Case: Mondy v. Messina

2:17-cv-00104 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: June 14, 2017

Closed Date: Aug. 25, 2017

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about whether plaintiffs have standing to bring--and federal courts have jurisdiction to hear--claims regarding a city council's repeal of an initiated ordinance in alleged violation of state law. On June 14, 2017, the plaintiff filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas on behalf of himself and all similarly situated citizens of the City of Helena-West Helena, Arkansas. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff sued…

This case is about whether plaintiffs have standing to bring--and federal courts have jurisdiction to hear--claims regarding a city council's repeal of an initiated ordinance in alleged violation of state law. On June 14, 2017, the plaintiff filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas on behalf of himself and all similarly situated citizens of the City of Helena-West Helena, Arkansas. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff sued the City of Helena-West Helena and its mayor and aldermen, each in their individual and official capacities This case was initially assigned to Judge Billy Roy Wilson but was reassigned to Judge James Leon Holmes on June 22, 2017. 

In September 2016, after obtaining the requisite number of signatures, the plaintiff filed a petition to initiate an ordinance that would reduce the number of wards in Helena-West Helena from five to three and, consequently, reduce the number of city council members from ten to six. This ordinance passed by majority vote at the November 2016 election. However, in December 2016, this ordinance was voided by the city council, which adopted a repeal ordinance that took immediate effect.

In the complaint, the plaintiff claimed this repeal ordinance violated the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution as well as myriad Arkansas state laws and petitioned the court to, among other things, declare the initiated ordinance valid and award costs, fees, and expenses associated with the litigation. The parties subsequently exchanged various motions, amendments, responses, and replies, including plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and defendants' Motion to Disqualify Counsel.

On August 25, 2017, Judge Holmes issued an Opinion and Order granting defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss, denying as moot both defendants' Motion to Disqualify Counsel and plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, and, ultimately, dismissing the case without prejudice. Given the plaintiff did not even allege diversity jurisdiction, Judge Holmes based his decision on two basic principles: (i) that a federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction when a plaintiff fails to state a claim arising under federal law and (ii) that a plaintiff lacks standing when the plaintiff fails to allege injury that is sufficiently particular to him or a discrete group. Judge Holmes explained that, here, the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction because the "heart" of the plaintiff's complaint was violations of state law and his few allegations of federal law violations were made in a "conclusory fashion" without explanation or backing. Furthermore, Judge Holmes explained that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to demonstrate any "concrete and personalized injuries" or "particularized stake in the litigation," instead admitting that all citizens of Helena-West Helena were similarly injured by the repealed ordinance.

The plaintiff has not filed any objections or appeals following the Judgment entered by Judge Holmes on August 25, 2017.

Summary Authors

Nathaniel Hsieh (11/8/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6193627/parties/mondy-v-messina/


Judge(s)

Holmes, James Leon (Arkansas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Valley, J. F. (Arkansas)

Attorney for Defendant

Valley, Andre K. (Arkansas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

No documents yet available via the Clearinghouse.

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6193627/mondy-v-messina/

Last updated Sept. 4, 2026, 4:50 a.m.

Docket for: Mondy v. Messina
ECF Number Date Description Link
28 Feb. 14, 1996

OBJECTIONS by Tyler Farms to Southern Implement Company, Inc's fourth set of requests for production (vjt) (Entered: 02/15/1996)

RECAP
29 Feb. 20, 1996

MOTION by pltf to amend complt (vjt) (Entered: 02/21/1996)

RECAP
30 Feb. 20, 1996

MOTION by pltf to compel disc (vjt) (Entered: 02/21/1996)

RECAP
31 Feb. 20, 1996

BRIEF by pltf in support of motion to compel disc [30-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/21/1996)

RECAP
32 Feb. 20, 1996

EXHIBITS by pltf re motion to compel disc [30-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/21/1996)

RECAP
33 Feb. 21, 1996

RESPONSE by deft Deere & Company to motion to compel disc dated 2/9/96 [25-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
34 Feb. 21, 1996

MEMORANDUM by deft Deere & Company in support of motion response [33-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
35 Feb. 21, 1996

CROSS-MOTION by pltf for partial summary judgment (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
36 Feb. 21, 1996

BRIEF by pltf in support of motion for partial summary judgment [35-1] & motion response [35-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
37 Feb. 21, 1996

STATEMENT OF FACTS (Rule 29) by pltf in support of cross-motion for partial summary judgment [35-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
38 Feb. 21, 1996

RESPONSE by pltf to deft's statement of undisputed material facts [24-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
39 Feb. 21, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Jess Askew III regarding pltf's motion for partial summary judgment [35-1] (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
40 Feb. 22, 1996

Supplement to MOTION by pltf to compel production of Tyler Farms List in reply to Deere's response (vjt) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

RECAP
41 Feb. 22, 1996

CLERK'S MINUTES: Pretrial conference on 2/22/96 @ 2:30 p.m. before Judge Susan W Wright; Court takes up certain pending issues and grants parties oral request for continuance of trial from 4/8/96 to 10/7/96; orders to follow (Lois Lambert, court reporter) (sjc) (Entered: 02/23/1996)

RECAP
42 Feb. 23, 1996

ORDER by Judge Susan W. Wright granting pltf's motion to compel disc; deft is directed to provide the dealer performance reviews of Producer's only [16-1]; denying Producer's motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum [18-1]; granting pltf's motions to compel disc to the extent that Tyler Farms is directed to supply pltf w/a list of its partners [25-1] [40-1]; granting pltf's motion to compel disc to the extent that deft is directed to provide pltf w/the requested info as it relates to Producer's & Southern Implement's trade areas only [30-1] (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 02/26/1996)

RECAP
43 March 1, 1996

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: by Judge Susan W. Wright the parties' oral motion for continuance having been granted during the pretrial conference, the court trial is reset for 9:30 10/7/96; disc & mot due 7/15/96; pretrial info sheet due 9/6/96 (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 03/04/1996)

RECAP
44 March 4, 1996

REPLY by deft to pltf's response to motion for summary judgment [22-1] (vjt) (Entered: 03/05/1996)

RECAP
45 March 4, 1996

BRIEF by deft in support of motion reply [44-1] & motion response [44-1] (vjt) (Entered: 03/05/1996)

RECAP
46 March 4, 1996

RESPONSE by deft to pltf's statement of undisputed material facts [37-1] (vjt) (Entered: 03/05/1996)

RECAP
47 March 4, 1996

RESPONSE by deft to pltf's motion to amend complt [29-1] (vjt) (Entered: 03/05/1996)

RECAP
48 March 4, 1996

NOTICE by deft of filing suggestion of mootness re response to pltf's motion to compel (vjt) (Entered: 03/05/1996)

RECAP
49 March 15, 1996

REPLY by pltf to deft's response to pltf's cross-motion for partial summary judgment [35-1] (vjt) (Entered: 03/18/1996)

RECAP
50 March 15, 1996

REPLY BRIEF by pltf [49-1] (vjt) (Entered: 03/18/1996)

RECAP
51 March 15, 1996

MOTION by pltf to supplement response to motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment (vjt) (Entered: 03/18/1996)

RECAP
52 March 18, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant Deere & Company to plaintiff's motion to supplement response to motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment [51-1] (former empl) (Entered: 03/19/1996)

RECAP
53 May 8, 1996

TRANSCRIPT (Volume I) of pretrial conference before the Honorable Susan Webber Wright on 2/22/96 (vjt) (Entered: 05/08/1996)

RECAP
54 May 31, 1996

SECOND MOTION by pltf to supplement response to motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment (filed under seal) (vjt) Modified on 05/31/1996 (Entered: 05/31/1996)

RECAP
55 June 4, 1996

REQUEST for Admissions by pltf (vjt) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

RECAP
56 June 11, 1996

RESPONSE by deft Deere & Company to pltf's second motion to supplement response to motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment [54-1] (vjt) (Entered: 06/12/1996)

RECAP
57 June 11, 1996

BRIEF by deft in support of motion response [56-1] (vjt) (Entered: 06/12/1996)

RECAP
58 June 14, 1996

SECOND SET OF REQUESTS for Admissions by pltf (vjt) (Entered: 06/17/1996)

RECAP
59 July 3, 1996

REPLY by plaintiff Southern Implement to response to motion to supplement response to motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment [54-1] [35-1] (former empl) (Entered: 07/03/1996)

RECAP
60 July 3, 1996

RESPONSE by deft Deere & Company to pltf's request for admissions under Rule 36 [55-1] (bsm) (Entered: 07/05/1996)

RECAP
61 July 11, 1996

AMENDED REQUEST by pltf for Admission under Rule 36 (vjt) (Entered: 07/15/1996)

RECAP
62 July 11, 1996

ANSWERS by deft Deere & Company to pltf's second set of requests for admissions [58-1] (vjt) (Entered: 07/15/1996)

RECAP
63 July 15, 1996

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Susan W. Wright granting deft's motion for summary judgment as to all pltf's claims [22-1]; denying pltf's motion for partial summary judgment [35-1]; granting pltf's motions to supplement response to motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for partial summary judgment [51-1] [54-1]; denying pltf's motion to amend complt [29-1]; pltf's complt is dismissed (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 07/16/1996)

RECAP
64 July 15, 1996

SUPPLEMENTAL CROSS-MOTION by pltf for partial summary judgment (vjt) (Entered: 07/16/1996)

RECAP
65 July 15, 1996

JUDGMENT: by Judge Susan W. Wright dismissing pltf's complt purs to the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date; the relief sought is denied (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 07/16/1996)

RECAP
66 Aug. 5, 1996

NOTICE of appeal by plaintiff Southern Implement from District Court decision [65-2] (appeal fees paid) (2 certified copies to Clerk 8USCA), (cc: counsel) (dac) (Entered: 08/06/1996)

RECAP
67 Aug. 8, 1996

MOTION by defendant Deere & Company for attorney fees (dac) (Entered: 08/09/1996)

RECAP
68 Aug. 8, 1996

MEMORANDUM by defendant Deere & Company in support of motion for attorney fees [67-1] (dac) (Entered: 08/09/1996)

RECAP
69 Aug. 12, 1996

MOTION by plaintiff Southern Implement to strike motion for attys' fees and costs (dac) (Entered: 08/13/1996)

RECAP
70 Aug. 14, 1996

SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION by defendant Deere & Company for attorney fees, and for costs (dac) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

RECAP
71 Aug. 14, 1996

MOTION by defendant Deere & Company to extend time to 8/15/96 to present its petition for atty's fees pursuant to Rule 6(b) of FRCP (dac) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

RECAP
72 Aug. 14, 1996

MEMORANDUM by defendant Deere & Company in support of motion to extend time to 8/15/96 to present its petition for atty's fees pursuant to Rule 6(b) of FRCP [71-1], of motion response [71-1] (dac) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

RECAP
73 Aug. 14, 1996

AFFIDAVIT of Samuel Jones, III regarding motion for attorney fees [70-1], regarding motion for costs [70-2] (dac) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

RECAP
Aug. 16, 1996

DOCKETING LETTER: 8 USCA Number 96-3095EAH ; court reporter's transcripts due 9/23/96; counsel to proceed on appendix (dac)

74 Aug. 20, 1996

RESPONSE by plaintiff Southern Implement to motion to extend time to 8/15/96 to present its petition for atty's fees pursuant to Rule 6(b) of FRCP [71-1] (dac) (Entered: 08/21/1996)

RECAP
75 Aug. 20, 1996

BRIEF by plaintiff Southern Implement in support of motion response [74-1] (dac) (Entered: 08/21/1996)

RECAP
76 Aug. 20, 1996

VERIFICATION OF TRANSCRIPT ARRANGEMENTS by plaintiff Southern Implement (dac) (Entered: 08/21/1996)

RECAP
77 Aug. 23, 1996

ORDER by Judge Susan W. Wright denying motion for attorney fees [67-1], denying motion for costs [70-2], [70-1], w/o prej. after resolution of the appeal, the deft may refile the motion for attys' fees and costs; granting motion to extend time to 8/15/96 to present its petition for atty's fees pursuant to Rule 6(b) of FRCP [71-1] (EOD 8/23/96) (cc: all counsel) (dac) (Entered: 08/23/1996)

RECAP
78 Aug. 26, 1996

NOTICE of appeal by plaintiff Southern Implement from District Court decision [77-1](appeal fees paid) (2 certified copies to Clerk 8USCA), (cc: counsel) (dac) (Entered: 08/26/1996)

RECAP
Sept. 4, 1996

DOCKETING LETTER: 8 USCA Number 96-3281EAH; case has been consolidated with case #96-3095 (dac)

79 Sept. 26, 1996

MEMO TO FILE: (Law Clerk to Judge Wright) finding the motion to strike motion for attys' fees and costs [69-1] moot. (dac) (Entered: 10/02/1996)

RECAP
March 14, 1997

DOCKET NOTE: 3 volumes original files and transcript of 2/22/96 pretrial conf forwarded to Clerk USCA8, per request of Scott-Records Manager (dac)

80 Sept. 23, 1997

Opinion (8USCA), the district court's grant of summary judgment is reversed in part and affirmed in part. We remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion (dac) (Entered: 09/23/1997)

RECAP
81 Sept. 23, 1997

MANDATE from 8 USCA judgment of the district court is affirmed in part and reversing and remanding the Decision of the District Court [Appeal [78-1] [Appeal [66-1] (original files and transcript returned) ORDER- USCA8 -Southern Implement shall recover $690.00 from Deere as costs on appeal (dac) Modified on 09/23/1997 (Entered: 09/23/1997)

RECAP
82 Sept. 23, 1997

ORDER (8 USCA), appellant Southern Implement shall recover from appellee Deere & Co $690.00 as taxable costs on appeal (dac) (Entered: 09/23/1997)

RECAP
Sept. 23, 1997

Docket Modification (Utility Event) Case reopened in accordance with USCA8 Mandate (dac)

83 Oct. 3, 1997

MOTION by pltf to amend complt (vjt) (Entered: 10/06/1997)

RECAP
84 Oct. 8, 1997

MOTION by pltf to set case for jury trial or, in the alternative to extend time to demand jury trial (vjt) (Entered: 10/08/1997)

RECAP
85 Oct. 20, 1997

RESPONSE by defendant to motion to set case for jury trial [84-1] or in the alternative, to extend time to demand jury trial [84-2] (bmt) (Entered: 10/21/1997)

RECAP
86 Oct. 20, 1997

BRIEF by defendant in support of response to motion to set case for jury trial or in the alternative, to extend time to demand for jury trial [85-1] (bmt) (Entered: 10/21/1997)

RECAP
87 Nov. 26, 1997

ORDER by Judge Susan W. Wright granting motion to amend complt [83-1] and pltf's demand for jury trial [84-1] [84-2] (cc: all counsel) (bmt) (Entered: 11/28/1997)

RECAP
88 Dec. 1, 1997

AMENDED complt [1-1] by pltf (vjt) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

RECAP
89 Dec. 12, 1997

SCHEDULING ORDER: by Judge Susan W. Wright; jury trial set for 9:30 7/13/98; motions to amend pleadings due 5/1/98; motions in limine due 10 days prior to trial; all other motions & discovery due 5/29/98; pretrial info sheet due 6/12/98 (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 12/12/1997)

RECAP
90 Dec. 12, 1997

COUNTERCLAIM by deft Deere & Company against pltf Southern Implement (vjt) (Entered: 01/02/1998)

RECAP
91 Dec. 31, 1997

ANSWER by counter-deft Southern Implement to Counterclaim of deft Deere & Company [90-1] (vjt) (Entered: 01/02/1998)

RECAP
92 Feb. 9, 1998

NOTICE by pltf of taking depo of Brooks Griffin on 3/10/98 (vjt) (Entered: 02/10/1998)

RECAP
93 Feb. 9, 1998

NOTICE by pltf of taking depo of David Brooks Griffin on 3/10/98 (vjt) (Entered: 02/10/1998)

RECAP
94 Feb. 9, 1998

NOTICE by pltf of taking depo of Gary Inman on 3/10/98 (vjt) (Entered: 02/10/1998)

RECAP
95 Feb. 9, 1998

NOTICE by pltf of taking depo of Curtis Crisp on 3/10/98 (vjt) (Entered: 02/10/1998)

RECAP
96 Feb. 19, 1998

CONSENT/ORDER of reference; this case may proceed before Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau with consent of ptys (cc: all counsel) EOD 2/19/98 (vjt) (Entered: 02/19/1998)

RECAP
97 Feb. 26, 1998

OBJECTIONS by deft Deere & Company to pltf's interrogs & requests for production dated January 27, 1998 (vjt) (Entered: 02/27/1998)

RECAP
98 Feb. 26, 1998

ANSWERS by deft Deere & Company to pltf's requests for admission dated January 27, 1998 (vjt) (Entered: 02/27/1998)

RECAP
99 March 2, 1998

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC): jury trial scheduled for 9:30 on 7/13/98 is before Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau in Room #444; all previously set deadlines remain in effect (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 03/03/1998)

RECAP
100 April 9, 1998

NOTICE by deft Deere & Company of taking depo of Producer's Tractor Company upon written questions (questions attached) (vjt) (Entered: 04/10/1998)

RECAP
101 April 30, 1998

MOTION by defendant to extend time to amend pleadings (bmt) (Entered: 05/01/1998)

RECAP
102 May 1, 1998

MOTION by plaintiff Southern Implement to amend and supplement complaint (former empl) (Entered: 05/01/1998)

RECAP
103 May 5, 1998

RESPONSE by pltf to Deere's motion to extend time to amend pleadings [101-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/05/1998)

RECAP
104 May 11, 1998

RESPONSE by deft to pltf's motion to amend and supplement complaint [102-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/12/1998)

RECAP
105 May 11, 1998

BRIEF by deft in opposition to pltf's motion to amend and supplement complaint [102-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/12/1998)

RECAP
106 May 11, 1998

MOTION by deft for revised witness list (vjt) (Entered: 05/12/1998)

RECAP
107 May 11, 1998

BRIEF by deft in support of motion for revised witness list [106-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/12/1998)

RECAP
108 May 12, 1998

RESPONSE by pltf to Deere's motion for revised witness list [106-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/13/1998)

RECAP
109 May 12, 1998

REPLY by deft to pltf's response to motion to extend time to amend pleadings [101-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/13/1998)

RECAP
110 May 14, 1998

MOTION by pltf to compel and for sanctions as to DCA documents (vjt) (Entered: 05/15/1998)

RECAP
111 May 14, 1998

BRIEF by pltf in support of motion to compel [110-1] and for sanctions as to DCA documents [110-2] (vjt) (Entered: 05/15/1998)

RECAP
112 May 18, 1998

ORDER by Mag. Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau granting pltf's motion to amend & supplement complt [102-1]; pltf is directed to immediately file its amended & supplemental complt; discovery deadline is hereby extended to 6/12/98, with any further motions to be filed no later than 6/19/98; denying as moot deft's motion to extend time to amend pleadings [101-1]; denying deft's motion for revised witness list [106-1] (cc: all counsel) (vjt) (Entered: 05/19/1998)

RECAP
113 May 18, 1998

AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL complt [88-1] [1-1] by pltf (vjt) (Entered: 05/19/1998)

RECAP
114 May 28, 1998

SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by pltf to compel and for sanctions as to DCA documents (vjt) (Entered: 05/29/1998)

RECAP
115 May 28, 1998

MOTION by pltf to compel and for sanctions as to delivery documents (vjt) (Entered: 05/29/1998)

RECAP
116 May 28, 1998

BRIEF by pltf in support of motion to compel [115-1] and for sanctions as to delivery documents [115-2] (vjt) (Entered: 05/29/1998)

RECAP
117 May 28, 1998

RESPONSE by deft to pltf's motion to compel [110-1] and for sanctions as to DCA documents [110-2] (vjt) (Entered: 05/29/1998)

RECAP
118 May 28, 1998

BRIEF by deft in support of motion response [117-1] (vjt) (Entered: 05/29/1998)

RECAP
119 May 28, 1998

COUNTERCLAIM by defendant Deere & Company against plaintiff Southern Implement Company, Inc. (former empl) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

RECAP
120 June 4, 1998

RESPONSE by deft Deere & Company to pltf's supplemental motion to compel [114-1] and for sanctions as to DCA documents [114-2] (vjt) (Entered: 06/05/1998)

RECAP
121 June 4, 1998

AMENDED RESPONSE by deft Deere & Company to pltf's motion to compel [110-1] and for sanctions as to DCA documents [110-2] (vjt) (Entered: 06/05/1998)

RECAP
122 June 4, 1998

AMENDED BRIEF by deft in support of motion response [121-1] (vjt) (Entered: 06/05/1998)

RECAP
123 June 5, 1998

MOTION by movant Producer's Tractor to quash subpoena (vjt) (Entered: 06/08/1998)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Arkansas

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 14, 2017

Closing Date: Aug. 25, 2017

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff was a private citizen of Helena-West Helena, Arkansas who initiated an ordinance to reduce the number of wards and, consequently, city council members in Helena-West Helena. Plaintiff purported to represent all citizens of Helena-West Helena but never sought class certification.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

City of Helena-West Helena

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Freedom of speech/association

Unreasonable search and seizure

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Arkansas 2:17-cv-00104

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Voting:

Challenges to at-large/multimember district/election

Election administration

Redistricting/district composition

Voting: General & Misc.

Recommended Citation