Case: Foote v. Ludlow School Committee

3:22-cv-30041 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Filed Date: April 12, 2022

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case involved four parents who believed local public school officials overreached when they chose not to disclose their children’s decision to establish a new gender identity at school. On April 12, 2022, two sets of parents filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The parents sued the school district and various officials, administrators, and teachers in their official capacity under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Represented by public interest attorneys for the Massachus…

This case involved four parents who believed local public school officials overreached when they chose not to disclose their children’s decision to establish a new gender identity at school. On April 12, 2022, two sets of parents filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The parents sued the school district and various officials, administrators, and teachers in their official capacity under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Represented by public interest attorneys for the Massachusetts Family Institute and Child and Parental Rights Campaign, the parents sought various declarations regarding the policy at issue to be unconstitutional, an injunction against adherence to the policy, nominal damages, compensatory damages, and attorneys’ fees.

Plaintiffs claimed that a school district may not empower individual teachers to assist students who are in the midst of a crisis of gender identity to transition and in particular to conceal in any manner the student's desire to transition or feelings on the matter from the parents either deliberately or accidentally. In 2012, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education published guidance for school districts when faced with the instant issue. While the guidance has never been adopted as legally binding or as such to have substantive effect, the plaintiffs rely on the Board’s suggestion for how individual school districts should handle informing parents of their children’s gender identity crisis. The plaintiffs argued that in the absence of a local school district policy to the contrary, the Board’s guidance should govern.

On July 29, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Defendants argued that plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because they failed to allege that their children were transgender or had interacted with any of the defendants, failing both the cause or controversy requirement, traceability, and claim upon which relief could be granted requirements of standing. Defendants also asserted qualified immunity.

District Judge Mark Mastroianni granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing on December 14, 2022, and noted that in the alternative the allegations in the complaint would not have overcome the school district’s qualified immunity. 2022 WL 18356421. On January 11, 2023, Plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. 

On February 18, 2025, the appellate court upheld the dismissal, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to present a plausible claim that the school's protocol infringed upon their fundamental right under the due process clause “to direct the upbringing of their child.” 128 F.4th 336. The court also noted that the “shock-in-conscience” test was not the appropriate legal standard to utilize because the school policy was not executive but legislative conduct. The court based this conclusion on the fact that the policy applies broadly to all students and is administered by multiple government actors. Thus, the test they used was whether the plaintiffs had adequately alleged that Ludlow’s conduct restricted a fundamental right, which the court concluded it had not. 

As of February 19, 2025, the case is ongoing. 

 

Summary Authors

Zach Antin (2/14/2023)

Logan Moore (3/9/2024)

Isabel Bysiewicz (3/6/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63231218/parties/foote-v-ludlow-school-committee/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Beckwith, Andrew D. (Massachusetts)

Attorney for Defendant
Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Alger, Maureen P. (Massachusetts)

Anderson, Katherine L. (Massachusetts)

Arnold, Alexandra (Massachusetts)

Berg, Luke (Massachusetts)

Other

Alger, Maureen P. (Massachusetts)

Anderson, Katherine L. (Massachusetts)

Arnold, Alexandra (Massachusetts)

Berg, Luke (Massachusetts)

Bonauto, Mary L. (Massachusetts)

Bonta, Robert (Massachusetts)

Bourquin, Ruth A. (Massachusetts)

Brown, Anthony G. (Massachusetts)

Buseck, Gary D. (Massachusetts)

Cambier, Adam (Massachusetts)

Campbell, Andrea J. (Massachusetts)

Castillo, Paul D. (Massachusetts)

Clark, Charity R. (Massachusetts)

Coleman, Ronald D. (Massachusetts)

Cortman, David Andrew (Massachusetts)

Davidson, Jon W. (Massachusetts)

Ellison, Keith (Massachusetts)

Erchull, Christopher M. (Massachusetts)

Estrada, William Anthony (Massachusetts)

Ferguson, Robert W. (Massachusetts)

Fitschen, Steven W. (Massachusetts)

Frey, Aaron M. (Massachusetts)

Gutkin, Jeffrey M. (Massachusetts)

James, Letitia (Massachusetts)

Klein, Bennett H. (Massachusetts)

Kristan, Arielle Brooks (Massachusetts)

Lawkowski, Gary (Massachusetts)

Loewy, Karen Lee (Massachusetts)

Lopez, Anne E. (Massachusetts)

Minter, Shannon (Massachusetts)

Monnin-Browder, Elizabeth E. (Massachusetts)

Neronha, Peter F. (Massachusetts)

Platkin, Matthew J. (Massachusetts)

Raoul, Kwame (Massachusetts)

Rosenblum, Ellen F. (Massachusetts)

Rossman, Jessie J. (Massachusetts)

Schaerr, Gene C. (Massachusetts)

Schmitt, Carl F. (Massachusetts)

Schwalb, Brian L. (Massachusetts)

Seideman, Tina (Massachusetts)

Seldin, Harper S. (Massachusetts)

Shapiro, Ilya (Massachusetts)

Shelton, Adam (Massachusetts)

Thomson, Cassandra J. (Massachusetts)

Tong, William M. (Massachusetts)

Torstensen, Peter Martin (Massachusetts)

Trevor, Reece (Massachusetts)

Wagner, Vincent M. (Massachusetts)

Weiser, Philip J. (Massachusetts)

Wheat, John Marc (Massachusetts)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:22-cv-30041

Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Judgment, and Damages

April 12, 2022

April 12, 2022

Complaint
22

3:22-cv-30041

Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Judgment, and Damages

June 21, 2022

June 21, 2022

Complaint
28

3:22-cv-30041

DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Aug. 1, 2022

Aug. 1, 2022

Pleading / Motion / Brief
51

3:22-cv-30041

Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

Foote v. Town of Ludlow

Dec. 14, 2022

Dec. 14, 2022

Order/Opinion

2022 WL 18356421

52

3:22-cv-30041

Notice of Appeal

Jan. 11, 2023

Jan. 11, 2023

Other

23-01069

Brief of Amicus Curiae State of Montana and 18 Other States Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellants and Reversal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

March 20, 2023

March 20, 2023

Pleading / Motion / Brief

23-01069

Brief of Amici Curiae Massachusetts, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Affirmance

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

June 27, 2023

June 27, 2023

Pleading / Motion / Brief
108249041

23-01069

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Feb. 18, 2025

Feb. 18, 2025

Order/Opinion

128 F.4th 336

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63231218/foote-v-ludlow-school-committee/

Last updated July 28, 2026, 8:52 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 12, 2022

COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9272303 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 JS45 Local Category Sheet)(Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/12/2022)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 JS45 Local Category Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 April 13, 2022

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Finn, Mary) (Entered: 04/13/2022)

RECAP
3 April 13, 2022

Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 04/13/2022)

RECAP
April 13, 2022

Notice of Case Assignment

4 April 27, 2022

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. Todd Gazda served on 4/15/2022, answer due 5/6/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Marissa Silvestri; Stephen Foote; Sandra Salmeron. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

RECAP
5 April 27, 2022

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Jonathan Feliciano, Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. Marie-Claire Foley served on 4/27/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Jonathan Feliciano; Marissa Silvestri; Stephen Foote; Sandra Salmeron. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

RECAP
6 April 27, 2022

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Jonathan Feliciano, Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. Lisa Nemeth served on 4/27/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Jonathan Feliciano; Marissa Silvestri; Stephen Foote; Sandra Salmeron. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

RECAP
7 April 27, 2022

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Jonathan Feliciano, Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. Ludlow School Committee served on 4/27/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Jonathan Feliciano; Marissa Silvestri; Stephen Foote; Sandra Salmeron. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

RECAP
8 April 27, 2022

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Jonathan Feliciano, Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. Stacy Monette served on 4/27/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Jonathan Feliciano; Marissa Silvestri; Stephen Foote; Sandra Salmeron. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

RECAP
9 April 28, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Nancy Frankel Pelletier on behalf of Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth (Pelletier, Nancy) (Entered: 04/28/2022)

RECAP
10 April 28, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Lawless on behalf of Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth (Lawless, David) (Entered: 04/28/2022)

RECAP
11 April 28, 2022

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Vernadette R. Broyles Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number BMADC-9297732 by Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri.(Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/28/2022)

RECAP
12 April 28, 2022

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Mary E. McAlister Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9297783 by Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri.(Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 04/28/2022)

RECAP
13 April 29, 2022

MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/28/2022 to File Answer re 1 Complaint, or to file motion to dismiss by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Lawless, David) (Entered: 04/29/2022)

1 Exhibit Exhibit 1

View on PACER

RECAP
14 April 29, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Given the time-sensitive nature of 13 Defendants' Motion for an Extension of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, Plaintiffs opposition, if any, shall be due on or before 5/6/2022. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 04/29/2022)

RECAP
April 29, 2022

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

15 May 6, 2022

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Jonathan Feliciano, Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. All Defendants. Acknowledgement filed by Jonathan Feliciano, Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 05/06/2022)

RECAP
16 May 6, 2022

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/28/2022 to File Answer re 1 Complaint, or to file motion to dismiss filed by Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri. (Beckwith, Andrew) (Entered: 05/06/2022)

RECAP
17 May 10, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part 13 Defendants' Motion for an Extension of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Defendants' response to Plaintiffs Complaint shall be due forty-five days from the date of this order. Defendants' request that their deadline to respond to the complaint be delayed until after Plaintiffs file a notice of constitutional challenge as set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1 is denied. Rule 5.1 requires the filing of notice with a state attorney general only when the constitutionality of a state (or federal) statute is drawn into question. Plaintiffs have clarified in their response (Dkt. No. 16) that their complaint does not contest the constitutionality of Mass. Gen. Laws c. 76, s. 5 and such challenge is waived. Plaintiffs reference to the statute is not sufficient to put its constitutionality in doubt. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 05/10/2022)

RECAP
May 10, 2022

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

18 May 23, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Vernadette R. Broyles. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 05/23/2022)

RECAP
19 May 23, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added MARY E. MCALISTER. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 05/23/2022)

RECAP
20 May 23, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Mary E. McAlister on behalf of Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri (McAlister, Mary) (Entered: 05/23/2022)

RECAP
21 May 23, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Vernadette Ramirez Broyles on behalf of Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri (Broyles, Vernadette) (Entered: 05/23/2022)

RECAP
May 23, 2022

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

22 June 21, 2022

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jonathan Feliciano, Stephen Foote, Sandra Salmeron, Marissa Silvestri.(McAlister, Mary) (Entered: 06/21/2022)

Clearinghouse
23 June 29, 2022

Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 07/29/2022 to respond to amended complaint by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth.(Lawless, David) (Entered: 06/29/2022)

RECAP
24 June 30, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 23 Defendants' Assented-to Motion for an Extension of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Defendants' response to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint shall be due on or before July 29, 2022. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 06/30/2022)

RECAP
June 30, 2022

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

25 July 29, 2022

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth.(Lawless, David) (Entered: 07/29/2022)

RECAP
26 July 29, 2022

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Lawless, David) (Entered: 07/29/2022)

RECAP
27 Aug. 1, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Electronic Order entered granting 26 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Counsel for Defendant, should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 08/01/2022)

RECAP
28 Aug. 1, 2022

MEMORANDUM in Support re 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Lawless, David) (Entered: 08/01/2022)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
Aug. 1, 2022

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

29 Aug. 12, 2022

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Stephen Foote, Marissa Silvestri. (McAlister, Mary) (Entered: 08/12/2022)

RECAP
30 Aug. 31, 2022

Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Reply by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth.(Lawless, David) (Entered: 08/31/2022)

RECAP
31 Sept. 2, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 30 Defendants' Assented-Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Defendants shall file a reply not to exceed five pages of substantive material. Counsel for Defendants, should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 09/02/2022)

RECAP
Sept. 2, 2022

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

32 Sept. 9, 2022

REPLY to Response to 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Marie-Claire Foley, Jordan Funke, Todd Gazda, Ludlow School Committee, Stacy Monette, Lisa Nemeth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Lawless, David) (Entered: 09/09/2022)

RECAP
33 Sept. 12, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The court will schedule a hearing in this matter to take place at Western New England University School of Law, which is located at 1215 Wilbraham Road, Springfield, MA, in the moot courtroom at 12:00 p.m. on October 17, 2022. Counsel should be aware that law students will be in attendance and courtroom technology may be limited. The court has allotted up to an hour for arguments in this case, to be split between the parties; counsel should be prepared to make comprehensive arguments for the benefit of the law students. In order to adequately plan for this event, the parties are instructed that any motion for a continuance (or similar requests or actions which may affect the hearing) shall be filed no later than September 26, 2022.(Rivera, Christina) (Entered: 09/12/2022)

RECAP
34 Sept. 12, 2022

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion: 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : Motion Hearing set for 10/17/2022 at 12:00 PM in Springfield before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. **PLEASE NOTE: This hearing will take place at: Western New England University School of Law: 1215 Wilbraham Road, Springfield, MA, in the moot courtroom**(Rivera, Christina) (Entered: 09/12/2022)

RECAP
Sept. 12, 2022

Order

Sept. 12, 2022

Notice Setting or Resetting Hearing on Motion

35 Oct. 7, 2022

MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curiae Memorandum in Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Memorandum of Law of Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Erchull, Christopher) (Entered: 10/07/2022)

RECAP
36 Oct. 10, 2022

Opposition re 35 MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curiae Memorandum in Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss filed by Stephen Foote, Marissa Silvestri. (McAlister, Mary) (Entered: 10/10/2022)

RECAP
37 Oct. 11, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Electronic Order entered granting 35 Motion by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders and the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents for Leave to File Amici Curiae Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss will continue as scheduled. The court will consider any additional motions for leave to make amicus filed on or before 10/21/2022 before issuing a decision on Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Counsel for GLAD and M.A.S.S. should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 10/11/2022)

RECAP
38 Oct. 11, 2022

MEMORANDUM in Support re 35 MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curiae Memorandum in Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss, 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents. (Erchull, Christopher) (Entered: 10/11/2022)

RECAP
Oct. 11, 2022

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

39 Oct. 12, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Erchull on behalf of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (Erchull, Christopher) (Entered: 10/12/2022)

RECAP
40 Oct. 13, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Gary D. Buseck on behalf of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (Buseck, Gary) (Entered: 10/13/2022)

RECAP
41 Oct. 13, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Mary L. Bonauto on behalf of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (Bonauto, Mary) (Entered: 10/13/2022)

RECAP
42 Oct. 13, 2022

NOTICE of Appearance by Bennett H. Klein on behalf of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (Klein, Bennett) (Entered: 10/13/2022)

RECAP
Oct. 17, 2022

Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: By Plaintiff's Oral Motion, Jonathan Feliciano and Sandra Salmeron terminated. (Attorneys present: Atty McAlister, Atty Beckwith, Atty Lawless, Atty Frankel Pelletier) (Rivera, Christina)

Oct. 17, 2022

Add and Terminate Parties

43 Oct. 19, 2022

Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Motion Hearing held on 10/19/2022. (Attorneys present: Atty McAlister, Atty Beckwith, Atty Lawless, Atty Frankel Pelletier)Plaintiffs moves to remove Plaintiff(s): Jonathan Feliciano and Sandra Salmeron from suit. Court allows oral Motion to remove named plaintiffs. Court hears arguments re 25 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Court takes matter under advisement. A separate Order shall Issue. (Court Reporter: Leigh Gershowitz, email: leighjoeem@gmail.com.) (Rivera, Christina) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

RECAP
Oct. 19, 2022

Motion Hearing

44 Oct. 21, 2022

Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by Carl F. Schmitt on behalf of Family Institute of Connecticut. (Schmitt, Carl) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

RECAP
45 Oct. 21, 2022

MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Family Institute of Connecticut. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amicus Memorandum of Law)(Schmitt, Carl) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

1

View on RECAP

RECAP
46 Oct. 25, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Electronic Order entered granting 45 Motion of Family Institute of Connecticut for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Counsel for Family Institute of Connecticut should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 10/25/2022)

RECAP
Oct. 25, 2022

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

47 Oct. 26, 2022

AMICUS BRIEF filed by Family Institute of Connecticut In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (Schmitt, Carl) (Entered: 10/26/2022)

RECAP
48 Oct. 26, 2022

Transcript of Hearing held on October 17, 2022, before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Leigh B. Gershowitz, leighjoeem@gmail.com. Redaction Request due 11/16/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/28/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/24/2023. (Coppola, Katelyn) (Entered: 11/04/2022)

RECAP
49 Oct. 26, 2022

NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, available on the court website at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/transcripts.htm (Coppola, Katelyn) (Entered: 11/04/2022)

RECAP
Nov. 5, 2022

Notice of Filing of Official Transcript

50 Nov. 7, 2022

Notice of Supplemental Authorities re 25 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (McAlister, Mary) (Entered: 11/07/2022)

RECAP
51 Dec. 14, 2022

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ORDER entered granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 12/14/2022)

Clearinghouse
52 Jan. 11, 2023

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 51 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Stephen Foote, Marissa Silvestri Filing fee: $ 505, receipt number AMADC-9663258 Fee Status: Not Exempt. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf. US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 1/31/2023. (McAlister, Mary) (Entered: 01/11/2023)

Clearinghouse
53 Jan. 11, 2023

Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 52 Notice of Appeal (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 01/11/2023)

RECAP
54 Jan. 12, 2023

USCA Case Number 23-1069 for 52 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 01/12/2023)

RECAP
Jan. 12, 2023

USCA Case Number

55 Feb. 18, 2025

OPINION of USCA as to 52 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote. (MAP) (Entered: 02/19/2025)

RECAP
56 Feb. 18, 2025

USCA Judgment as to 52 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote. AFFIRMED... (MAP) (Entered: 02/19/2025)

RECAP
57 March 12, 2025

MANDATE of USCA as to 52 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marissa Silvestri, Stephen Foote. Appeal 52 Terminated (MAP) (Entered: 03/13/2025)

RECAP
58 July 22, 2025

Case Appealed to Supreme Court of the United States, Case Number 25-77. (MAP) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

RECAP
59 April 20, 2026

Order entered from the U.S. Supreme Court. The Petition for a Writ of Certiorari is Denied. (MAP) (Entered: 04/23/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Massachusetts

Case Type(s):

Education

Child Welfare

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 12, 2022

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two sets of parents whose children attend Ludlow school district.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

Town of Ludlow

Private Entity/Person

Baird Middle school Counselor

Librarian at Baird Middle School

Principle of Baird Middle School

School District

Ludlow Public School District

Ludlow Public School District

Ludlow Public School District

Superintendent of Ludlow Public Schools

Defendant Type(s):

Elementary/Secondary School

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Other Dockets:

District of Massachusetts 3:22-cv-30041

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 23-01069

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Juveniles

Parents (visitation, involvement)

Discrimination Basis:

Family discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Intersex

Male

LGBTQ+:

LGBTQ+

Recommended Citation