Case: Jake Bertellotti v. Regents of the University of California

2:25-cv-03069 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: April 8, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In this lawsuit, two disabled UCLA students sued the Regents of the University of California, the University’s President, its Chancellor, and ten unknown individuals, alleging widespread accessibility barriers and discriminatory practices.  On April 8, 2025, represented by Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund and private counsel, the two students filed a complaint in the United States District Court Central District of California for alleged violations of Title II of the Americans with …

In this lawsuit, two disabled UCLA students sued the Regents of the University of California, the University’s President, its Chancellor, and ten unknown individuals, alleging widespread accessibility barriers and discriminatory practices. 

On April 8, 2025, represented by Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund and private counsel, the two students filed a complaint in the United States District Court Central District of California for alleged violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act, and California Government Codes § 11135 and § 12955 (Fair Housing and Employment Act). Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and damages for UCLA’s failure to provide reasonable accommodations and comply with accessibility standards. The complaint alleges that UCLA failed to make its facilities, including dormitories, classrooms, and paths of travel, wheelchair accessible, and that it failed to provide disability-specific emergency evacuation protocols.

This case has been assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi. As of May 20, 2025, the case is ongoing.

 

Summary Authors

Jacquelynn Gutierrez (5/20/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69861128/parties/jake-bertellotti-v-regents-of-the-university-of-california/


Judge(s)

Scarsi, Mark Christopher (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cabalo, Catherine (California)

MacLeod, Jillian (California)

Mehton, Khushpreet R (California)

Uzeta, Maria Michelle (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

2:25-cv-03069

Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Relief, and Damages

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69861128/jake-bertellotti-v-regents-of-the-university-of-california/

Last updated Sept. 29, 2025, 1:19 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39465705 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Jake Bertellotti, Taylor Carty. (Attorney Catherine Cabalo added to party Jake Bertellotti(pty:pla), Attorney Catherine Cabalo added to party Taylor Carty(pty:pla))(Cabalo, Catherine) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Jake Bertellotti, Taylor Carty. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

PACER
3

NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Jake Bertellotti, Taylor Carty, (Cabalo, Catherine) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

PACER
4

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiffs Jake Bertellotti, Taylor Carty. (Cabalo, Catherine) (Entered: 04/08/2025)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

PACER
5

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER
6

NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER
7

Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER
8

21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendants Michael V. Drake, M.D., Julio Frenk, Regents of the University of California. (lh) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER
9

INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER
10

Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days)

April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025

PACER
11

Waiver of Service Executed

April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025

PACER
12

Waiver of Service Executed

April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025

PACER
13

Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER
14

Extending Answer Due Deadline

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

PACER
15

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

May 28, 2025

May 28, 2025

PACER
16

Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days)

June 3, 2025

June 3, 2025

PACER
17

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
18

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
19

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
20

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
21

Extending Answer Due Deadline

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
22

Dismiss (cause or other)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 7, 2025

July 7, 2025

PACER
23

Deficiency in Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER
24

Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER
25

Corporate Disclosure Statement

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER
26

Dismiss

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

PACER
27

Amended Complaint/Petition

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

PACER
28

Deficiency in Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

PACER
29

Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

PACER
30

Amended Complaint/Petition

July 29, 2025

July 29, 2025

PACER
31

Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)

Aug. 12, 2025

Aug. 12, 2025

PACER
32

Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

PACER
33

Proof of Service (subsequent documents)

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

PACER

Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

PACER
34

Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan

Sept. 22, 2025

Sept. 22, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Disability Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 8, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two UCLA students with disabilities who alleged insufficient accommodations and accessibility from the university

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

University of California (Los Angeles), State

Defendant Type(s):

College/University

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Barrier Removal

Buildings

School/University Facilities

School/University policies

Disability and Disability Rights:

Cerebral palsy

Integrated setting

Mobility impairment

Reasonable Accommodations

Reasonable Modifications

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)