Case: Reeves v. Nago

1:20-cv-00433 | U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii

Filed Date: Oct. 8, 2020

Closed Date: Sept. 6, 2022

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about the constitutionality of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (“UOCAVA”), codified at 52 U.S.C. §§ 20301 to 20311, Hawaii’s Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act (“UMOVA”), codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) §§ 15D-1 to -18, and Hawaii Administrative Rules (“HAR”) § 3-177-600. Taken together, these provisions allow U.S. Citizens who are former Hawaii residents to vote absentee in Hawaii’s federal elections if they reside in a foreign country, th…

This case is about the constitutionality of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (“UOCAVA”), codified at 52 U.S.C. §§ 20301 to 20311, Hawaii’s Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act (“UMOVA”), codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) §§ 15D-1 to -18, and Hawaii Administrative Rules (“HAR”) § 3-177-600. Taken together, these provisions allow U.S. Citizens who are former Hawaii residents to vote absentee in Hawaii’s federal elections if they reside in a foreign country, the Northern Mariana Islands, or other insular territories but not if they reside in Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, or Puerto Rico.

On October 8, 2020, six former Hawaii residents who resided in Guam or the Virgin Islands, along with the Equally American Legal Defense and Education Fund, a non-partisan civil rights organization, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. Represented by private counsel, they sued the Chief Election Officer of the Hawaii Office of Elections, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, the Federal Voting Assistance Program, and the United States of America under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs alleged that denying similarly situated U.S. Citizens the right to vote based on which particular territory they resided in violated the Equal Protection and Due Process guarantees of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. They sought declaratory relief, an injunction expanding voting rights to all former Hawaii citizens living in any territory, and attorneys’ fees. The case was assigned to District Judge Jill A. Otake.

On April 23, 2021, the court held it lacked the power to order federal and state officials to expand voting rights to all U.S. citizens who formerly resided in Hawaii, and thus plaintiffs had not established the redressability requirement for standing. The court dismissed the case with leave to file an amended complaint.

On May 14, 2021, plaintiffs filed their amended complaint. This time, in addition to declaratory relief and attorneys’ fees, they sought any order preventing enforcement of the challenged provisions insofar as they would extend the right to vote absentee in a way that discriminated against plaintiffs relative to other similarly situated former Hawaii residents. On September 2, 2021, the court ruled the amended complaint satisfied the requirements for standing because while the plaintiffs had previously asked the court to order defendants to do more than the statute authorized, plaintiffs were now only asking the court to enjoin enforcement of the allegedly unconstitutional provisions in the statutes.

The parties subsequently filed cross motions for summary judgment. On September 6, 2022, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court applied a rational basis review and held that UOCAVA and UMOVA did not violate the plaintiffs’ equal protection rights. The court explained that rational basis was the appropriate standard because territorial residents do not have a fundamental right to vote in federal elections, U.S. Citizens do not have a fundamental right to vote absentee in their former states of residence, and plaintiffs were not members of a suspect or quasi-suspect class. Plaintiffs timely filed an appeal.

On August 30, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision. On November 7, 2024, the Ninth Circuit denied the plaintiffs' petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. 

Summary Authors

John McGinnis (7/10/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18527259/parties/reeves-v-nago/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney, Pamela Lynn (Hawaii)

Attorney, Geoffrey M. (Hawaii)

Attorney for Defendant

Attorney, Ernest Haruo (Hawaii)

Barbata, Dana A. (Hawaii)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Attorney, Dwyer Arce, (Hawaii)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:20-cv-00433

Complaint

Oct. 8, 2020

Oct. 8, 2020

Complaint
39

1:20-cv-00433

Amended Complaint

Oct. 29, 2020

Oct. 29, 2020

Complaint
73

1:20-cv-00433

Second Amended Complaint

Dec. 18, 2020

Dec. 18, 2020

Complaint
102

1:20-cv-00433

Order Granting Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

April 23, 2021

April 23, 2021

Order/Opinion

535 F.Supp.3d 943

105

1:20-cv-00433

Third Amended Complaint

Borja v. Nago

May 14, 2021

May 14, 2021

Complaint
128

1:20-cv-00433

Order Denying Federal Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

Borja v. Nago

Sept. 2, 2021

Sept. 2, 2021

Order/Opinion

2021 WL 4005990

179

1:20-cv-00433

Order (1) Granting Defendants' Cross-Motions for Summary judgment and )2) Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment

Borja v. Nago

Sept. 6, 2022

Sept. 6, 2022

Order/Opinion

2022 WL 4082061

22-16742

Opinion

Borja v. Nago

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Aug. 30, 2024

Aug. 30, 2024

Order/Opinion

115 F.4th 971

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18527259/reeves-v-nago/

Last updated July 14, 2026, 5:17 a.m.

Docket for: Reeves v. Nago
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Oct. 8, 2020

COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Randall Jay Reeves, Vicente Topasna Borja, Edmund Frederick Schroeder, Jr., Ravinder Singh Nagi, Patricia Arroyo Rodriguez, Laura Castillo Nagi, and Equally American against Scott Nago, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer of the Hawaii Office of Elections, United States of America, Mark Esper, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense, Federal Voting Assistance Program, and David Beirne, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Voting Assistance Program against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2433224.), filed by Randall Jay Reeves. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/08/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Oct. 8, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/08/2020)

RECAP
3 Oct. 8, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/08/2020)

RECAP
4 Oct. 8, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/08/2020)

RECAP
5 Oct. 8, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/08/2020)

RECAP
6 Oct. 8, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/08/2020)

RECAP
7 Oct. 9, 2020

NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 20-00433 JAO-RT on all further pleadings. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
8 Oct. 9, 2020

Summons Issued as to Scott Nago. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
9 Oct. 9, 2020

Summons Issued as to United States of America. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
10 Oct. 9, 2020

Summons Issued as to Mark Esper. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
11 Oct. 9, 2020

Summons Issued as to Federal Voting Assistance Program. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
12 Oct. 9, 2020

Summons Issued as to David Beirne. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
13 Oct. 9, 2020

Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 12/7/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/9/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
14 Oct. 9, 2020

CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: # 1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, # 2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons)(emt, ) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
15 Oct. 9, 2020

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equally American. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/09/2020)

RECAP
16 Oct. 10, 2020

NOTICE by Randall Jay Reeves re 1 Complaint,, Plaintiffs Randall Jay Reeves, Vicente Topasna Borja, Edmund Frederick Schroeder, Jr., Ravinder Singh Nagi, Patricia Arroyo Rodriguez, Laura Castillo Nagi, and Equally American's Rule 5.1 Notice of Constitutional Challenge to a Statute Randall Jay Reeves. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/10/2020)

RECAP
17 Oct. 13, 2020

EO: The parties are directed to review the General Civil Case Procedures Before Judge Otake on the court's website. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 10/13/2020)

RECAP
18 Oct. 13, 2020

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Geoffrey Wyatt Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2434333.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Attachment to Declaration of Counsel, # 3 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/13/2020)

RECAP
19 Oct. 13, 2020

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Nicole Cleminshaw Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2434339.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/13/2020)

RECAP
20 Oct. 13, 2020

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Andrew Hanson Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2434345.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/13/2020)

RECAP
21 Oct. 13, 2020

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Zachary Martin Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2434349.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/13/2020)

RECAP
22 Oct. 14, 2020

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO GEOFFREY WYATT re 18 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 10/14/2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/14/2020)

RECAP
23 Oct. 14, 2020

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO NICOLE CLEMINSHAW re 19 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 10/14/2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/14/2020)

RECAP
24 Oct. 14, 2020

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO ANDREW HANSON re 20 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 10/14/2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/14/2020)

RECAP
25 Oct. 14, 2020

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO ZACHARY MARTIN re 21 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 10/14/2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/14/2020)

RECAP
26 Oct. 23, 2020

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Vanessa L. Williams Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2439470.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
27 Oct. 23, 2020

Errata re 26 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Vanessa L. Williams Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2439470. . (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
28 Oct. 23, 2020

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Pamela L. Colon Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2439488.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
29 Oct. 23, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. Scott Nago served on 10/15/2020. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
30 Oct. 23, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. Scott Nago served on October 14, 2020 through Deputy Attorney General Amanda Weston (Quan, Anthony) Modified on 10/27/2020 (emt, ). (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
31 Oct. 23, 2020

Errata re 29 Summons Returned Executed as to Defendant Scott Nago at Hawaii Office of Elections. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
32 Oct. 23, 2020

Errata re 30 Summons Returned Executed as to Defendant Scott Nago at State of Hawaii, Dept. of the Attorney General. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
33 Oct. 23, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. United States of America Mark Esper served on 10/14/2020 . (Quan, Anthony) Modified on 10/27/2020 (emt, ). (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
34 Oct. 23, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. Mark Esper United States of America served on 10/14/2020. (Quan, Anthony) Modified on 10/27/2020 (emt, ). (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
35 Oct. 23, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. Federal Voting Assistance Program served on 10/14/2020. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
36 Oct. 23, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. David Beirne served on 10/15/2020. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
37 Oct. 23, 2020

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO VANESSA L. WILLIAMS re 26, 27 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 10/23/2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
38 Oct. 23, 2020

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO PAMELA LYNN COLON re 28 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 10/23/2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

RECAP
39 Oct. 29, 2020

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Randall Jay Reeves, Vicente Topasna Borja, Edmund Frederick Schroeder, Jr., Ravinder Singh Nagi, Patricia Arroyo Rodriguez, Laura Castillo Nagi, and Equally American .(Quan, Anthony) Modified on 10/30/2020 (emt, ). (Entered: 10/29/2020)

Clearinghouse
40 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
41 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
42 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
43 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
44 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
45 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
46 Oct. 29, 2020

Summons (Proposed) (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 10/29/2020)

RECAP
47 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to Scott Nago, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer for the Hawaii Office of Elections. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
48 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to Glen Takahashi, in his official capacity as Clerk of the City and County of Honolulu. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
49 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to Kathy Kaohu, in her official capacity as Clerk of the County of Maui. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
50 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to United States of America. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
51 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to Mark Esper, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
52 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to Federal Voting Assistance Program. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
53 Oct. 30, 2020

Summons Issued as to David Beirne, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Voting Assistance Program. (emt, ) (Entered: 10/30/2020)

RECAP
54 Nov. 2, 2020

EO: The Court ADVANCES the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 12/7/2020 at 09:00 AM to 08:30 AM the same day before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. Parties and other participants must call-in at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Call-in instructions are below:1. Dial 1-888-363-4735.2. Access Code 2070326. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(laa) (Entered: 11/02/2020)

RECAP
55 Nov. 4, 2020

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to 39 Amended Complaint, 47 Summons Issued as to Defendant Scott Nago at Hawaii Office of Elections Acknowledgement filed by Randall Jay Reeves. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 11/04/2020)

RECAP
56 Nov. 4, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. Glen Takahashi served on 11/2/2020. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 11/04/2020)

RECAP
57 Nov. 4, 2020

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall Jay Reeves. Kathy Kaohu served on 10/30/2020. (Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 11/04/2020)

RECAP
58 Nov. 6, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Dana A. Barbata on behalf of David Beirne, Mark Esper, Federal Voting Assistance Program, United States of America on behalf of David Beirne, Mark Esper, Federal Voting Assistance Program, United States of America. (Barbata, Dana) (Entered: 11/06/2020)

RECAP
59 Nov. 13, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Ernest H. Nomura on behalf of Glen Takahashi on behalf of Glen Takahashi. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Nomura, Ernest) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

RECAP
60 Nov. 13, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Kohn on behalf of Glen Takahashi on behalf of Glen Takahashi. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Kohn, Robert) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

RECAP
61 Nov. 13, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Lori N. Tanigawa on behalf of Scott Nago on behalf of Scott Nago. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Tanigawa, Lori) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

RECAP
62 Nov. 13, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb P. Rowe on behalf of Kathy Kaohu on behalf of Kathy Kaohu. (Rowe, Caleb) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

RECAP
63 Nov. 17, 2020

EO: In light of the Parties request, the Court hereby converts the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 12/7/2020 at 08:30 AM to a Telephonic Status Conference before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER.Parties and other participants must call-in at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Call-in instructions are below:1. Dial 1-888-363-4735.2. Access Code 2070326. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(rls, ) (Entered: 11/17/2020)

RECAP
64 Nov. 17, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen M. Pezzi on behalf of David Beirne, Mark Esper, Federal Voting Assistance Program, United States of America on behalf of David Beirne, Mark Esper, Federal Voting Assistance Program, United States of America. (Pezzi, Stephen) (Entered: 11/17/2020)

RECAP
65 Nov. 23, 2020

Joint MOTION Parties' Joint Motion to Set Stipulated Briefing Schedule filed by Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit [Proposed] Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 11/23/2020)

RECAP
66 Nov. 23, 2020

REPORT of Planning Meeting Joint Report of the Parties Pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and LR26.1. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 11/23/2020)

RECAP
67 Nov. 24, 2020

EO: The parties filed a 65 Joint Motion to Set Stipulated Briefing Schedule, identifying the relevant legal issues and proposing a briefing and hearing schedule for the motions for summary judgment that are expected to resolve this litigation. Given the issues to be litigated, the Court finds that judicial economy will be served by a multistep process. The parties dispute Plaintiffs' standing, a threshold issue concerning subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, it should be addressed as a preliminary matter, particularly because the Court may "allow or [] require the plaintiff to supply, by amendment to the complaint or by affidavits, further particularized allegations of fact deemed supportive of plaintiff's standing." Maya v. Centex Corp., 658 F.3d 1060, 1067 (9th Cir. 2011) (citation and quotations omitted). Once the motion(s) regarding standing are filed, the Court will set the briefing schedule. Only after standing is resolved should the parties file their anticipated motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Joint Motion is DENIED. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 11/24/2020)

RECAP
68 Nov. 25, 2020

NOTICE of Appearance by Glen Ramos Pascual on behalf of Kathy Kaohu on behalf of Kathy Kaohu. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Pascual, Glen) (Entered: 11/25/2020)

RECAP
69 Dec. 1, 2020

Email from Robert M. Kohn, Deputy Corporation Counsel re ECF No. 67, dated December 1, 2020. (emt, ) (Entered: 12/01/2020)

RECAP
70 Dec. 1, 2020

EO: Counsel emailed the Courtroom Manager requesting the Court's confirmation that filing motions to dismiss based solely on standing will not waive their right to move to dismiss on other grounds later. The Court declines to opine on this matter, but notes that the multistep process was in part implemented due to the parties' representation that this case is susceptible to resolution by summary judgment. Defendants did not express any intention to file motions to dismiss. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 12/01/2020)

RECAP
71 Dec. 7, 2020

EP: TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE held.Discussion had. Parties confirm expectation that case will likely resolve by cross-motions. United States to file motion to dismiss, however, if denied, it will participate in cross motions. Parties discussing possible stipulation as to facts applicable to anticipated motions.Court declines to set trial date and deadlines, however, will continue to monitor case via periodic status conferences. Court sets Telephone Conference for 4/2/2021 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Trader. No submissions required. Parties and other participants must call-in at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Call-in instructions are below:1. Dial 1-888-363-47352. Enter Access Code 2070326 (ATT / 8:30 a.m. - 8:35 a.m.) (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(laa) (Entered: 12/07/2020)

RECAP
72 Dec. 18, 2020

STIPULATION PERMITTING LEAVE TO PLAINTIFFS TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 12/18/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A).NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants through their respective counsel, good cause appearing and justice so requiring, Plaintiffs should be permitted leave to file their Second Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A, upon entry of an order of the Court approving same. Defendants reserve all rights to challenge and/or object to the allegations of the Second Amended Complaint.(jni) (Entered: 12/18/2020)

RECAP
73 Dec. 18, 2020

Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Randall Jay Reeves, Vicente Topasna Borja, Edmund Frederick Schroeder, Jr., Ravinder Singh Nagi, Patricia Arroyo Rodriguez, Laura Castillo Nagi, and Equally American .(Quan, Anthony) Modified on 12/20/2020 (emt, ). (Entered: 12/18/2020)

Clearinghouse
74 Jan. 14, 2021

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Stephen M. Pezzi appearing for Defendants Christopher C. Miller, Federal Voting Assistance Program, United States of America, David Beirne (Pezzi, Stephen) (Entered: 01/14/2021)

RECAP
75 Jan. 14, 2021

MEMORANDUM in Support re 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by David Beirne, Federal Voting Assistance Program, Christopher C. Miller, United States of America. (Pezzi, Stephen) (Entered: 01/14/2021)

RECAP
76 Jan. 14, 2021

EO: The parties are notified that per standard practice in this district, memoranda in support of motions, as well as declarations, exhibits, and certificates of service, should be filed as attachments to the associated motions, not as separate documents. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 01/14/2021)

RECAP
77 Jan. 15, 2021

EO: The hearing on 74 Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction is SET for 3/5/21 at 9:00 AM before DISTRICT JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE. Responses are due by 2/5/21, Reply due by 2/12/21.The hearing will be conducted by video teleconference (VTC). The courtroom manager will provide the participants with instructions and information to connect by video prior to the scheduled VTC. Participants must connect to the VTC at least ten (10) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing. All participants shall mute their lines until directed to speak by the Court.All attorneys participating in the hearing are directed to refrain from using speaker phones. The public may attend this conference (audio only) with the information provided below:1. Dial 1-650-479-3207.2. Enter your Access Code (1607265019) The Court reminds all participants that they are strictly prohibited from recording or broadcasting any hearing, in whole or in part, in any fashion. (shm) (Entered: 01/15/2021)

RECAP
78 Jan. 15, 2021

Defendant Scott Nago's Partial MOTION for Joinder re 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and 75 Memorandum in Support Lori N. Tanigawa appearing for Defendant Scott Nago (Tanigawa, Lori) Modified on 1/19/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 01/15/2021)

RECAP
79 Jan. 15, 2021

Defendant Glen Takahashi's Partial MOTION for Joinder re 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and 75 Memorandum in Support Robert M. Kohn appearing for Defendant Glen Takahashi (Kohn, Robert) Modified on 1/19/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 01/15/2021)

RECAP
80 Jan. 15, 2021

Defendant Kathy Kaohu's Partial MOTION for Joinder re 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support 75 Caleb P. Rowe appearing for Defendant Kathy Kaohu (Rowe, Caleb) Modified on 1/19/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 01/15/2021)

RECAP
81 Jan. 19, 2021

EO: The hearing on the following Joinders is set for 3/5/21 at 9:00 A.M. before DISTRICT JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE: 78 Defendant Scott Nago's Partial Joinder in the Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisidction [sic] [ECF #74] and Memorandum in Support [ECF #75]; 79 Defendant Glen Takahashi's Partial Joinder to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisidction [sic] [ECF #74] and Memorandum in Support [ECF #75]; and 80 Defendant Kathy Kaohu's Partial Joinder to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [ECF #74] and Memorandum in Support [ECF #75].The hearing will be conducted by video teleconference (VTC). The courtroom manager will provide the participants with instructions and information to connect by video prior to the scheduled VTC. Participants must connect to the VTC at least ten (10) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing. All participants shall mute their lines until directed to speak by the Court.All attorneys participating in the hearing are directed to refrain from using speaker phones. The public may attend this conference (audio only) with the information provided below:1. Dial 1-650-479-3207.2. Enter your Access Code (1607265019) The Court reminds all participants that they are strictly prohibited from recording or broadcasting any hearing, in whole or in part, in any fashion. (shm) (Entered: 01/19/2021)

RECAP
82 Feb. 2, 2021

MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Neil C. Weare, Esq. Filing fee $ 300, receipt number 0975-2480400.Anthony F. Quan, Jr appearing for Plaintiff Randall Jay Reeves (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Quan, Anthony) (Entered: 02/02/2021)

RECAP
83 Feb. 3, 2021

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO NEIL C. WEARE re 82 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER on 2/3/2021. (emt, ) (Entered: 02/03/2021)

RECAP
84 Feb. 5, 2021

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support (Dkt. No.s. 74 and 75 ), and Defendant Scott Nago's (Dkt. No. 78 ), Glen Takahashi's (Dkt. No. 79 ), and Kathy Kaohu's (Dkt. No. 80 ) Partial Joinders to the Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Randall Jay Reeves, Vicente Topasna Borja, Edmund Frederick Schroeder, Jr., Ravinder Singh Nagi, Patricia Arroyo Rodriguez, Laura Castillo Nagi and Equally American. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Brief of Constitutional Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners at 5-13, Segovia v. United States, No. 17-1463 (U.S. June 2018), # 3 Exhibit Brief of Voting Rights Scholars as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner at 18, Segovia v. United States, No. 17-1463 (U.S. May 23, 2018), # 4 Exhibit Brief of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners at 7-8, Segovia v. United States, No. 17-1463 (U.S. May 23, 2018), # 5 Exhibit Brief of Amicus Curiae U.S. Virgin Islands in Support of Petitioners at 6, Segovia v. United States, No. 17-1463 (U.S. June 28, 2018), # 6 Certificate of Service)(Quan, Anthony) Modified on 2/8/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 02/05/2021)

RECAP
85 Feb. 5, 2021

Defendant Scott Nago's MEMORANDUM in Partial Opposition to the 74 Federal Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support [ECF # 75 ] filed by Scott Nago. (Tanigawa, Lori) Modified on 2/8/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 02/05/2021)

RECAP
86 Feb. 5, 2021

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and 75 Memorandum in Support filed by Glen Takahashi. (Kohn, Robert) (Entered: 02/05/2021)

RECAP
87 Feb. 5, 2021

Defendant Kathy Kaohu's MEMORANDUM in Opposition in Part to 74 Federal Defedants' MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and 75 Memorandum in Support filed by Kathy Kaohu. (Rowe, Caleb) Modified on 2/8/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 02/05/2021)

RECAP
88 Feb. 12, 2021

Federal Defendants' REPLY Memorandum in Support of 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by David Beirne, Federal Voting Assistance Program, Christopher C. Miller, United States of America. (Pezzi, Stephen) Modified on 2/18/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 02/12/2021)

RECAP
89 Feb. 23, 2021

EO: The Federal Defendants are directed to confirm that their 75 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction and 88 Reply comply with Local Rule 10.2(a)(4)'s requirement that all documents be double spaced. If the briefing is not double spaced -- which appears to be the case -- the Federal Defendants must comply with Local Rule 7.4. A statement of confirmation and/or a certificate of compliance with Local Rule 7.4 shall be filed by 2/24/21. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 02/23/2021)

RECAP
90 Feb. 24, 2021

STATEMENT of Confirmation in Response to the Court's February 23, 2021 Order re 89 filed by David Beirne, Federal Voting Assistance Program, Christopher C. Miller, United States of America. (Pezzi, Stephen) Modified on 2/25/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 02/24/2021)

RECAP
91 Feb. 24, 2021

EO: After reviewing the Federal Defendants' 90 Response, the Court notes that they have misapprehended the Courts double-spacing requirement. The Local Rules contemplate the use of Microsoft Words standard double spacing. While it appears that standard double spacing would cause the briefing to exceed the page limitation and might preclude certification of compliance with Local Rule 7.4, the Court will not require resubmission at this time because reformatted briefs will not materially impact the content therein. Should this case survive dismissal, however, all future filings must comply with formatting requirements. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 02/24/2021)

RECAP
92 March 1, 2021

EO: The following time limits will apply at the hearing on the Federal Defendants' 74 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: (1) Federal Defendants - 20 mins; (2) Hawai'i Defendants - 15 minutes; (3) Plaintiffs - 25 minutes. Defendants may reserve a portion of their allocated time for rebuttal. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(otake1) (Entered: 03/01/2021)

RECAP
93 March 5, 2021

EP: Hearing on 74 Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction and Various Joinders 78, 79 and 80 was conducted by video teleconference (VTC).Oral arguments heard. 74 Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction - TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. 78 Defendant Scott Nago's Partial Joinder in the Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisidction [sic] [ECF #74] and Memorandum in Support [ECF #75] - TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. 79 Defendant Glen Takahashi's Partial Joinder to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisidction [sic] [ECF #74] and Memorandum in Support [ECF #75] - TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. 80 Defendant Kathy Kaohu's Partial Joinder to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [ECF #74] and Memorandum in Support [ECF #75] - TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.Court to issue a written order. (Reporter-Ann Matsumoto) (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 03/05/2021)

RECAP
94 March 5, 2021

EO: The parties are directed to file supplemental briefing -- not to exceed ten (10) pages -- addressing the following questions, and should consult M.S. v. Brown, 902 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2018), in doing so: (1) Assuming Plaintiffs' injuries are traceable to UOCAVA, would the declaratory relief requested in paragraph a of the Second Amended Complaint's ("SAC") prayer for relief -- declaring definitions unconstitutional -- without more, allow Plaintiffs to receive absentee ballots? If yes, describe mechanically how this would occur.(2) Assuming Plaintiffs' injuries are not traceable to UOCAVA, would the declaratory relief, applied only to UMOVA and HAR ยง 3-177-600, without more, allow Plaintiffs to receive absentee ballots? If yes, describe mechanically how this would occur. (3) Does the Court have the power to award the injunctive relief requested in paragraph b of the SAC's prayer for relief? Provide legal authority for an affirmative or negative response.(4) Does this case fall under the narrow set of circumstances in which the Court has the authority to order government officials to implement or enact legislation or take other action? See, M.S., 902 F.3d at 1088 n.14.(5) Assuming Plaintiffs lack standing, could amendment of the SAC -- which the Court is authorized to permit -- overcome the asserted defects?Plaintiffs' deadline is 3/19/21 and Defendants' deadline is 4/2/21. Hawaii Defendants may file a consolidated memorandum if they wish. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) (Entered: 03/05/2021)

RECAP
95 March 12, 2021

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings Via Video Teleconference, Motion and Various Joinders, held on March 5, 2021, before Judge Jill A. Otake. Court Reporter/Transcriber - ANN MATSUMOTO, Telephone number - 8085412061,Email Address - am@hid. PP. - 51 90-Day Transcript Restriction: PACER access to filed transcripts is restricted for 90 days from the file date to permit redaction of personal identifiers. Citations to restricted transcripts in filed documents must be limited to those portions of the proceedings that are relevant and in need of judicial review. Attaching restricted transcripts, in their entirety, to filed documents should be limited to situations with specific need. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or ordered through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript. Redaction Request due 3/30/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2021. (Matsumoto, Ann) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

RECAP
96 March 19, 2021

Plaintiffs SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF Pursuant to the Court's March 5, 2021 Order re 94 by Randall Jay Reeves, Vicente Topasna Borja, Edmund Frederick Schroeder, Jr., Ravinder Singh Nagi, Patricia Arroyo Rodriguez, Laura Castillo Nagi and Equally American (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Quan, Anthony) Modified on 3/22/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 03/19/2021)

1 Certificate of Service

View on PACER

RECAP
97 March 23, 2021

EO: Per Defendant's request, the Telephone Conference set for 4/2/2021 is CONTINUED to 5/7/2021 at 09:00 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. Parties and other participants must call-in at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Call-in instructions are below:1. Dial 1-888-363-4735.2. Access Code 2070326. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(laa) (Entered: 03/23/2021)

RECAP
98 April 1, 2021

Defendant Scott Nago's Supplemental Brief Pursuant to the Court's March 5, 2021 Order [ECF #94]. (Tanigawa, Lori) Modified on 4/5/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 04/01/2021)

RECAP
99 April 1, 2021

Defendant Glen Takahashi's Joinder re 98 Defendant Scott Nago's Supplemental Brief filed by Glen Takahashi. (Kohn, Robert) Modified on 4/5/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 04/01/2021)

RECAP
100 April 1, 2021

Defendant Kathy Kaohu's Joinder to 98 Defendant Scott Nago's Supplemental Brief PURSUANT TO THE COURTS MARCH 5, 2021 ORDER [ECF #94] filed by Kathy Kaohu. (Rowe, Caleb) Modified on 4/5/2021 (emt, ). (Entered: 04/01/2021)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Hawaii

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 8, 2020

Closing Date: Sept. 6, 2022

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Former Hawaii residents who resided in Guam or the Virgin Islands, along with a non-partisan civil rights organization

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Director of the Federal Voting Assistance Program

Federal Voting Assistance Program

Secretary of Defense

United States of America

State

Chief Election Officer

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

District of Hawaii 1:20-cv-00433

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 22-16742

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Voting:

Voter qualifications

Voting: General & Misc.

Recommended Citation