Case: United States v. State of Illinois

01:25-cv-01285 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Feb. 6, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case concerns the enforcement of federal immigration laws and the extent to which state and local laws can hinder this enforcement. It followed Executive Order 14159: Protecting the American People Against Invasion, as well as Congress' passage of the Laken Riley Act. On February 6, 2025, the United States of America filed this civil action via the Department of Justice's Civil Division and Office of Immigration Litigation in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern D…

This case concerns the enforcement of federal immigration laws and the extent to which state and local laws can hinder this enforcement. It followed Executive Order 14159: Protecting the American People Against Invasion, as well as Congress' passage of the Laken Riley Act.

On February 6, 2025, the United States of America filed this civil action via the Department of Justice's Civil Division and Office of Immigration Litigation in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiff named the State of Illinois, the City of Chicago, and other local and state officials as Defendants. Plaintiff argued that the combined “sanctuary city laws” of defendants (including the Illinois Way Forward Act, Illinois TRUST Act, Chicago Welcoming City Act) were designed to obstruct the Federal Government's enforcement of federal immigration law by protecting the information of noncitizens in their jurisdiction. The complaint alleged that these laws limited cooperation between state and local law enforcement and federal immigration officials, thereby impeding the detention and removal of aliens, including those who are dangerous criminals. They claimed that the conduct of officials in Chicago and Illinois resulted in criminals being released who should have been held for immigration removal from the United States. Plaintiff asked the Court to declare that the challenged provisions violate the Supremacy Clause and 8 U.S.C. § 1373, which bars local jurisdictions from interfering with federal immigration enforcement, and to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions. 

On February 6, 2025, the case was assigned to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. 

On March 4, 2025, Defendants filed separate motions to dismiss, alleging that all of the plaintiff's claims failed as a matter of law. The defendants Cook County and the County Board of Commissioners also filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on April 14, 2025. 

On July 25, 2025, the court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss. 2025 WL 2098688. The court found that the U.S. had standing to bring this suit against some of the defendants, since it "alleged enough plausible facts to show that there is a real and imminent threat that it will be injured through the Sanctuary Policies’ continued implementation." However, the court found that the U.S. had failed to show standing with regard to the individual defendants, given its lack of allegations showing that the individual defendants enforced the sanctuary policies. 

Turning to the merits, the court found that certain information-sharing laws were not preempted since Section 1373 only pertains to information regarding a person's legal classification under federal law, while the state laws do not restrict employees from sharing this information. Second, even if the state laws were preempted under Section 1373(a), the court found that Section 1373(a) was not a preemptive statute "because it doesn't regulate private actors in language or effect. Under Supreme Court cases, a preemptive statute must regulate private actors, not states. 

Next, the court examined whether the state's laws posed an illegal "obstacle" to federal law. The court found that the state's regulations did not pose an obstacle to the INA because it "gives States the option to share information but does not require it." The court also ruled that if the INA did require the sharing of information by states, then it would run afoul of the anticommandeering doctrine, since it "would dictate what a state legislature may and may not do." 

Finally, the court rejected the U.S.'s argument that the sanctuary policies unlawfully discriminated against and regulated the federal government. First, the court said the U.S. failed to give an example of a class of state employees that the policies treated preferentially over federal immigration enforcement. "It is doubtful that a comparator exists, for the United States concedes that only the federal government enforces civil immigration law." Finally, the court rejected the argument that the policies directly regulated the federal government. 

Given its findings, the court originally dismissed the complaint without prejudice but gave the U.S. permission to amend its complaint if it wished to do so. As the U.S. did not filed an amended complaint, Judge Jenkins dismissed the lawsuit.  On October 24, 2025, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal.  The appeal, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, remains pending. 

Summary Authors

Aanvi Jhaveri (5/8/2025)

Jeremiah Price (7/28/2025)

Nithya Arun (1/30/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69616357/parties/united-states-v-state-of-illinois/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney, Daniel Tenny, (Illinois)

Attorney, Elisabeth J. (Illinois)

Attorney, J. Kain (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Attorney, Jessica M. (Illinois)

Attorney, Alex Hemmer, (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

01:25-cv-01285

Complaint

Feb. 6, 2025

Feb. 6, 2025

Complaint
24

01:25-cv-01285

The State of Illinois and Governor Pritzker's Rule 12(B) Motion to Dismiss

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
25

01:25-cv-01285

Memorandum in Support of the State of Illinois and Governor Pritzker's Motion to Dismiss

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
28

01:25-cv-01285

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1) & (B)(6) Filed by Cook County

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
30

01:25-cv-01285

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1) and 12(b)(6) Filed by Cook County Board of Commissioners and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
31

01:25-cv-01285

Motion to Dismiss Filed by Cook County Sheriff Thomas J. Dart's Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6)

March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
86

01:25-cv-01285

Memorandum Opinion and Order

United States of America v. State of Illinois

July 25, 2025

July 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 2098688

88

01:25-cv-01285

Judgment in a Civil Case

United States of America v. State of Illinois

Aug. 26, 2025

Aug. 26, 2025

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69616357/united-states-v-state-of-illinois/

Last updated Sept. 8, 2026, 4:12 a.m.

Docket for: United States v. State of Illinois
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 6, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 02/06/2025)

Clearinghouse
2 Feb. 6, 2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 02/06/2025)

RECAP
3 Feb. 6, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by Elisabeth Jo Neylan (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 02/06/2025)

RECAP
4 Feb. 6, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In person initial status hearing set for April 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2119. Initial Status Report shall be filed by April 8, 2025. The report should comply with the requirements set forth in the Initial Status Report standing order, which can be found at Judge Jenkins's web page @ (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov, "District Judges", to "Judge Lindsay Jenkins", to "Initial Status Hearings" under Case Management Procedures"). The parties must follow all the standing orders for Judge Jenkins and all Local Rules, which can be found at the same web page. At the Initial Status hearing, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; and (3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 02/06/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 6, 2025

case assigned

Feb. 6, 2025

clerk's notice

Feb. 6, 2025

summons issued

Feb. 6, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (dec, )

Feb. 6, 2025

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dec, )

Feb. 6, 2025

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City Of Chicago, Cook County, THOMAS DART, Brandon Johnson, Toni Preckwinkle, in her official capacity as County Board of Commissioners President, J. B. Pritzker, Larry Snelling, State of Illinois, cook county board of commissioners (khg, )

5 Feb. 13, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois by Christopher Graham Wells (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

RECAP
6 Feb. 13, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois by Alex Hemmer (Hemmer, Alex) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

RECAP
7 Feb. 13, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois by Alexandra Lane Reed (Reed, Alexandra) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

RECAP
8 Feb. 13, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois by Darren Bernens Kinkead (Kinkead, Darren) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

RECAP
9 Feb. 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling by Andrew W Worseck (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
10 Feb. 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Jessica Megan Scheller (Scheller, Jessica) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
11 Feb. 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Prathima Yeddanapudi (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
12 Feb. 14, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America as to All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Affidavit, # 3 Affidavit, # 4 Affidavit, # 5 Affidavit, # 6 Affidavit, # 7 Affidavit, # 8 Affidavit, # 9 Affidavit, # 10 Affidavit, # 11 Affidavit)(Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
13 Feb. 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Jonathon D. Byrer (Byrer, Jonathon) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
14 Feb. 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling by Emily A Vernon (Vernon, Emily) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
15 Feb. 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling by Amie Leann Medley (Medley, Amie) (Entered: 02/14/2025)

RECAP
16 Feb. 18, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling by Ellen Wight Mclaughlin (Mclaughlin, Ellen) (Entered: 02/18/2025)

RECAP
17 Feb. 18, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Megan Marie Honingford (Honingford, Megan) (Entered: 02/18/2025)

RECAP
18 Feb. 24, 2025

MOTION by Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois for leave to file excess pages (Unopposed) (Kinkead, Darren) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

RECAP
19 Feb. 25, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion by the State of Illinois for excess pages 18 is granted. Any motion the State intends to file should, if possible, include an agreed proposed briefing schedule consistent with the Court's standing order. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 02/25/2025)

RECAP
20 Feb. 28, 2025

MOTION by Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois to set a briefing schedule for Defendants' Forthcoming Motions to Dismiss and for Leave to File Oversize Briefs (Jointly Filed) (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
21 Feb. 28, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for an extension and for excess pages 20 is granted. The Court imposes the following agreed briefing schedule on the motions to dismiss: The State, City, and County Defendants each have until March 4, 2025 to file any Rule 12(b) motion. The government's response is due by April 1, 2025; any replies are due by April 29, 2025. Opening motions by any Defendant may not exceed 25 pages. The government should request an appropriate page extension after the dismissal motions are filed. Emailed notice (cn). (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
22 Feb. 28, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle by Prathima Yeddanapudi (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
23 Feb. 28, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle by Jessica Megan Scheller (Scheller, Jessica) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
24 March 4, 2025

MOTION by Defendants State of Illinois, J. B. Pritzker to dismiss Rule 12(B) (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

Clearinghouse
25 March 4, 2025

MEMORANDUM by J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois in support of motion to dismiss 24 (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

Clearinghouse
26 March 4, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Edward M. Brener (Brener, Edward) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
27 March 4, 2025

MOTION by Defendant Cook County to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Cook County Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
28 March 4, 2025

MEMORANDUM by Cook County in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 27 (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

Clearinghouse
29 March 4, 2025

MOTION by Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Toni Preckwinkle to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Toni Preckwinkle Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
30 March 4, 2025

MEMORANDUM by County Board of Commissioners, Toni Preckwinkle in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction,, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 29 (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

Clearinghouse
31 March 4, 2025

MOTION by Defendant Thomas Dart to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Thomas Dart Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

Clearinghouse
32 March 4, 2025

MEMORANDUM by Thomas Dart in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 31 (Yeddanapudi, Prathima) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
33 March 4, 2025

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
34 March 4, 2025

NOTICE by City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling 33 Notice of Unconstitutionality (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
35 March 4, 2025

MEMORANDUM by City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 33 (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 03/04/2025)

RECAP
36 March 5, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Silvia Mercado Masters (Masters, Silvia) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

RECAP
37 March 5, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County by Jessica Wasserman (Wasserman, Jessica) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

RECAP
38 March 5, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the motions to dismiss, the April 15, 2025 initial status hearing is stricken and no initial status report need be filed by April 8, 2025. The Court will set appropriate dates following its ruling on the pending motions. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

RECAP
39 March 20, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-23235065. (Gaiser, Thomas) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
40 March 20, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Motion to appear pro hac vice 39 is granted. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
41 March 21, 2025

MOTION by Amicus State of Ohio for leave to file Brief of Amici Curiae (Gaiser, Thomas) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

RECAP
42 March 25, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Amicus Parties ACLU of Illinois, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Mujeres Latinas en Accion, National Immigrant Justice Center by Rebecca Kim Glenberg (Glenberg, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/25/2025)

RECAP
43 March 25, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Amicus Parties ACLU of Illinois, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Mujeres Latinas en Accion, National Immigrant Justice Center by Michelle Teresa Garcia (Garcia, Michelle) (Entered: 03/25/2025)

RECAP
44 March 25, 2025

MOTION by Amicus Parties ACLU of Illinois, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Mujeres Latinas en Accion, National Immigrant Justice Center for leave to file Brief of Amici Curiae (Attachments: # 1 EXHIBIT A)(Glenberg, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/25/2025)

RECAP
45 March 28, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff United States of America for leave to file excess pages and leave to file a consolidated memorandum, MOTION by Plaintiff United States of America to set a briefing schedule for its anticipated cross-motion for summary judgment (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 03/28/2025)

RECAP
46 March 28, 2025

MOTION by Amicus Parties Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Organized Communities Against Deportations, Raise the Floor AllianceMOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICI CURIAE BRIEF ON BEHALF OF BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS, ORGANIZED COMMUNITIES AGAINST DEPORTATIONS AND RAISE THE FLOOR ALLIANCE (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Bedi, Sheila) (Entered: 03/28/2025)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

RECAP
47 March 31, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for leave 46 is partly granted. The United States' forthcoming consolidated brief in response to the motions to dismiss may not exceed 45 pages. Defendants' replies remain due by April 29, 2025. The United States also anticipates filing a motion for summary judgment, but Defendants oppose this approach and have asked for an opportunity to explain their reasons. Any response from Defendants (ideally in a single consolidated filing representing all views) is due by April 4, 2025, and that filing should include an alternative briefing schedule to the one the United States has proposed. For now, no summary judgment motion should be filed so that the Court can take Defendants' positions into account and set the appropriate schedule thereafter. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
48 March 31, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motions for leave to file an amici curiae brief 41 44 45 are all granted. Any amici briefs by the moving entities are due no later than April 8, 2025. Those amici who attached their proposed briefs to their motions should file their briefs as a freestanding docket entry no later than April 8, 2025. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
49 March 31, 2025

Brief of Amici Curiae by ACLU of Illinois, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Mujeres Latinas en Accion, National Immigrant Justice Center (Glenberg, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
50 April 1, 2025

RESPONSE by United States of Americain Opposition to MOTION by Defendants State of Illinois, J. B. Pritzker to dismiss Rule 12(B) 24, MOTION by Defendant Cook County to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Cook County Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 27, MOTION by Defendant Thomas Dart to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Thomas Dart Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 31, MOTION by Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Toni Preckwinkle to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Toni Preckwinkle Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 29, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling 33 (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/01/2025)

RECAP
51 April 2, 2025

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS, ORGANIZED COMMUNITIES AGAINST DEPORTATIONS AND RAISE THE FLOOR ALLIANCE by Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Organized Communities Against Deportations, Raise the Floor Alliance, Brighton Park Neighborhood Council (Bedi, Sheila) (Entered: 04/02/2025)

RECAP
52 April 3, 2025

ENTERED IN ERROR (Entered: 04/03/2025)

RECAP
53 April 4, 2025

RESPONSE by Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois to order on motion for miscellaneous relief,,,, text entry,,, 47 Defendants' Combined Response re: Plaintiff's Request for Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 04/04/2025)

RECAP
54 April 7, 2025

NOTICE by United States of America of Intent to File a Reply In Support of Motion to File a Consolidated Memorandum and to Set a Briefing Schedule, ECF No. 45 (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/07/2025)

RECAP
55 April 8, 2025

BRIEF filed by State of Ohio and 22 Other States (Gaiser, Thomas) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

RECAP
56 April 8, 2025

REPLY by United States of America to Response, 53, MOTION by Plaintiff United States of America for leave to file excess pages and leave to file a consolidated memorandum MOTION by Plaintiff United States of America to set a briefing schedule for its anticipated cross-motion for summary judgment 45 (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

RECAP
57 April 9, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the United States' acknowledgement that the motion to file a consolidated brief is moot given that it has already filed its response to Defendants' motions to dismiss, see Dkt. 50; Dkt. 56 at 4 n.3, the motion for leave to file a consolidated memorandum and to set a briefing schedule for a cross-motion for summary judgment 45 is denied. The United States may file a cross-motion for summary judgment "at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(b). Any motion it files must comply with Local Rule 56.1. However, the Court will not set a briefing schedule for summary judgment at this time given that the parties have not agreed on whether discovery is needed, and no discovery has taken place. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) (explaining the court may allow parties time to "obtain affidavits or declarations or to take discovery"); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 n.5 (1986) ("[S]ummary judgment [may] be refused where the nonmoving party has not had the opportunity to discover information that is essential to his opposition."). Defendants will have one week after any motion for summary judgment is filed to advise the Court, preferably through a single consolidated filing, as to their position on a briefing schedule and discovery in accordance with Rule 56(d). Defendants' replies in support of its motions to dismiss remain due by April 29, 2025. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

RECAP
58 April 14, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff United States of America for summary judgment (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
59 April 14, 2025

MEMORANDUM by United States of America in support of motion for summary judgment 58 (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
60 April 14, 2025

RULE 56 (c)(4) Statement by United States of America regarding motion for summary judgment 58 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Samuel J. Olson)(Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

1 Declaration Declaration of Samuel J. Olson

View on RECAP

RECAP
61 April 15, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants have until April 22, 2025 to advise the Court, preferably through a single consolidated filing, as to their position on a briefing schedule and discovery in light of the United States' motion for summary judgment. No replies are permitted unless the Court requests a reply. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/15/2025)

RECAP
62 April 22, 2025

RESPONSE by Defendants City Of Chicago, Cook County, County Board of Commissioners, Thomas Dart, Brandon Johnson, Toni Preckwinkle, J. B. Pritzker, Larry Snelling, State of Illinois to set deadlines, 61 Defendants' Consolidated Response to the Court's April 15 Order re: Summary Judgment Briefing and Discovery (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Rule 56(d) Declaration of Prathima Yeddanapudi)(Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 04/22/2025)

1 Declaration Rule 56(d) Declaration of Prathima Yeddanapudi

View on PACER

RECAP
63 April 23, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Immigration Reform Law Institute by Christopher Hajec; Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-23386307. (Hajec, Christopher) (Entered: 04/23/2025)

RECAP
64 April 23, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Immigration Reform Law Institute by Christopher Hajec; Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-23386811. (Hajec, Christopher) (Duplicate filing of entry no. 63) Modified on 4/24/2025 (rc, ). (Entered: 04/23/2025)

RECAP
65 April 23, 2025

MOTION by Amicus Immigration Reform Law Institute for leave to file Amicus Memorandum (Attachments: # 1 Amicus Memorandum, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hajec, Christopher) (Entered: 04/23/2025)

RECAP
66 April 23, 2025

REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 150, receipt no. AILNDC-23386811, regarding motion to appear pro hac vice 64 United States v. Illinois (Hajec, Christopher) (Entered: 04/23/2025)

RECAP
67 April 24, 2025

REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 150, receipt no. AILNDC-23386811, regarding motion to appear pro hac vice 64 United States v. Illinois (Hajec, Christopher) 66 (td, ) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

RECAP
68 April 24, 2025

MINUTE entry be fore the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motions to appear pro hac vice 63 64 are granted. The motion for leave to file an amicus 65 is granted. Counsel shall file the amicus memorandum as a freestanding docket entry by no later than April 28, 2025. (lp, ) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

RECAP
69 April 24, 2025

MEMORANDUM by Immigration Reform Law Institute as Amicus in Support of Plaintiff (Hajec, Christopher) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

RECAP
70 April 28, 2025

MOTION by Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois for leave to file excess pages State Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File 20-Page Reply re: Motion to Dismiss (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

RECAP
71 April 28, 2025

MOTION by Defendant Cook County for leave to file excess pages (Brener, Edward) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

RECAP
72 April 28, 2025

MOTION by Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling for leave to file excess pages (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

RECAP
73 April 28, 2025

RESPONSE by United States of America to MOTION by Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois for leave to file excess pages State Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File 20-Page Reply re: Motion to Dismiss 70, MOTION by Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling for leave to file excess pages 72, MOTION by Defendant Cook County for leave to file excess pages 71 (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

RECAP
74 April 29, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court has reviewed Defendants' motions for excess pages and the United States' opposition to that request. The motions 70 71 72 are granted. Reply briefs may not exceed 20 pages. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
75 April 29, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling by Katherine Rose Lamb (Lamb, Katherine) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
76 April 29, 2025

REPLY by Defendants J. B. Pritzker, State of Illinois to motion to dismiss 24, memorandum in support of motion 25, response in opposition to motion,,,, 50 State of Illinois and Governor Pritzker's Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss (Wells, Christopher) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
77 April 29, 2025

REPLY by Defendants County Board of Commissioners, Toni Preckwinkle to response in opposition to motion,,,, 50, motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction,, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 29, memorandum in support of motion 30 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS COOK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND COOK COUNTY BOARD PRESIDENT TONI PRECKWINKLES FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS (Scheller, Jessica) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
78 April 29, 2025

REPLY by Defendant Thomas Dart to response in opposition to motion,,,, 50, motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 31, memorandum in support of motion 32 REPLY IN SUPPORT DEFENDANT COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS J. DARTS FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS (Scheller, Jessica) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
79 April 29, 2025

REPLY by Defendant Cook County to response in opposition to motion,,,, 50, motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 27, memorandum in support of motion 28 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT COOK COUNTYS FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS (Scheller, Jessica) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
80 April 29, 2025

REPLY by Defendants City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling in support of motion to dismiss (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
81 July 1, 2025

MOTION by Attorney Katherine Rose Lamb to withdraw as attorney for City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling. No party information provided (Lamb, Katherine) (Entered: 07/01/2025)

RECAP
82 July 2, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to withdraw 81 is granted. Attorney Katherine Rose Lamb is terminated from the case. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 07/02/2025)

RECAP
83 July 3, 2025

Entered in Error. (rc, ) Modified on 7/3/2025 (rc, ). (Entered: 07/03/2025)

RECAP
84 July 3, 2025

NOTICE of Correction regarding Patent/Trademark report 83 . (rc, ) (Entered: 07/03/2025)

RECAP
85 July 25, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants State of Illinois, Governor J.B. Pritzker, Cook County Board of Commissioners, and City of Chicago's motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) [ 24, 29, 33 ] are granted. Sheriff Thomas Dart's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) and on standing grounds under Rule 12(b)(1) 31 is also granted. Defendant Cook County's motion to dismiss 27 is granted in part and denied in part; it is denied under Rule 12(b)(1) but otherwise granted for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). Individual Defendants Governor J.B. Pritzker, Cook County Board of Commissioners President Toni Preckwinkle, Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart, Larry Snelling, and Brandon Johnson are each dismissed from the case for lack of standing. Defendant Cook County Board of Commissioners is also dismissed because it is not a suable entity separate from Cook County. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice and the motion for summary judgment [Dkt. 58 ] is denied as moot. If it wishes to do so, the United States may amend its complaint by August 22, 2025. If no amended pleading is filed by the date the court separately provides, the dismissal will convert to one with prejudice. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 07/25/2025)

RECAP
86 July 25, 2025

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 7/25/2025. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 07/25/2025)

Clearinghouse
87 Aug. 26, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: No amended complaint was filed by August 22, 2025, so the prior dismissal is converted to dismissal with prejudice. The clerk shall enter a Rule 58 judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

Clearinghouse
88 Aug. 26, 2025

ENTERED JUDGMENT on 8/26/2025. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

Clearinghouse
89 Sept. 24, 2025

MOTION by Attorney Emily A. Vernon to withdraw as attorney for City Of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Larry Snelling. No party information provided (Vernon, Emily) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

RECAP
90 Sept. 24, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:Motion to withdraw as attorney 89 is granted. Attorney Emily A Vernon terminated as counsel. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

RECAP
91 Oct. 24, 2025

NOTICE of appeal by United States of America regarding orders 88 Receipt number: y (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Entered: 10/24/2025)

RECAP
92 Oct. 27, 2025

NOTICE of Appeal Due letter sent to counsel of record regarding notice of appeal 91 (jxm, ) (Entered: 10/27/2025)

RECAP
93 Oct. 27, 2025

TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal 91 . Notified counsel (jxm, ) (Entered: 10/27/2025)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations By the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 6, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

United States of America

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-DOJ federal government plaintiff

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

City of Chicago

County

Cook County

State

STATE OF ILLINOIS

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Supremacy Clause

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 01:25-cv-01285

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 25-02904

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Immigration/Border:

Deportation - procedure

Detention - procedures

Sanctuary city/state

Recommended Citation