Case: Doe v. Rollins

1:25-cv-01066 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 8, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case alleged political interference in the federal civil service. On April 8, 2025, three anonymous career civil servants employed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins. The presiding judge has not been publicly identified. Represented by private counsel, the employees alleged that they were placed on administrative leave due to their previous involvement in Diversity, Eq…

This case alleged political interference in the federal civil service. On April 8, 2025, three anonymous career civil servants employed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins. The presiding judge has not been publicly identified. Represented by private counsel, the employees alleged that they were placed on administrative leave due to their previous involvement in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) initiatives even though they had not performed DEIA-related functions in months. At the time of the filing, they were on administrative leave for over 70 days.

The complaint alleged violations of the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The employees asserted that Secretary Rollins engaged in political discrimination, infringing on their rights to free speech and association, and denying them equal protection and due process under the law. They argued that the agency failed to follow required procedural safeguards such as providing adequate notice, an opportunity to respond, and a fair investigation. The employees contended they were targeted because they were perceived to hold political views differing from those of Secretary Rollins and her allies.

The employees sought injunctive relief to be reinstated to their positions, declaratory relief affirming the unlawfulness of the USDA's actions, compensatory damages for lost wages and emotional distress, and punitive damages to deter future misconduct.

On April 9, 2025, the court issued a notice of error regarding the initial complaint and directed the plaintiffs to file a Notice of Errata with the corrected information by the close of business that day. Given that the plaintiffs did not correct the complaint by that deadline, the status of this case is unclear. 

Summary Authors

Victoria Tan (5/28/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69862295/parties/doe-v-rollins/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Branch, David A. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-01066

Complaint

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69862295/doe-v-rollins/

Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, 8:50 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against BROOKE ROLLINS with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11600444) filed by JOHN DOE, 1. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(Branch, David) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

SEALED MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by JOHN DOE, 1 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(Branch, David) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

PACER

Notice of Error- New Case

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER

ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding 1 Complaint. The following error(s) need correction: Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file a Notice of Errata stating the error and attach the corrected initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party and file using the event Errata. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmtm) Modified on 4/9/2025 (zmtm).

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Speech and Religious Freedom

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Appointments/Civil Service)

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Diversity/Equity/Inclusion/Accessibility (DEIA) and/or Antisemitism)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 8, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Anonymous civil servants employed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

U.S. Department of Agriculture (- United States (national) -), Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Freedom of speech/association

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Discharge & termination plans

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

Civil Service