2022

April 14, 2022

PACER
39

Transcript of Proceedings held on 4-13-2022, before Judge William H. Alsup. Court Reporter/Transcriber Debra Pas, CRR, telephone number (415) 431-1477/Email: Debra_Pas@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 37 Transcript Order, 38 Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/18/2022. (Related documents(s) 37, 38 ) (Pas, Debra) (Filed on 4/18/2022) (Entered: 04/18/2022)

April 18, 2022

April 18, 2022

PACER
40

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Stipulated Protective Order filed by United States of America. (Rost, Cheryl) (Filed on 4/22/2022) (Entered: 04/22/2022)

April 22, 2022

April 22, 2022

PACER
41

PROTECTIVE ORDER. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

PACER
42

ANSWER to Complaint byUber Technologies, Inc.. (Schoenfeld, Alan) (Filed on 4/27/2022) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

April 27, 2022

April 27, 2022

RECAP
43

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL filed by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Settlement Agreement)(DeVito, David) (Filed on 7/18/2022) (Entered: 07/18/2022)

1 Exhibit 1 - Settlement Agreement

View on RECAP

July 18, 2022

July 18, 2022

RECAP
44

CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING SPECIALLY SET TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE FOR 7/27/2022 AT 2:00PM: This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-684-8852Access Code: 3707514The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. Status Conference set for 7/27/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Telephonic Only before Judge William Alsup. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) (Entered: 07/22/2022)

July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

PACER

~Util - Telephonic Hearing (AT&T) AND Clerk's Notice

July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

PACER
45

Minute Entry for proceedings held telephonically before Judge William Alsup: Status Conference re: Settlement held on 7/27/2022. Court approved settlement. Order to issue.Total Time in Court: 14 Minutes. Court Reporter: Ana Dub. Plaintiff Attorneys: Cheryl Rost, David Knight. Defendant Attorney: Alan Shoenfeld. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afm, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 7/27/2022) (Entered: 07/27/2022)

July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

PACER

Status Conference

July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

PACER
46

ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting 43 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Attachments: # 1 Settlement Agreement)(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2022) (Entered: 07/28/2022)

1 Settlement Agreement

View on Clearinghouse

July 28, 2022

July 28, 2022

RECAP
47

TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 07/27/2022 before Judge William Alsup by United States of America, for Court Reporter Ana Dub. (Faiella, Matthew) (Filed on 8/4/2022) (Entered: 08/04/2022)

Aug. 4, 2022

Aug. 4, 2022

PACER
48

Transcript of Proceedings held on July 27, 2022, before Judge William H. Alsup. Court Reporter Ana Dub, CSR 7445, RDR, RMR, CRR, CCRR, CRG, CCG, telephone number 415-290-1651; ana_dub@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 47 Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/7/2022. (Related documents(s) 47 ) (amd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022) (Entered: 08/08/2022)

Aug. 8, 2022

Aug. 8, 2022

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Disability Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 10, 2021

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Uber Technologies, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Defendant Type(s):

Transportation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: $2288550

Order Duration: 2022 - None

Content of Injunction:

Reasonable Accommodation

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Training

Issues

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Disability:

disability, unspecified