Case: National Association of Agriculture Employees v. Trump

1:25-cv-02657 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Aug. 13, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the second Trump Administration’s Executive Order 14251, “Exclusions From Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs” (Executive Order), which purports to revoke the collective bargaining rights of the Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) organizational unit in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on the basis that their primary function constitutes national security work. On August 13, 2025, the National Association of Agriculture Employees (NAAE),  a labor union th…

This case challenged the second Trump Administration’s Executive Order 14251, “Exclusions From Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs” (Executive Order), which purports to revoke the collective bargaining rights of the Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) organizational unit in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on the basis that their primary function constitutes national security work. On August 13, 2025, the National Association of Agriculture Employees (NAAE),  a labor union that represents approximately 1,500 PPQ employees filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against President Trump, USDA, and the Office of Personnel Management. The case was assigned to District Judge Paul L. Friedman.

Represented by O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue LLP, a union-side law firm, NAAE alleged that the Executive Order’s removal of recognition and collective bargaining rights for PPQ employees who do not perform “national security” functions violated legal and constitutional protections for civil service employees. NAAE alleged that enforcement of the Executive Order would violate their First Amendment rights because it is retaliatory against union activity; their rights to Equal Protection; and would be an ultra vires action that exceeds the authority granted to President Trump by Congress in 5 U.S.C. § 7103(b). NAAE sought declaratory and injunctive relief.

The case is ongoing. 

 

Summary Authors

Madena Mustafa (9/29/2025)

Related Cases

National Weather Service Employees Organization v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71101307/parties/national-association-of-agriculture-employees-v-trump/


Judge(s)

Friedman, Paul L. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bolek, Keith R. (District of Columbia)

Hirn, Richard J (District of Columbia)

Pullium, April H. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-02657

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71101307/national-association-of-agriculture-employees-v-trump/

Last updated Oct. 25, 2025, 11:39 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11886666) filed by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURE EMPLOYEES. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons to Donald J. Trump, # 3 Summons to Brooke L. Rollins, # 4 Summons to Scott Kupor, # 5 Summons to U.S. Attorney General, # 6 Summons to U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia)(Pullium, April) (Entered: 08/13/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons to Donald J. Trump

View on PACER

3 Summons to Brooke L. Rollins

View on PACER

4 Summons to Scott Kupor

View on PACER

5 Summons to U.S. Attorney General

View on PACER

6 Summons to U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia

View on PACER

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURE EMPLOYEES. Case related to Case No. 25-cv-00935-PLF; 25-cv-01030-PLF; 25-cv-01362-PLF; 25-cv-02445-PLF; 3:25-cv-03070 (N.D. Cal.). (Pullium, April) (Entered: 08/13/2025)

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

RECAP
3

NOTICE of Appearance by Keith R. Bolek on behalf of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURE EMPLOYEES (Bolek, Keith) (Entered: 08/14/2025)

Aug. 14, 2025

Aug. 14, 2025

PACER
4

SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 08/14/2025)

Aug. 14, 2025

Aug. 14, 2025

PACER
5

NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J Hirn on behalf of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURE EMPLOYEES (Hirn, Richard) (Entered: 08/14/2025)

Aug. 14, 2025

Aug. 14, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Aug. 14, 2025

Aug. 14, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Paul L. Friedman. (zmtm)

Aug. 14, 2025

Aug. 14, 2025

PACER
10

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DONALD J. TRUMP served on 8/26/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

PACER
6

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/18/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/17/2025. (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

RECAP
7

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/21/2025. (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

PACER
8

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SCOTT KUPOR served on 8/20/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

PACER
9

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BROOKE L. ROLLINS served on 8/20/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Labor Rights

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 13, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A labor union that represents employees of the Plant Protection and Quarantine organizational unit in U.S. Department of Agriculture

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

President Trump (District of Columbia), Federal

U.S. Department of Agriculture (District of Columbia), Federal

Office of Personnel Management (District of Columbia), Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

Civil Service