Case: Khairullah v. Garland

3:23-cv-30095 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Filed Date: Sept. 18, 2023

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This lawsuit relates to a terrorism watchlist maintained by the United States government. Several Muslim American citizens, permanent residents, and asylees brought this lawsuit alleging that the US government placed names on the list without valid reason, and that the Muslims on the list face scrutiny only because of anti-Muslim discrimination. On September 18, 2023, twelve Muslim-Americans filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the heads of twenty-nine…

This lawsuit relates to a terrorism watchlist maintained by the United States government. Several Muslim American citizens, permanent residents, and asylees brought this lawsuit alleging that the US government placed names on the list without valid reason, and that the Muslims on the list face scrutiny only because of anti-Muslim discrimination.

On September 18, 2023, twelve Muslim-Americans filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the heads of twenty-nine US agencies. The plaintiffs were represented by attorneys at the Council on American-Islamic Relations Legal Defense Fund (“CAIR”), and three state chapters of CAIR: Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Michigan. They alleged that they had been placed on the Terrorist Screening Dataset (“TSDS”), known colloquially as the “federal terrorist watchlist.”

The plaintiffs alleged that being on the federal watchlist led to public humiliation, as well as surveillance and harassment when they tried to travel, meaning that they could not attend important life events such as weddings, funerals, and graduations. Being on the watchlist had also caused them to be separated from their children; to be denied jobs, security clearances, U.S. citizenship, visas, gun licenses, and other government benefits; and in some cases to be essentially barred from the United States. They alleged that the use of the watchlist constituted religious discrimination because many of the factors that led to being placed on the watchlist were not grounded in any actual national security justification; rather, they were things like going to a mosque or traveling to Muslim-majority countries. They alleged that the watchlist was in practice a Muslim registry because over 98% of people on the watchlist were Muslim, and that the individuals placed on the list were not allowed to challenge the allegations against them. The plaintiffs alleged that this violated the Fifth Amendment by infringing on their procedural and substantive due process rights and by violating the Equal Protection Clause and the Self-Incrimination Clause. They also alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment’s protections against search and seizure as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Finally, they alleged that the defendants had violated the Administrative Procedure Act because the dissemination of the watchlist was arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to law, unconstitutional, and beyond the agencies' statutory powers. They requested injunctive relief, monetary damages, attorneys' fees, and a declaratory judgment that the policies and practices surrounding the federal terrorist watchlist were unconstitutional. 

The case was assigned to Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. On February 20, 2024, the defendants moved to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of D.C., or to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint the next month, on March 12. The amended complaint added several plaintiffs, and included two new claims. First, the plaintiffs argued that the watchlist violated the nondelegation doctrine because it delegated legislative power to an executive agency and did not provide an intelligible principle for that agency to follow. Second, the plaintiffs argued that the federal agencies responsible for the watchlist had delegated this responsibility to sub-agencies, which contradicted Congress's intent and therefore violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

The following day, the court denied the motion to transfer or dismiss as moot due to the amended complaint. As of April 18, 2024, this case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Samantha Houghton (4/15/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67803896/parties/khairullah-v-meyer/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Abbas, Gadeir (Massachusetts)

Dougan, Barbara J. (Massachusetts)

Doukoure, Amy (Massachusetts)

Masri, Lena F. (Massachusetts)

Attorney for Defendant

Ely, Alexander N. (Massachusetts)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:23-cv-30095

Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Relief, and Damages

Sept. 18, 2023

Sept. 18, 2023

Complaint
29

3:23-cv-30095

First Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Relief, and Damages

March 12, 2024

March 12, 2024

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67803896/khairullah-v-meyer/

Last updated Aug. 31, 2026, 4:45 a.m.

Docket for: Khairullah v. Meyer
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 18, 2023

COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number BMADC-10040221 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Dougan, Barbara) (Entered: 09/18/2023)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Category Form

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Sept. 19, 2023

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Phillips, Sophie) (Entered: 09/19/2023)

RECAP
3 Sept. 19, 2023

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Hannah Mullen Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10042186 by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad.(Dougan, Barbara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2023: # 1 Affidavit) (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/19/2023)

RECAP
4 Sept. 19, 2023

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Lena Masri Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10042485 by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad.(Dougan, Barbara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2023: # 1 Affidavit) (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/19/2023)

RECAP
5 Sept. 19, 2023

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Gadeir Abbas Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10042533 by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad.(Dougan, Barbara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2023: # 1 Affidavit) (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/19/2023)

RECAP
6 Sept. 19, 2023

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Amy Doukoure Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10042537 by Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady.(Dougan, Barbara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2023: # 1 Affidavit) (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/19/2023)

RECAP
Sept. 19, 2023

Notice of Case Assignment

7 Sept. 20, 2023

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Justin Sadowsky Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10045546 by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad.(Dougan, Barbara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2023: # 1 Affidavit) (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/20/2023)

RECAP
8 Sept. 22, 2023

Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 09/22/2023)

RECAP
9 Sept. 25, 2023

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Hannah Mullen. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Zamorski, Michael) Modified on 9/25/2023 (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/25/2023)

RECAP
10 Sept. 25, 2023

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Lena Masri. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Zamorski, Michael) Modified on 9/25/2023 (Zamorski, Michael). (Entered: 09/25/2023)

RECAP
11 Sept. 25, 2023

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Gadeir Abbas. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 09/25/2023)

RECAP
12 Sept. 25, 2023

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Amy Doukoure. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 09/25/2023)

RECAP
13 Sept. 25, 2023

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Justin Sadowsky. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Zamorski, Michael) (Entered: 09/25/2023)

RECAP
Sept. 25, 2023

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

14 Feb. 6, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander N. Ely on behalf of Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray (Ely, Alexander)

RECAP
15 Feb. 6, 2024

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition and Reply Briefs, Joint MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Government's Opening Brief, Plaintiffs' Opposition, and Government's Reply Brief ( Responses due by 2/20/2024) by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Ely, Alexander)

RECAP
16 Feb. 7, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandra Widas on behalf of Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray (Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
17 Feb. 7, 2024

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Abdulrahman Cherri, Michael Migliore, Mohamed Khairullah, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Moneeb Elhady, Nidal El-Takach, Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Ihab Rashad, Tawhidullah Amini, Ahmad Mirzay, Naveed Butt. (Masri, Lena)

RECAP
18 Feb. 8, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting [15] Motion for Enlargement of Page Limits and to set a Briefing Schedule. (Zamorski, Michael)

RECAP
Feb. 8, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time AND Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages

19 Feb. 9, 2024

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to February 20, 2024 to File Opening Brief by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Ely, Alexander)

RECAP
20 Feb. 12, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting [19] Motion for Extension of Time. (Lendon, Tyler)

RECAP
Feb. 12, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

21 Feb. 20, 2024

MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.., MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Responses due by 3/5/2024) by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Watchlisting Overview, # 2 Exhibit B - Weselmann Decl., # 3 Text of Proposed Order, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Widas, Alexandra) (Main Document 21 replaced on 2/23/2024) (Figueroa, Tamara). (Entered: 02/20/2024)

RECAP
24 Feb. 20, 2024

NOTICE by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray Notice of Lodging (Ely, Alexander) (Entered: 02/20/2024)

RECAP
25 Feb. 20, 2024

MEMORANDUM in Support re 21 MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Merrick Garland. (Figueroa, Tamara) (Entered: 02/23/2024)

RECAP
26 Feb. 20, 2024

Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. The MOTION and Memorandum in Support as to (Dkt#21) was filed as one document. The Motion to (Dkt.#21) was edited to remove the attached Memorandum which was incorrectly filed. The Memorandum in Support has been removed and entered separately. (Figueroa, Tamara) (Entered: 02/23/2024)

RECAP
Feb. 23, 2024

Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff

27 Feb. 27, 2024

Joint MOTION to Maintain Enlargement of Page Limits and to Set a New Briefing Schedule by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Masri, Lena) (Entered: 02/27/2024)

RECAP
28 Feb. 28, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 27 MOTION to Maintain Enlargement of Page Limits and to Set a New Briefing Schedule by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad. (Figueroa, Tamara) (Entered: 02/28/2024)

RECAP
Feb. 28, 2024

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

29 March 12, 2024

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Abdulrahman Cherri, Michael Migliore, Mohamed Khairullah, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Moneeb Elhady, Nidal El-Takach, Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Ihab Rashad, Tawhidullah Amini, Ahmad Mirzay, Naveed Butt, Muad Maya, Hazem Ibrahim, Khalil Alwohoush.(Masri, Lena) Modified on 3/13/2024 (Healy, Bethaney). (Entered: 03/12/2024)

RECAP
30 March 13, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot 21 Motion to Transfer, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, in light of the filing of the Amended Complaint. Defendants may file a renewed motion to transfer and/or dismiss directed at the Amended Complaint by April 19, 2024. (See Dkt. Nos. 27, 28.) (Lendon, Tyler) (Entered: 03/13/2024)

RECAP
31 March 13, 2024

Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: 29 Amended Complaint was edited to link the document to the proper parties. (Healy, Bethaney) (Entered: 03/13/2024)

RECAP
March 13, 2024

Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim AND Order on Motion to Transfer Case

March 13, 2024

Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff

32 April 19, 2024

MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.., MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Responses due by 5/3/2024) by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray.(Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
33 April 19, 2024

MEMORANDUM in Support re [32] MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Watchlisting Overview, # (2) Exhibit B - Weselmann Decl., # (3) Exhibit C - Chart, # (4) Text of Proposed Order, # (5) Text of Proposed Order)(Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
36 April 19, 2024

NOTICE by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray Notice of Lodging (Ely, Alexander)

RECAP
37 May 13, 2024

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Khalil Alwohoush, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Hazem Ibrahim, Mohamed Khairullah, Muad Maya, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Masri, Lena)

RECAP
38 May 20, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Electronic order entered granting [37] Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 32) shall be filed on or before May 23, 2024. Defendants' reply to Plaintiffs' response shall be filed on or before June 13, 2024. (Figueroa, Tamara)

RECAP
May 20, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

39 May 23, 2024

Opposition re [32] MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Nusratilla Abdukhamidov, Khalil Alwohoush, Tawhidullah Amini, Naveed Butt, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nidal El-Takach, Moneeb Elhady, Hazem Ibrahim, Mohamed Khairullah, Muad Maya, Michael Migliore, Ahmad Mirzay, Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad. (Masri, Lena)

RECAP
41 June 13, 2024

REPLY to Response to [32] MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray. (Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
42 June 13, 2024

NOTICE by Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray Notice of Lodging (Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
43 June 20, 2024

Motion to Withdrawal Appearance. Attorney Hannah Mullen terminated. (Figueroa, Tamara) Modified on 6/20/2024 correct event (Figueroa, Tamara).

RECAP
44 June 20, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting [43] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (Figueroa, Tamara)

RECAP
June 20, 2024

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

45 Sept. 23, 2024

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion [32] MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : Motion Hearing set for 11/21/2024 at 10:00 AM in Hampden Courtroom (In person only) before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. (Lendon, Tyler)

RECAP
Sept. 23, 2024

Notice Setting or Resetting Hearing on Motion

46 Nov. 13, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. Meyer on behalf of Christine Abizaid, Lloyd J Austin, Scott Berrier, Antony J Blinken, William Burns, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Pete Buttigieg, Kimberly Cheatle, Mason Clutter, Himamauli Das, Susan Davies, Andrea Gacki, Merrick Garland, Michael Glasheen, Avril Haines, Ur Jaddou, Hillary Batier Johnson, Patrick Lechleitner, Shonnie Lyon, Alejandro Mayorkas, Johnathan Meyer, Troy Miller, Paul Nakasone, Matthew Olsen, David Pekoske, Shoba Wadhia, Kenneth Wainstein, Peter Winn, Christopher Wray (Meyer, Robert)

RECAP
47 Nov. 22, 2024

Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Motion Hearing held on 11/22/2024. (Attorneys present: Atty Abbas for Plaintiffs, Atty Meyer & Atty Widas for Defts) Arguments heard re: [32] Defendant's MOTION to Transfer Case, Motion to Dismiss. Court takes the matter advisement. A separate order shall issue. (Court Reporter: Leigh Gershowitz at Leigh_Gershowitz@mad.uscourts.gov.) (Rivera, Christina)

RECAP
Nov. 22, 2024

Motion Hearing

48 Nov. 26, 2024

Transcript of Motion Hearing held on November 21, 2024, before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Leigh Gershowitz at Leigh_Gershowitz@mad.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 12/17/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/27/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/24/2025. (Kelly, Danielle)

RECAP
49 Nov. 26, 2024

NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, available on the court website at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/transcripts.htm (Kelly, Danielle)

RECAP
50 Nov. 26, 2024

Notice of Supplemental Authorities re [32] MOTION to Transfer Case to D.D.C.. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
Nov. 26, 2024

Notice of Filing of Official Transcript

51 Nov. 27, 2024

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re [50] Notice of Supplemental Authorities. Plaintiffs shall file a response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority by December 12, 2024. Plaintiffs should address, among other things, the procedure described in footnote 1 of the Notice of Supplemental Authority and whether and how such a procedure could be used in this case.(Lendon, Tyler)

RECAP
Nov. 27, 2024

Order

52 Dec. 12, 2024

NOTICE by Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad, Mohamed Khairullah, Muad Maya, Hazem Ibrahim, Khalil Alwohoush, Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das, Paul Nakasone, Michael Migliore, Kimberly Cheatle, Christine Abizaid, Pete Buttigieg, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Matthew Olsen, Scott Berrier, Andrea Gacki, Lloyd J Austin, Merrick Garland, Hillary Batier Johnson, Nidal El-Takach, William Burns, Shonnie Lyon, Mason Clutter, David Pekoske, Susan Davies, Michael Glasheen, Troy Miller, Ahmad Mirzay, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony J Blinken, Avril Haines, Naveed Butt, Moneeb Elhady, Abdulrahman Cherri, Tawhidullah Amini, Nusratilla Abdukhamidov (Masri, Lena)

RECAP
53 Dec. 19, 2024

MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority by Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das, Kimberly Cheatle, Christine Abizaid, Pete Buttigieg, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Matthew Olsen, Scott Berrier, Andrea Gacki, Lloyd J Austin, Merrick Garland, Hillary Batier Johnson, Christopher Wray, William Burns, Kenneth Wainstein, Shonnie Lyon, Shoba Wadhia, Mason Clutter, David Pekoske, Susan Davies, Michael Glasheen, Troy Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony J Blinken, Avril Haines, Peter Winn. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - [Proposed] Reply in Support of Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority)(Widas, Alexandra)

1 Exhibit A - [Proposed] Reply in Support of Defendants' Notice of Supplement

View on PACER

RECAP
54 Jan. 3, 2025

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting [53] Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Lendon, Tyler)

RECAP
55 Jan. 3, 2025

NOTICE by Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das, Paul Nakasone, Kimberly Cheatle, Christine Abizaid, Pete Buttigieg, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Matthew Olsen, Scott Berrier, Andrea Gacki, Lloyd J Austin, Merrick Garland, Hillary Batier Johnson, Christopher Wray, William Burns, Kenneth Wainstein, Shonnie Lyon, Shoba Wadhia, Mason Clutter, David Pekoske, Susan Davies, Michael Glasheen, Troy Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony J Blinken, Avril Haines, Peter Winn re [52] Notice (Other),, Leave to File Granted on Jan 3, 2025 (Meyer, Robert)

RECAP
Jan. 3, 2025

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

56 Jan. 31, 2025

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ORDER entered. Accordingly, the court finds that the ex parte materials must be provided to Plaintiffs' counsel, provided such counsel completes the required background checks and the court enters a sufficient protective order. The court therefore ORDERS Plaintiffs' counsel to apply to TSA for the criminal history and terrorist assessment background checks under § 525(d). The parties shall also confer and file a joint status report, by February 14, 2025, regarding the content of a strong attorneys eyes only protective order and the steps taken by the parties with regard to the background checks, as well as an estimated timeframe for completion of the background checks. Please see attached order for complete details.(TRL)

RECAP
57 Feb. 14, 2025

STATUS REPORT (Jointly filed by the Parties) by Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das, Paul Nakasone, Kimberly Cheatle, Christine Abizaid, Pete Buttigieg, Matthew Olsen, Scott Berrier, Andrea Gacki, Lloyd J Austin, Merrick Garland, Hillary Batier Johnson, Christopher Wray, William Burns, Kenneth Wainstein, Shonnie Lyon, Shoba Wadhia, Mason Clutter, David Pekoske, Susan Davies, Michael Glasheen, Troy Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony J Blinken, Avril Haines, Peter Winn. (Meyer, Robert)

RECAP
58 Feb. 14, 2025

MOTION for Reconsideration re [56] Order,,, (Motion for Partial Reconsideration) by Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das, Paul Nakasone, Kimberly Cheatle, Christine Abizaid, Pete Buttigieg, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Matthew Olsen, Scott Berrier, Andrea Gacki, Lloyd J Austin, Merrick Garland, Hillary Batier Johnson, Christopher Wray, William Burns, Kenneth Wainstein, Shonnie Lyon, Shoba Wadhia, Mason Clutter, David Pekoske, Susan Davies, Michael Glasheen, Troy Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony J Blinken, Avril Haines, Peter Winn. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Meyer, Robert)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
59 Feb. 18, 2025

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re [57] Joint Status Report. As proposed by the parties, they shall file another joint status report on or before March 6, 2025, regarding their progress on a proposed protective order. (TRL)

RECAP
Feb. 18, 2025

Order

60 Feb. 28, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Catherine Keck Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10865680 by Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad, Mohamed Khairullah, Muad Maya, Hazem Ibrahim, Khalil Alwohoush, Michael Migliore, Nidal El-Takach, Ahmad Mirzay, Naveed Butt, Moneeb Elhady, Abdulrahman Cherri, Tawhidullah Amini, Nusratilla Abdukhamidov. (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit Affidavit)(Dougan, Barbara)

RECAP
61 Feb. 28, 2025

RESPONSE to Motion re [58] MOTION for Reconsideration re [56] Order,,, (Motion for Partial Reconsideration) filed by Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad, Mohamed Khairullah, Muad Maya, Hazem Ibrahim, Khalil Alwohoush, Michael Migliore, Nidal El-Takach, Ahmad Mirzay, Naveed Butt, Moneeb Elhady, Abdulrahman Cherri, Nusratilla Abdukhamidov. (Masri, Lena)

RECAP
62 March 6, 2025

STATUS REPORT Joint by Talha Mohamed, Adam Qashou, Ihab Rashad, Mohamed Khairullah, Muad Maya, Hazem Ibrahim, Khalil Alwohoush, Michael Migliore, Nidal El-Takach, Ahmad Mirzay, Naveed Butt, Moneeb Elhady, Abdulrahman Cherri, Tawhidullah Amini, Nusratilla Abdukhamidov. (Masri, Lena)

RECAP
63 March 11, 2025

MOTION to Withdraw by Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das, Paul Nakasone, Kimberly Cheatle, Christine Abizaid, Pete Buttigieg, Kelli Ann Burriesci, Matthew Olsen, Scott Berrier, Andrea Gacki, Lloyd J Austin, Merrick Garland, Hillary Batier Johnson, Christopher Wray, William Burns, Kenneth Wainstein, Shonnie Lyon, Shoba Wadhia, Mason Clutter, David Pekoske, Susan Davies, Michael Glasheen, Troy Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony J Blinken, Avril Haines, Peter Winn.(Widas, Alexandra)

RECAP
64 March 11, 2025

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part [58] Defendants' Motion for Partial Reconsideration. The government requests that the court limit the ex parte materials it is required to provide to Plaintiffs' counsel to Section III of the Argument portion of the ex parte brief (Dkt. No. 34) and related portions of the ex parte declaration (Dkt. No. 35) and Supplemental In Camera, Ex Parte Statement (Dkt. No. 40.) According to the government, the other portions of the ex parte materials are not relevant to any pending motion and w[ere] instead submitted to the Court in furtherance of the Government's duty of candor. (Dkt. No. 58 at 2.) The court does not entirely agree. As previously explained, "courts generally insist -- as a matter of fundamental fairness, basic due process, and overall accuracy -- that each party be provided with access to the other party's evidence and the opportunity to contest it; in other words, secret evidence is inherently improper." (Dkt. No. 56 at 3.) The government's proposal would remove too much relevant information and disrupt the overall flow and arguments set forth in the ex parte brief, thereby undermining the fairness and accuracy concerns of the court. Moreover, as to relevancy, the government explained on page 5 of the ex parte brief, in the Background section: "In the interest of candor to the Court and because Plaintiffs' TSDS status is relevant to subject matter jurisdiction and dispositive of venue, the McQueen Declaration further explains the following jurisdictional facts with respect to Plaintiffs in this action." (Dkt. No. 34 at 7.) Thus, contrary to the government's current argument, the government previously asserted that this additional ex parte material was relevant to the pending motion, in addition to satisfying the duty of candor. On the other hand, the court does find that limited portions of the ex parte materials should be redacted, at least at this stage. In particular, the court finds that disclosure of the TSDS status of each Plaintiff -- even those with no connection to this venue -- is not necessary to fairly adjudicate the pending motion. For example, on page 1 of the ex parte brief, the court finds information in the second sentence of the second paragraph, as well as footnote 2, should be redacted at this time. Similarly, limited portions of the first full sentence on page 3, the entirety of footnote 4, part of the second sentence in the first full paragraph on page 5, the entirety of footnote 5, part of the second sentence in Section IV on page 16, and part of the first sentence in the first full paragraph on page 17 should be redacted. In addition, parallel information set forth in the ex parte declaration may be redacted as well. The government shall provide the court with proposed redactions by March 20, 2025, and the court will decide whether the redactions are satisfactory. (TRL)

RECAP
65 March 11, 2025

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re [62] Joint Status Report. The parties report that they have made progress on a proposed protective order and request that they update the court once they have finalized the proposed protective order or by March 20, 2025, whichever is sooner. The court grants the parties' request. In addition, the parties shall report the steps taken with regard to the background checks, as well as an estimated timeframe for completion of the background checks, no later than March 20, 2025. (TRL)

RECAP
March 11, 2025

Order

March 11, 2025

Order on Motion for Reconsideration

66 March 12, 2025

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting [63] Motion to Withdraw. (TRL)

RECAP
March 12, 2025

Order on Motion to Withdraw

67 March 20, 2025

Status Report

RECAP
68 March 20, 2025

Notice - Other

RECAP
March 24, 2025

~Util - Case Stayed

March 24, 2025

Order

70 April 8, 2025

Withdraw as Attorney

RECAP
71 April 10, 2025

Status Report

RECAP
April 11, 2025

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

April 11, 2025

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

April 11, 2025

Order

75 May 9, 2025

Status Report

RECAP
May 12, 2025

Order

77 May 30, 2025

Protective Order

RECAP
79 June 2, 2025

Protective Order

RECAP
June 2, 2025

Order on Motion for Protective Order

80 June 9, 2025

Status Report

RECAP
June 10, 2025

Order

82 July 9, 2025

Status Report

RECAP
July 11, 2025

Order

84 July 14, 2025

Notice - Other

RECAP
85 July 24, 2025

Notice - Other

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Massachusetts

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Immigration and/or the Border

Public Benefits/Government Services

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 18, 2023

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Fifteen Muslim-Americans placed on the Terrorist Screening Dataset, also called the "federal terrorist watchlist"

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

United States

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Right to travel

Unreasonable search and seizure

Other Dockets:

District of Massachusetts 3:23-cv-30095

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Religious programs / policies

Search policies

Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues

Watchlist

Discrimination Basis:

Religion discrimination

Immigration/Border:

Asylum - criteria

Deportation - criteria

Detention - criteria

Detention - procedures

Family Separation

Refugees

U.S. citizenship - acquiring

Visas - criteria

Visas - procedures

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Over/Unlawful Detention (facilities)

Policing:

Phone (policing)

Strip search policy (policing)

Recommended Citation