Case: Detroit Action v. City of Hamtramck

2:21-cv-11315 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: June 3, 2021

Closed Date: July 13, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In this case, Michigan voters alleged that the City of Hamtramck violated the Voting Rights Act Section 203’s bilingual language assistance requirements; the case was settled by consent decree shortly after the complaint was filed. On June 3, 2021, a voters’ organization (Detroit Action) and a Bengali-speaking voter alleged that the City of Hamtramck had failed to provide Bengali-translated election materials and support for Bengali-speaking, Bangladeshi-American voters.  Specifically, the comp…

In this case, Michigan voters alleged that the City of Hamtramck violated the Voting Rights Act Section 203’s bilingual language assistance requirements; the case was settled by consent decree shortly after the complaint was filed.

On June 3, 2021, a voters’ organization (Detroit Action) and a Bengali-speaking voter alleged that the City of Hamtramck had failed to provide Bengali-translated election materials and support for Bengali-speaking, Bangladeshi-American voters.  Specifically, the complaint made § 1983 claims against state defendants (the City of Hamtramck, Office of the City Clerk, and the City Clerk in his/her official capacity), alleging the city had violated Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act between 2011 and 2020 because the city: (a) failed to provide “accurate” 2020 General Election sample ballots (claiming the ballots were in the incorrect dialect and contained misspellings); (b) provided incorrect Bengali instructions for straight-party voting; (c) failed to provide Bengali Democratic ballots at an election site between 7am to 6pm in the 2020 Primary Election; (d) failed to hire sufficient Bengali interpreters, resulting in numerous sites not having a Bengali-speaking interpreter able to assist voters; (e) failed to provide Bengali signage at and around polling places; and (f) failed to translate the Clerk’s website from English to Bengali (from April 2020 to May 2021).  

According to the Complaint, Hamtramck was required to follow Section 203’s requirements since October 13, 2011, the date the Director of the Census Bureau designated Hamtramck as a covered jurisdiction for Bengali language assistance based on the 2010 census, and the infractions listed above violated those requirements.

The Complaint sought a declaration that Hamtramck had failed to provide election materials translated to Bengali, as required by Section 203.  It further sought to enjoin the city from “failing to provide” translated voting materials or information and requiring the city to implement a remedial plan to ensure compliance with Section 203.  

On July 13, 2021, a little more than a month after filing, United States District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith of the Eastern District of Michigan signed a Consent Decree, which closed the case subject to Court oversight.  The Consent Decree did not contest the application of Section 203 to Hamtramck nor the underlying facts of the lawsuit.  The Decree required Hamtramck to “provide in Bengali ‘registration or voting notices, forms, instructions, assistance or other materials or information relating to the electoral process’ that it provides in English, as required by Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.”  The city was required to provide this voting material in the “‘most widely used’ Bengali dialects,” which, at the time of the Decree, were Bangla/Shuddo. The city was also required to provide Bengali translations to its website, a sufficient number of trained Bengali-speaking personnel three weeks before and after an election, and Section 203 training to all poll workers.  A Program Coordinator and Advisory Group were also created to help implement the Consent Decree.  No paper is on the docket after this July 13, 2021 Consent Decree.  By its terms, the Consent Decree expired July 13, 2025, four years after it was signed.

Summary Authors

LFAA (8/13/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59959492/parties/detroit-action-v-city-of-hamtramck/


Judge(s)

Goldsmith, Mark Allan (Michigan)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Lorenzo-Giguere, Susana (Michigan)

Prescott, Sarah (Michigan)

Vattamala, Jerry (Michigan)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

2:21-cv-11315

Complaint

June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

Complaint
10

2:21-cv-11315

Consent Decree and Order

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59959492/detroit-action-v-city-of-hamtramck/

Last updated Aug. 16, 2025, 3:04 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8487959 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Prescott, Sarah) (Entered: 06/03/2021)

June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

Clearinghouse

Notice to Parties of Consent of a Civil Action before a Magistrate Judge Option

June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

PACER

A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)

June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

PACER
2

SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (LGra) (Entered: 06/04/2021)

June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

PACER
3

CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. City of Hamtramck, City Clerk and Office of the Clerk for the City of Hamtramck served on 06-08-2021. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation POS #2, # 2 Document Continuation POS #3) (Prescott, Sarah) (Entered: 06/15/2021)

June 15, 2021

June 15, 2021

PACER
4

ORDER Regarding Certification Requirements. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan) (Entered: 06/25/2021)

June 25, 2021

June 25, 2021

PACER
5

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Deadline for Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint (Answer due by 7/6/2021). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan) (Entered: 06/29/2021)

June 29, 2021

June 29, 2021

PACER
6

CONSENT Decree by All Plaintiffs (Prescott, Sarah) (Entered: 07/06/2021)

July 6, 2021

July 6, 2021

PACER
7

NOTICE of Appearance by Jerry Vattamala on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Vattamala, Jerry) (Entered: 07/12/2021)

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

PACER
8

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Susana Lorenzo-Giguere appearing on behalf of Detroit Action and Rahima Begum (Lorenzo-Giguere, Susana) . (Entered: 07/13/2021)

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

PACER
9

CONSENT Decree by All Plaintiffs (Prescott, Sarah) (Entered: 07/13/2021)

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

RECAP
10

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan) (Entered: 07/13/2021)

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Michigan

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 3, 2021

Closing Date: July 13, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Voters organization (Detroit Action) and Bengali-speaking voter (Rahima Begum).

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Attorney Organizations:

Asian American Legal Defense & Educ. Fund (AALDEF)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City of Hamtramck (Hamtramck), City

City Clerk of Hamtramck (Hamtramck), City

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Voting Rights Act, section 203 (language minority provision), 52 U.S.C. § 10503 (previously 42 U.S.C. § 1973aa-1a)

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Provide antidiscrimination training

Monitor/Master

Training

Voting Process Changes

Order Duration: 2021 - 2025

Issues

Discrimination Basis:

Language discrimination

Affected Language(s):

Other

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Indian

Voting:

Election administration

Voter registration rules

Voting: Physical/Effective Access