Case: Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock

3:25-cv-05240 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: March 20, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a challenge to the policy and practice of denying bond hearings to detained noncitizens at the Northwest ICE Processing Center (NWIPC) in Tacoma, Washington. Beginning in late 2022, immigration judges at the Tacoma Immigration Court stopped granting bond hearings to immigrants who had entered the United States without inspection, treating them as subject to mandatory detention with no possibility of release. On March 20, 2025, a Washington resident who had been detained at the Northwest…

This is a challenge to the policy and practice of denying bond hearings to detained noncitizens at the Northwest ICE Processing Center (NWIPC) in Tacoma, Washington.

Beginning in late 2022, immigration judges at the Tacoma Immigration Court stopped granting bond hearings to immigrants who had entered the United States without inspection, treating them as subject to mandatory detention with no possibility of release. On March 20, 2025, a Washington resident who had been detained at the Northwest ICE Processing Center and denied bond filed this putative class action and petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. He sued officials of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Executive Office for Immigration Review. Represented by the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and later joined on appeal by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), he alleged that the practice violated the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. He sought a declaratory judgment, release or a lawful bond hearing, and attorneys' fees. The case was assigned to District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.

At the heart of the case was a dispute over which detention statute governed. The plaintiff argued that immigration judges at the Tacoma Immigration Court had wrongly classified immigrants who entered without inspection as subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) rather than the discretionary detention statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), which allows for bond hearings. The complaint also challenged the Board of Immigration Appeals' practice of delaying decisions on bond appeals for more than six months, which the plaintiff said rendered the right to appeal virtually meaningless. He sought to represent two classes: a Bond Denial Class, of those denied bond hearings because of the misclassification, and a Bond Appeal Class, of those facing prolonged delays in their appeals.

Also on March 20, 2025, the plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction requiring an individualized custody hearing. The court granted the injunction on April 24, 2025, finding the plaintiff likely to succeed on his claim that he was unlawfully held under the mandatory detention statute rather than the discretionary one. It excused the usual requirement of administrative exhaustion and ordered the defendants to provide a bond hearing under § 1226(a) within fourteen days. (779 F. Supp. 3d 1239).

On May 2, 2025, the court granted class certification in part. It certified the Bond Denial Class as to the detention-classification claims and certified the Bond Appeal Class as to the due process claims, but it declined to certify the Bond Appeal Class's Administrative Procedure Act unreasonable-delay claims.

On May 14, 2025, the plaintiff sought a temporary restraining order on behalf of a class member who, the plaintiff claimed, had been denied bond a week earlier under the same mandatory-detention theory, despite the preliminary injunction; the immigration judge had indicated that she would have otherwise set bond at $5,000. On May 19, 2025, the court denied the restraining order, finding that the class member had not met the high bar for emergency relief and directed that any renewed request address the court's power to grant relief to an unnamed class member.

In July 2025, the Department of Homeland Security issued a memorandum directing ICE nationwide to adopt the mandatory-detention interpretation challenged in this case, rendering immigrants present without admission ineligible for release except through discretionary parole.

The named plaintiff later withdrew his request for individual injunctive relief, which mooted his individual claim. On September 30, 2025, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment for the Bond Denial Class and denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court declared that Bond Denial Class members are detained under the discretionary authority of § 1226(a), not subject to mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2), and that denying them bond on that basis violates the Immigration and Nationality Act. The court entered judgment for the class the same day and allowed the Bond Appeal Class's due process claims to proceed. (2025 WL 2782499).

The plaintiffs then sought further relief to make the declaratory judgment effective. On January 14, 2026, the court granted that relief in part, ordering the defendants to give individualized written notice of the declaratory judgment to newly detained class members within five days of arrival and to provide class counsel with weekly lists of affected detainees. On January 28, 2026, the court specified the records to accompany the weekly lists and set a deadline of February 2026 to notify class members already in custody. Separately, after changes in the officials holding the relevant offices, the district court amended the case caption to substitute the current officeholders.

The defendants appealed the summary judgment and declaratory judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, with argument held on March 4, 2026. On July 30, 2026, the Ninth Circuit affirmed. Writing for the panel, Circuit Judge Daniel A. Bress, joined by Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown, held that § 1225(b)(2)(A)'s mandatory detention applies to immigrants seeking admission at the border, not to unadmitted immigrants apprehended in the interior, who remain subject to § 1226(a) and eligible for bond. The panel stressed that for roughly three decades, no administration had read the statute to require detaining such immigrants. Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea dissented, concluding that anyone Congress deemed an applicant for admission is necessarily seeking admission and therefore subject to mandatory detention, a question on which other circuits have divided.

As of August 2026, the case remained ongoing in the district court. The Bond Appeal Class's due process claims had proceeded toward dispositive motions under a schedule extending into 2027; the defendants were complying with the court's notice and reporting requirements; and the Ninth Circuit had affirmed the judgment for the Bond Denial Class.

 

Summary Authors

Simon Jillson (8/11/2026)

Muhammad Hammad Amin (12/6/2025)

Related Cases

Pablo Sequen v. Kaiser, Northern District of California (2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69762477/parties/rodriguez-vazquez-v-hermosillo/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Adams, Matt (Washington)

Attorney, Matt Adams,

Attorney for Defendant

Attorney, Mr. Victor

Attorney, Michael Ross,

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Attorney, Nicole Allicock,

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:25-cv-05240

Class Action Complaint and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

March 20, 2025

March 20, 2025

Complaint
3

3:25-cv-05240

Motion for Preliminary Injunction

March 20, 2025

March 20, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
29

3:25-cv-05240

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction

Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

April 24, 2025

April 24, 2025

Order/Opinion

779 F.Supp.3d 1239

32

3:25-cv-05240

Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Motion For Class Certification

Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

May 2, 2025

May 2, 2025

Order/Opinion

349 F.R.D. 333

33

3:25-cv-05240

Motion For Temporary Restraining Order On Behalf Of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino

Rodriguez Vazquez et al. v. Bostock

May 14, 2025

May 14, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
38

3:25-cv-05240

Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order on Behalf of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino

Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 1655483

65

3:25-cv-05240

Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Partial Motion For Summary Judgment And Denying Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss

Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 2782499

66

3:25-cv-05240

Judgment in a Civil Case

Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Order/Opinion
112

3:25-cv-05240

Order on Motion for Further Relief

Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

Jan. 14, 2026

Jan. 14, 2026

Order/Opinion

816 F.Supp.3d 1234

125

3:25-cv-05240

Opinion

Vazquez v. Bostock et al.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

July 30, 2026

July 30, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 2196424

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69762477/rodriguez-vazquez-v-hermosillo/

Last updated Sept. 15, 2026, 3:51 a.m.

Docket for: Rodriguez Vazquez v. Hermosillo
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 20, 2025

COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8891963) filed by Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Summons, # 9 Summons, # 10 Summons)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

2 Summons

View on RECAP

3 Summons

View on RECAP

4 Summons

View on RECAP

5 Summons

View on RECAP

6 Summons

View on RECAP

7 Summons

View on RECAP

8 Summons

View on RECAP

9 Summons

View on RECAP

10 Summons

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
2 March 20, 2025

MOTION to Certify Class, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/21/2025 4/17/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron) Modified noting date per 14 Notice on 4/1/2025 (CJS). (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
3 March 20, 2025

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/21/2025 <4/17/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron) Modified noting date per 14 Notice on 4/1/2025 (CJS). (Entered: 03/20/2025)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
4 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Sydney Maltese filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

RECAP
5 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Christopher Stanislowski filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G

View on PACER

8 Exhibit H

View on PACER

9 Exhibit I

View on PACER

10 Exhibit J

View on PACER

11 Exhibit K

View on PACER

12 Exhibit L

View on PACER

RECAP
6 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Adam Boyd filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

1 Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

RECAP
7 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Aaron Korthuis filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
8 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Julia Braker filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

1 Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 2

View on RECAP

RECAP
9 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
10 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Daniela Torres Medina filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
11 March 20, 2025

DECLARATION of Matt Adams filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/20/2025)

RECAP
12 March 21, 2025

Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Pamela Bondi, Drew Bostock, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Kristi Noem, Sirce Owen, Bruce Scott, Tacoma Immigration Court, United States Department of Homeland Security. (CJS) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

RECAP
13 March 21, 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez (Kang, Leila) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

RECAP
March 21, 2025

Add and Terminate Judges

March 21, 2025

District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright added. (CJS)

14 March 31, 2025

NOTICE that the following is RE-NOTED: 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 2 MOTION to Certify Class . Filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. Noting Date 4/21/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
15 April 1, 2025

NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 4/2/2025 at 01:30 PM via ZOOM before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.The court will provide remote audio public access for this hearing. Access information can be found on the court's Calendar page at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. (MET) (Entered: 04/01/2025)

RECAP
16 April 1, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Victor M. Mercado-Santana on behalf of Defendants Pamela Bondi, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Sirce Owen, Tacoma Immigration Court, Drew Bostock, Bruce Scott, Kristi Noem, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Mercado-Santana, Victor) (Entered: 04/01/2025)

RECAP
April 1, 2025

Notice of Hearing

17 April 2, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ian S Lam on behalf of Defendants Pamela Bondi, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Sirce Owen, Tacoma Immigration Court, Drew Bostock, Bruce Scott, Kristi Noem, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 04/02/2025)

RECAP
18 April 2, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michael D. Ross on behalf of Defendants Pamela Bondi, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Sirce Owen, Tacoma Immigration Court, Drew Bostock, Bruce Scott, Kristi Noem. (Ross, Michael) (Entered: 04/02/2025)

RECAP
19 April 2, 2025

MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held on 4/2/2025 before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright- Dep Clerk: Mary Trent; Pla Counsel: Aaron Korthuis, Glenda Madrid, Leila Kang, Matt Adams; Def Counsel: Victor Mercado-Santana, Ian Lam, Michael Ross; CR: Sheri Schelbert; Time of Hearing: 1:30 PM; Courtroom: Zoom; Court hears from parties and sets the following briefing schedule: defense response to motions due 4/14; plaintiff reply due 4/17. Motions Hearing re: 2 MOTION to Certify Class and 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction set for 4/21/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright. The court will provide remote audio public access for this hearing. Access information can be found on the court's Calendar page at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. (MET) (Entered: 04/02/2025)

RECAP
April 2, 2025

Scheduling Conference

20 April 11, 2025

AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to Drew Bostock, Bruce Scott, Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Pamela Bondi, Executive Office for Immigratino Review, Sirce Owen, Tacoma Immigration Court on 3/21/2025, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Kang, Leila) (Entered: 04/11/2025)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

RECAP
21 April 14, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . (Ross, Michael) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
22 April 14, 2025

DECLARATION of Jessica Harrold filed by All Defendants re 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Ross, Michael) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
23 April 14, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to 2 MOTION to Certify Class . (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
24 April 17, 2025

REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez, TO RESPONSE to 2 MOTION to Certify Class (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 04/17/2025)

RECAP
25 April 17, 2025

REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez, TO RESPONSE to 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 04/17/2025)

RECAP
26 April 17, 2025

DECLARATION of Andrea Lino filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 2 MOTION to Certify Class, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 04/17/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

RECAP
27 April 21, 2025

MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held on 4/21/2025 before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright- Dep Clerk: Mary Trent; Pla Counsel: Aaron Korthuis, Glenda Madrid, Leila Kang, Matt Adams; Def Counsel: Victor Mercado-Santana, Michael Ross; CR: Angela Nicolavo; Time of Hearing: 9:30 AM; Courtroom: C; Court hears arguments from counsel re 2 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez, 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez and takes the matters under consideration. Written orders to issue. (MET) (Entered: 04/21/2025)

RECAP
April 21, 2025

Motion Hearing

28 April 24, 2025

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by All Defendants for proceedings held on 4/21/2025 re 27 Motion Hearing,,. Requesting Attorney: Victor M. Mercado-Santana.Posting of this Transcript Order form does not constitute an official request for transcript(s). If you have not already done so, you MUST contact the individual court reporter(s), Angela Nicolavo (angela_nicolavo@wawd.uscourts.gov, 253-882-3832) to make payment arrangements and secure your desired delivery time. (Mercado-Santana, Victor) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

RECAP
29 April 24, 2025

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court further ORDERS that:(1)Defendants must provide Rodriguez with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C.§ 1226(a) within fourteen days of this Order;(2)Defendants are enjoined from denying bond to Rodriguez on the basis that heis detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2);(3)Defendants must record the hearing provided in connection with this Order.Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(CJS) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

Clearinghouse
30 April 29, 2025

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 4/21/2025 before Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.Parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Information regarding the policy can be found on the court's website at www.wawd.uscourts.gov.To purchase a copy of the transcript, contact court reporter Angela Nicolavo, angela_nicolavo@wawd.uscourts.gov, 253-882-3832. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/28/2025, (AN) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

RECAP
31 April 30, 2025

ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT, DISCOVERY, DEPOSITIONS AND EARLY SETTLEMENT by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 7/15/2025, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/22/2025, Joint Status Report due by 7/29/2025. (MET) (Entered: 04/30/2025)

RECAP
32 May 2, 2025

ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MW) (Entered: 05/02/2025)

Clearinghouse
33 May 14, 2025

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Behalf of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/14/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 05/14/2025)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
34 May 14, 2025

DECLARATION of Sydney Maltese filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 33 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Behalf of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 05/14/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

RECAP
35 May 14, 2025

DECLARATION of Alfredo Juarez Zeferino filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re 33 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Behalf of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 05/14/2025)

RECAP
36 May 15, 2025

NOTICE of Intent to Oppose re 33 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Behalf of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino ; filed by All Defendants. (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 05/15/2025)

RECAP
37 May 16, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to 33 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order on Behalf of Class Member Alfredo Juarez Zeferino. (Mercado-Santana, Victor) (Entered: 05/16/2025)

RECAP
38 May 19, 2025

ORDER denying Class Member Zeferino's 33 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The Court finds that Zeferino has failed to satisfy the high bar required for emergency relief. Thus, the Court DENIES Zeferinos motion for a TRO. The Court instructs Zeferino that he may still seek a preliminary injunction that allows for full briefing or pursue alternative paths for individual relief. Should he choose to seek a preliminary injunction, Zeferino must address the Court's power to grant the type of relief requested to an unnamed class member. Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(CJS) (Entered: 05/19/2025)

Clearinghouse
39 May 20, 2025

Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, with Proposed Order, filed by All Defendants. Noting Date 5/20/2025, (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 05/20/2025)

RECAP
40 May 20, 2025

ORDER granting the Parties' 39 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before June 6, 2025. Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(CJS) (Entered: 05/20/2025)

RECAP
41 June 2, 2025

MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class, filed by All Plaintiffs. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/8/2025 6/30/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron) Modified to correct motion event on 6/3/2025 (MDH). Modified Noting date per 53 Order on 6/10/2025 (MDH). (Entered: 06/02/2025)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
42 June 2, 2025

DECLARATION of Sydney Maltese filed by All Plaintiffs re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/02/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G

View on PACER

8 Exhibit H

View on PACER

9 Exhibit I

View on PACER

10 Exhibit J

View on PACER

11 Exhibit K

View on PACER

12 Exhibit L

View on PACER

13 Exhibit M

View on PACER

RECAP
43 June 2, 2025

DECLARATION of David Nunez Hernandez filed by All Plaintiffs re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/02/2025)

RECAP
44 June 2, 2025

DECLARATION of Yesica Contreras-Baca filed by All Plaintiffs re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/02/2025)

RECAP
45 June 2, 2025

DECLARATION of Jose Manuel Mateo filed by All Plaintiffs re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/02/2025)

RECAP
46 June 5, 2025

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs, filed by All Defendants. Noting Date 6/5/2025, (Mercado-Santana, Victor) (Entered: 06/05/2025)

RECAP
47 June 5, 2025

MINUTE ORDER. Defendants' unopposed motion for leave to file overlength briefing 46 is GRANTED. Defendants are allowed up to 10,500 words for their forthcoming combined dispositive motion. Plaintiff will also be allowed up to 10,500 words for his opposition brief. Authorized by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MW) (Entered: 06/05/2025)

RECAP
June 5, 2025

Order on Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs

48 June 6, 2025

MOTION to Stay re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class stay briefing, filed by All Defendants. Noting Date 6/20/2025, (Mercado-Santana, Victor) (Entered: 06/06/2025)

RECAP
49 June 6, 2025

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by All Defendants. Oral Argument Requested. Noting Date 7/7/2025, (Ross, Michael) (Entered: 06/06/2025)

RECAP
50 June 6, 2025

DECLARATION of Jessica Harrold filed by All Defendants re 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Ross, Michael) (Entered: 06/06/2025)

RECAP
51 June 6, 2025

DECLARATION of Daniel Strzelczyk filed by All Defendants re 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Ross, Michael) (Entered: 06/06/2025)

RECAP
52 June 9, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Plaintiffs, to 48 MOTION to Stay re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class stay briefing. (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/09/2025)

RECAP
53 June 10, 2025

ORDER denying 48 Motion to Stay re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class stay briefing. The Court GRANTS Defendants' alternative request to allow 21 days from entry of this Order for Defendant to file an opposition to Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. Defendants must now file their opposition to Plaintiffs' motion by July 1, 2025 instead of June 23, 2025.The Court directs the clerk to re-note the pending summary judgment motion (Dkt. 41 ) for July 8, 2025. See LCR 7(d)(4). The Court will contact the parties to schedule a combined, in-person oral argument on the partial summary judgment motion and the motion to dismiss after the briefing on both motions is complete. Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MDH) Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MDH) (Entered: 06/10/2025)

RECAP
54 June 27, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Plaintiffs, to 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Oral Argument Requested. (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/27/2025)

RECAP
55 June 27, 2025

DECLARATION of Aaron Korthuis filed by All Plaintiffs re 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 06/27/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

RECAP
56 July 1, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class. Oral Argument Requested. (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 07/01/2025)

RECAP
July 2, 2025

At the parties request and agreement, the following deadlines are reset: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/15/2025, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/22/2025, Joint Status Report due by 9/29/2025. (MET)

57 July 7, 2025

REPLY, filed by All Defendants, TO RESPONSE to 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 07/07/2025)

RECAP
58 July 8, 2025

REPLY, filed by All Plaintiffs, TO RESPONSE to 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class (Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 07/08/2025)

RECAP
59 July 8, 2025

DECLARATION of Sydney Maltese filed by All Plaintiffs re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 07/08/2025)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

RECAP
60 July 21, 2025

NOTICE of Hearing on 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment & 49 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 8/22/2025 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom C before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.The court will provide remote audio public access for this hearing. Access information can be found on the court's Calendar page at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. (MET) (Entered: 07/21/2025)

RECAP
July 21, 2025

Notice of Hearing on Motion

61 Aug. 18, 2025

NOTICE of Supplemental Authority re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class, 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - D. Mass. decision, # 2 Exhibit B - S.D.N.Y. decision, # 3 Exhibit C - D. Mass decision, # 4 Exhibit D - C.D. Cal. decision, # 5 Exhibit E - D. Minn. decision, # 6 Exhibit F - ICE memo, # 7 Exhibit G - Mateo IJ order, # 8 Exhibit H - Nunez IJ order, # 9 Exhibit I - Contereras-Baca IJ order, # 10 Exhibit J - Juarez IJ order)(Korthuis, Aaron) (Entered: 08/18/2025)

1 Exhibit A - D. Mass. decision

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B - S.D.N.Y. decision

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C - D. Mass decision

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D - C.D. Cal. decision

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E - D. Minn. decision

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F - ICE memo

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G - Mateo IJ order

View on PACER

8 Exhibit H - Nunez IJ order

View on PACER

9 Exhibit I - Contereras-Baca IJ order

View on PACER

10 Exhibit J - Juarez IJ order

View on PACER

RECAP
62 Aug. 22, 2025

MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held on 8/22/2025 before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright- Dep Clerk: Mary Trent; Pla Counsel: Aaron Korthuis, Glenda Madrid, Leila Kang, Matt Adams; Def Counsel: Michael Ross, Iam Lam; CR: Sheri Schelbert; Time of Hearing: 1:30 PM; Courtroom: C; Court hears from counsel on 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class and re 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and takes the matters under advisement. Written order will issue. (MET) (Entered: 08/22/2025)

RECAP
Aug. 22, 2025

Motion Hearing

63 Sept. 8, 2025

NOTICE of Supplemental Authority re 57 Reply to Response to Motion, 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 56 Response to Motion by All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025))(Lam, Ian) (Entered: 09/08/2025)

1 Exhibit A, Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)

View on PACER

RECAP
64 Sept. 11, 2025

NOTICE to Withdraw Request for Individual Injunctive Relief re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Bond Denial Class ; filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Kang, Leila) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

RECAP
Sept. 26, 2025

At the parties' request and agreement, the following deadline is reset: Joint Status Report due by 10/29/2025. (MET)

65 Sept. 30, 2025

ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 41 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying Defendants' 49 Motion to Dismiss. Summary judgment is GRANTED to the Bond Denial Class on their claims that their detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) is unlawful. The Court declares that Bond Denial Class members are detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). The Court further declares that the Tacoma Immigration Courts practice of denying bond to Bond Denial Class members on the basis of § 1225(b)(2) violates the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Court will enter final judgment in a separate document on the claims of the Bond Denial Class. Signed by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MW) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Clearinghouse
66 Sept. 30, 2025

JUDGMENT BY COURT. Summary judgment is GRANTED to the Bond Denial Class on their claims that their detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) is unlawful. As set forth in the class certification order, the Bond Denial Class is defined as all noncitizens without lawful status detained at the Northwest ICE Processing Center who (1) have entered or will enter the United States without inspection, (2) are not apprehended upon arrival, (3) are not or will not be subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. §1226(c), § 1225(b)(1), or § 1231 at the time the noncitizen is scheduled for or requests a bond hearing. The Court declares that Bond Denial Class members are detained under 8 U.S.C.§1226(a) and are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2).The Court further declares that the Tacoma Immigration Court's practice of denying bond to Bond Denial Class members on the basis of § 1225(b)(2) violates the Immigration and Nationality Act. (MW) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Clearinghouse
67 Oct. 1, 2025

MOTION to Stay Deadlines in Light of Lapse of Appropriations, filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/15/2025, (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 10/01/2025)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
68 Oct. 1, 2025

MINUTE ORDER. Defendants' motion to stay 67 is GRANTED IN PART. The Court grants Defendants' request to stay the deadline to answer the complaint and file the parties' 26(f) joint status report due to the lapse in appropriations. The Court agrees with Plaintiff, however, that the answer and the JSR shall be due within 14 days of the end of the government shutdown. Defendants' counsel shall notify the Court as soon as Congress has appropriated funds for the Department of Justice. Authorized by District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.(MW) (Entered: 10/01/2025)

RECAP
Oct. 1, 2025

Order on Motion to Stay AND ~Util - Terminate Deadlines/Hearings

70 Oct. 15, 2025

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by All Defendants for proceedings held on 08/22/2025 re 62 Motion Hearing,,. Requesting Attorney: Ian S Lam.Posting of this Transcript Order form does not constitute an official request for transcript(s). If you have not already done so, you MUST contact the individual court reporter(s), Sheri Schelbert (sheri_schelbert@wawd.uscourts.gov, 253-882-3831) to make payment arrangements and secure your desired delivery time. (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 10/15/2025)

RECAP
71 Oct. 28, 2025

NOTICE OF APPEAL to Ninth Circuit (#25-6842) re 65 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, 66 Judgment by Court,,, by All Defendants. No fee required- US Government Party (cc: USCA) (Ross, Michael) Modified to add Appeal no. on 10/30/2025 (ZMG). (Entered: 10/28/2025)

RECAP
73 Oct. 29, 2025

TIME SCHEDULE ORDER (#25-6842) as to 71 Notice of Appeal, filed by Bruce Scott, Sirce Owen, Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, Tacoma Immigration Court, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Drew Bostock, United States Department of Homeland Security. (ZMG) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

RECAP
72 Oct. 30, 2025

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on 8/22/2025 before Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright.Parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Information regarding the policy can be found on the court's website at www.wawd.uscourts.gov.To purchase a copy of the transcript, contact court reporter Sheri Schelbert, sheri_schelbert@wawd.uscourts.gov Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/28/2026, (SLS) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

RECAP
74 Oct. 31, 2025

MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, , filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/21/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
75 Oct. 31, 2025

DECLARATION of Nicolas McKee filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Korthuis, Aaron)

RECAP
76 Oct. 31, 2025

DECLARATION of Jennifer Lesmez filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Korthuis, Aaron)

RECAP
77 Oct. 31, 2025

DECLARATION of Virginia Rivas Aldrete filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Korthuis, Aaron)

RECAP
78 Oct. 31, 2025

DECLARATION of Laura Reist filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Korthuis, Aaron)

RECAP
79 Oct. 31, 2025

MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Motion for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/31/2025, (Korthuis, Aaron)

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
80 Nov. 3, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to 79 MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Motion for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202. (Lam, Ian) (Entered: 11/03/2025)

RECAP
81 Nov. 3, 2025

MINUTE ORDER at the direction of District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright: Plaintiff's motion to expedite briefing Dkt. [79] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court agrees with Defendants that motions to shorten time are procedurally improper under the Local Civil Rules and it is rare that briefing will be expedited in a typical civil case. The parties are usually expected to cooperate on briefing schedules that depart from the Local Civil Rules or use the telephonic hearing procedure under Local Civil Rule 7 for true emergencies. The Court also agrees with Defendants that four business days would be an unreasonably short amount of time for Defendants to respond to the motion. The Court, however, is faced with its own scheduling constraints due to the lapse in federal appropriations and intends to schedule a hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Further Relief (Dkt. 74) for Thursday, November 20, 2025. To accommodate that hearing date, based on the Courts inherent power to manage its docket, the Court ORDERS that Defendants response to the Motion for Further Relief shall be filed no later than November 14, 2025. Plaintiffs reply shall be filed no later than November 19, 2025. The Clerk is respectfully requested to re-note the Motion for Further Relief Dkt. [74] for November 20, 2025. A hearing notice will follow. (ZMG)

RECAP
Nov. 3, 2025

Order on Motion to Expedite AND ~Util - Set/Reset Motion Noting Date

82 Nov. 6, 2025

NOTICE of Hearing on [74] MOTION for Further Relief. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2025 via ZOOM at 10:00 AM before District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright. The court will provide remote audio public access for this hearing. Access information can be found on the court's Calendar page at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. (MET)

RECAP
Nov. 6, 2025

Notice of Hearing on Motion

83 Nov. 12, 2025

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by All Defendants for proceedings held on 8/22/2025. Requesting Attorney: Victor M. Mercado-Santana. Posting of this Transcript Order form does not constitute an official request for transcript(s). If you have not already done so, you MUST contact the individual court reporter(s), Sheri Schelbert (sheri_schelbert@wawd.uscourts.gov, 253-882-3831) to make payment arrangements and secure your desired delivery time. (Mercado-Santana, Victor)

RECAP
84 Nov. 13, 2025

NOTICE OF RESTORATION OF FUNDING FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE re [68] Order on Motion to Stay,,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, ; filed by All Defendants. (Lam, Ian)

RECAP
85 Nov. 14, 2025

RESPONSE, by All Defendants, to [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, . (Lam, Ian)

RECAP
86 Nov. 14, 2025

DECLARATION of Jamie Burns filed by All Defendants re [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Lam, Ian)

RECAP
87 Nov. 19, 2025

REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez, TO RESPONSE to [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Korthuis, Aaron)

RECAP
88 Nov. 19, 2025

DECLARATION of Luis Garcia filed by Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez re [74] MOTION for Further Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 re [65] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, [66] Judgment by Court,,, (Korthuis, Aaron)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Washington

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 20, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiff in this case, Ramon Rodriguez Vazquez, is a resident of Washington state who was detained at the NWIPC and denied bond by the Tacoma Immigration Court on March 12, 2025; and, the Bond Denial Class of unadmitted, interior-apprehended NWIPC detainees, and the Bond Appeal Class facing BIA appeal delays.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Federal

Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2253; 2254; 2255

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

Western District of Washington 3:25-cv-05240

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 25-06842

Special Case Type(s):

Habeas

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Habeas

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Declaratory Judgment

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Recordkeeping

Issues

Immigration/Border:

Detention - criteria

Detention - procedures

ICE/DHS/INS raid

Recommended Citation