Case: Democracy Forward Foundation v. U.S. Marshals Service

1:25-cv-00749 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 14, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about government transparency and the public’s right to access information about possible executive branch interference in the federal judiciary. On March 14, 2025, the Democracy Forward Foundation, a nonprofit organization focused on government accountability, filed this lawsuit against the U.S. Marshals Service ("USMS") in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Plaintiff had previously filed several requests under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOI…

This is a case about government transparency and the public’s right to access information about possible executive branch interference in the federal judiciary. On March 14, 2025, the Democracy Forward Foundation, a nonprofit organization focused on government accountability, filed this lawsuit against the U.S. Marshals Service ("USMS") in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Plaintiff had previously filed several requests under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), seeking information and documentation relating to (1) potential inappropriate communications between USMS and federal judges about pending cases related to the January 6, 2021 riots at the U.S. Capitol, potentially following direction from the Department of Government Efficiency ("DOGE"); and (2) USMS’s role in enforcing court orders in light of Vice President JD Vance’s comments declaring that “judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” Democracy Forward brought this action after the Defendant failed to respond to its FOIA requests within the time period required by law. The case was assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly.

The plaintiff sued the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Represented by its in-house counsel, Democracy Forward sought injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. They claimed that USMS unlawfully failed to respond to multiple FOIA requests submitted in early 2025, which sought records concerning the agency’s interactions with federal judges and White House officials in sensitive and potentially politically charged situations. Democracy Forward’s requests stemmed from widespread media reports indicating that USMS personnel may have communicated inappropriately with federal judges handling January 6-related cases, allegedly under direction from DOGE, a controversial federal office. Additional reporting raised alarms that DOGE leader Elon Musk’s private security team had been deputized by USMS, and that DOGE associates had improperly used the Marshals Service to gain access to federal facilities. These developments sparked public concern about executive overreach, especially after Vice President J.D. Vance publicly questioned the judiciary’s power to restrain the executive branch.

In response to these developments, Democracy Forward submitted four separate FOIA requests between January 27 and February 12, 2025. These included requests for communications between USMS and DOGE, phone logs and directives involving the Executive Office of the President, and records related to the enforcement of federal court orders. Each request was acknowledged and assigned a tracking number, and USMS granted fee waivers. On February 14, the agency asked Democracy Forward to consolidate the requests into a single administrative request. The Foundation agreed, provided that the search scope would extend to the date of the actual search, and it also agreed to narrow certain custodian and keyword fields to facilitate processing.

Despite these accommodations, the USMS failed to issue any final determination within the statutory deadline. Democracy Forward therefore alleged that it had constructively exhausted its administrative remedies, as permitted under FOIA when agencies fail to respond in a timely manner. The lawsuit seeks a court order compelling USMS to conduct a comprehensive search for responsive documents and to release all non-exempt records. Democracy Forward also asked for a Vaughn index describing any withheld documents and invoked its right to recover litigation costs and attorneys’ fees under FOIA’s fee-shifting provision.

On April 21, 2025, the U.S. Marshals Service filed its answer to the complaint, denying allegations of unlawful FOIA delay and raising standard defenses. In response, Judge Timothy J. Kelly issued a Minute Order on April 23, directing the parties to meet and confer regarding a proposed schedule for briefing or document disclosure. Following the submission of the proposed schedule, another joint status report regarding the schedule was due on June 9. After consideration of the report, the court ordered the parties to file a schedule for the case by July 9. 

The case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Karma Karira (5/7/2025)

Jeremiah Price (6/9/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69737989/parties/democracy-forward-foundation-v-us-marshals-service/


Judge(s)

Kelly, Timothy James (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

McGrath, Daniel Alexander (District of Columbia)

Thurston, Robin F. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Bardo, John (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-00749

Complaint for Injunctive Relief

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69737989/democracy-forward-foundation-v-us-marshals-service/

Last updated July 14, 2025, 12:35 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11542262) filed by DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(McGrath, Daniel) (Entered: 03/14/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION (McGrath, Daniel) (Entered: 03/14/2025)

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

PACER
3

NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Alexander McGrath on behalf of DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION (McGrath, Daniel) (Entered: 03/16/2025)

March 16, 2025

March 16, 2025

PACER
4

NOTICE of Appearance by Robin F. Thurston on behalf of DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION (Thurston, Robin) (Entered: 03/16/2025)

March 16, 2025

March 16, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsl)

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

PACER
5

SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) (Entered: 03/17/2025)

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

RECAP
6

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE served on 3/20/2025 (McGrath, Daniel) (Entered: 03/23/2025)

March 23, 2025

March 23, 2025

PACER
7

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/20/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/19/2025. (McGrath, Daniel) (Entered: 03/23/2025)

March 23, 2025

March 23, 2025

PACER
8

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 03/20/2025. (McGrath, Daniel) (Entered: 03/23/2025)

March 23, 2025

March 23, 2025

PACER
9

ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE.(Bardo, John) (Entered: 04/21/2025)

April 21, 2025

April 21, 2025

RECAP

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and file, by May 7, 2025, a joint proposed schedule for briefing or disclosure. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 4/23/2025. (lctjk2)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER
10

Joint STATUS REPORT by U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE. (Bardo, John) (Entered: 05/07/2025)

May 7, 2025

May 7, 2025

RECAP

.Order AND Status Report Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' 10 Joint Proposed Schedule, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall, by June 9, 2025, file a joint status report, proposing a schedule for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 5/8/2025. (lctjk2)

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER
11

Joint STATUS REPORT by U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE. (Bardo, John) (Entered: 06/09/2025)

June 9, 2025

June 9, 2025

RECAP

.Order AND Status Report Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

June 10, 2025

June 10, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' 11 Joint Status Report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall, by July 9, 2025, file a further joint status report, proposing a schedule for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 6/10/2025. (lctjk2)

June 10, 2025

June 10, 2025

PACER
12

Status Report

July 9, 2025

July 9, 2025

RECAP

.Order AND Status Report Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

July 10, 2025

July 10, 2025

PACER

Case Details