Case: Castaneda v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

2:25-cv-05209 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: June 7, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenges alleged unlawful immigration enforcement practices, specifically the sharp rise in immigration raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in California since November 2024. On June 7, 2025, the Director of the California Association of Family Services filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against ICE, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, President Trump, and t…

This case challenges alleged unlawful immigration enforcement practices, specifically the sharp rise in immigration raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in California since November 2024. On June 7, 2025, the Director of the California Association of Family Services filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against ICE, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, President Trump, and the Governor of California. The proposed class included: "All undocumented persons residing in California who have been or are at risk of being targeted by ICE raids carried out in coordination with local law enforcement since November 2024.” 

Plaintiffs alleged that defendants’ actions violated the Fourth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the California Values Act, and also brought tort and Bivens claims against defendants. Plaintiffs claimed that beginning in November 2024, ICE conducted coordinated raids with local and state law enforcement, causing unlawful searches, due process violations, and widespread harm to immigrant communities, especially in Latino neighborhoods, resulting in unlawful arrests and family separations. Represented by private counsel, plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief, including a declaration that the raids were unlawful, an injunction to prohibit their continuation, and monetary damages for the constitutional and statutory violations alleged. 

On June 13, 2025, a notice of case termination was issued, stating that the clerk had previously issued a notice to filer of deficiencies in attorney case opening, and counsel failed to correct the discrepancy within two business days. As a result, the case was closed, and no further filings were permitted under that case number, except for a refund of fees. This case has not yet been refiled. 

Summary Authors

Victoria Tan (7/21/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70483089/parties/benjamin-job-castaneda-v-united-states-immigration-and-customs-enforcement/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Castaneda, Bryan Christopher (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

2:25-cv-05209

Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial

Castaneda v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

June 7, 2025

June 7, 2025

Complaint
4

2:25-cv-05209

Notice of Case Termination

Castaneda v. Los Angeles Police Department

June 13, 2025

June 13, 2025

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70483089/benjamin-job-castaneda-v-united-states-immigration-and-customs-enforcement/

Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, 2:30 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Benjamin J Castaneda, California Association of Family Services. (Attorney Bryan Christopher Castaneda added to party California Association of Family Services(pty:pla), Attorney Bryan Christopher Castaneda added to party Benjamin J Castaneda(pty:pla))(Castaneda, Bryan) (Entered: 06/07/2025)

June 7, 2025

June 7, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Benjamin J Castaneda, California Association of Family Services. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castaneda, Bryan) (Entered: 06/08/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

June 8, 2025

June 8, 2025

PACER
3

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (mza) (Entered: 06/09/2025)

June 9, 2025

June 9, 2025

RECAP
4

In response to the opening of this case, the Clerk issued a Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Attorney Case Opening. The Notice indicated that unless counsel corrected the identified discrepancy within two business days, the docket for this case number would be closed and no further filings would be permitted under this case number. Counsel has not corrected the discrepancy. Accordingly, this case is now closed. No further filings may be made under this case number, except, if applicable, to request a refund of fees using a Form G-124, Application for Refund of Fees. Should you wish to pursue this action, a new case must be filed and a new case number issued. (Case Terminated.) (mza) (Entered: 06/13/2025)

June 13, 2025

June 13, 2025

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump 1.0 & 2.0 Immigration Enforcement Order Challenges

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Immigration Enforcement)

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 7, 2025

Closing Date: June 13, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Benjamin Job Castenada, in his individual capacity and his representative capacity as founder and director of the California Association of Family Services, a nonprofit association headquartered in Los Angeles, that advocates for children, youth, and families in California

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Mooted before ruling

Defendants

Los Angeles Police Department, City

United States (- United States (national) -), Federal

Los Angeles County Sheriff Department, County

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (- United States (national) -), Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Racial profiling

Search policies

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Hispanic

Immigration/Border:

ICE/DHS/INS raid