Case: Murphy v. Williams

1:18-cv-01919 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: July 30, 2018

Closed Date: Nov. 14, 2018

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about the constitutionality of Colorado’s “sore loser” law, the law that prohibits a losing candidate in a primary election from running as an independent in the general election. On July 20, 2018, the individual candidate filed the complaint pro se against the Colorado Secretary of State in the District Court of Colorado. Plaintiff alleged that the state's “sore loser” laws were unconstitutional in light of the plaintiff being deemed ineligible for the general election, on accou…

This is a case about the constitutionality of Colorado’s “sore loser” law, the law that prohibits a losing candidate in a primary election from running as an independent in the general election.

On July 20, 2018, the individual candidate filed the complaint pro se against the Colorado Secretary of State in the District Court of Colorado. Plaintiff alleged that the state's “sore loser” laws were unconstitutional in light of the plaintiff being deemed ineligible for the general election, on account of the plaintiff previously being an unsuccessful anonymous write-in candidate in the open primary election. Plaintiff challenged Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) § 1-4-105 as an unconstitutional abridgement of the plaintiff’s Article I right to qualify for office, First Amendment rights to speech and freedom of association, Due Process and Equal Protection under the 14th Amendment, and the statutory prohibition of deprivation. Plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief namely that, (i) a declaratory judgment that CRS § 1-4-105, as enforced by the Colorado Secretary of State / defendant violates Article I § 2 cl. 2 and (ii) a permanent injunction directing the Colorado Secretary of State, and all of defendant's agents from enforcing CRS § 1-4- 105. Further, the plaintiff sought preliminary injunctive relief as the State of Colorado was due to hold the general election on 6th November, 2018, arguing that there was insufficient time between the date of filing of the complaint and when the election-machinery began in order for the plaintiff to obtain an adequate remedy. The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya.

On 29th August 2018, Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya issued an order denying the plaintiff’s motion to expedite the scheduling conference or discovery and granted the Colorado Secretary of State an extension to answer the complaint.

On 5th September 2018, the Plaintiff filed a motion for interlocutory appeal and request for a writ of mandamus in order to compel declaratory and injunctive relief and convene an En Banc panel hearing in the 10th Tenth Circuit federal Court of Appeals (docket no. 18-1363). After reviewing the status of the district court proceedings and the notice of appeal, the motion was dismissed by Circuit Court judges, Lucero, Bacharach, and Carson on 20th September, 2018 for lack of appellate jurisdiction as the August 29 interlocutory order was not deemed immediately appealable.

On 12th September 2018, the Colorado Secretary of State filed a motion to dismiss stating that Colorado’s so-called “sore loser” law expressly limits candidates to one bite at the apple, and the Constitution permits this reasonable, non-discriminatory ballot access requirement, which furthers Colorado’s critical interest in regulating the election process and prevents voter confusion.

On 21st September, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an opposition to the Colorado Secretary of State’s motion to dismiss, which was replied to by the Colorado Secretary of State on 9th October, 2018. On 7th November 2018, the Plaintiff filed a support to the Colorado Secretary of State’s motion to dismiss stating that the issue of the plaintiff’s eligibility as a write-in congressional candidate was then moot and concurred that dismissal of the complaint was warranted. 

On 14th November, 2018, Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger dismissed the matter without prejudice in light of the plaintiff’s motion in support filed on 7th November and as the defendant had not submitted an answer or summary judgment motion. 

This case is closed.

Summary Authors

Anindya Roy (7/25/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7678160/parties/murphy-v-williams/


Judge(s)

Krieger, Marcia S. (Colorado)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Murphy, Marcus A. (Colorado)

Attorney for Defendant

Buckley, Emily B. (Colorado)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:18-cv-01919

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

July 30, 2018

July 30, 2018

Complaint
19

1:18-cv-01919

Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal

No Court

Sept. 10, 2018

Sept. 10, 2018

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter
21

1:18-cv-01919

Motion to Dismiss

Sept. 12, 2018

Sept. 12, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief
22

1:18-cv-01919

Order

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Sept. 20, 2018

Sept. 20, 2018

Order/Opinion
23

1:18-cv-01919

Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss

Sept. 21, 2018

Sept. 21, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief
24

1:18-cv-01919

Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss

Oct. 9, 2018

Oct. 9, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief
25

1:18-cv-01919

Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement

Oct. 11, 2018

Oct. 11, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief
29

1:18-cv-01919

Plaintiff's support of Defendant's motion to dismiss

Nov. 7, 2018

Nov. 7, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7678160/murphy-v-williams/

Last updated Aug. 9, 2025, 9:05 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Wayne W. Williams, Filing Fee: 400.00 (Receipt Number:COX086031), filed by Marcus A. Murphy. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rvill, ) (Entered: 07/30/2018)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

July 30, 2018

July 30, 2018

Clearinghouse
2

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) (Entered: 07/30/2018)

July 30, 2018

July 30, 2018

PACER
3

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons issued. (rvill, ) (Entered: 07/30/2018)

July 30, 2018

July 30, 2018

PACER
4

SUMMONS issued by Clerk over the counter. (rsams, ) (Entered: 08/01/2018)

Aug. 1, 2018

Aug. 1, 2018

PACER
5

CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. All parties do not consent.. (jgonz, ) (Entered: 08/01/2018)

Aug. 1, 2018

Aug. 1, 2018

PACER
6

CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to 5 Consent/Non-Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-01919-MSK. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) (Entered: 08/02/2018)

Aug. 2, 2018

Aug. 2, 2018

PACER
7

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to:(1) Convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a Scheduling Order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, enter such orders as appropriate to enforce the Scheduling Order, and resolve discovery matters;(2) ADR: Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. Early Neutral Evaluation is approved. On the informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in a settlement conference conducted by the magistrate judge if the parties have engaged in an Early Neutral Evaluation and are unable to afford or otherwise attain private settlement assistance;(3) Hear and determine referred matters in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B). by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/03/2018. Text Only Entry (msklc4, ) (Entered: 08/03/2018)

Aug. 3, 2018

Aug. 3, 2018

PACER
8

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Emily B. Buckley on behalf of Wayne W. WilliamsAttorney Emily B. Buckley added to party Wayne W. Williams(pty:dft) (Buckley, Emily) (Entered: 08/16/2018)

Aug. 16, 2018

Aug. 16, 2018

PACER
9

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Complaint by Defendant Wayne W. Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Document Proposed Order Granting Motion For Extension of Time)(Buckley, Emily) (Entered: 08/16/2018)

1 Proposed Document Proposed Order Granting Motion For Extension of Time

View on PACER

Aug. 16, 2018

Aug. 16, 2018

PACER
10

ORDER granting 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond All Defendants. In the absence of any opposition by Plaintiff, Defendant Wayne Williams' Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Defendant Williams shall have until September 12, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond. It is anticipated that no further extensions will be granted. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/21/2018. Text Only Entry (msklc4, ) (Entered: 08/21/2018)

Aug. 21, 2018

Aug. 21, 2018

PACER
12

RESPONSE to 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (dkals, ) (Entered: 08/22/2018)

Aug. 21, 2018

Aug. 21, 2018

PACER
11

ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 10/22/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 08/22/2018. (ksena) (Entered: 08/22/2018)

Aug. 22, 2018

Aug. 22, 2018

Clearinghouse
13

MOTION for Expedited Discovery & [sic] an Expedited Status Conference, and to Reschedule Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference & [sic] Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (dkals, ) (Entered: 08/29/2018)

Aug. 29, 2018

Aug. 29, 2018

PACER
14

MEMORANDUM regarding 13 MOTION to Expedite filed by Marcus A. Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/29/18. Text Only Entry (msksec, ) (Entered: 08/29/2018)

Aug. 29, 2018

Aug. 29, 2018

PACER
15

MINUTE ORDER denying 13 Motion for Expedited Discovery, Expedited Status Conference, and to Reschedule Scheduling Conference. Defendants have been granted an extension to answer the Complaint. Moreover, this case has been referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b) and Chief District Judge Krieger's 7 Order. As such, matters referred to the magistrate judge will be handled in the Colorado Springs courtroom. There is no basis upon which to expedite the scheduling conference or discovery in this matter. Finally, it appears Plaintiff did not confer with Defendant's counsel before filing this motion, as is required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/29/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 08/29/2018)

Aug. 29, 2018

Aug. 29, 2018

PACER
16

NOTICE OF APPEAL by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt #86576)(dkals, ) (Entered: 09/06/2018)

1 Receipt #86576

View on PACER

Sept. 5, 2018

Sept. 5, 2018

PACER
17

LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the 16 Notice of Appeal filed by Marcus A. Murphy to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee paid,) (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Record)(dkals, ) (Entered: 09/06/2018)

1 Preliminary Record

View on PACER

Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

PACER
18

USCA Case Number 18-1363 for 16 Notice of Appeal filed by Marcus A. Murphy. (dkals, ) (Entered: 09/07/2018)

Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

Clearinghouse
19

[Amended] NOTICE OF APPEAL by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (USCA Case No. 18-1363) (dkals, ) (Entered: 09/10/2018)

Sept. 10, 2018

Sept. 10, 2018

Clearinghouse
20

AMENDED ORDER Resetting Scheduling Conference for 10/30/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/11/2018. (ksena) (Entered: 09/11/2018)

Sept. 11, 2018

Sept. 11, 2018

Clearinghouse
21

MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Wayne W. Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Buckley, Emily) (Entered: 09/12/2018)

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Order Granting Motion to Dismiss

View on RECAP

Sept. 12, 2018

Sept. 12, 2018

Clearinghouse
22

ORDER of USCA dismissing 16 Notice of Appeal filed by Marcus A. Murphy. (USCA Case No. 18-1363) (dkals, ) (Entered: 09/20/2018)

Sept. 20, 2018

Sept. 20, 2018

Clearinghouse
23

Opposition to 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (dkals, ) (Entered: 09/24/2018)

Sept. 21, 2018

Sept. 21, 2018

Clearinghouse
24

REPLY to Response to 21 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint under F.R.C.P 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Wayne W. Williams. (Buckley, Emily) (Entered: 10/09/2018)

Oct. 9, 2018

Oct. 9, 2018

Clearinghouse
25

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 22 USCA Order by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (dkals, ) (Entered: 10/12/2018)

Oct. 11, 2018

Oct. 11, 2018

Clearinghouse
26

LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the 25 Notice of Appeal filed by Marcus A. Murphy to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Record)(dkals, ) (Entered: 10/12/2018)

1 Preliminary Record

View on PACER

Oct. 12, 2018

Oct. 12, 2018

PACER
27

MINUTE ORDER: Due to the pending appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Scheduling Conference set for October 30, 2018, is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/23/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 10/23/2018)

Oct. 23, 2018

Oct. 23, 2018

PACER
28

Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Wayne W. Williams. (Buckley, Emily) (Entered: 10/23/2018)

Oct. 23, 2018

Oct. 23, 2018

Clearinghouse
29

Plaintiff's Support of 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Marcus A. Murphy. (dkals, ) (Entered: 11/08/2018)

Nov. 7, 2018

Nov. 7, 2018

Clearinghouse
30

MINUTE ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2018 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/14/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 11/14/2018)

Nov. 14, 2018

Nov. 14, 2018

PACER
31

ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has submitted a document entitled "Plaintiff's Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss," in which Plaintiff states that this lawsuit is now moot and concurs that dismissal is warranted (Dkt. #29). As Defendant has not yet submitted an answer or summary judgment motion, the Court will construe that filing as a stipulation of dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The matter therefore is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/14/2018. Text Only Entry (msklc4, ) (Entered: 11/14/2018)

Nov. 14, 2018

Nov. 14, 2018

PACER
32

MINUTE ORDER: Based on the 31 Order granting the Motion to Dismiss, the Scheduling Conference set for December 17, 2018 is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/14/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 11/14/2018)

Nov. 14, 2018

Nov. 14, 2018

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Colorado

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 30, 2018

Closing Date: Nov. 14, 2018

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff is a registered Colorado voter affiliated with the Democrat Party. Plaintiff unsuccessfully ran for congressional office in the 2018 Democratic primary election as a write-in candidate. Plaintiff was seeking relief to run for the same office as a write-in candidate in the general election through this compliant.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Colorado Secretary of State defending election administration (Colorado), State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

42 U.S.C. § 1985

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Non-settlement Outcome

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

Settlement

None

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Voting:

Candidate qualifications

Election administration