Case: The Associated Press v. Tewalt

1:24-cv-00587 | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Filed Date: Dec. 6, 2024

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is a lawsuit by the Associated Press, The Idaho Statesman, and East Idaho News against Josh Tewalt, in his official capacity as Director of the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC). On December 6, 2024, the news organizations filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, seeking declaratory relief and preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting IDOC from preventing execution witnesses from viewing and hearing what occurs in the Medical Team Room leading up to…

This case is a lawsuit by the Associated Press, The Idaho Statesman, and East Idaho News against Josh Tewalt, in his official capacity as Director of the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC). On December 6, 2024, the news organizations filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, seeking declaratory relief and preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting IDOC from preventing execution witnesses from viewing and hearing what occurs in the Medical Team Room leading up to, during, and immediately after future executions, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

The dispute arose from Idaho’s revised lethal-injection procedures after the State’s failed attempt to execute Thomas Creech in February 2024. According to the complaint, execution team members tried eight times over several hours to establish a viable IV line before halting the execution. After that failed attempt, IDOC renovated the execution unit and, in October 2024, issued revised execution procedures reflecting a new layout consisting of witness areas, an Execution Preparation Room, an Execution Chamber, and a separate Medical Team Room. Under the revised setup, witnesses could watch the condemned person in the Execution Preparation Room through a live closed-circuit audio and video feed and later in the Execution Chamber through a window. They could not, however, see or hear what occurred in the Medical Team Room. That room was central to the execution process because the IV lines passed from the condemned person, through a wall opening, into the Medical Team Room, where the medical team prepared and labeled syringes, drew the lethal drugs into those syringes, tracked and monitored the syringes, observed the condemned person and vital signs, and ultimately administered the lethal drugs through the IV lines. The plaintiffs alleged that this arrangement turned a critical part of the execution into a “black box,” allowing the public to observe only the effects of lethal injection, not the acts that produced them.

The plaintiffs brought the case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Idaho’s policy violated the First Amendment’s qualified right of public and press access to governmental proceedings, including executions and the procedures inextricably intertwined with them. In essence, the news organizations claimed that by denying witnesses access to the Medical Team Room, Idaho unlawfully prevented the press from serving its constitutionally protected role as the public’s surrogate in observing and reporting on the full execution process. They further alleged that Idaho’s continued issuance of death warrants and stated intent to carry out future executions made the dispute both imminent and recurring. On the same day they filed the complaint, the plaintiffs also moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant from precluding witnesses from viewing and hearing what occurs in the Medical Team Room during future executions.

The parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, and the case was assigned to  U.S. Magistrate Judge Debora K. Grasham. On February 3, 2025, IDOC  filed a motion to dismiss. On March 6, 2025, Judge Grasham denied that motion, concluding that the news organizations had brought a real, reviewable dispute and had plausibly alleged that what happens in the Medical Team Room could fall within the First Amendment access right they invoked. The defendant then answered the complaint on March 10, 2025.

The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction on April 29, 2025. Judge Grasham held that, at least at the preliminary stage, the plaintiffs had shown a qualified First Amendment right to witness the “preparation and administration of the lethal injection drugs”—the part of the execution that occurred in the Medical Team Room—and that verbal updates and post-execution reporting by officials were not adequate substitutes for independent observation.  The order explicitly did not require full, general visibility into everything in the Medical Team Room, but it did require audio and visual access to medical team members performing tasks tied to preparing and administering the lethal drugs, and it pointed to a closed-circuit feed as a practical, less intrusive way to provide that access. Associated Press v. Tewalt, 780 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (D. Idaho 2025).

On May 21, 2025, the defendant filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, challenging the preliminary injunction. On June 10, 2025, the district court entered an order staying further proceedings pending appeal. The case was heard in the Ninth Circuit on December 5, 2025. 

 

Summary Authors

Jacob Chang (3/8/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69444722/parties/the-associated-press-v-tewalt/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Olson, Wendy (Idaho)

Pedersen, Eric Anders (Idaho)

Attorney for Defendant

Elia, Michael J (Idaho)

Schindele, Kristina M (Idaho)

Smith, Tanner J (Idaho)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:24-cv-00587

Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

Complaint
2-1

1:24-cv-00587

Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
21

1:24-cv-00587

Order Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

The Associated Press et al. v. Tewalt

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 723034

28

1:24-cv-00587

Order Re: Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

The Associated Press et al. v. Tewalt

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

Order/Opinion

780 F.Supp.3d 1052

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69444722/the-associated-press-v-tewalt/

Last updated April 4, 2026, 4:52 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief against Josh Tewalt ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIDDC-2851022.), filed by The McClatchy Company, LLC, The Associated Press, East-Idaho-News.com, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Summons to Josh Tewalt, # 2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Olson, Wendy)

1 Summons to Josh Tewalt

View on PACER

2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

Clearinghouse
2

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Wendy Olson appearing for Plaintiffs East-Idaho-News.com, LLC, The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC. Responses due by 12/27/2024 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 2 Declaration of Rebecca Boone, # 3 Declaration of Chadd Cripe, # 4 Declaration of Nate Sunderland)(Olson, Wendy)

1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

View on RECAP

2 Declaration of Rebecca Boone

View on RECAP

3 Declaration of Chadd Cripe

View on RECAP

4 Declaration of Nate Sunderland

View on RECAP

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

Clearinghouse
3

Corporate Disclosure Statement by East-Idaho-News.com, LLC, The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC. (Olson, Wendy)

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

4

Corporate Disclosure Statement by East-Idaho-News.com, LLC, The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC identifying Corporate Parent SIJ Intermediatae, LLC for The McClatchy Company, LLC. (Olson, Wendy)

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

5

Corporate Disclosure Statement by East-Idaho-News.com, LLC, The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC. (Olson, Wendy)

Dec. 6, 2024

Dec. 6, 2024

6

Summons Issued as to Josh Tewalt. (Print attached Summons for service.) (hs)

Dec. 9, 2024

Dec. 9, 2024

7

SUMMONS Returned Executed by The McClatchy Company, LLC, The Associated Press, East-Idaho-News.com, LLC. Josh Tewalt served on 12/9/2024, answer due 12/30/2024. (Olson, Wendy)

Dec. 16, 2024

Dec. 16, 2024

8

NOTICE of Appearance by Kristina M Schindele on behalf of Josh Tewalt (Schindele, Kristina)

Dec. 26, 2024

Dec. 26, 2024

9

NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J Elia on behalf of Josh Tewalt (Elia, Michael)

Dec. 26, 2024

Dec. 26, 2024

10

NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Josh Tewalt, The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC, East-Idaho-News.com, LLC re 1 Complaint, 9 Notice of Appearance, 8 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 2/25/2025. (km)

Dec. 27, 2024

Dec. 27, 2024

11

Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Tanner J Smith appearing for Defendant Josh Tewalt. Responses due by 1/17/2025 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support)(Smith, Tanner)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

Dec. 27, 2024

Dec. 27, 2024

RECAP
12

RESPONSE to Motion re 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Response in Opposition filed by Josh Tewalt. Replies due by 1/10/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Josh Tewalt)(Smith, Tanner)

1 Declaration of Josh Tewalt

View on RECAP

Dec. 27, 2024

Dec. 27, 2024

RECAP
13

DOCKET ENTRY ORDER - Upon review of the docket in this matter, and Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. 2), the Court finds good cause to shorten the deadline within which to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. (Dkt. 10). The parties shall have up through and including January 17, 2025, within which to consent to proceed before a magistrate judge. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K. Grasham. (mab)

Dec. 27, 2024

Dec. 27, 2024

14

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages to Consolidate Briefing Wendy Olson appearing for Plaintiffs The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC, East-Idaho-News.com, LLC. Responses due by 1/27/2025 (Olson, Wendy)

Jan. 6, 2025

Jan. 6, 2025

15

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE BRIEFING (DKT. 14 ) - Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Briefing (Dkt. 14). The Court, having review the Plaintiffs' motion and the record in this matter, and finding good cause exists, hereby orders that Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's motion to dismiss and reply in support of their motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed in a single 30-page brief no later than January 10, 2025.IT IS SO ORDERED.. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs)

Jan. 6, 2025

Jan. 6, 2025

16

REPLY to Response to Motion re 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by The Associated Press, The McClatchy Company, LLC, East-Idaho-News.com, LLC.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 1/13/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rebecca Boone, # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Rebecca Boone, # 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Rebecca Boone)(Olson, Wendy)

1 Declaration of Rebecca Boone

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Rebecca Boone

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Rebecca Boone

View on RECAP

Jan. 10, 2025

Jan. 10, 2025

RECAP
17

Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jd)

Jan. 13, 2025

Jan. 13, 2025

18

ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(jd)

Jan. 13, 2025

Jan. 13, 2025

19

REPLY to Response to Motion re 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Josh Tewalt.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 1/27/2025.(Elia, Michael)

Jan. 24, 2025

Jan. 24, 2025

RECAP
20

DECLARATION of Objection to Rebecca Boone's Second Declaration re 16 Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Josh Tewalt . (Elia, Michael)

Jan. 24, 2025

Jan. 24, 2025

RECAP
21

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. 11) - Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. 11 ) is DENIED. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

Clearinghouse
22

ANSWER to 1 Complaint, Defendant's by Josh Tewalt.(Elia, Michael)

March 20, 2025

March 20, 2025

RECAP
23

DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Hearing on Motion: 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Motion Hearing set for 4/8/2025 09:30 AM in Boise - Courtroom 6 before US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (at)

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

24

DISREGARD - CONTAINS WRONG HEARING INFORMATION -AMENDED DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Hearing on Motion: 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Motion Hearing currently set for 4/17/2025 09:30 AM is RESCHEDULED for 10:00 AM in Boise - Courtroom 6 before US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (same date as previously set, correction to time only) (at) Modified on 3/27/2025, see Dkt. 25 for correct hearing info (at).

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

25

SECOND AMENDED DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Hearing on Motion: 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Motion Hearing set for 4/8/2025 10:00 AM in Boise - Courtroom 6 before US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (at)

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines as to 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . Motion Ripe Deadline set for 4/8/2025 due to hearing being set. (LT)

April 1, 2025

April 1, 2025

26

THIRD AMENDED DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Hearing on Motion: 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Motion Hearing set for 4/8/2025 10:00 AM in Boise - Courtroom 4 before US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (same date/time as previously set, update to courtroom location only) (at)

April 4, 2025

April 4, 2025

27

Docket Text Minute Entry for proceedings held before US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham: Appearance by Wendy Olson and Anders Pedersen for the Plaintiffs; Tanner Smith, Kristina Schindele, and Michael Elia for the Defendant. Motion Hearing held on 4/8/2025 re 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Oral argument heard. Motion taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. Order forthcoming. Time in Court 9:58-11:38 AM. (ESR A. Tate.) Audio File Location Boise - Courtroom 4. (at)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

29

Notice of Filing of Official Transcript of Proceedings held on 04/08/2025 before Judge Debora K. Grasham. Transcriber Tamara Weber, Email weber.tamara@icloud.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. This transcript is not available to the general public and as such is sealed until release of transcript restriction re 27 Motion Hearing,, Terminate Hearings. Redaction Request due 5/19/2025. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/29/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/28/2025. (dmv) (Entered: 05/01/2025)

April 28, 2025

April 28, 2025

28

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 2 ) is GRANTED insofar as Defendant must provide execution witnesses with audio and visual access to the preparation and administration of the lethal injection drugs. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

Clearinghouse
30

LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan due by 6/10/2025. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2025 09:30 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) (Entered: 05/14/2025)

May 13, 2025

May 13, 2025

31

NOTICE OF APPEAL 25-3312 as to 28 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, by Josh Tewalt. Filing Fee Due. $ 605, receipt number AIDDC-2931052. (Notice sent to Court Reporter & 9th Cir) (Schindele, Kristina) Modified on 5/29/2025, to add USCA case number (jd).

May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

32

USCA Case Number 25-3312 for dkt. 31 Notice of Appeal filed by Josh Tewalt. (ac)

May 23, 2025

May 23, 2025

33

USCA PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TIME SCHEDULE NOTICE ( USCA Case No.25-3312) as to 31 Notice of Appeal filed by Josh Tewalt. (Notice sent by e-mail to Court Reporter) (ac)

May 23, 2025

May 23, 2025

34

STIPULATION to Stay Action by Josh Tewalt. (Schindele, Kristina)

June 9, 2025

June 9, 2025

35

ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY - this matter is STAYED until the appeal in Associated Press et al. v. Derrick, Ninth Circuit Docket No. 25-3312 is resolved and the mandate issues. Further, the telephonic scheduling conference currently set for June 17, 2025, is hereby VACATED, to be reset as needed, when the stay is lifted. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)

June 10, 2025

June 10, 2025

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Idaho

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Speech and Religious Freedom

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 6, 2024

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Three news organizations

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

Idaho Department of Correction

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Other Dockets:

District of Idaho 1:24-cv-00587

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 25-03312

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Injunction

Declaratory judgment

Relief Granted:

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

Death Penalty:

Lethal Injection - General

Recommended Citation