Case: Gomez v. GEO Group

1:22-cv-00868 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Filed Date: July 13, 2022

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On July 13, 2022, nine plaintiffs detained in one of GEO's facilities filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California against the GEO Group, a private prison corporation contracted by the federal government to detain immigrants. Plaintiffs filed suit to stop violations of California's labor laws, including minimum wage provisions, and forced labor in violation of state and federal laws. Plaintiffs alleged that GEO violated the California Minimum Wage Law, Unfair Com…

On July 13, 2022, nine plaintiffs detained in one of GEO's facilities filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California against the GEO Group, a private prison corporation contracted by the federal government to detain immigrants. Plaintiffs filed suit to stop violations of California's labor laws, including minimum wage provisions, and forced labor in violation of state and federal laws. Plaintiffs alleged that GEO violated the California Minimum Wage Law, Unfair Competition Law, and Trafficking Victims Protection Act as well as the Federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act. Plaintiffs also sought to certify a class of all individuals incarcerated and forced to labor in GEO's facilities. The case was assigned to District Judge Ana de Alba.

Plaintiffs alleged that GEO forced detained immigrants to operate its facilities for payment of $1 a day or nothing at all. Detained immigrants were forced to participate in this labor in order to pay fees imposed by GEO to access email and other messaging services and, if detained immigrants did not participate, GEO would revoke recreation, chow, law library, and telephone access.

On September 15, 2022, GEO filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The hearing was set for October 31, 2022, but plaintiffs filed a motion to stay on October 3, 2022 and an amended complaint the following day. The hearing was rescheduled for November 28, 2022.

As of November, 2022 litigation was ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Anna Lennon (11/2/2022)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63593326/parties/hernandez-gomez-v-the-geo-group-inc/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Freedman, Michael Louis (California)

Galvan, Ernest (California)

Grunfeld, Gay Crosthwait (California)

Hattem, Benjamin (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Coleman, Susan Eileen (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:22-cv-00868

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages

Ruben v. GEO Group

July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63593326/hernandez-gomez-v-the-geo-group-inc/

Last updated April 15, 2026, 5:29 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
86

JOINT STATEMENT of Joint Status Report - 90 day filed by Defendant The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 07/01/2024)

July 1, 2024

July 1, 2024

RECAP
87

JOINT STATUS REPORT by The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 09/30/2024)

Sept. 30, 2024

Sept. 30, 2024

88

JOINT STATUS REPORT by The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 12/30/2024)

Dec. 30, 2024

Dec. 30, 2024

89

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Kimberly Ouillette on behalf of Pedro Jesus Figueroa Padilla, Fidel Garcia, Isaac Cardona Hernandez, Jose Ruben Hernandez Gomez, Oliva Sierra Ivan, Adan Castillo Merino, Salesh Prasad, Guillermo Medina Reyes, Edgar Sanchez. Attorney Ouillette, Kimberly added. (Ouillette, Kimberly) (Entered: 01/29/2025)

Jan. 29, 2025

Jan. 29, 2025

90

NOTICE of APPEARANCE by George Alejandro Warner on behalf of Pedro Jesus Figueroa Padilla, Fidel Garcia, Isaac Cardona Hernandez, Jose Ruben Hernandez Gomez, Oliva Sierra Ivan, Adan Castillo Merino, Salesh Prasad, Guillermo Medina Reyes, Edgar Sanchez. Attorney Warner, George Alejandro added. (Warner, George) (Entered: 01/29/2025)

Jan. 29, 2025

Jan. 29, 2025

RECAP
91

JOINT STATUS REPORT by The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 01/30/2025)

Jan. 30, 2025

Jan. 30, 2025

92

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 02/10/2025: The Court has considered the parties' positions set forth in their joint status report (Doc. 91 ), filed January 30, 2025, addressing the propriety of maintaining the stay of this action pending the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' resolution of Defendant's now-pending petition for panel or en banc hearing, filed February 6, 2025 (see Case No. 21-36024, Doc. 145). Because, as this Court previously found, the issues under consideration by the Ninth Circuit may significantly impact this action and because the continued stay of these proceedings would be of limited duration, the Court concludes the balance of factors previously considered by the Court (see Doc. 75) weighs in favor of maintaining the stay. Accordingly, the parties SHALL notify the Court within seven (7) days after the Ninth Circuit either grants the currently pending petition or issues its mandate. (Deputy Clerk CRB) (Entered: 02/10/2025)

Feb. 10, 2025

Feb. 10, 2025

Minute Order

Feb. 10, 2025

Feb. 10, 2025

93

JOINT STATUS REPORT by The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 04/30/2025)

April 30, 2025

April 30, 2025

94

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL GEORGE A. WARNER by All Plaintiffs. (Warner, George) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

June 20, 2025

June 20, 2025

95

JOINT STATUS REPORT by The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 07/29/2025)

July 29, 2025

July 29, 2025

RECAP
96

JOINT STATUS REPORT by The GEO Group, Inc.. (Paloutzian, Dirk) (Entered: 10/27/2025)

Oct. 27, 2025

Oct. 27, 2025

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Labor Rights

Immigration and/or the Border

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 13, 2022

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Immigrants detained in GEO's facilities and subject to forced labor.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

The GEO Group

Facility Type(s):

Non-government for-profit

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), 18 U.S.C. § 1589

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of California 1:22-cv-00868

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conditions of confinement

Forced labor

Recommended Citation