Case: District of Columbia v. United States

1:25-cv-00065 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Jan. 10, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On January 10, 2025, the District of Columbia (“the District”) sued the United States of America in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The District alleged that the federal government was liable for over 150 years of pollution of the Anacostia River under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and the District of Columbia Brownfield Revitalization Act of 2000 (the “Brownfield Act”). The District sought costs related to th…

On January 10, 2025, the District of Columbia (“the District”) sued the United States of America in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The District alleged that the federal government was liable for over 150 years of pollution of the Anacostia River under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and the District of Columbia Brownfield Revitalization Act of 2000 (the “Brownfield Act”). The District sought costs related to the District’s new Anacostia River revitalization plan, as well as natural resource damages arising from the contamination. The complaint also sought declaration of future liability against the U.S. arising from the District’s investigation of contamination of the Anacostia. The case was assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. 

In its complaint, the District alleged that generations of residents had not been able to enjoy the use of the River due to decades of contamination, and that the U.S. has been the biggest polluter of the River. The complaint stated that several federal government projects and agencies had contributed to the River’s contamination. For example, the complaint alleged that the federal naval operations at Washington Navy Yard, including shipbuilding and gun manufacturing, polluted the River with heavy metals and other toxic chemicals. In addition, the District cited the Arms Corps and Department of Interior selection of Kenilworth Park, an area on the banks of the River, as a burning waste dump site as another example of harmful treatment. Starting in 2013, the District began to investigate and eliminate contamination in the River, and confirmed that hazardous substances increased the risk of various diseases, including cancer, diabetes and asthma. As a result of the independent investigation, the District planned to implement an extensive cleanup project to decontaminate the River, starting in 2025. 

As of February 2025, the case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Isabel Bysiewicz (2/17/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69533268/parties/district-of-columbia-v-united-states/


Judge(s)

Friedrich, Dabney Langhorne (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Rosenfeld, Wesley Franklin (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Gange, Heather E. (District of Columbia)

Higgins, Elliot (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-00065

Complaint

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69533268/district-of-columbia-v-united-states/

Last updated July 7, 2025, 5:56 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT for environmental damages against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(Rosenfeld, Wesley) (Entered: 01/10/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

Clearinghouse

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zmtm)

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

PACER

Notice of Error- New Case

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

PACER
2

SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA through U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 01/10/2025)

1 Notice and Consent

View on PACER

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

PACER

NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR The following error(s) need correction: Missing summonses- U.S. government. When naming a U.S. government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply additional summons for the U.S. Attorney. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (zmtm)

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

PACER
3

STANDARD ORDER for CIVIL CASES. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 11, 2025. (lcdlf2) (Entered: 01/11/2025)

Jan. 11, 2025

Jan. 11, 2025

RECAP
4

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Related document: 1 Complaint filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Rosenfeld, Wesley) (Entered: 01/14/2025)

Jan. 14, 2025

Jan. 14, 2025

PACER
5

SUMMONS (1) Reissued Electronically as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(mg) (Entered: 01/15/2025)

1 Notice and Consent

View on PACER

Jan. 15, 2025

Jan. 15, 2025

PACER
6

NOTICE of Appearance by Heather E. Gange on behalf of All Defendants (Gange, Heather) (Entered: 01/24/2025)

Jan. 24, 2025

Jan. 24, 2025

PACER
7

NOTICE of Appearance by Elliot Higgins on behalf of All Defendants (Higgins, Elliot) (Entered: 01/28/2025)

Jan. 28, 2025

Jan. 28, 2025

RECAP
8

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/22/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/23/2025. (Rosenfeld, Wesley) (Entered: 02/03/2025)

Feb. 3, 2025

Feb. 3, 2025

RECAP
9

AFFIDAVIT of Mailing re 1 Complaint and summons served on US Attorney General by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Rosenfeld, Wesley) Modified event on 2/4/2025 (mg). (Entered: 02/03/2025)

Feb. 3, 2025

Feb. 3, 2025

RECAP
10

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint, Opposition, and Reply by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenfeld, Wesley) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting the plaintiff's unopposed 10 Motion for Extension of Time. Accordingly, the government shall answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's 1 Complaint on or before May 23, 2025. Further, if the government files a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff shall file its opposition on or before July 15, 2025, and the government shall file any reply on August 15, 2025. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 21, 2025. (lcdlf2)

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines

Feb. 23, 2025

Feb. 23, 2025

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines: Government shall answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's 1 Complaint on or before May 23, 2025. Further, if the government files a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff shall file its opposition on or before July 15, 2025, and the government shall file any reply on August 15, 2025. (smc)

Feb. 23, 2025

Feb. 23, 2025

PACER
11

Hold in Abeyance

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

May 14, 2025

May 14, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion to Hold in Abeyance AND Set/Reset Deadlines

May 14, 2025

May 14, 2025

PACER

Case Details