Case: Stringer v. Cascos

5:16-cv-00257 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: March 14, 2016

Closed Date: Aug. 3, 2021

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 14, 2016, four individual plaintiffs filed a suit against the Texas Secretary of State and the Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety (“DPS”), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to redress defendants’ alleged systemic and ongoing violations of the “motor voter” provisions of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (“NVRA”). The plaintiffs also alleged that the defendants’ conduct violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment due to alleged dispa…

On March 14, 2016, four individual plaintiffs filed a suit against the Texas Secretary of State and the Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety (“DPS”), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to redress defendants’ alleged systemic and ongoing violations of the “motor voter” provisions of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (“NVRA”). The plaintiffs also alleged that the defendants’ conduct violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment due to alleged disparate treatment and arbitrary restrictions on the right to vote.  

The main purpose of the NVRA is to increase the registration of eligible voters. The NVRA requires eligible voters to be registered to vote “simultaneously” with the submission of any driver’s license application, renewal, or change-of-address form.  

The plaintiffs claimed that unlike defendants’ simultaneous voter registration services for license renewal or address update applications submitted in-person at a DPS office, the defendants did not provide for simultaneous voter registration at any point during the online license renewal or address update process. Instead, the voters were directed to another website where they were notified to download or request a physical voter registration form. In order to register to vote, the voter would have to complete a separate voter registration form and then mail the form to the appropriate county registrar before the voter registration deadline. 

Represented by private attorneys and the Texas Civil Rights Project, the plaintiffs sought declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, and injunctive relief. Specifically, they sought to enjoin the defendants (including their agents and successors in office, and all individuals working in concert with them) from implementing practices and procedures that violate the NVRA. Further, the plaintiffs requested the court to direct defendants to take appropriate measures necessary to remedy the harm caused by their noncompliance. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division and assigned to Judge Orlando Garcia.

On May 10, 2018, the District Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The District Court stated that the requirements in the NVRA clearly apply to online transactions (e.g., electronic, remote, or internet transactions). The District Court further stated that numerous courts have determined that the NVRA requirements applies to online or remote transactions in the same manner it applies to in-person and mail transactions. The District Court reasoned that the NVRA requires DPS to provide a simultaneous application, not a simultaneous opportunity to undergo a second duplicate application process. The District Court determined that DPS is legally obligated to provide a simultaneous voter registration application with every transaction. The District Court found that the defendants violated the NVRA and the Equal Protection Clause. Therefore, the District Court entered a final judgment granting plaintiffs declaratory and injunctive relief. The District Court permanently enjoined defendants from continuing to violate the NVRA and Equal Protection Clause, and ordered them to establish procedures that treat each online driver's license renewal or change-of-address application as a simultaneous application for voter registration, which must then be submitted to the Secretary of State.

On November 13, 2019, the defendants appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit held that the plaintiffs did not have standing to seek declaratory and injunctive relief because they had not shown a continuing or threatened future injury to their right to vote. Therefore, the Fifth Circuit reversed the judgment of the District Court and vacated the District Court’s injunction. The case was remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for lack of standing. 

On January 17, 2020, the plaintiffs filed an emergency application for preliminary injunction and request for hearing. The District Court stated that although the Fifth Circuit found that the plaintiffs had not proven they would likely sustain another injury in the future, the injury has happened again. The plaintiffs visited the DPS website to change their address and were not offered a simultaneous application for voter registration. If these registrations were not updated before February 3, 2020, the plaintiffs would not have been able to vote in the March 2020 primary election. The District Court stated that it had revisited the issue and reached the same conclusion as it did in May 2018. The District Court found that the defendants violated the NVRA because plaintiffs were denied the right to simultaneously update their voter registration when they updated their address on the DPS website. The District Court reasoned that the provisions of the NVRA did not incorporate Texas election law and was not subject to it, Texas election law must yield to the NVRA, and there was nothing in either the NVRA or state law that prevented the use of electronic signatures in online driver's license-voter registration transactions. Therefore, the District Court determined there was a substantial likelihood that the plaintiffs would succeed on the merits of their NVRA claims. The District Court also determined that the plaintiffs had met the other elements of the preliminary injunction and granted partial injunctive relief. The District Court ordered that the defendants must immediately register the plaintiffs to vote and must confirm that the plaintiffs are registered to vote before the deadline to register to vote so they may participate in the upcoming primary elections. 

On August 28, 2020, the District Court granted the remainder of the request for preliminary injunctive relief. The District Court ordered the defendants to immediately take all the remaining steps necessary to come into compliance with NVRA by establishing a DPS System that treats each online driver's license renewal or change-of-address application as a simultaneous application for voter registration. The Defendants were ordered to complete this process and make the DPS system fully operable for public use by September 23, 2020.

Summary Authors

Devaki Patel (5/29/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4606992/parties/stringer-v-cascos/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Brailey, Emily R. (Texas)

Branch, Aria C. (Texas)

Champion, Cassandra Lang (Texas)

Cox, Ryan V. (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant
Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Curry, P. Michael (Texas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

5:16-cv-00257

Plaintiffs' Original Complaint

Stringer, et al. v. Cascos, et al.

March 14, 2016

March 14, 2016

Complaint
7

5:16-cv-00257

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6)

Stringer, et al. v. Cascos, et al.

May 16, 2016

May 16, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief
9

5:16-cv-00257

Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)

Stringer, et al. v. Cascos, et al.

May 31, 2016

May 31, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief
12

5:16-cv-00257

Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6)

Stringer, et al. v. Cascos, et al.

June 21, 2016

June 21, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief
52

5:16-cv-00257

Order

Stringer, et al. v. Pablos, et al.

March 31, 2017

March 31, 2017

Order/Opinion

274 F.Supp.3d 588

67-1

5:16-cv-00257

Exhibit A: Amended Report on Updating Voter Registration Records with Data from Online Motor Vehicle Transactions

Stringer, et al. v. Pablos, et al.

June 6, 2017

June 6, 2017

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report
77

5:16-cv-00257

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Stringer, et al. v. Pablos, et al.

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

Pleading / Motion / Brief
80

5:16-cv-00257

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Stringer, et al. v. Pablos, et al.

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

Pleading / Motion / Brief
82

5:16-cv-00257

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Stringer, et al. v. Pablos, et al.

July 18, 2017

July 18, 2017

Pleading / Motion / Brief
85

5:16-cv-00257

Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

Stringer, et al. v. Pablos, et al.

July 28, 2017

July 28, 2017

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4606992/stringer-v-cascos/

Last updated June 26, 2026, 5:24 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 14, 2016

COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-8285655). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)(Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 03/14/2016)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Exhibit A

View on PACER

3 Exhibit B

View on PACER

4 Exhibit C

View on PACER

5 Exhibit D

View on PACER

6 Exhibit E

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
March 14, 2016

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

March 14, 2016

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 14, 2016

Case Randomly Reassigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg)

March 14, 2016

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Primomo (wg)

2 March 18, 2016

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Caitlyn E. Silhan of Peter K. Kraus ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-8305196) by on behalf of Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 03/18/2016)

RECAP
3 March 18, 2016

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jarrod Stringer as to Steven C. McCraw. Waiver sent on 3/17/2016, answer due 5/16/2016. (Siegel, Charles) (Entered: 03/18/2016)

RECAP
4 March 18, 2016

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jarrod Stringer as to Carlos H. Cascos. Waiver sent on 3/17/2016, answer due 5/16/2016. (Siegel, Charles) (Entered: 03/18/2016)

RECAP
5 March 23, 2016

ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Peter A. Kraus for Jarrod Stringer. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (aej) (Entered: 03/23/2016)

RECAP
6 April 29, 2016

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mimi M.D. Marziani on behalf of Jarrod Stringer. Attorney Mimi M.D. Marziani added to party Jarrod Stringer(pty:pla) (Marziani, Mimi) (Entered: 04/29/2016)

RECAP
7 May 16, 2016

Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/5/2016: # 2 Supplement Authority Related to Plaintiff's Response) (wg). (Entered: 05/16/2016)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

2 Supplement Authority Related to Plaintiff's Response

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
8 May 31, 2016

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hani Mirza on behalf of Jarrod Stringer. Attorney Hani Mirza added to party Jarrod Stringer(pty:pla) (Mirza, Hani) (Entered: 05/31/2016)

RECAP
9 May 31, 2016

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jarrod Stringer, re 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Silhan, Caitlyn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2016: # 1 Supplement Plaintiff's Response) (wg). (Entered: 05/31/2016)

1 Supplement Plaintiff's Response

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
10 June 3, 2016

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, to Dismiss by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 06/03/2016)

RECAP
11 June 6, 2016

ORDER GRANTING 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint in the above-captioned cause is now June 21, 2016. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 06/06/2016)

RECAP
12 June 21, 2016

REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw, re 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 06/21/2016)

Clearinghouse
13 June 27, 2016

NOTICE Joint Rule 26(f) Conference Report by Jarrod Stringer (Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 06/27/2016)

RECAP
14 June 30, 2016

***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT, MISSING CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, PLEASE FILE ONLY THE CERTIFICATE AS AN ATTACHMENT ***NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cassandra Lang Champion on behalf of Jarrod Stringer. Attorney Cassandra Lang Champion added to party Jarrod Stringer(pty:pla) (Champion, Cassandra) Modified on 6/30/2016 (wg). (Entered: 06/30/2016)

RECAP
15 June 30, 2016

***NOTIFIED COUNSEL, TO JUST ATTACH A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO CURE DEFICIENCY***DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re 14 Notice of Appearance, (wg) (Entered: 06/30/2016)

RECAP
16 June 30, 2016

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cassandra Lang Champion on behalf of Jarrod Stringer (Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 06/30/2016)

RECAP
17 July 15, 2016

Proposed Scheduling Order Joint by Jarrod Stringer. (Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 07/15/2016)

RECAP
18 Aug. 2, 2016

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Mirza, Hani) (Entered: 08/02/2016)

RECAP
19 Aug. 3, 2016

SCHEDULING ORDER, ( ADR Mediation Completed by 2/27/2017,, ADR Report Deadline due by 9/13/2016,, Amended Pleadings due by 10/12/2016,, Discovery due by 12/12/2016,, Joinder of Parties due by 10/12/2016,, Dispositive Motions due by 1/31/2017,, Bench Trial set for 5/1/2017 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,, Pretrial Conference set for 4/26/2017 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,). Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 08/03/2016)

RECAP
20 Aug. 4, 2016

ORDER GRANTING 18 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response to Deft. Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 08/05/2016)

RECAP
21 Sept. 8, 2016

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Caitlyn E. Silhan for Rachel A. Gross ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-8828591) by on behalf of Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 09/08/2016)

RECAP
22 Sept. 13, 2016

ADR Report Filed - by Jarrod Stringer(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 09/13/2016)

RECAP
Sept. 15, 2016

Text Order GRANTING 21 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Rachel A. Gross. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

Sept. 15, 2016

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

23 Sept. 16, 2016

NOTICE Attorney Vacation Letter by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw (Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 09/16/2016)

RECAP
24 Sept. 16, 2016

MOTION for Protective Order by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 09/16/2016)

RECAP
25 Sept. 23, 2016

RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Jarrod Stringer, re 24 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 09/23/2016)

RECAP
26 Sept. 23, 2016

ATTACHMENT Proposed Order to 25 Response to Motion by Jarrod Stringer. (Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 09/23/2016)

RECAP
27 Sept. 26, 2016

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 25 Response to Motion for Protective Order by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 09/26/2016)

RECAP
Oct. 3, 2016

Text Order GRANTING 27 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Motion for Protective Order. The deadline to file Reply in Support is now October 5, 2016. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

Oct. 3, 2016

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

28 Oct. 5, 2016

Memorandum in Support, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw, re 24 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 10/05/2016)

RECAP
29 Oct. 21, 2016

Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order Joint Amended 26(f) Conference Report by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 10/21/2016)

RECAP
30 Oct. 28, 2016

MOTION to Compel by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Proposed Order)(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 10/28/2016)

RECAP
31 Oct. 31, 2016

Second MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority for Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Supplemental Authority, # 2 Proposed Order)(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 10/31/2016)

RECAP
32 Nov. 3, 2016

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER, ( ADR Mediation Completed by 4/17/2017,, Amended Pleadings due by 2/13/2017,, Discovery due by 5/15/2017,, Joinder of Parties due by 2/13/2017,, Dispositive Motions due by 6/30/2017,, Jury Selection set for 10/2/2017 09:30AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,, Jury Trial set for 10/2/2017 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,, Pretrial Conference set for 9/27/2017 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,). Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 11/04/2016)

RECAP
33 Nov. 4, 2016

ORDER GRANTING 31 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority related to Plaintiff's Response to Defts. Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 11/04/2016)

RECAP
34 Nov. 8, 2016

MOTION to Grant Unopposed Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendants re 30 MOTION to Compel by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 11/08/2016)

RECAP
35 Nov. 9, 2016

Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Response to Motion to Compel by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 11/09/2016)

RECAP
36 Nov. 10, 2016

Unopposed MOTION for Hearing re 24 MOTION for Protective Order by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Fiat-Order Setting Hearing)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 11/10/2016)

RECAP
37 Dec. 14, 2016

ORDER DENYING 34 Motion Compel Discovery; GRANTING 35 Motion for Leave to File Response Out Of Time; The Response has been considered by the Court. DENYING 36 Motion for Hearing; DENYING 24 Motion for Protective Order; GRANTING 30 Motion to Compel; Defendants must produce the requested documents within thirty (30) days from the date below unless the parties agree in writing to a different schedule for production. The parties shall confer and re-schedule the depositions to take place at a mutually convenient time, date, and location. The parties shall also submit a proposed confidentiality and protective order within ten (10) days from the date below. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 12/15/2016)

RECAP
38 Dec. 22, 2016

Opposed MOTION for Reconsideration re 37 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,, Order on Motion for Leave to File,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,, Order on Motion for Protective Order,,, Order on Motion to Compel,, by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 12/22/2016)

RECAP
39 Dec. 22, 2016

Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Proposed Protective Order, # 2 Appendix ESI Protocol)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 12/22/2016)

RECAP
40 Dec. 23, 2016

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 38 Opposed MOTION for Reconsideration re 37 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,, Order on Motion for Leave to File,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,, Order on Motion for Protective Order,,, Order on Motion to Compel,, by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 12/23/2016)

RECAP
41 Dec. 29, 2016

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jarrod Stringer, re 38 Opposed MOTION for Reconsideration re 37 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,, Order on Motion for Leave to File,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,, Order on Motion for Protective Order,,, Order on Motion to Compel,, filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Caitlyn E. Silhan, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H)(Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 12/29/2016)

RECAP
Dec. 29, 2016

Text Order GRANTING 40 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. IT IS, THEREFORD, ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs response is due on or before Friday, January 6, 2016 entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

Dec. 29, 2016

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

42 Jan. 3, 2017

CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER re 39 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 01/04/2017)

RECAP
43 Jan. 6, 2017

ORDER DENYING 38 Emergency Motion for Partial Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 01/06/2017)

RECAP
44 Jan. 23, 2017

MOTION for Sanctions by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Proposed Order)(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 01/23/2017)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit C

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit D

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit E

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit F

View on RECAP

7 Exhibit G

View on RECAP

8 Exhibit H

View on RECAP

9 Exhibit I

View on RECAP

10 Exhibit J

View on RECAP

11 Exhibit K

View on RECAP

12 Exhibit L

View on RECAP

13 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
45 Jan. 30, 2017

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw, re 44 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Jarrod Stringer (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Affidavit Mackin Declaration)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 01/30/2017)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 3

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 4

View on PACER

5 Exhibit 5

View on PACER

6 Exhibit 6

View on PACER

7 Exhibit 7

View on PACER

8 Exhibit 8

View on PACER

9 Exhibit 9

View on PACER

10 Exhibit 10

View on PACER

11 Affidavit Mackin Declaration

View on PACER

RECAP
46 Feb. 3, 2017

PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE in Support, filed by Jarrod Stringer, re 44 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Jarrod Stringer for Violating the Court's Order Mandating Production of Documents by January 13, 2017 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Affidavit Caitlyn E. Silhan Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 1, # 8 Exhibit 2, # 9 Exhibit 3, # 10 Exhibit 4)(Silhan, Caitlyn) Modified on 2/6/2017 (wg). (Entered: 02/03/2017)

RECAP
47 Feb. 13, 2017

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Cassandra Lang Champion ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-9289091) by on behalf of Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 02/13/2017)

RECAP
Feb. 15, 2017

Text Order GRANTING 47 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Rebecca E. Harrison Stevens. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

Feb. 15, 2017

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

48 Feb. 16, 2017

ORDER GRANTING 44 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (aej) (Entered: 02/17/2017)

RECAP
49 March 6, 2017

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Esteban San Miguel Soto on behalf of Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. Attorney Esteban San Miguel Soto added to party Carlos H. Cascos(pty:dft), Attorney Esteban San Miguel Soto added to party Steven C. McCraw(pty:dft) (Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 03/06/2017)

RECAP
50 March 10, 2017

JOINT MOTION to Amend Scheduling Order by Jarrod Stringer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stevens, Rebecca) Modified on 3/10/2017 (wg). Modified on 3/23/2017, to edit text (rf). (Entered: 03/10/2017)

RECAP
51 March 23, 2017

SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER, ( ADR Mediation Completed by 5/1/2017,, Amended Pleadings due by 2/13/2017,, Discovery due by 5/30/2017,, Joinder of Parties due by 2/13/2017,, Dispositive Motions due by 6/30/2017,, Jury Selection set for 10/2/2017 09:30AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,, Jury Trial set for 10/2/2017 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,, Pretrial Conference set for 9/27/2017 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia,). Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 03/23/2017)

RECAP
52 March 31, 2017

ORDER DENYING 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; DENYING 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 04/03/2017)

Clearinghouse
53 April 17, 2017

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 04/17/2017)

RECAP
54 April 17, 2017

DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES by Jarrod Stringer. (Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 04/17/2017)

RECAP
55 April 20, 2017

Opposed MOTION to be Excused from ADR/Mediation by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 04/20/2017)

RECAP
56 April 20, 2017

ORDER GRANTING re 53 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw, Carlos H. Cascos answer due 4/21/2017; Steven C. McCraw answer due 4/21/2017. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 04/21/2017)

RECAP
57 April 21, 2017

Original ANSWER to Complaint by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw.(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 04/21/2017)

RECAP
58 April 26, 2017

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jarrod Stringer, re 55 Opposed MOTION to be Excused from ADR/Mediation filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 04/26/2017)

RECAP
59 May 1, 2017

NOTICE Designation of Nonretained Expert by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw re 54 Designation of Expert Witnesses (Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 05/01/2017)

RECAP
60 May 4, 2017

ORDER DENYING re 55 Opposed MOTION to be Excused from ADR/Mediation filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw, ( ADR Mediation has been extended, and shall be Completed by 6/20/2017,). Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 05/04/2017)

RECAP
61 May 12, 2017

Opposed MOTION for Order Preserving Designated Status of Classified Information by Carlos H. Cascos. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 05/12/2017)

RECAP
62 May 19, 2017

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, Totysa Watkins, John Woods, re 61 Opposed MOTION for Order Preserving Designated Status of Classified Information filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos (Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 05/19/2017)

RECAP
63 May 19, 2017

STIPULATION of Dismissal of Plaintiff Totysa Watkins' Claims by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, Totysa Watkins, John Woods. (Silhan, Caitlyn) (Entered: 05/19/2017)

RECAP
64 May 26, 2017

REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, re 61 Opposed MOTION for Order Preserving Designated Status of Classified Information filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 05/26/2017)

RECAP
65 May 30, 2017

REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, re 61 Opposed MOTION for Order Preserving Designated Status of Classified Information filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos Corrected (Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 05/30/2017)

RECAP
66 June 2, 2017

ORDER DENYING 61 Motion Preserving Designanted Status of Claissified Info. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) (Entered: 06/05/2017)

RECAP
67 June 6, 2017

MOTION to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 06/06/2017)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on RECAP

3 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
68 June 6, 2017

MOTION to Compel Discovery by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, John Woods. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Exhibit Index, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Proposed Order)(Stevens, Rebecca). Added MOTION to Expedite on 6/7/2017 (rf). (Entered: 06/06/2017)

RECAP
69 June 9, 2017

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 68 MOTION to Compel Discovery MOTION to Expedite by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Proposed Order)(Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 06/09/2017)

RECAP
June 12, 2017

Text Order GRANTING 69 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to MOTION to Compel Discovery entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Response is now due June 15, 2017.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

June 12, 2017

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

70 June 13, 2017

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Jarrod Stringer, re 67 MOTION to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert filed by Defendant Carlos H. Cascos, Defendant Steven C. McCraw (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, Expert Report and all Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, Hersh Deposition Transcript)(Champion, Cassandra) (Entered: 06/13/2017)

1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, Expert Report and all Exhibits

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, Hersh Deposition Transcript

View on RECAP

RECAP
71 June 15, 2017

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw, re 68 MOTION to Compel Discovery MOTION to Expedite filed by Plaintiff Jarrod Stringer, Plaintiff Benjamin Hernandez, Plaintiff John Woods (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Proposed Order)(Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 06/15/2017)

RECAP
72 June 19, 2017

REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, John Woods, re 68 MOTION to Compel Discovery MOTION to Expedite filed by Plaintiff Jarrod Stringer, Plaintiff Benjamin Hernandez, Plaintiff John Woods PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANTS DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES FROM DEFENDANTS, BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RULING (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stevens, Rebecca) (Entered: 06/19/2017)

RECAP
73 June 21, 2017

ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 06/21/2017)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

RECAP
74 June 29, 2017

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation for Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgement by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, John Woods. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stevens, Rebecca) (Entered: 06/29/2017)

RECAP
75 June 29, 2017

ATTACHMENT Corrected Proposed Order to 74 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation for Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgement by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, John Woods. (Stevens, Rebecca) (Entered: 06/29/2017)

RECAP
76 June 30, 2017

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation for Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Ds' MSJ, # 2 Exhibit A-1 - MSJ Appendix, # 3 Proposed Order)(Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 06/30/2017)

RECAP
77 June 30, 2017

MOTION for Summary Judgment by Benjamin Hernandez, Jarrod Stringer, John Woods. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Proposed Order)(Stevens, Rebecca) (Entered: 06/30/2017)

1 Appendix

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
78 June 30, 2017

Unopposed Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I, # 2 Proposed Order) (Soto, Esteban) (Entered: 06/30/2017)

RECAP
79 June 30, 2017

ORDER GRANTING 76 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages for Defts. Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) Modified on 7/6/2017 (wg). (Entered: 07/06/2017)

RECAP
80 June 30, 2017

DEFENDANT'S MOTION for Summary Judgment by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Exhibits)(wg) (Entered: 07/06/2017)

1 Appendix Exhibits

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
81 July 7, 2017

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Summary Judgment Motions by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mackin, Anne) (Entered: 07/07/2017)

RECAP
July 7, 2017

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

July 7, 2017

Text Order GRANTING 81 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. It is therefore ORDERED that responses to cross motions for summary judgment are now due on July 28, 2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

82 July 18, 2017

DEFENDANT'S MOTION for Summary Judgment by Carlos H. Cascos, Steven C. McCraw. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(wg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/18/2017: # 2 Sealed Document Exhibit 1) (wg). (Entered: 07/18/2017)

Clearinghouse
July 18, 2017

Text Order GRANTING 74 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages for Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file their Motion for Summary Judgment using up to 25 pages (exclusive of the caption, table of contents, table of authorities, signature block, certificate of service, and accompanying documents).(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)

July 18, 2017

Order on Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 14, 2016

Closing Date: Aug. 3, 2021

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Eligible Texas voters who were directly and individually harmed by Defendants’ conduct with respect to voter registration policies.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

Texas Secretary of State and Director of Texas Department of Public Safety

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

National Voter Registration Act ("Motor Voter law"), 52 U.S.C. § 20501 (previously 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Western District of Texas 5:16-cv-00257

Western District of Texas 5:20-cv-00046

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 18-50428

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Declaratory Judgment

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Voter Registration

Issues

General/Misc.:

Drivers Licenses

Voting:

Voter registration rules

Voting: General & Misc.

Recommended Citation