Case: Curran v. Oakland

3:23-cv-02354 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: May 15, 2023

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about systemic discrimination against individuals with mobility disabilities in Oakland's public pedestrian pathways. On May 15, 2023, two individuals with mobility disabilities filed suit against the City of Oakland in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs sued the City of Oakland under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and California Government Code § 11135. Represent…

This is a case about systemic discrimination against individuals with mobility disabilities in Oakland's public pedestrian pathways. On May 15, 2023, two individuals with mobility disabilities filed suit against the City of Oakland in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs sued the City of Oakland under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and California Government Code § 11135. Represented by a coalition of attorneys specializing in civil rights and disability law, including Disability Rights Advocates, the plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief to end the city's alleged discriminatory practices, compensatory damages, reasonable attorney's fees, and class action status on behalf s similarly situated individuals with mobility disabilities. They claimed that Oakland's failure to maintain accessible pedestrian rights of way, including sidewalks, curb ramps, crosswalks, and other walkways, has systematically denied them full and equal access, violating federal and state disability access laws.

The complaint detailed pervasive and hazardous conditions across the city's pedestrian infrastructure that allegedly violate accessibility standards required by law. These conditions include non-compliant curb ramps, obstructed or insufficiently maintained sidewalks, and other barriers that impede mobility and pose safety risks. The plaintiffs argued that Oakland's neglect of its pedestrian pathways not only violates specific provisions of federal and state disability laws but also subjects them to danger, exclusion, and diminished quality of life. Specific examples of the alleged barriers include uplifted sidewalks, inaccessible curb ramps with steep slopes, and sidewalks obstructed by various obstacles, all of which significantly impeded the plaintiffs' ability to navigate the city safely. The complaint also highlighted the city's alleged failure to address these issues despite being aware of them, accusing Oakland of failing to implement a comprehensive plan to make public walkways accessible to people with disabilities.

The lawsuit emphasized the broader impact of Oakland's inaccessible pedestrian infrastructure on the plaintiffs' independence, social inclusion, and equal participation in public life. It argued that the city's actions—or lack thereof—contributed to the isolation and segregation of people with mobility disabilities, contravening the core objectives of the ADA and related laws aimed at ensuring full and equal access to public facilities and accommodations. The plaintiffs sought judicial intervention to mandate Oakland to comply with accessibility laws, rectify the identified access barriers, and establish clear, enforceable timelines and standards for making its pedestrian rights of way fully accessible to people with mobility disabilities.

On July 30, 2025, plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a class action settlement. An order from Chief District Judge Richard Seeborg granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement on September 5, 2025. The proposed settlement certified the class, including all persons with any mobility disability, who, at the time prior to the final approval of or during the term of the settlement, have been denied full and equal access to the City’s pedestrian right of way due to the lack of a curb ramp, or a curb ramp or pedestrian walkway that was damaged, in need of repair, not accessible, or otherwise not sufficient for use. The proposed settlement also required the city to install or remediate over 12,500 curb ramps, remediate sidewalks at over 78,000 locations, and make additional construction, reporting, and monitoring commitments. Plaintiffs agreed to release all injunctive, declaratory, and non-monetary claims related to the City’s actions or omissions related to curb ramp and pedestrian walkway accessibility in return. They did not release claims for non-monetary damages, personal injuries, or property damages. Two plaintiffs also received $35,000 in damages each. A fairness hearing was scheduled for December 4, 2025. 

Plaintiffs moved for class representative payments, attorneys’ fees, and costs on October 10, 2025. The case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Carlos Larrauri (2/3/2024)

Amanda Gao (11/23/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67389179/parties/curran-v-oakland/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Bichell, Rosa Lee (California)

Cabalo, Catherine M. (California)

Dardarian, Linda Mary (California)

Kim, Jinny (California)

Lee, Andrew Paul (California)

Attorney for Defendant

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67389179/curran-v-oakland/

Last updated Nov. 23, 2025, 2:44 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against City of Oakland ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18265201.). Filed byMichael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wallace, Guy) (Filed on 5/15/2023) (Entered: 05/15/2023)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

May 15, 2023

May 15, 2023

Clearinghouse
2

Proposed Summons. (Wallace, Guy) (Filed on 5/15/2023) (Entered: 05/15/2023)

May 15, 2023

May 15, 2023

3

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/30/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023) (Entered: 05/15/2023)

May 15, 2023

May 15, 2023

4

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023) (Entered: 05/15/2023)

May 15, 2023

May 15, 2023

5

Summons Issued as to City of Oakland. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023) (Entered: 05/15/2023)

May 15, 2023

May 15, 2023

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

May 15, 2023

May 15, 2023

6

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran.. (Wallace, Guy) (Filed on 5/17/2023) (Entered: 05/17/2023)

May 17, 2023

May 17, 2023

7

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2023) (Entered: 05/17/2023)

May 17, 2023

May 17, 2023

8

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 05/17/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2023) (Entered: 05/17/2023)

May 17, 2023

May 17, 2023

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

May 17, 2023

May 17, 2023

10

NOTICE of Appearance by Jinny Kim on Behalf of Plaintiffs (Kim, Jinny) (Filed on 5/18/2023) (Entered: 05/18/2023)

May 18, 2023

May 18, 2023

9

NOTICE of Appearance by Rosa Lee Vetters Bichell on Behalf of Plaintiffs (Bichell, Rosa Lee) (Filed on 5/18/2023) (Entered: 05/18/2023)

May 18, 2023

May 18, 2023

11

NOTICE of Appearance by Linda Mary Dardarian (Dardarian, Linda) (Filed on 5/19/2023) (Entered: 05/19/2023)

May 19, 2023

May 19, 2023

12

NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Paul Lee (Lee, Andrew) (Filed on 5/19/2023) (Entered: 05/19/2023)

May 19, 2023

May 19, 2023

13

NOTICE of Appearance by Mengfei Sun (Sun, Mengfei) (Filed on 5/19/2023) (Entered: 05/19/2023)

May 19, 2023

May 19, 2023

14

NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine M. Cabalo for Plaintiffs, MICHAEL CURRAN, NICOLE BROWN- BOOKER, and the Proposed Classes (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 5/23/2023) (Entered: 05/23/2023)

May 23, 2023

May 23, 2023

15

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 AND REQUEST FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Nicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 5/23/2023) (Entered: 05/23/2023)

May 23, 2023

May 23, 2023

16

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 15 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 AND REQUEST FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2023. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/23/2023. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2023) (Entered: 05/23/2023)

May 23, 2023

May 23, 2023

RECAP
17

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. City of Oakland served on 5/17/2023, answer due 6/7/2023. (Wallace, Guy) (Filed on 5/23/2023) (Entered: 05/23/2023)

May 23, 2023

May 23, 2023

18

STIPULATION STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by City of Oakland. (McLaughlin, Kevin) (Filed on 6/5/2023) (Entered: 06/05/2023)

June 5, 2023

June 5, 2023

19

NOTICE of Appearance by Lorena Matei (Matei, Lorena) (Filed on 6/5/2023) (Entered: 06/05/2023)

June 5, 2023

June 5, 2023

20

ANSWER to Complaint DEFENDANT CITY OF OAKLAND'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT byCity of Oakland. (McLaughlin, Kevin) (Filed on 6/20/2023) (Entered: 06/20/2023)

June 20, 2023

June 20, 2023

21

NOTICE of Change of Address by Catherine M. Cabalo (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 9/8/2023) (Entered: 09/08/2023)

Sept. 8, 2023

Sept. 8, 2023

22

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES filed by Nicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 10/24/2023) (Entered: 10/24/2023)

Oct. 24, 2023

Oct. 24, 2023

23

CLERK'S NOTICE. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 11/2/2023 is continued to 2/8/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Initial Case Management Statement due by 2/1/2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2023) (Entered: 10/24/2023)

Oct. 24, 2023

Oct. 24, 2023

Clerk's Notice

Oct. 24, 2023

Oct. 24, 2023

24

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES filed by Nicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Filed on 1/29/2024) (Entered: 01/29/2024)

Jan. 29, 2024

Jan. 29, 2024

25

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 24 TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/18/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 7/11/2024. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/30/2024. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2024) (Entered: 01/30/2024)

Jan. 30, 2024

Jan. 30, 2024

RECAP
26

Stipulation and Proposed Order

July 2, 2024

July 2, 2024

27

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 26 THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 7/18/2024 is continued to 10/24/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/17/2024. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/2/2024. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2024)

July 2, 2024

July 2, 2024

RECAP
28

FOURTH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES filed by Nicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Kim, Jinny) (Filed on 10/16/2024) Modified on 10/16/2024 (jlg, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 10/16/2024)

Oct. 16, 2024

Oct. 16, 2024

29

FOURTH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES, GRANTING 28 Stipulation. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2025 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only.(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2024) (Entered: 10/17/2024)

Oct. 17, 2024

Oct. 17, 2024

30

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES filed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. (Dardarian, Linda) (Filed on 2/11/2025) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

Feb. 11, 2025

Feb. 11, 2025

31

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg GRANTING 30 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 2/20/2025 is continued to 6/26/2025 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 6/18/2025.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2025) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

Feb. 11, 2025

Feb. 11, 2025

32

NOTICE of Withdrawal filed by Jinny Kim, no longer appearing on behalf of Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker in this case (Kim, Jinny) (Filed on 2/13/2025) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

Feb. 13, 2025

Feb. 13, 2025

33

NOTICE of Withdrawal filed by Rosa Lee Vetters Bichell, no longer appearing on behalf of Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker in this case (Bichell, Rosa Lee) (Filed on 2/13/2025) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

Feb. 13, 2025

Feb. 13, 2025

Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

Feb. 13, 2025

Feb. 13, 2025

34

NOTICE of Appearance filed by Shawna L Parks on behalf of Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker (Parks, Shawna) (Filed on 3/3/2025) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

35

NOTICE by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker Notice of Change of Firm Name and Email Addresses (Dardarian, Linda) (Filed on 3/7/2025) (Entered: 03/07/2025)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

36

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER filed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. (Dardarian, Linda) (Filed on 6/18/2025) (Entered: 06/18/2025)

June 18, 2025

June 18, 2025

37

ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/18/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/26/2025 is taken off calendar. Motion for Preliminary Approval due by 7/30/2025. Responses to Motion for Preliminary Approval due by 8/13/2025. Motion For Preliminary Approval Hearing set for 9/4/2025 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees due by 10/13/2025.Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees due by 10/27/2025.Motion for Final Approval of Settlement due by 10/27/2025.Reply to Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees due by 11/3/2025. City's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval of Settlement due by 11/10/2025.Plaintiffs' Reply in support of Motion for Final Approval of Settlement due by 11/20/2025. Fairness Hearing & Motion for Final Approval set for 12/4/2025 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2025)(Related document 36 ) (Entered: 06/18/2025)

June 18, 2025

June 18, 2025

38

NOTICE by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker Plaintiffs Notice of Change of Law Firm Name (Wallace, Guy) (Filed on 7/1/2025) (Entered: 07/01/2025)

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

39

NOTICE of Appearance filed by Katharine Fisher Trabucco on behalf of Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker (Trabucco, Katharine) (Filed on 7/22/2025) (Entered: 07/22/2025)

July 22, 2025

July 22, 2025

Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

July 22, 2025

July 22, 2025

40

MOTION for Settlement (Plainitffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement) filed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. Motion for Settlement Hearing set for 9/4/2025 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. Responses due by 8/13/2025. Replies due by 8/20/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Linda Dardarain, # 2 Declaration of Guy Wallace, # 3 Declaration of Cat Cabalo, # 4 Declaration of Shawna Parks, # 5 Declaration of Michael Curran, # 6 Declaration of Nicole Brown-Booker, # 7 Proposed Order)(Trabucco, Katharine) (Filed on 7/30/2025) (Entered: 07/30/2025)

July 30, 2025

July 30, 2025

41

Proposed Order re 40 MOTION for Settlement (Plainitffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement) by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. (Trabucco, Katharine) (Filed on 7/31/2025) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

July 31, 2025

July 31, 2025

42

OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 40 MOTION for Settlement (Plainitffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement) ) filed byCity of Oakland. (McLaughlin, Kevin) (Filed on 8/12/2025) (Entered: 08/12/2025)

Aug. 12, 2025

Aug. 12, 2025

43

CLERK'S NOTICE CHANGING TIME FOR Motion Hearing. Motion Hearing as to 40 MOTION for Settlement (Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement) set for 9/4/2025 at 1:30 PM will be heard ON THE SAME DAY AT 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) 40 )(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2025) (Entered: 08/19/2025)

Aug. 19, 2025

Aug. 19, 2025

Clerk's Notice Continuing Motion Hearing AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

Aug. 19, 2025

Aug. 19, 2025

44

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Richard Seeborg: Motion Hearing held on 9/4/2025 re 40 MOTION for Settlement (Plainitffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement) filed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. Counsel present. Oral arguments heard. Motion will be granted. Court to issue Order. Total Time in Court: 21 M. Court Reporter: Marla Knox (via Zoom). Plaintiff Attorney: Linda Dardarian. Defendant Attorney: Kevin McLaughlin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 9/4/2025) (Entered: 09/04/2025)

Sept. 4, 2025

Sept. 4, 2025

Motion Hearing

Sept. 4, 2025

Sept. 4, 2025

45

ORDER GRANTING 40 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on September 5, 2025. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2025)

Sept. 5, 2025

Sept. 5, 2025

Clearinghouse

Set/Reset Hearings

Sept. 5, 2025

Sept. 5, 2025

Set/Reset Hearing re 45 Order on Motion for Settlement. Fairness Hearing set for 12/4/2025 at 02:30 PM. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2025)

Sept. 5, 2025

Sept. 5, 2025

46

MOTION for Attorney Fees Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. Motion for Attorney Fees Hearing set for 12/4/2025 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Responses due by 10/27/2025. Replies due by 11/3/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Linda M. Dardarian in Support of Plaintiffs' Motions for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Class Representative Payments, # 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs)(Trabucco, Katharine) (Filed on 10/10/2025) (Entered: 10/10/2025)

Oct. 10, 2025

Oct. 10, 2025

47

MOTION for Class Representative Payments Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Representative Payments; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Michael Curran, Nicole Brown-Booker. Motion Hearing set for 12/4/2025 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Responses due by 10/27/2025. Replies due by 11/3/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Linda M. Dardarian in Support of Plaintiffs' Motions for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Class Representative Payments, # 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Representative Payments)(Trabucco, Katharine) (Filed on 10/10/2025) (Entered: 10/10/2025)

Oct. 10, 2025

Oct. 10, 2025

48

CLERK'S NOTICE CHANGING TIME. Fairness Hearing and Motion Hearing as to 46 MOTION for Attorney Fees Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, 47 MOTION for Class Representative Payments Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Representative Payments; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support set for 12/4/2025 at 2:30 PM is advanced TO THE SAME DAY at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2025) (Entered: 10/20/2025)

Oct. 20, 2025

Oct. 20, 2025

Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

Oct. 20, 2025

Oct. 20, 2025

49

OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 47 MOTION for Class Representative Payments Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Representative Payments; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, 46 MOTION for Attorney Fees Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof ) filed byCity of Oakland. (McLaughlin, Kevin) (Filed on 10/24/2025) (Entered: 10/24/2025)

Oct. 24, 2025

Oct. 24, 2025

50

Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by Nicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Linda Dardarain, # 2 Declaration of Gouri Chakrborty, # 3 Proposed Order)(Trabucco, Katharine) (Filed on 10/27/2025) (Entered: 10/27/2025)

Oct. 27, 2025

Oct. 27, 2025

51

Declaration of Kevin P. McLaughlin in Support of 50 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment Regarding City of Oakland's Compliance with Notice Requirements filed byCity of Oakland. (Related document(s) 50 ) (McLaughlin, Kevin) (Filed on 10/28/2025) (Entered: 10/28/2025)

Oct. 28, 2025

Oct. 28, 2025

52

Declaration of Linda M. Dardarian in Support of 46 MOTION for Attorney Fees Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (Supplemental) filed byNicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Related document(s) 46 ) (Dardarian, Linda) (Filed on 11/3/2025) (Entered: 11/03/2025)

Nov. 3, 2025

Nov. 3, 2025

53

REPLY (re 50 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment ) filed byNicole Brown-Booker, Michael Curran. (Dardarian, Linda) (Filed on 11/20/2025) (Entered: 11/20/2025)

Nov. 20, 2025

Nov. 20, 2025

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Disability Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 15, 2023

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs are two individuals with mobility disabilities who allege systemic discrimination due to inaccessible public pedestrian pathways.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

City of Oakland, City

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State Anti-Discrimination Law

State law

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 3:23-cv-02354

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Barrier Removal

Disability and Disability Rights:

Mobility impairment

Reasonable Modifications

Sidewalks

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)