Case: Johnson v. State of Wyoming III

2025-CV-0114940 | Wyoming state trial court

Filed Date: Feb. 28, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is a challenge to series of Wyoming state laws regulating pregnant people and abortion providers in Wyoming.  Procedural Background Plaintiffs originally filed suit in Natrona County District Court on February 28. On March 11, having not been granted a TRO hearing, plaintiffs dismissed that case and refiled in Teton County District Court. Ten days later, the court dismissed the second lawsuit, since patients had been denied care at a clinic in Natrona County. The case was refiled in N…

This case is a challenge to series of Wyoming state laws regulating pregnant people and abortion providers in Wyoming. 

Procedural Background

Plaintiffs originally filed suit in Natrona County District Court on February 28. On March 11, having not been granted a TRO hearing, plaintiffs dismissed that case and refiled in Teton County District Court. Ten days later, the court dismissed the second lawsuit, since patients had been denied care at a clinic in Natrona County. The case was refiled in Natrona County District Court; this summary concerns this third lawsuit.

The Lawsuit

On March 24, 2025, Chelsea's Fund, JTP Professional Service Corporation (“Just The Pill”), and Circle of Hope Health Care Services, Inc., (“Wellspring”), a registered nurse, and two OB-GYNs (collectively, the "abortion defenders") filed a lawsuit challenging a series of targeted restrictions of abortion providers with criminal consequences (the "Criminal TRAP Laws"). Chelsea's Fund and Just the Pill are nonprofits that help people access abortion care, and Wellspring is an abortion clinic. Represented by private counsel, the abortion defenders filed suit in the Teton County District Court against Wyoming, the Governor, the Attorney General, the Teton County Sheriff, and the Jackson Chief of Police.

Specifically, the abortion defenders challenged House Bill 42 and 64 (collectively, the "Criminal TRAP Laws"). HB 64 mandated that a person must undergo an ultrasound at least 48 hours before a medication abortion, and that a violation would constitute a misdemeanor. HB 42 mandated:

  • Facilities providing procedural abortion be licensed as Ambulatory Surgical Centers ("ASC");
  • Physicians performing procedural abortions have admitting privileges at a hospital within 10 miles; 
  • Physicians report each procedural abortion performed to the Department of Health;
  • Procedural abortions may only be performed by physicians licensed in Wyoming; and 
  • Abortion is not recognized as "health care" under Article 1, section 30 of the Wyoming Constitution.

Plaintiffs alleged that the laws violated the state and federal equal protection clauses; violated the state constitution's prohibition against the  establishment of religion by imposing a sectarian religious viewpoint on all Wyoming citizens; and were unconstitutionally vague. They requested injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as costs and fees. 

On April 21, 2025, the district court enjoined HB 42 and HB 64. The Clearinghouse does not have access to the court order at this time.

As of April 24, 2025, the case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Avery Coombe (4/24/2025)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

25-CV-114940

Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief

Johnson v. State of Wyoming

Feb. 28, 2025

Feb. 28, 2025

Complaint

Docket

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory:

Wyoming

Case Type(s):

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 28, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

An abortion clinic, two nonprofits focused on helping people access abortion care, two OB-GYNs, and a registered nurse.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Wyoming, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Wyoming state trial court 2025-CV-0114940

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Reproductive rights:

Abortion

Admitting privileges

Licensing restriction

Medication abortion

Reproductive health care (including birth control, abortion, and others)