Case: In re Wells Fargo Mortgage Discrimination Litigation

3:22-cv-00990 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Feb. 17, 2022

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case, originally captioned as Williams v. Wells Fargo, is about whether Wells Fargo illegally discriminated against non-white applicants for home mortgage loans or refinancing options. On February 17, 2022, a Black home borrower from Georgia brought a putative class action lawsuit against Wells Fargo in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The original complaint alleged that Wells Fargo maintained a nationwide set of discriminatory mortgage loan origination and …

This case, originally captioned as Williams v. Wells Fargo, is about whether Wells Fargo illegally discriminated against non-white applicants for home mortgage loans or refinancing options. On February 17, 2022, a Black home borrower from Georgia brought a putative class action lawsuit against Wells Fargo in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The original complaint alleged that Wells Fargo maintained a nationwide set of discriminatory mortgage loan origination and underwriting practices and engaged in a pattern or practice of systemic race discrimination against Black mortgage loan applicants, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. § 16901, et seq.), Sections 1 and 2 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982), and the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq.).

The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. On March 3, 2022, Wells Fargo declined to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. The case was subsequently reassigned to District Judge James Donato. On April 14, 2022, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that further detailed the factual allegations against the bank and added two additional named plaintiffs to the lawsuit. Represented by private counsel, plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief to stop the alleged discriminatory practices, restitutionary relief, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees.

In the wake of a Bloomberg report that found that Wells Fargo had accepted only 47 percent of all Black borrowers’ refinancing applications in 2020, while other lenders had approved a combined 71 percent of their Black customers’ applications, further lawsuits against the bank ensued. From March to June 2022, five additional putative class action lawsuits were filed against Wells Fargo in the Northern District of California that alleged similar claims of racial discrimination by the bank. Judge Donato related each of these cases with this case; they were all reassigned to him.

Braxton v. Wells Fargo (filed March 18, 2022):

In Braxton, plaintiffs alleged that Wells Fargo engaged in discriminatory practices against Black applicants for home mortgage refinancing.
Plaintiffs brought claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, Section 1 of Civil Rights Act of 1866, and California civil rights and consumer protection laws.
Judge Donato related the case on June 9, 2022.

Pope v. Wells Fargo (filed March 21, 2022):

In Pope, the plaintiff alleged that Wells Fargo engaged in discriminatory practices against minority applicants for home mortgage refinancing.
The plaintiff brought claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and California’s Unfair Competition Law.
Judge Donato related the case on June 29, 2022.

Thomas v. Wells Fargo (filed March 26, 2022):

In Thomas, plaintiffs alleged that Wells Fargo engaged in discriminatory practices against minority applicants for home mortgage refinancing.
Plaintiffs brought claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and California’s Unfair Competition Law.
Judge Donato related the case on August 9, 2022.

Ebo v. Wells Fargo (filed April 26, 2022):

In Ebo, plaintiffs alleged that Wells Fargo engaged in discriminatory practices against Black applicants for home mortgage loans and refinancing.
Plaintiffs brought claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and Section 1 of Civil Rights Act of 1866.
Judge Donato related the case on June 29, 2022.

Perkins v. Wells Fargo (filed June 10, 2022):

In Perkins, plaintiffs alleged that Wells Fargo engaged in discriminatory practices against minority applicants for home mortgage loans and refinancing.
Plaintiffs brought claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, Section 1 of Civil Rights Act of 1866, and California’s Unfair Competition Law.
Judge Donato related the case on August 1, 2022.

The parties then turned to the issue of consolidation. On October 11, 2022, Judge Donato ordered Wells Fargo and the plaintiffs in each related case to submit statements regarding their respective positions on consolidation. In Wells Fargo’s report, filed on November 4, 2022, the bank stated that it believed that one consolidated complaint was appropriate, but that it was also amenable to one complaint for refinancing products and another complaint for purchase mortgages. In a joint report filed by all of the plaintiffs in the six related cases on November 18, 2022, the plaintiffs proposed filing two complaints: (1) a consolidated complaint, filed by the Braxton/Williams group, on behalf of a class of Black applicants and borrowers, including origination and refinance mortgages, and (2) a consolidated complaint, filed by the Pope/Ebo/Thomas/Perkins group, on behalf of a class of non-Black protected minorities, including both loan origination and refinance applicants.

On January 18, 2023, all six related cases were consolidated into a single action. In his order, Judge Donato noted that “[a]ll of the complaints allege the same theory, namely that Wells Fargo discriminated against non-white customers with respect to residential mortgages and refinances.” Judge Donato justified his decision to not split the case into one complaint for Black applicants and another for non-Black applicants by noting that while “some plaintiffs [Black applicants]” may have “experienced more discriminatory conduct and impacts than others,” that was “a difference of degree and not substance.” The consolidated case was captioned as “In re Wells Fargo Mortgage Discrimination Litigation” under the 3:22-cv-00990 case number. Judge Donato ordered the plaintiffs to file one amended, consolidated complaint.

The parties turned to the issue of the appointment of interim lead counsel. After different plaintiff groups submitted applications for interim lead appointment, Judge Donato selected Dennis S. Ellis, of Ellis George Cipollone O’Brien Annaguey LLP, as interim lead class counsel. Attorney Ellis brought the original complaint in the Braxton case. Judge Donato stated that Ellis would serve as interim lead counsel for “all claims[,] irrespective of the bank products involved (original loan or refinancing), or race or ethnicity of the loan applicants.”

The plaintiffs filed their amended, consolidated complaint on March 24, 2023. The amended complaint alleged that Wells Fargo engaged in “digital redlining” by using algorithms that drew on historical data to make lending and refinancing decisions that exacerbated existing racial disparities. Furthermore, the complaint alleged that Wells Fargo failed to properly monitor and correct the lending algorithms, and thus, the company intentionally and disproportionately discriminated against applicants based on their race and ethnicity.

The plaintiffs defined the proposed class as “all Minority Applicants in the United States who, from January 1, 2018 through the present (the “Class Period”), submitted an application for a original purchase or other home mortgage loan or to refinance or modify a home mortgage loan through Defendants that was (i) denied; (ii) approved at higher interest rates or subject to less favorable terms as compared to similarly situated non-Minority Applicants; or (iii) processed at a rate slower than the average processing time of applications submitted by similarly situated non-Minority Applicants.”

The plaintiffs also proposed two sub-classes. The first, the “Denial Subclass,” was defined as members of the class “whose applications were denied but would have been approved had such applications been submitted by similarly situated non-Minority Applicants.” The second, the “Delayed, Higher Rate or Less Favorable Terms Subclass,” was defined as members of the class “whose applications were (a) processed at a rate slower than that of the average processing time of applications submitted by non-Minority Applicants; or (b) whose applications were eventually approved, but at higher interest rates or subject to less favorable terms than similarly situated non-Minority Applicants.”

The plaintiffs brought claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, Section 1 of Civil Rights Act of 1866, and California civil rights and consumer protection laws. Represented by an array of private law firms, plaintiffs plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief to stop the alleged discriminatory practices, restitutionary relief, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees.

Wells Fargo filed its answer on May 17, 2023. The parties then turned to discovery issues. From May 2023 to March 2024, the parties filed multiple motions regarding amending the scheduling order and compelling discovery requests. On March 5, 2024, Judge Donato stated in an order that “[t]he parties have filed an inordinate number of discovery letter briefs,” and he directed the parties to file a status report identifying discovery issues by April 5, 2024. On April 5, 2024, the parties identified one outstanding discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ failure to fully answer Wells Fargo’s Second Set of Interrogatories concerning the identification of Wells Fargo’s policies and practices that resulted in a disparate impact.

The case is still ongoing.

show full summary

Summary Authors

Muiz Wani (3/6/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63052766/parties/in-re-wells-fargo-mortgage-discrimination-litigation/

Judge(s)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Adams, Alisa Rose (California)

Bish, Suzanne Elaine (California)

Calvert, Jared (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Baiardo, Alicia Anne (California)

Brinson, Kobi Kennedy (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Judge(s)

Donato, James (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Adams, Alisa Rose (California)

Bish, Suzanne Elaine (California)

Calvert, Jared (California)

Crump, Benjamin (California)

Dann, Marc E (California)

Evangelista, James M. (California)

Flick, Brian D. (California)

Frank, Jason M. (California)

Goodwin, David Allen (California)

Gustafson, Daniel E. (California)

Helpern, Noah Samuel (California)

Hirsch, Scott David (California)

Jr, Thomas A. (California)

Jr, Abou Amara (California)

Keech, Ryan Q (California)

Lewin, Daniel (California)

Robinson, Sue-Ann (California)

Robot, George S. (California)

Shaer, Nabeha (California)

Sims, Scott Howard (California)

Stewart, Dennis (California)

Stolper, Andrew Dana (California)

Straus, Alex R. (California)

Williams, Amanda M. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Baiardo, Alicia Anne (California)

Brinson, Kobi Kennedy (California)

Chabot, Ryan Michael (California)

Corbett, Ross J. (California)

Gardner, Jasmine (California)

Greene, Olivia (California)

Griset, Jill Crawley (California)

Groves, Amanda L. (California)

Ireland, Elizabeth J. (California)

Knight, Stacie Corbett (California)

Lias-Booker, Ava (California)

Markarian, Lara (California)

Martinez, Melissa (California)

McCauley, Rachel Alanna (California)

Newsome, Jervonne D. (California)

Popkin, Lee Maia (California)

Schoenfeld, Alan Evan (California)

Waxman, Seth P. (California)

Williams, Bart Harper (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Copeland, Trent Brehon (California)

Czeisler, Jennifer S (California)

Ellis, Dennis S. (California)

Friedman, Linda Debra (California)

Hassell, Madeline (California)

Jr, Dalmacio Vergara (California)

Littlejohn, Joshua C (California)

Sani, Sam (California)

Solar, Daniel Martin (California)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
1 3:22-cv-00990	Complaint Williams v. Wells Fargo	Feb. 17, 2022	Feb. 17, 2022 Complaint
1 3:22-cv-01748	Class Action Complaint - Demand for Jury Trial Braxton v. Wells Fargo	March 18, 2022	March 18, 2022 Complaint
1 3:22-cv-01793	Complaint Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank	March 21, 2022	March 21, 2022 Complaint
1 3:22-cv-01931	Class Action Complaint - Demand for Jury Trial Thomas v. Wells Fargo	March 26, 2022	March 26, 2022 Complaint
14 3:22-cv-01748	First Amended Class Action Complaint - Demand for Jury Trial Braxton v. Wells Fargo	April 12, 2022	April 12, 2022 Complaint
22 3:22-cv-00990	Amended Complaint Williams v. Wells Fargo	April 14, 2022	April 14, 2022 Complaint
1 3:22-cv-02535	Complaint Ebo v. Wells Fargo Bank	April 26, 2022	April 26, 2022 Complaint
45 3:22-cv-00990	Related Case Order	June 9, 2022	June 9, 2022 Order/Opinion
1 3:22-cv-03455	Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded Perkins v. Wells Fargo	June 10, 2022	June 10, 2022 Complaint
55 3:22-cv-00990	Related Case Order Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank	June 29, 2022	June 29, 2022 Order/Opinion

show / hide documents

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63052766/in-re-wells-fargo-mortgage-discrimination-litigation/

Last updated Aug. 8, 2025, 4:12 a.m.

Change selected docket

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; Jury Trial Demanded against Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number BCANDC-16916622). Filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sani, Sam) (Filed on 2/17/2022) (Entered: 02/17/2022) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER	Feb. 17, 2022	Feb. 17, 2022 Clearinghouse
2	Proposed Summons. (Sani, Sam) (Filed on 2/17/2022) (Entered: 02/17/2022)	Feb. 17, 2022	Feb. 17, 2022 PACER
3	Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/4/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2022) (Entered: 02/18/2022)	Feb. 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2022 PACER
4	Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/11/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/18/2022 at 1:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2022) (Entered: 02/18/2022)	Feb. 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2022 PACER
5	Summons Issued as to Defendants Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2022) (Entered: 02/18/2022)	Feb. 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2022 PACER
	~Util - Case Assigned by Intake	Feb. 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2022 PACER
6	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number ACANDC-16925235) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 2/22/2022) (Entered: 02/22/2022)	Feb. 22, 2022	Feb. 22, 2022 PACER
7	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number ACANDC-16927752) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Lewin, Daniel) (Filed on 2/23/2022) (Entered: 02/23/2022)	Feb. 23, 2022	Feb. 23, 2022 PACER
8	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number ACANDC-16928041) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Calvert, Jared) (Filed on 2/23/2022) (Entered: 02/23/2022)	Feb. 23, 2022	Feb. 23, 2022 PACER
9	ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 6 Linda D. Friedman's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2022) (Entered: 02/23/2022)	Feb. 23, 2022	Feb. 23, 2022 PACER
10	ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 7 Daniel B. Lewin's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2022) (Entered: 02/23/2022)	Feb. 23, 2022	Feb. 23, 2022 PACER
11	ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 8 Jared A. Calvert's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2022) (Entered: 02/23/2022)	Feb. 23, 2022	Feb. 23, 2022 PACER
12	CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Christopher Williams.. (Lewin, Daniel) (Filed on 3/3/2022) (Entered: 03/03/2022)	March 3, 2022	March 3, 2022 PACER
13	CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2022) (Entered: 03/03/2022)	March 3, 2022	March 3, 2022 PACER
14	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 3/4/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2022) (Entered: 03/04/2022)	March 4, 2022	March 4, 2022 PACER
15	CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/19/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 5/12/2022. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/7/2022. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2022) (Entered: 03/07/2022)	March 7, 2022	March 7, 2022 PACER
16	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Christopher Williams. Service waived by Wells Fargo & Co., waiver sent on 3/4/2022, answer due 5/3/2022. (Calvert, Jared) (Filed on 3/21/2022) (Entered: 03/21/2022)	March 21, 2022	March 21, 2022 PACER
17	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Christopher Williams. Service waived by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. waiver sent on 3/4/2022, answer due 5/3/2022. (Calvert, Jared) (Filed on 3/21/2022) (Entered: 03/21/2022)	March 21, 2022	March 21, 2022 PACER
18	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number ACANDC-17018814) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Robot, George) (Filed on 3/23/2022) (Entered: 03/23/2022)	March 23, 2022	March 23, 2022 PACER
19	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number ACANDC-17018852) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Bish, Suzanne) (Filed on 3/23/2022) (Entered: 03/23/2022)	March 23, 2022	March 23, 2022 PACER
20	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to George Robot. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022) (Entered: 03/24/2022)	March 24, 2022	March 24, 2022 PACER
21	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 19 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Suzanne E Bish. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022) (Entered: 03/24/2022)	March 24, 2022	March 24, 2022 PACER
22	AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Filed by Christopher Williams. (Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 4/14/2022) Modified on 4/15/2022 (slh, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/14/2022)	April 14, 2022	April 14, 2022 Clearinghouse
23	First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17086873.) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing: Northern District of Fla, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing: Fla., # 3 Certificate of Good Standing: DC, # 4 Certificate of Good Standing: Tenn.)(Crump, Benjamin) (Filed on 4/14/2022) (Entered: 04/14/2022)	April 14, 2022	April 14, 2022 PACER
24	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Benjamin L. Crump. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2022) (Entered: 04/15/2022)	April 15, 2022	April 15, 2022 RECAP
25	STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Co. to Respond to 22 Plaintiffs First Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 4/26/2022) (Entered: 04/26/2022)	April 26, 2022	April 26, 2022 PACER
26	ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2022) (Entered: 05/03/2022)	May 3, 2022	May 3, 2022 PACER
27	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 5/5/2022) (Entered: 05/05/2022)	May 5, 2022	May 5, 2022 PACER
28	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 5/6/2022) (Entered: 05/06/2022)	May 6, 2022	May 6, 2022 PACER
29	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 5/9/2022) (Entered: 05/09/2022) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER	May 9, 2022	May 9, 2022 RECAP
30	Declaration of Alicia A. Baiardo in Support of 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines Declaration in Support of Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines filed byWells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Related document(s) 29 ) (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 5/10/2022) (Entered: 05/10/2022)	May 10, 2022	May 10, 2022 PACER
31	ORDER. At the parties' joint request, Dkt. No. 29, Wells Fargo may respond to the first amended complaint by June 10, 2022. The initial case management conference set for May 19, 2022, is continued to June 16, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint case management statement by June 9, 2022. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/11/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2022) (Entered: 05/11/2022)	May 11, 2022	May 11, 2022 PACER
32	ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 5/31/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Alicia A. Baiardo in Support of Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 5/27/2022) Modified on 5/31/2022 (slh, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 05/27/2022)	May 27, 2022	May 27, 2022 PACER
33	NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda L. Groves for Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Co. (Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 5/27/2022) (Entered: 05/27/2022)	May 27, 2022	May 27, 2022 RECAP
34	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17218958) filed by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Brinson, Kobi) (Filed on 5/27/2022) (Entered: 05/27/2022)	May 27, 2022	May 27, 2022 PACER
35	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17219050) filed by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Knight, Stacie) (Filed on 5/27/2022) (Entered: 05/27/2022)	May 27, 2022	May 27, 2022 PACER
36	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 34 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Kobi K Brimson. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022)	May 31, 2022	May 31, 2022 PACER
37	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 35 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Stacie C. Knight. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022)	May 31, 2022	May 31, 2022 PACER
38	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number BCANDC-17221873.) filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Gardner, Jasmine) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022)	May 31, 2022	May 31, 2022 PACER
39	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17222083.) Filing fee previously paid on May 31, 2022 filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Lias-Booker, Ava) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022)	May 31, 2022	May 31, 2022 PACER
40	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 32 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related ) filed byChristopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sani, Sam) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER	May 31, 2022	May 31, 2022 RECAP
41	Response re 32 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related (by Aaron Braxton, et al.) byAaron Braxton. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ellis, Dennis) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022)	May 31, 2022	May 31, 2022 PACER
42	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 38 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Jasmine K. Gardner. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2022) (Entered: 06/01/2022)	June 1, 2022	June 1, 2022 PACER
43	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 39 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Ava Lias-Booker. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2022) (Entered: 06/01/2022)	June 1, 2022	June 1, 2022 PACER
44	NOTICE of Lodging Response to Plaintiff Ifeoma Ebo's Admin Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 6/6/2022) Modified on 6/7/2022 (slh, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/06/2022)	June 6, 2022	June 6, 2022 PACER
45	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 32 Administrative Motion To Relate Cases. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2022) (Entered: 06/09/2022)	June 9, 2022	June 9, 2022 Clearinghouse
46	ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Appear Remotely at the Case Management Conference filed by Christopher Williams. Responses due by 6/13/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of Suzanne E. Bish)(Bish, Suzanne) (Filed on 6/9/2022) (Entered: 06/09/2022)	June 9, 2022	June 9, 2022 PACER
47	JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 6/9/2022) (Entered: 06/09/2022)	June 9, 2022	June 9, 2022 RECAP
48	Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 6/9/2022) (Entered: 06/09/2022)	June 9, 2022	June 9, 2022 PACER
49	Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1 Disclosure Statement filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 6/9/2022) (Entered: 06/09/2022)	June 9, 2022	June 9, 2022 PACER
50	Answer to 22 Amended Complaint - Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.s Answer to Plaintiffs Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 6/10/2022) (Entered: 06/10/2022)	June 10, 2022	June 10, 2022 PACER
51	Answer to 22 Amended Complaint - Defendant Wells Fargo & Co.s Answer to Plaintiffs Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 6/10/2022) (Entered: 06/10/2022)	June 10, 2022	June 10, 2022 RECAP
52	ORDER. The case management conference set for June 16, 2022, is continued to August 11, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint case management statement by August 4, 2022. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/13/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2022) (Entered: 06/13/2022)	June 13, 2022	June 13, 2022 PACER
53	JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2022) (Entered: 06/16/2022)	June 16, 2022	June 16, 2022 RECAP
54	Response re 53 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases - Defendants Response to Judicial Referral for the Purposes of Determining Relationship by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Alicia A. Baiardo in Support of Defendants Response to Judicial Referral for the Purposes of Determining Relationship, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Alicia A. Baiardo)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 6/23/2022) (Entered: 06/23/2022) 1 Declaration Declaration of Alicia A. Baiardo in Support of Defendants Response t View on PACER 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Alicia A. Baiardo View on PACER	June 23, 2022	June 23, 2022 RECAP
55	ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/29/2022. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2022) (Entered: 06/29/2022)	June 29, 2022	June 29, 2022 Clearinghouse
56	CLERK'S NOTICE. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) (Entered: 07/22/2022)	July 22, 2022	July 22, 2022 PACER
57	Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines re 52 Order filed by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Ava E. Lias-Booker in Support of Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines, # 2 Proposed Order [Proposed Order Approving Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 7/22/2022) (Entered: 07/22/2022) 1 Declaration Declaration of Ava E. Lias-Booker in Support of Joint Stipulation to View on PACER 2 Proposed Order [Proposed Order Approving Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial C View on PACER	July 22, 2022	July 22, 2022 RECAP
58	ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Relate Cases filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 8/1/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amanda Groves, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Proposed Order)(Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 7/28/2022) (Entered: 07/28/2022)	July 28, 2022	July 28, 2022 PACER
59	STIPULATION TO RELATE CASES re 58 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Relate Cases filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 7/28/2022) (Entered: 07/28/2022)	July 28, 2022	July 28, 2022 PACER
60	NOTICE by Aaron Braxton of Lodging of Plaintiffs Braxton et al's Motion for Interim Lead Counsel (Ellis, Dennis) (Filed on 7/29/2022) (Entered: 07/29/2022)	July 29, 2022	July 29, 2022 PACER
61	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 58 Administrative Motion relate. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022) (Entered: 08/01/2022)	Aug. 1, 2022	Aug. 1, 2022 Clearinghouse
62	ORDER. At the parties' joint request, Dkt. No. 57, the case management conference set for August 11, 2022, is continued to October 20, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint case management statement by October 13, 2022. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/1/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022) (Entered: 08/01/2022)	Aug. 1, 2022	Aug. 1, 2022 PACER
63	MOTION to Consolidate Cases; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion Hearing set for 11/10/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 8/19/2022. Replies due by 8/26/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amanda Groves, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Proposed Order)(Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 8/5/2022) (Entered: 08/05/2022) 6 View on RECAP	Aug. 5, 2022	Aug. 5, 2022 PACER
64	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule and Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Consolidate the Related Cases filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration A - to the Request for Judicial Notice, # 2 Proposed Order)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 8/8/2022) (Entered: 08/08/2022) 2 View on RECAP	Aug. 8, 2022	Aug. 8, 2022 PACER
65	NOTICE by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. of Lodging of Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule and Hearing on Plaintiffs Motion to Appoint Interim Counsel for a Putative Refinancing Class (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 8/8/2022) (Entered: 08/08/2022)	Aug. 8, 2022	Aug. 8, 2022 PACER
66	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/10/2022. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022) (Entered: 08/10/2022)	Aug. 10, 2022	Aug. 10, 2022 PACER
67	NOTICE by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. of Lodging of Order Granting Stipulation re Briefing Schedule and Plaintiffs Motion To Appoint Interim Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 8/10/2022) (Entered: 08/10/2022) 1 Exhibit A View on PACER	Aug. 10, 2022	Aug. 10, 2022 RECAP
68	First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number ACANDC-17436363) filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing: New York)(Shaer, Nabeha) (Filed on 8/12/2022) (Entered: 08/12/2022)	Aug. 12, 2022	Aug. 12, 2022 PACER
69	ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 68 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Nabeha B. Shaer. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022) (Entered: 08/15/2022)	Aug. 15, 2022	Aug. 15, 2022 PACER
70	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases ) [Plaintiffs Aaron Braxton et al.'s Opposition to Wells Fargo et al.'s Motion to Consolidate] filed byAaron Braxton. (Ellis, Dennis) (Filed on 8/26/2022) (Entered: 08/26/2022)	Aug. 26, 2022	Aug. 26, 2022 PACER
71	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases ) Consolidated Memorandum filed byChristopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Consolidated Exhibits for Response to Defendants' Motion to Consolidate)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 8/26/2022) (Entered: 08/26/2022)	Aug. 26, 2022	Aug. 26, 2022 PACER
72	MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and to Submit Consolidated Brief filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 8/26/2022) (Entered: 08/26/2022)	Aug. 26, 2022	Aug. 26, 2022 PACER
73	MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Pleading filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 8/26/2022) (Entered: 08/26/2022)	Aug. 26, 2022	Aug. 26, 2022 PACER
74	MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel Interim Lead Counsel filed by Christopher Williams. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 9/9/2022. Replies due by 9/16/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Consolidated Exhibits, # 2 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 8/26/2022) (Entered: 08/26/2022)	Aug. 26, 2022	Aug. 26, 2022 PACER
75	ORDER. In light of the pending motion to consolidate, Dkt. No. 63, plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint, Dkt. No. 73, and plaintiffs' motion for leave to submit a consolidated brief, Dkt. No. 72, are denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/29/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2022) (Entered: 08/29/2022)	Aug. 29, 2022	Aug. 29, 2022 PACER
76	NOTICE by Elretha Perkins Notice of Lodging Elretha Perkins et al Response in Support of the Wells Fargo Defendants' Motion to Consolidate (Williams, Amanda) (Filed on 8/30/2022) (Entered: 08/30/2022)	Aug. 30, 2022	Aug. 30, 2022 RECAP
77	NOTICE by Elretha Perkins Notice of Lodging Elretha Perkins et al. Motion for Appointment of Interim Lead Counsel (Williams, Amanda) (Filed on 8/30/2022) (Entered: 08/30/2022)	Aug. 30, 2022	Aug. 30, 2022 PACER
78	MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel filed by Christopher Williams. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 9/15/2022. Replies due by 9/22/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Linda Friedman, # 2 Declaration of Benjamin Crump, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 9/1/2022) (Entered: 09/01/2022)	Sept. 1, 2022	Sept. 1, 2022 PACER
79	MOTION for Leave to File INSTANTER RESPONSE TO WELLS FARGOS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 9/1/2022) (Entered: 09/01/2022) 2 View on RECAP	Sept. 1, 2022	Sept. 1, 2022 PACER
80	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 74 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel Interim Lead Counsel ) Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment as Interim Lead Counsel filed byWells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 9/9/2022) (Entered: 09/09/2022)	Sept. 9, 2022	Sept. 9, 2022 PACER
81	ORDER GRANTING 79 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE INSTANTER RESPONSE TO WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/12/2022. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2022) (Entered: 09/12/2022)	Sept. 12, 2022	Sept. 12, 2022 PACER
82	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases ) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Wells Fargo's Motion for Consolidation filed byChristopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Linda Friedman, # 2 Declaration of Benjamin Crump, # 3 Exhibit C)(Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 9/13/2022) (Entered: 09/13/2022)	Sept. 13, 2022	Sept. 13, 2022 PACER
83	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 78 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ) /Plaintiffs in related Case No. 3:22-cv-01748-JD Aaron Braxton, Gia Gray, Bryan Brown, Paul Martins Opposition To Williams Counsel Motion For Appointment As Interim Lead Counsel/ filed byAaron Braxton. (Ellis, Dennis) (Filed on 9/15/2022) (Entered: 09/15/2022)	Sept. 15, 2022	Sept. 15, 2022 PACER
84	REPLY in Support (re 63 MOTION to Consolidate Cases) filed by Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 9/16/2022) (Entered: 09/16/2022)	Sept. 16, 2022	Sept. 16, 2022 PACER
85	REPLY (re 78 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ) filed byChristopher Williams. (Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 9/22/2022) (Entered: 09/22/2022)	Sept. 22, 2022	Sept. 22, 2022 PACER
86	ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference re 62 Order,, Terminate Motions,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, filed by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 9/27/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Alicia Baiardo in Support of Wells Fargo Motion to Continue Case Management Conference, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Wells Fargo Motion to Continue Case Management Conference)(Baiardo, Alicia) (Filed on 9/23/2022) (Entered: 09/23/2022) 1 Declaration Declaration of Alicia Baiardo in Support of Wells Fargo Motion to Co View on PACER 2 Proposed Order Granting Wells Fargo Motion to Continue Case Management Conferenc View on RECAP	Sept. 23, 2022	Sept. 23, 2022 RECAP
87	JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time re 86 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference re 62 Order filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Suzanne E. Bish)(Bish, Suzanne) (Filed on 9/27/2022) (Entered: 09/27/2022) 1 Declaration of Suzanne E. Bish View on PACER	Sept. 27, 2022	Sept. 27, 2022 RECAP
88	ORDER GRANTING 87 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/27/2022. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2022) (Entered: 09/27/2022)	Sept. 27, 2022	Sept. 27, 2022 RECAP
	Set/Reset Deadlines as to 86 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Continue Case Management Conference re 62 Order,, Terminate Motions,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, ., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 86 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Continue Case Management Conference re 62 Order,, Terminate Motions,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, . Responses due by 10/4/2022. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2022)	Sept. 27, 2022	Sept. 27, 2022 PACER
89	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to (re 86 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference re 62 Order,, Terminate Motions,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, ) filed by Christopher Williams. (Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 10/4/2022) (Entered: 10/04/2022)	Oct. 4, 2022	Oct. 4, 2022 PACER
90	ORDER. The initial case management conference is continued pending further order. The parties should appear on October 20, 2022, to discuss consolidation and related matters. Signed by Judge James Donato on 10/11/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2022) (Entered: 10/11/2022)	Oct. 11, 2022	Oct. 11, 2022 PACER
91	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 10/20/2022 before Judge James Donato by Wells Fargo & Co.,, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., for Court Reporter - Marla Knox. (Groves, Amanda) (Filed on 10/20/2022) Modified on 10/21/2022: Corrected court reporter name. (rjd, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 10/20/2022)	Oct. 20, 2022	Oct. 20, 2022 PACER
92	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 10/20/2022 before Judge James Donato by Christopher Williams, for Court Reporter Marla Knox. (Williams, Amanda) (Filed on 10/21/2022) Modified on 10/21/2022: Corrected court reporter name. (rjd, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 10/21/2022)	Oct. 21, 2022	Oct. 21, 2022 PACER
93	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge James Donato: Motion Hearing held on 10/20/2022. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 10/21/2022) (Entered: 10/21/2022)	Oct. 21, 2022	Oct. 21, 2022 PACER
94	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 10/20/2020 before Judge James Donato by Aaron Braxton, for Court Reporter Marla Knox. (Helpern, Noah) (Filed on 10/21/2022) (Entered: 10/21/2022)	Oct. 21, 2022	Oct. 21, 2022 PACER
95	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 10/20/2022 before Judge James Donato by Alfred Pope, Winfred Thomas, Ifeoma Ebo, for Court Reporter Marla Knox. (Dann, Marc) (Filed on 10/21/2022) (Entered: 10/21/2022)	Oct. 21, 2022	Oct. 21, 2022 PACER
96	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 10/20/2022 before Judge James Donato by Christopher Williams, for Court Reporter Marla Knox. (Friedman, Linda) (Filed on 10/24/2022) Modified on 10/24/2022: Corrected court reporter's name. (rjd, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 10/24/2022)	Oct. 24, 2022	Oct. 24, 2022 PACER
97	Transcript of Proceedings held on October 20, 2022, before Judge James Donato. Court Reporter, Marla F. Knox, RPR, CRR, RMR, telephone number (602) 391-6990/email marla_knox@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 91 Transcript Order, ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/26/2023. (Related documents(s) 91 ) (mfk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2022) (Entered: 10/28/2022)	Oct. 28, 2022	Oct. 28, 2022 PACER
98	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 93 Motion Hearing to Submit Joint Statement filed by Ifeoma Ebo. (Dann, Marc) (Filed on 11/3/2022) (Entered: 11/03/2022)	Nov. 3, 2022	Nov. 3, 2022 RECAP

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 17, 2022

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Minority (non-White) applicants who submitted an application for a home mortgage loan or to refinance home mortgage loan through Wells Fargo that was either (1) denied; (2) approved at higher interest rates or subject to less favorable terms as compared to similarly situated non-Minority Applicants; or (3) processed at a rate slower than the average processing time of applications submitted by similarly situated non-Minority Applicants.”

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (San Francisco, San Francisco), Private Entity/Person

Defendant Type(s):

Bank or credit provider

Case Details

Causes of Action: