Case: Public Citizen, Inc. v. Trump

1:25-cv-00164 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Jan. 20, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On January 20, 2025, after President Trump signed an executive order to establish the federal "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), two non-profit organizations (Public Citizen, Inc. and State Democracy Defenders Fund) and an organization representing federal government employees (American Federation of Government Employees), filed this lawsuit against Trump and the Office of Management and Budget challenging the legality of DOGE under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The case…

On January 20, 2025, after President Trump signed an executive order to establish the federal "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), two non-profit organizations (Public Citizen, Inc. and State Democracy Defenders Fund) and an organization representing federal government employees (American Federation of Government Employees), filed this lawsuit against Trump and the Office of Management and Budget challenging the legality of DOGE under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The case was assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. This is one of three cases challenging DOGE under FACA (see also American Public Health Association v. Office of Management and Budget (1:25-cv-00167) and Lentini v. Department of Government Efficiency (1:25-cv-00166)). (To see the Clearinghouse's collection on challenges to the second Trump Administration, click here.)

In their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that DOGE, led by Trump-appointee Elon Musk, is an advisory group and therefore required to meet FACA requirements, but was failing to do so. FACA is a 1972 federal statute that authorizes presidential administrations to set up advisory groups of members from the private sector but sets procedural requirements to prevent the advancement of private interests in the federal decision-making process. Among its safeguards, FACA requires that executive advisory groups have open meetings, include members with differing points of view, and make public their work product and records.

The plaintiffs alleged that President Trump solicited work from DOGE—directing DOGE to make its recommendations by July 4, 2026—but Trump did not acknowledge that DOGE, as an advisory group, requires a charter to operate; that DOGE must include members with differing points of view, or that DOGE’s operations must be transparent. 

In relief, the plaintiffs seek acknowledgment by the defendants that DOGE violates FACA; enjoinment of DOGE’s operation as an advisory committee—its meetings and advising of the President—unless DOGE is in compliance with FACA;  filing of a charter; compliance with FACA's viewpoint balance requirements; compliance with other FACA obligations including notice for meetings and public transparency; attorney’s fees, costs, and other expenditures; and any other appropriate relief. 

On February 4, 2025, the defendants moved to consolidate this case, American Public Health Association v. Office of Management and Budget (1:25-cv-00167), and Lentini v. Department of Government Efficiency (1:25-cv-00166), alleging that all three cases involve the same legal issue and claims and are in the same stage of litigation.  

On February 18, 2025, this case was consolidated with American Public Health Association  and Lentini—and all filings going forward are under this case, Public Citizen. Developments in the consolidated cases will be documented here.  

On March 3, 2025, the Public Citizen plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal of their action without prejudice. 

On March 3, 2025, the Lentini plaintiffs (two individuals and National Security Counselors, Inc.) filed a motion for expedited discovery and, on March 5, filed a motion to expedite briefing and adjudication of their motion for expedited discovery. The court denied the motion for expedited briefing on March 6, explaining that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently explain an emergency requiring expedited briefing and that the defendants said they would not be able to meet expedited briefing deadlines. On March 17, the defendants filed an opposition to the motion for expedited discovery. On March 25, Judge Cobb denied the Lentini plaintiffs' motion for expedited discovery. 

On April 11, 2025, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice Lentini and American Public Health Association for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The plaintiffs' opposition is due by May 13 and any reply from the defendants is due by May 28. 

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Sylvia Al-Mateen (4/21/2025)

Related Cases

American Public Health Association v. Office of Management and Budget, District of District of Columbia (2025)

Lentini v. Department of Government Efficiency, District of District of Columbia (2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69559444/parties/public-citizen-inc-v-trump/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Joshi, Nandan M. (District of Columbia)

McClanahan, Kelly Brian (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Deffebach, Anna Lynn (District of Columbia)

Holt, Samuel (District of Columbia)

Humphreys, Bradley P. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-00164

Complaint

Jan. 20, 2025

Jan. 20, 2025

Complaint
10

1:25-cv-00164

Motion to Consolidate Cases

Feb. 4, 2025

Feb. 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
20

1:25-cv-00164

Plaintiffs' Motion for Expedited Discovery

Lentini v. Department of Government Efficiency

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
22

1:25-cv-00164

Notice of New Evidence

Lentini v. Department of Government Efficiency

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
23

1:25-cv-00164

Motion to Expedite

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

31

1:25-cv-00164

Order on Motion for Discovery

March 25, 2025

March 25, 2025

33

1:25-cv-00164

Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction

April 11, 2025

April 11, 2025

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69559444/public-citizen-inc-v-trump/

Last updated April 22, 2025, 7:40 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11416485) filed by PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons Atty Gen, # 3 Summons Donald Trump, # 4 Summons OMB, # 5 Summons USAO - DC)(Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 01/20/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

2 Summons Atty Gen

View on RECAP

3 Summons Donald Trump

View on RECAP

4 Summons OMB

View on RECAP

5 Summons USAO - DC

View on RECAP

Jan. 20, 2025

Jan. 20, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 01/20/2025)

Jan. 20, 2025

Jan. 20, 2025

RECAP
3

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 01/20/2025)

Jan. 20, 2025

Jan. 20, 2025

RECAP
4

NOTICE of Appearance by Nicolas Sansone on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Sansone, Nicolas) (Entered: 01/20/2025)

Jan. 20, 2025

Jan. 20, 2025

RECAP

Case Assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. (zmtm)

Jan. 21, 2025

Jan. 21, 2025

PACER
5

SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 01/21/2025)

1 Notice and Consent

View on RECAP

Jan. 21, 2025

Jan. 21, 2025

RECAP
6

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Plaintiffs. Case related to Case No. 25-166 & 25-167. (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 01/21/2025)

Jan. 21, 2025

Jan. 21, 2025

Clearinghouse
7

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/21/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/22/2025. (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 01/22/2025)

Jan. 22, 2025

Jan. 22, 2025

RECAP
8

NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley P. Humphreys on behalf of All Defendants (Humphreys, Bradley) (Entered: 01/31/2025)

Jan. 31, 2025

Jan. 31, 2025

RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Anna Lynn Deffebach on behalf of All Defendants (Deffebach, Anna) (Entered: 02/04/2025)

Feb. 4, 2025

Feb. 4, 2025

PACER
10

MOTION to Consolidate Cases by DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Humphreys, Bradley) (Entered: 02/04/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Feb. 4, 2025

Feb. 4, 2025

Clearinghouse
11

LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Harold P. Kupersmit, Notice of Intervention This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to File Denied, This Motion does not comply with local civil rule 7(m).". Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 2/13/2025. (zdp) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

Feb. 13, 2025

Feb. 13, 2025

PACER
12

LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Harold P. Kupersmit, DOGE This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED. This motion does not comply with Local Civil Rule 7(m)". Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 2/13/2025. (zdp) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

Feb. 13, 2025

Feb. 13, 2025

PACER
13

Memorandum in opposition to re 10 Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 02/18/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Feb. 18, 2025

Feb. 18, 2025

RECAP

MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Motion to Consolidate Cases: Defendants move to consolidate Case Nos. 25-cv-164, 25-cv-166, and 25-cv-167. Having considered the motion 10 and Plaintiffs' opposition 13, the Court GRANTS the motion. The parties shall make all future filings in this case (25-cv-164) and shall not "spread text."

Feb. 18, 2025

Feb. 18, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Motion to Consolidate Cases: Defendants move to consolidate Case Nos. 25-cv-164, 25-cv-166, and 25-cv-167. Having considered the motion 10 and Plaintiffs' opposition 13, the Court GRANTS the motion. The parties shall make all future filings in this case (25-cv-164) and shall not "spread text." A district court may consolidate actions that "involve a common question of law or fact," Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), which the parties agree is the case here. See ECF 13 at 3 ("As the government correctly observes, all three cases concern the applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)."); ECF 10 at 3-4. Further, consolidating these three cases would "promote convenience and judicial economy, simplify management of the cases...and conserve judicial resources." Singh v. Carter, 185 F. Supp. 3d 11, 18 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Steele v. United States, No. 14-CV-1523, 2015 WL 4121607, at *2 (D.D.C. June 30, 2015)). Managing a single, streamlined docket allows the Court to communicate effectively with all parties simultaneously, especially given that all three cases are in a similar procedural posture.Plaintiffs' only objection to consolidation is that it would be difficult for them to "file joint papers and act as one going forward." ECF 13 at 3. Accordingly, and because each set of Plaintiffs represents a distinct group, the Court will consolidate these cases - but that does not require Plaintiffs to proceed as one. Each set of Plaintiffs will have leave to file its own motions and briefs unless the Court orders otherwise. Defendants may move for leave to file a single, consolidated response to Plaintiffs' pleadings or future motions, if they prefer, and the Court will grant Defendants leave to exceed the usual page limits if necessary. The Court will address any proposed limitations on discovery at any future scheduling conference. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on February 18, 2025. (lcjmc2)

Feb. 18, 2025

Feb. 18, 2025

PACER

Cases Consolidated: The following cases have been consolidated with this case: 25cv166 and 25cv167. pursuant to Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases,. From this date forward, all pleadings shall be filed ONLY in this case. Parties are advised NOT to elect the SPREAD TEXT option when filing in ECF, as this will result in repetitive docketing. (zdp)

Feb. 18, 2025

Feb. 18, 2025

PACER
14

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 1/28/2025. (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 02/19/2025)

Feb. 19, 2025

Feb. 19, 2025

PACER

Remark- Consolidation

Feb. 19, 2025

Feb. 19, 2025

PACER
15

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET served on 2/19/2025 (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 02/19/2025)

Feb. 19, 2025

Feb. 19, 2025

PACER
16

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DONALD J. TRUMP served on 2/19/2025 (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 02/19/2025)

Feb. 19, 2025

Feb. 19, 2025

RECAP
17

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Skye L. Perryman, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11497419. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICA, VOTEVETS ACTION FUND, THE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, INC., CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Perryman Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Perryman DC Bar COGS, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Seel, Benjamin) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

1 Exhibit Perryman Declaration

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Perryman DC Bar COGS

View on RECAP

3 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: Attorney Skye L. Perryman is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear in this matter. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on February 21, 2025. (lcjmc2)

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

PACER
18

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICA, VOTEVETS ACTION FUND, THE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, INC., CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON. Attorney Benjamin M. Seel terminated. (Seel, Benjamin) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

Feb. 24, 2025

Feb. 24, 2025

RECAP
19

NOTICE of Appearance by Skye Perryman on behalf of AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICA, VOTEVETS ACTION FUND, THE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, INC., CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON (Perryman, Skye) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

Feb. 24, 2025

Feb. 24, 2025

RECAP
20

MOTION for Discovery (Expedited) by JERALD LENTINI, JOSHUA ERLICH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

Clearinghouse
21

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal re Public Citizen, State Democracy Defenders Fund, and American Federation of Government Employees by PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (Joshi, Nandan) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

RECAP

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 20 MOTION for Discovery (Expedited). Please note the following for future filings: Documents in consolidated cases must include all relevant case numbers and case captions. Do not refile.(znmw)

March 3, 2025

March 3, 2025

PACER
22

NOTICE of New Evidence by JERALD LENTINI, JOSHUA ERLICH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS re 20 Motion for Discovery (McClanahan, Kelly) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Clearinghouse
23

MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Adjudication of Motion for Expedited Discovery by JERALD LENTINI, JOSHUA ERLICH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

Clearinghouse

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

PACER
24

NOTICE of Defendants' Position by JERALD LENTINI, JOSHUA ERLICH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS re 23 Motion to Expedite (McClanahan, Kelly) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

RECAP
25

Memorandum in opposition to re 23 Motion to Expedite filed by DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Deffebach, Anna) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

RECAP

MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiffs have filed a motion 20 for expedited discovery. Defendants' response to that motion would otherwise be due March 17, 2025, but Plaintiffs have filed a motion 23 for expedited briefing - which they request that Defendants respond to by 12 PM tomorrow, March 6, 2025. Because Defendants have represented that they intend to respond to Plaintiffs' motion 23 for expedited briefing within 48 hours, see ECF 24, and the Court cannot discern any grounds in Plaintiffs' motion for any even more expeditious response, the Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file any opposition to Plaintiffs' 23 motion to expedite briefing by March 7, 2025. In addition to any arguments about the need for an expedited briefing schedule, Defendants' opposition shall include their position as to the earliest date by which Defendants could feasibly respond to Plaintiffs' motion 20 for expedited discovery. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on March 5, 2025. (lcjmc2)

March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER denying 23 motion to expedite briefing: The Lentini Plaintiffs request expedited briefing on their 20 motion for expedited discovery, stating that "the factual background of this case is in a constant state of flux" and referencing a forthcoming motion for preliminary injunction. ECF 23 at 2. Plaintiffs have not explained, with clarity, the nature of any emergency here that would require the Court to compel Defendants to respond more rapidly than the default rules provide for. In any event, Defendants' counsel has indicated that, given counsel's upcoming deadlines in other matters, an expedited briefing schedule would be infeasible.

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion to Expedite AND Set/Reset Deadlines

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER denying 23 motion to expedite briefing: The Lentini Plaintiffs request expedited briefing on their 20 motion for expedited discovery, stating that "the factual background of this case is in a constant state of flux" and referencing a forthcoming motion for preliminary injunction. ECF 23 at 2. Plaintiffs have not explained, with clarity, the nature of any emergency here that would require the Court to compel Defendants to respond more rapidly than the default rules provide for. In any event, Defendants' counsel has indicated that, given counsel's upcoming deadlines in other matters, an expedited briefing schedule would be infeasible. The Court therefore finds it appropriate to allow Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' 20 motion for expedited discovery in the normal course. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs' 23 motion to expedite briefing is DENIED, and that Defendants shall file any opposition to Plaintiffs' 20 motion for expedited discovery by March 17, 2025. Plaintiffs are free to file any subsequent reply earlier than the default rules require so that the Court may rule expeditiously. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall confer and file a notice on the docket by March 12, 2025 indicating their mutual availability for a hearing on Plaintiffs' 20 motion, to be held once Plaintiffs' motion is fully briefed at the Court's discretion (should the Court determine that such a hearing would be appropriate and helpful after full briefing). Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on March 6, 2025. (lcjmc2)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 23 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Adjudication of Motion for Expedited Discovery, 22 Notice (Other), 24 Notice Documents in consolidated cases must include all relevant case numbers and case captions. Do not refile(zdp)

March 10, 2025

March 10, 2025

PACER
26

NOTICE Joint Notice of Mutual Availability for a Hearing by DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET (Deffebach, Anna) (Entered: 03/11/2025)

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

RECAP
27

Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule by DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET. (Attachments: (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Deffebach, Anna)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

RECAP

MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Joint Motion for Briefing Schedule: Having considered the motion, and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion and enters the following briefing schedule. Defendants shall file their motion to dismiss by April 11, 2025; Plaintiffs shall file their opposition(s) by May 13, 2025; and Defendants shall file any reply by May 28, 2025. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on March 14, 2025. (lcjmc2)

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Briefing Schedule AND Set/Reset Deadlines

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

PACER
28

Memorandum in opposition to re 20 Motion for Discovery filed by DONALD J. TRUMP, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Humphreys, Bradley) (Entered: 03/17/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

RECAP
29

REPLY to opposition to motion re 20 Motion for Discovery filed by JERALD LENTINI, JOSHUA ERLICH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Thune email, # 2 Exhibit B - Miller-Meeks email, # 3 Exhibit C - Nehls letter)(McClanahan, Kelly) (Entered: 03/19/2025)

1 Exhibit A - Thune email

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B - Miller-Meeks email

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit C - Nehls letter

View on RECAP

March 19, 2025

March 19, 2025

RECAP
30

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by JERALD LENTINI, JOSHUA ERLICH, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D - Arnold letter)(McClanahan, Kelly) (Entered: 03/22/2025)

1 Exhibit D - Arnold letter

View on RECAP

March 22, 2025

March 22, 2025

RECAP
31

ORDER denying 20 Lentini Plaintiffs' Motion for Expedited Discovery. See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on March 25, 2025. (lcjmc2) (Entered: 03/25/2025)

March 25, 2025

March 25, 2025

Clearinghouse
32

NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Holt on behalf of All Defendants (Holt, Samuel)

April 10, 2025

April 10, 2025

PACER
33

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim by OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET, DONALD J. TRUMP. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Holt, Samuel) (Entered: 04/11/2025)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

3 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

April 11, 2025

April 11, 2025

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Appointments/Civil Service)

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (DOGE Status/Information Access)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 20, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two non-profit organizations, Public Citizen, Inc. and State Democracy Defenders Fund, and an organization representing federal government employees, American Federation of Government Employees.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Federal

United States, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Mandamus, 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq.

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency)