Case: Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles

2:23-cv-02568 | California state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 14, 2022

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged Los Angeles’s cash bail policy, which allowed the city and county of Los Angeles to demand cash bail from arrestees who had not yet been arraigned. On November 14, 2022,  six arrestees who had been held in jail awaiting a judicial determination on the conditions of their release pending further judicial proceedings filed this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, seeking a preliminary injunction. They filed in California state court under § 1983 and …

This case challenged Los Angeles’s cash bail policy, which allowed the city and county of Los Angeles to demand cash bail from arrestees who had not yet been arraigned. On November 14, 2022,  six arrestees who had been held in jail awaiting a judicial determination on the conditions of their release pending further judicial proceedings filed this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, seeking a preliminary injunction. They filed in California state court under § 1983 and California state law, against the city and county of Los Angeles, the LASD, the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, the Chief of the LAPD, and the California Attorney General, alleging that the policy resulted in detention and punishment for pre-trial detainees simply because they could not pay bail. The case was assigned to Judge Lawrence Riff.

The plaintiffs amended this application twice, filing the operative version on April 24, 2023. On May 16, 2023, the court issued a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits given recent bail reform precedent, and that it was in the public interest to issue a preliminary injunction. The court ordered that the injunction be effective as of May 24, 2023.

On April 5, 2023, the named plaintiff filed another lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the city and county of Los Angeles, the LASD, the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, the Chief of the LAPD, and the California Attorney General under § 1983 and California state law. Represented by Public Justice, the plaintiff alleged that his car had been seized in violation of the community caretaking exception to the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on warrantless seizures, and that this was part of a pattern engaged in by the defendants. He sought monetary damages and injunctive relief. The case was assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal.

On Sept. 8, 2023, following a settlement agreement, the plaintiff dismissed the causes of action against the City and Chief of the LAPD with prejudice. 

Summary Authors

Ruby Napora (4/21/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67145475/parties/phillip-urquidi-v-city-of-los-angeles/


Judge(s)

Bernal, Jesus Gilberto (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bailey, Leslie Andrea (California)

Hardingham, Brian A. (California)

Moore, Charles B (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Dermer, Gabriel Seth (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
32

2:23-cv-02568

Order Denying Plaintiff's Application For Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order as Moot

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

April 21, 2023

April 21, 2023

Order/Opinion
38

2:23-cv-02568

First Amended Complaint

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

May 1, 2023

May 1, 2023

Complaint

22:23-STCP-04044

Memorandum Decision and Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction

California state appellate court

May 16, 2023

May 16, 2023

Order/Opinion
66

2:23-cv-02568

Notice of Dismissal of Claims as to Defendants City of Los Angeles and Michel R. Moore

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Sept. 8, 2023

Sept. 8, 2023

Other

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67145475/phillip-urquidi-v-city-of-los-angeles/

Last updated Oct. 18, 2026, 4:15 a.m.

Docket for: Phillip Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 5, 2023

COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35088198 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attorney Leslie Andrea Bailey added to party Phillip Urquidi(pty:pla))(Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

2 April 5, 2023

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
3 April 5, 2023

NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. Related Case(s): 2:21-cv-06841-JGB-SP (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
4 April 5, 2023

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
5 April 5, 2023

EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
6 April 5, 2023

DECLARATION of Phillip Urquidi in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. 5 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
7 April 5, 2023

DECLARATION of Brian Hardingham in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. 5 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
8 April 5, 2023

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
9 April 5, 2023

NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
10 April 5, 2023

Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
11 April 5, 2023

DECLARATION of Charles Moore in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. 5 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
12 April 5, 2023

NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Charles Moore. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
13 April 5, 2023

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
14 April 5, 2023

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

RECAP
15 April 6, 2023

21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint 1 as to defendants City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Official Police Garage, City of Los Angeles Police Department, Jons Towing Inc., Michel R. Moore. (lom) (Entered: 04/06/2023)

RECAP
16 April 7, 2023

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian D Olney counsel for Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. Adding Brian Olney as counsel of record for Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attorney Brian D Olney added to party Phillip Urquidi(pty:pla))(Olney, Brian) (Entered: 04/07/2023)

RECAP
17 April 10, 2023

RESPONSE filed by Defendant City of Los Angelesto Notice of Related Case(s) 3 (Persoff, Joseph) (Entered: 04/10/2023)

RECAP
18 April 10, 2023

APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles B. Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35107213) filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Application) (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 04/10/2023)

RECAP
19 April 10, 2023

ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:21-cv-06841 JGB(SPx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo and Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-02568 JGB(SPx). Signed by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (aco) (Entered: 04/10/2023)

RECAP
20 April 10, 2023

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: (1) ORDERING Plaintiff to File Supplemental Response in Support of Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. 5) by April 12, 2023; and (2) ORDERING Defendant City of Los Angeles to Respond to Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order by April 12, 2023 5 . Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to the Courts questions outlined above by April 12, 2023. Defendant City of Los Angeles is ORDERED to file a response to the TRO by April 12, 2023. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) (Entered: 04/10/2023)

RECAP
21 April 11, 2023

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles Official Police Garage served on 4/11/2023, answer due 5/2/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michelle Greer, Assistant, authorized to accept service for Defendant City of Los Angeles Official Police Garage in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 04/11/2023)

RECAP
22 April 11, 2023

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles Police Department served on 4/10/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marisol Cortes, Deputy Clerk, authorized to accept service for Defendant City of Los Angeles Police Department in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 04/11/2023)

RECAP
23 April 11, 2023

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 4/10/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ottavia S., Deputy Clerk, authorized to accept service for Defendant City of Los Angeles in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 04/11/2023)

RECAP
24 April 11, 2023

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi, upon Defendant Michel R. Moore served on 4/10/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Julio Sandoval, Administrative Clerk, authorized to accept service for Defendant Michel R. Moore in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 04/11/2023)

RECAP
25 April 12, 2023

Joint STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to File Responses to the Court's Minute Order of April 10th from April 12, 2023 to April 18, 2023 Re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 20 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/12/2023)

RECAP
26 April 12, 2023

SUPPLEMENT to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. 5 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/12/2023)

RECAP
27 April 13, 2023

ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Stipulation to Continue Deadline to File Responses to the Court's Minute Order of April 10th 25 . ORDERED, that Defendants deadline to respond to Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO, Dkt. No. 5) is extended to April 18, 2023; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs deadline to file a supplemental response in support of the TRO is extended to April 18, 2023. (twdb) (Entered: 04/13/2023)

RECAP
28 April 18, 2023

Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. 5 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Police Department, Michel R. Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Reynaldo Martinez, # 2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Attorney Gabriel Seth Dermer added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Gabriel Seth Dermer added to party City of Los Angeles Police Department(pty:dft), Attorney Gabriel Seth Dermer added to party Michel R. Moore(pty:dft))(Dermer, Gabriel) (Entered: 04/18/2023)

2

View on RECAP

RECAP
29 April 18, 2023

SUPPLEMENT to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to precluding lien sale of Plaintiffs vehicle and ordering City of Los Angeles Defs to release Plaintiff's vehicle without payment of fines, fees, or other charges. 5 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Charles Moore, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/18/2023)

RECAP
30 April 19, 2023

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Minute Order (1) ORDERING Defendants Counsel to Immediately Contact Jons Towing; and (2) ORDERING Plaintiff to File Reply and/or Parties to File Stipulation Indicating TRO is Moot by April 24, 2023. In the alternative, if Mr. Urquidis vehicle is released, the parties are ORDERED to file a stipulation indicating that the TRO is moot by the same day. re: 5 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) (Entered: 04/19/2023)

RECAP
31 April 20, 2023

Joint STIPULATION for Order Denying Plaintiff's Application for Ex Parte TRO As Moot filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiff's Application for Ex Parte TRO as Moot)(Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/20/2023)

RECAP
32 April 21, 2023

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AS MOOT (Dkt. No. 5 ) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (lom) (Entered: 04/21/2023)

Clearinghouse
33 April 21, 2023

STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) (Entered: 04/21/2023)

RECAP
34 April 21, 2023

ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: granting 18 Non-Resident Attorney Charles B Moore APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Phillip Urquidi, designating Brian D Olney as local counsel. (lom) (Entered: 04/21/2023)

RECAP
35 April 25, 2023

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to City of Los Angeles Official Police Garage, Jons Towing Inc.. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/25/2023)

RECAP
36 April 25, 2023

NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. correcting Declaration (Motion related), 11 Exhibit A (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/25/2023)

RECAP
37 April 25, 2023

Notice of Amended Exhibit A to the Declaration of Charles Moore (Dkt. No. 11-1) filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 04/25/2023)

RECAP
38 May 1, 2023

First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R. Moore amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1, filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi(Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 05/01/2023)

Clearinghouse
39 May 3, 2023

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition 38 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 05/03/2023)

RECAP
40 May 4, 2023

21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition 38 as to Defendant Michel R. Moore. (twdb) (Entered: 05/04/2023)

RECAP
41 May 4, 2023

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi, upon Defendant Michel R Moore served on 5/4/2023, answer due 5/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Molly Stephens, Attorney, authorized to accept service for Defendant Michel R. Moore in his individual capacity in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Olney, Brian) (Entered: 05/04/2023)

RECAP
42 May 5, 2023

NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) 41 . The following error(s) was/were found: Judge's initials are incorrect. Correct initials are JGB(SPx). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) (Entered: 05/05/2023)

RECAP
43 May 9, 2023

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Amended Complaint/Petition 38 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Molly C Stephens added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Molly C Stephens added to party Michel R Moore(pty:dft))(Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 05/09/2023)

RECAP
44 May 15, 2023

ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Stipulation for Extension of Time For The City of Los Angeles to Respond to the First Amended Complaint 43 . Extended by 10 days, from May 15, 2023 to May 25, 2023, such that the deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint for both the City of Los Angeles and Michel R. Moore, constituting all remaining defendants, shall be May 25, 2023. (twdb) (Entered: 05/16/2023)

RECAP
45 May 25, 2023

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. Motion set for hearing on 6/26/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities) (Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 05/25/2023)

RECAP
46 May 25, 2023

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 45 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L)(Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 05/25/2023)

RECAP
47 May 25, 2023

[PROPOSED] ORDER re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 45 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 05/25/2023)

RECAP
48 June 5, 2023

OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 45 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 06/05/2023)

RECAP
49 June 12, 2023

REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 45 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 06/12/2023)

RECAP
50 June 12, 2023

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 45 (Supplemental) filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M, # 2 Exhibit N)(Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 06/12/2023)

RECAP
51 June 13, 2023

EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Ordering Release of Plaintiff's Vehicle filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed TRO Order, # 2 Proposed Order to Show Cause) (Moore, Charles) (Entered: 06/13/2023)

RECAP
52 June 13, 2023

DECLARATION of Charles Moore In Support Of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Ordering Release of Plaintiff's Vehicle 51 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I)(Moore, Charles) (Entered: 06/13/2023)

RECAP
53 June 14, 2023

OPPOSITION to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Ordering Release of Plaintiff's Vehicle 51 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 06/14/2023)

RECAP
54 June 14, 2023

DECLARATION of Molly Stephens in Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Ordering Release of Plaintiff's Vehicle 51 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 06/14/2023)

RECAP
55 June 16, 2023

REPLY in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Ordering Release of Plaintiff's Vehicle 51 filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Charles Moore, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Moore, Charles) (Entered: 06/16/2023)

RECAP
56 June 16, 2023

NOTICE OF FACTS NOT DISCLOSED BY PLAINTIFF IN TRO re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Ordering Release of Plaintiff's Vehicle 51 filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Michel R Moore. (Stephens, Molly) (Entered: 06/16/2023)

RECAP
57 June 20, 2023

MINUTES OF ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DKT. NO. 51) AND (2) ORDERING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. For the reasons above, the Court DENIES the Second TRO WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer by June 23, 2023. They shall file a joint status report and/or stipulation indicating they have resolved the issues raised by the Second TRO, or explaining why they are unable to do so, by June 26, 2023. (See document for further details).; denying 51 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order. (aco) (Entered: 06/20/2023)

RECAP
58 June 23, 2023

SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. On the Court's own motion, the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 45 ), is hereby CONTINUED from June 26, 2023, to July 10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/23/2023)

RECAP
June 23, 2023

Text Only Scheduling Notice

59 June 26, 2023

STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 06/26/2023)

RECAP
60 June 30, 2023

STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Bailey, Leslie) (Entered: 06/30/2023)

RECAP
61 July 7, 2023

[WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO #62] REQUEST for Order for to Attend Hearing Remotely via Telephone or Zoom filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. Request set for hearing on 7/10/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Moore, Charles) Modified on 7/10/2023 (twdb). (Entered: 07/07/2023)

RECAP
62 July 7, 2023

Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Order 61 filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Moore, Charles) (Entered: 07/07/2023)

RECAP
63 July 7, 2023

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: (1) DENYING AS MOOT Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 45); and (2) CLOSING Case 45 . All previously set deadlines and dates are hereby VACATED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (twdb) (Entered: 07/07/2023)

RECAP
64 Aug. 3, 2023

STIPULATION to Continue Deadline to File Motion to Reopen Case or File Notice of Dismissal from August 4, 2023 to October 3, 2023 filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Moore, Charles) (Entered: 08/03/2023)

RECAP
65 Aug. 29, 2023

ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Motion to Reopen Case or File Notice of Dismissal 64 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) (Entered: 08/29/2023)

RECAP
66 Sept. 8, 2023

Notice of Dismissal of Claims as to Defendants City of Los Angeles and Michel R. Moore filed by plaintiff Phillip Urquidi. (Moore, Charles) (Entered: 09/08/2023)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Policing

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 14, 2022

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs are six of the many people who are lawfully arrested in Los Angeles County by police officials without a warrant and then held in jail for a period of time before a judge determines whether and under what conditions the arrestee may be released pending further judicial proceedings.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

City

Chief of LAPD

City of Los Angeles

County

County of Los Angeles

LASD

Sheriff of Los Angeles County

State

California Attorney General

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

State law

Other Dockets:

California state trial court 22STCP0400

California state appellate court 22STCP04044

Central District of California 2:23-cv-02568

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

Policing:

Over/Unlawful Detention (policing)

Recommended Citation