Case: Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids v. Nessel

1:22-cv-01214 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Filed Date: Dec. 22, 2022

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about whether Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, which, in 2022, the Michigan Supreme Court interpreted to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, unconstitutionally infringed on religious liberty.  On December 22, 2022, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Sacred Heart, alongside its school, Sacred Heart Academy, and several individual Sacred Heart members …

This is a case about whether Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, which, in 2022, the Michigan Supreme Court interpreted to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, unconstitutionally infringed on religious liberty.  On December 22, 2022, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Sacred Heart, alongside its school, Sacred Heart Academy, and several individual Sacred Heart members (collectively “Sacred Heart”), sued the Michigan Attorney General, Department of Civil Rights, and Civil Rights Commission under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Sacred Heart claimed that application of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act to prohibit sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in employment, education, and public accommodation interfered with its ability to practice its Catholic beliefs. In particular, Sacred Heart alleged that it could not at once comply with the Act’s prohibitions on discrimination and limit enrollment, hiring, and/or use of space (including bathrooms) to form an “intentional Catholic community” in line with Catholic values.   Therefore, Sacred Heart claimed that the Act violated its free speech and free religious exercise rights as well as associational and parental rights. Represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, Sacred Heart sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and costs and attorneys’ fees. Also on December 22, 2022, Sacred Heart filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the state from enforcing the expanded Act against them.

The case was first assigned to District Court Judge Robert J. Jonker and then reassigned to District Court Judge Jane M. Beckering and Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green.  As of January 2023, the case is ongoing and the preliminary injunction motion remains pending. 

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Lewis (1/23/2023)

Elizabeth Lewis (1/29/2023)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:22-cv-01214

Verified Complaint

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66678379/sacred-heart-of-jesus-parish-grand-rapids-v-nessel/

Last updated Jan. 23, 2023, 4:19 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Katie Ugolini, Jerry Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Peter Ugolini, Robin Hatley, Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, Student Handbook, # 3 Exhibit 2, Student Agreement, # 4 Exhibit 3, Faculty Memo and Oath, # 5 Exhibit 4, Bishop Statement, # 6 Exhibit 5, Previous Job Postings, # 7 Exhibit 6, Michigan Education Policy, # 8 Exhibit 7, Statement on Catholic Doctrine, # 9 Exhibit 8, BFOQ Form, # 10 Exhibit 9, Current Job Postings, # 11 Exhibit 10, Theology of the Body, # 12 Exhibit 11, Faculty Handbook, # 13 Exhibit 12, BFOQ FOIA) (Bursch, John) (Entered: 12/22/2022)

1 Index of Exhibits

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 1, Student Handbook

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 2, Student Agreement

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 3, Faculty Memo and Oath

View on PACER

5 Exhibit 4, Bishop Statement

View on PACER

6 Exhibit 5, Previous Job Postings

View on PACER

7 Exhibit 6, Michigan Education Policy

View on PACER

8 Exhibit 7, Statement on Catholic Doctrine

View on PACER

9 Exhibit 8, BFOQ Form

View on PACER

10 Exhibit 9, Current Job Postings

View on PACER

11 Exhibit 10, Theology of the Body

View on PACER

12 Exhibit 11, Faculty Handbook

View on PACER

13 Exhibit 12, BFOQ FOIA

View on PACER

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

Clearinghouse
2

PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re 1 (Bursch, John) (Entered: 12/22/2022)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER
3

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini (Bursch, John) (Entered: 12/22/2022)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER
4

MOTION for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini; (Bursch, John) (Entered: 12/22/2022)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

RECAP
5

MEMORANDUM in support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction 4 filed by Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini (Attachments: # 1 Floyd Decl., # 2 Hatley Decl., # 3 Boutell Decl., # 4 Ugolini Decl.) (Bursch, John) (Entered: 12/22/2022)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

RECAP

(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Katherine L. Anderson on behalf of plaintiffs Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini (Anderson, Katherine)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER

(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Ryan Jeffrey Tucker on behalf of plaintiffs Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini (Tucker, Ryan)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER

FILING FEE PAID re 1 by plaintiffs Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6933818 (Bursch, John)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER

(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Hailey Vrdolyak on behalf of plaintiffs Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini (Vrdolyak, Hailey)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER

(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of David Andrew Cortman on behalf of plaintiffs Joseph Boutell, Renee Boutell, Jerry Hatley, Robin Hatley, Sacred Heart of Jesus Parish, Grand Rapids, Katie Ugolini, Peter Ugolini (Cortman, David)

Dec. 22, 2022

Dec. 22, 2022

PACER
6

CASE ASSIGNMENT REVIEW indicating the cases are related ; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (jmw) (Entered: 12/27/2022)

Dec. 27, 2022

Dec. 27, 2022

PACER
7

NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Robert J. Jonker (slk) (Entered: 12/27/2022)

Dec. 27, 2022

Dec. 27, 2022

PACER
8

SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Richard Corriveau, Zenna Faraj Elhason, Regina Gasco-Bentley, John E. Johnson, Jr, Anupama Kosaraju, Gloria E. Lara, Luke R. Londo, Dana Nessel, Portia L. Roberson, David Worthams (slk) (Entered: 12/27/2022)

Dec. 27, 2022

Dec. 27, 2022

PACER
9

Administrative Order Reassigning Case

Jan. 23, 2023

Jan. 23, 2023

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Michigan

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 22, 2022

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A religious organization, its school, and multiple private plaintiffs who are members of the religious organization.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Michigan Attorney General, State

Michigan Department of Civil Rights, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Free Exercise Clause

Freedom of speech/association

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General:

Juveniles

LGBTQ+

Religious programs / policies

School/University policies

Discrimination-basis:

Religion discrimination

Type of Facility:

Non-government non-profit