Case: Williams v. City of Beverly Hills

Williams v. Beverly Hills

California state trial court

NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, Central, case number 21STCV31949 Receipt No: ACACDC-32269019 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Complaint, # 2 Exhibit B - Proof of Service) (Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party City of Beverly Hills, a public entity(pty:dft))(Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 11/03/2021)

CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity, (Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 11/03/2021)

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity. (Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 11/03/2021)

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Roberta A Kraus counsel for Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity. Adding Daniel K. Spradlin as counsel of record for Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity. (Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 11/03/2021)

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Roberta A Kraus counsel for Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity. Adding Jeanne L. Tollison as counsel of record for Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Defendant City of Beverly Hills, a public entity. (Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 11/03/2021)

NON-CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Khalil White, Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant City of Beverly Hills served on 10/4/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, City Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL 1 . (et)

CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Beverly Hills, Jonathan De La Cruz(official capacities as employees of the City of Beverly Hills), Jonathan De La Cruz(individual), Does, Scott Dowling(official capacities as employees of the City of Beverly Hills), Scott Dowling(individual), Dale Drummond(individual), Dale Drummond(official capacities as employees of the City of Beverly Hills), Jon Ilusorio(individual), Jon Ilusorio(official capacities as employees of the City of Beverly Hills). Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Khalil White, Williams Jasmine. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/30/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL 1 . (et)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Crump on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Mark T Harris on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days)

Complaint - (Discovery)

STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Beverly Hills answer now due 12/10/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills.(Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 11/05/2021)

INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) (Entered: 11/06/2021)

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 24, 2022 re Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 12/06/2021)

Text Only Entry (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION (DKT. 13 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Court STRIKES the parties' Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to File A First Amended Complaint for failure to attest on the signature page of the document that all other signatories listed, who electronically signed with a s and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the content of and have authorized the filing. See Local Rule 5-4.3.4. Any renewed stipulation must comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) (Entered: 12/07/2021)

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 24, 2022 re Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kraus, Roberta) (Entered: 12/07/2021)

APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin L. Crump to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Williams Jasmine, Khalil White (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-32441531) filed by plaintiff Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Attachments: # 1 Unredacted Document Certificate of Good Standing - FL, # 2 Unredacted Document Certificate of Good Standing - TN, # 3 Unredacted Document Certificate of Good Standing - DC, # 4 Unredacted Document Certificate of Good Standing - ND FL, # 5 Proposed Order) (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 12/07/2021)

Generic Text Only Entry

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin L. Crump to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Williams Jasmine, Khalil White and designating Bradley C. Gage as local counsel 16 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc) (Entered: 12/09/2021)

APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew A. Lothson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City of Beverly Hills (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32481356) filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Spradlin, Daniel) (Entered: 12/14/2021)

APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arthur J. Reliford to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City of Beverly Hills (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32481373) filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Spradlin, Daniel) (Entered: 12/14/2021)

APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Susan E. Sullivan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City of Beverly Hills (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32481382) filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Spradlin, Daniel) (Entered: 12/14/2021)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew A. Lothson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City of Beverly Hills and designating Daniel K. Spradlin as local counsel 18 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc) (Entered: 12/15/2021)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arthur J. Reliford to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City of Beverly Hills and designating Daniel K. Spradlin as local counsel 19 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc) (Entered: 12/15/2021)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Susan E. Sullivan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City of Beverly Hills and designating Daniel K. Spradlin as local counsel 20 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc) (Entered: 12/15/2021)

ORDER GRANTING REVISED STIPULATION REGARDING FILING OF PLAINTIFFS' FIRSTAMENDED COMPLAINT 15 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: 1. Plaintiffs Jasmine Williams and Khalil White, in their individual and representative capacities on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated, shall have until January 21, 2022 to file their First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in this matter. 2. If Plaintiffs do not file their first amended complaint by that date, Defendant City of Beverly Hills shall have until January 28, 2022 to file its motion todismiss Plaintiffs' FAC. 3. If Plaintiffs file a FAC in this matter, Defendant City of Beverly Hills shall have until February 25, 2022 to file a responsive pleading to the FAC. (lc) (Entered: 12/22/2021)

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs amending Complaint - (Discovery),,, filed by plaintiff Khalil White, Williams Jasmine (Sadr, Milad) (Entered: 01/19/2022)

NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition 25 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of document is incomplete/incorrect. Caption of listed Officer defendants with ONLY initials... Docket record has these officers full named.. Clerk is unable to determine if the removing defendant Specified names to these officers identified with only initials. Also plaintiff in filing amended complaint erroneously selected the amended complaint as filed "All Plaintiffs" (see docket Text). Therefore Clerk unable to update the docket re parties to to conflict in caption and docket text In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 01/20/2022)

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint) filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. Motion set for hearing on 4/8/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order RE Motion to Dismiss) (Sullivan, Susan) (Entered: 02/25/2022)

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) (Entered: 02/28/2022)

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case (Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint) 27 filed by Plaintiffs Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Sadr, Milad) (Entered: 03/16/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition 25 filed by PLAINTIFF Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 03/23/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition 25 filed by PLAINTIFF Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 03/23/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition 25 filed by PLAINTIFF Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 03/23/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition 25 filed by PLAINTIFF Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 03/23/2022)

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request 32, Summons Request 33, Summons Request 30, Summons Request 31 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The named person on the "TO" area DO NOT MATCH THE CAPTION OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT NOR THE SUMMONS. On 1/19/22 filer was advised filer failed to properly name the defendants in the Caption and in the body text of the pleading. Clerk can only issue summons identical to the first amended complaint docket no. 25. Filer should include on the form "on the first Amended Complaint".. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) (Entered: 03/23/2022)

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On January 19, 2022, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), asserting claims against Defendants including individuals identified as "Sergeant D.D.," "Officer J.I.," and "Officer J.D." (Dkt. 25 ). On March 23, 2022, Plaintiffs requested the Clerk issue Summons with respect to individuals identified as "Sergeant Dale Drummond," "Officer Jon Ilusorio," and "Officer Jonathan De La Cruz." (Dkts. 30, 31, 32 ). The Clerk rejected Plaintiffs' requests on the grounds that the names listed in the "TO" area of the requests did not match the names listed in the caption of the FAC. (Dkt. 34 ). Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file, by April 8, 2022, either (1) an amended complaint that names these Defendants by their proper names or (2) a statement establishing that it is proper for Plaintiffs to maintain suit and to serve these individuals by pseudonyms, supported by relevant legal authority. The court CONTINUES the hearing on Defendant City of Beverly Hills' (the "City") Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 27 ), to April 29, 2022. If Plaintiffs file an amended complaint, the City's Motion to Dismiss will be denied as moot, without prejudice to the filing of a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/25/2022)

JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 15 days, filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet)(Tollison, Jeanne) (Entered: 03/25/2022)

JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-15, filed by Plaintiffs Williams Jasmine, Khalil White.. (Attachments: # 1 EXHIBIT)(Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 03/25/2022)

Text Only Scheduling Notice

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the April 8, 2022, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/28/2022)

ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 10/20/2023. (tf) (Entered: 03/28/2022)

ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, AND CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The Scheduling Order governing this action is set forth in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates chart below. See attached order for SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES for deadlines and hearings. (lom) (Entered: 03/28/2022)

Text Only Scheduling Notice

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Amended Complaint/Petition 25, Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,, 35 filed by plaintiff Williams Jasmine, Khalil White. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sadr, Milad) (Entered: 04/06/2022)

ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, Granting Stipulation Regarding Filing of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 41 ). Plaintiffs are granted leave to file their SAC on or before April 22, 2022. The court VACATES the April 29, 2022 hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 27. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) (Entered: 04/07/2022)

~Util - Terminate Hearings AND Order

Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint/Petition 25, filed by Plaintiff Khalil White, Williams Jasmine (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1, # 2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2, # 3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 3, # 4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 4, # 5 Exhibit EXHIBIT 5, # 6 Exhibit EXHIBIT 6, # 7 Exhibit EXHIBIT 7, # 8 Exhibit EXHIBIT 8, # 9 Exhibit EXHIBIT 9, # 10 Exhibit EXHIBIT 10, # 11 Exhibit EXHIBIT 11, # 12 Exhibit EXHIBIT 12, # 13 Exhibit EXHIBIT 13, # 14 Exhibit EXHIBIT 14, # 15 Exhibit EXHIBIT 15)(Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/21/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 04/25/2022)

NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Request 53, Summons Request 50, Summons Request 47, Summons Request 48, Summons Request 49, Summons Request 46, Summons Request 44, Summons Request 52, Summons Request 51, Summons Request 54, Summons Request 45 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): Filer clerical error in filling in date of summons... this date is for clerk ONLY upon issuing the summons. Since filer submitted 11 summons which are otherwise correct...and since this is a clerk's process, Clerk will assist filer this time only and the 11 summons will be issued by separate entry this date. Please do not add date in future submissions. Therefore NO Response to this notice is required. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to Officer Billy Blair [Formerly Sued as Doe 5] (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Officer Jonathan De La Cruz [Formerly J.D]. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Sergeant Dale Drummond [Formerly D.D.](lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Sgt. Billy Fair [Formerly Sued as Doe 3] (lc) Modified on 4/26/2022 (lc). (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Officer John Ilusorio [Formerly J.I.] (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Officer James Krug [Formerly Sued as Doe 4]. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Officer Jesse Lyga [Formerly Sued as Doe 7]. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 as to defendant Officer Jerry Whittaker [Formerly Sued as Doe 6]. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Sandra Spagnoli [Formerly sued as Doe 1]. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Dominick Rivetti [Formerly sued as Doe 2].(lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND Amended Complaint/Petition 43 as to defendant Captain Scott Dowling. (lc) (Entered: 04/26/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/2/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 69). APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Elizabeth Paige White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams Jasmine (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33208597) filed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit New York Certificate, # 2 Exhibit DC Certificate, # 3 Proposed Order) (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/2/2022 (lc). (Entered: 04/28/2022)

NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Elizabeth Paige White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams Jasmine (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33208597) 67 . The following error(s) was/were found: Missing page two of the Application on Non-Resident Attorney. Therefore unable to verify non-resident attorney's signature. (lom) (Entered: 04/29/2022)

RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Elizabeth Paige White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Williams Jasmine (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33208597) 67 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken. (lc) (Entered: 05/02/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Dominick Rivetti served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dominick Rivetti in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Billy Blair served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Jonathan De La Cruz(individual) served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82). PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Dale Drummond(individual) served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Billy Fair served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Jon Ilusorio(individual) served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82). PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant James Krug served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Jesse Lyga served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Jerry Whittaker served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

(STRICKEN PER 5/16/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 82).PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Scott Dowling(individual) served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Scott Dowling in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) Modified on 5/16/2022 (lc). (Entered: 05/03/2022)

NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 70, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 71, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 72, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 73, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 74, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 75, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (77], Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 78, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 79 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer failed to remove "LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT" on the form...instead only added [USDC]; and missing address of the court's location In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) (Entered: 05/03/2022)

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS AND THE SERVED INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Sullivan, Susan) (Entered: 05/13/2022)

RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 72, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 79, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 73, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 74, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 70, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 76, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 71, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), 75 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken. (lc) (Entered: 05/16/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/16/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Scott Dowling in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

(STRICKEN ON MAY 17, 2022, PER CM/ECF No. (Dkt. 94 ) Corrected STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jon Ilusorio(individual) answer now due 6/3/2022; Scott Dowling(individual) answer now due 6/3/2022; Jerry Whittaker answer now due 6/3/2022; Dominick Rivetti answer now due 6/3/2022; City of Beverly Hills answer now due 6/3/2022; Jonathan De La Cruz(individual) answer now due 6/3/2022; Jesse Lyga answer now due 6/3/2022; James Krug answer now due 6/3/2022; Dale Drummond(individual) answer now due 6/3/2022; Billy Fair answer now due 6/3/2022; Billy Blair answer now due 6/3/2022, re Amended Complaint/Petition,, 43 filed by Defendants Jon Ilusorio(individual); Scott Dowling(individual); Jerry Whittaker; Dominick Rivetti; City of Beverly Hills; Jonathan De La Cruz(individual); Jesse Lyga; James Krug; Dale Drummond(individual); Billy Fair; Billy Blair. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on [Corrected] Stipulation to Extend time for City of Beverly Hills and the Served Individual Defendants to Respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint)(Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Billy Blair(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Jonathan De La Cruz(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Scott Dowling(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Dale Drummond(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Billy Fair(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Jon Ilusorio(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party James Krug(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Jesse Lyga(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Dominick Rivetti(pty:dft), Attorney Jeanne L Tollison added to party Jerry Whittaker(pty:dft))(Tollison, Jeanne) Modified on 5/17/2022 (tf). (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dominick Rivetti in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Williams Jasmine, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Dunn, Records Manager, authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gage, Bradley) (Entered: 05/17/2022)