Case: United States v. Dyersburg Board of Education

2:66-cv-00241 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: Aug. 25, 1966

Closed Date: Feb. 12, 2026

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 25, 1966, the United States brought this lawsuit against the Dyersburg Board of Education and six of its individual members. The case was filed through Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, on behalf of a class of Black middle school students. The students alleged that Dyersburg had maintained a racially segregated school system. During this period, one senior high school, one junior high school and three elementary scho…

On August 25, 1966, the United States brought this lawsuit against the Dyersburg Board of Education and six of its individual members. The case was filed through Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, on behalf of a class of Black middle school students. The students alleged that Dyersburg had maintained a racially segregated school system. During this period, one senior high school, one junior high school and three elementary schools were maintained exclusively for white students and staffed exclusively by white personnel. One twelve grade school was maintained exclusively for Negro students and staffed exclusively by Negro personnel. While students were given the choice to enroll at either school, only thirteen of 601 Black students elected to enroll in traditionally all-white schools, and no white students chose to attend the traditionally all-Black schools.

The complaint alleged that Defendants had failed to take adequate steps for faculty and school desegregation and to remove the effect of past racial discrimination. Further, the students at primarily Black schools were afforded inferior educational opportunities and facilities to their white counterparts. Filing under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Plaintiff requested an injunction mandating that Defendants assign and reassign Black students to the predominantly white Dyersburg Junior and Senior High Schools, that Defendants provide remedial measures to correct past inadequacies in Black students' educations, and barring Dyersburg from further discriminatory practices.

The Court approved the Board’s desegregation plan, with the United States Department of Justice monitoring for compliance over the following decades. Sixty years later, the Trump administration began revisiting past settlements, consent decrees, and other court orders regarding racial discrimination, moving to dismiss those that did not suit their interests. The Department of Justice moved to dismiss this case on February 5, 2026, through a joint motion of unitary status and dismissal. That motion was granted on February 12, 2026. The Department of Justice announced the dismissal in a press release published on February 17, which stated that "Dyersburg City Schools no longer operates as a segregated system and has eliminated the vestiges of prior de jure segregation."

This case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Ben Hefter (2/19/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71464475/parties/united-states-of-america-v-dyersburg-board-of-education/


Judge(s)

Lipman, Sheryl Halle (Tennessee)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Carpenter, Jordan (Tennessee)

Feaman, Peter (Tennessee)

Williams, Sarah Pazar (Tennessee)

Attorney for Defendant

Owen, Debra D. (Tennessee)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

2:66-cv-00241

Complaint

United States of America v. Dyersburg Board of Education

Aug. 25, 1966

Aug. 25, 1966

Complaint
13

2:66-cv-00241

Stipulation

United States of America v. Dyersburg Board of Education

March 29, 1967

March 29, 1967

Order/Opinion
30

2:66-cv-00241

Joint Motion for Declaration of Unitary Status and Dismissal

United States of America v. Dyersburg Board of Education

Feb. 5, 2026

Feb. 5, 2026

Magistrate Report/Recommendation
31

2:66-cv-00241

Order Granting Joint Motion for Declaration of Unitary Status and Dismissal

United States of America v. Dyersburg Board of Education

Feb. 11, 2026

Feb. 11, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 382900

32

2:66-cv-00241

Judgment

United States of America v. Dyersburg Board of Education

Feb. 12, 2026

Feb. 12, 2026

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71464475/united-states-of-america-v-dyersburg-board-of-education/

Last updated Oct. 15, 2026, 3:43 a.m.

Docket for: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Dyersburg Board of Education
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 25, 1966

COMPLAINT against Fred Childress, Dyersburg Board of Education, William Murray, Hugh M Todd, Jr., A. D. Walker, Jr., W. C. Warren, George Yarbro, William S. Yates, filed by Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of the Attorney General)(cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

Clearinghouse
2 Aug. 25, 1966

MOTION for Application for an Order to Show Cause by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
3 Aug. 25, 1966

Filed Affidavit of Louis R. Lucas by Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits)(cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
4 Aug. 25, 1966

FILED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.. Signed by Judge Unassigned 7 on 08/25/1966. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
5 Sept. 1, 1966

MOTION of Defendants for Order Denying Application for a Preliminary Injunction by Fred Childress, Dyersburg Board of Education, William Murray, Hugh M Todd, Jr., A. D. Walker, Jr., W. C. Warren, George Yarbro, William S. Yates. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
6 Sept. 8, 1966

FILED ORDER on Motion of the Government to Withdraw its Application for Preliminary Injunctions Signed by Judge Unassigned 7 on 09/08/1966. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
7 Sept. 14, 1966

Filed ANSWER of Defendants to Complaint by Fred Childress, Dyersburg Board of Education, William Murray, Hugh M Todd, Jr., A. D. Walker, Jr., W. C. Warren, George Yarbro, William S. Yates. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
8 Jan. 30, 1967

NOTICE of Taking of Depositions by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
9 Feb. 1, 1967

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
10 Feb. 10, 1967

NOTICE of Taking of Deposition of Samuel Reed by Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
11 Feb. 10, 1967

MOTION to Substitute Defendant by Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
12 Feb. 28, 1967

NOTICE to Take Oral Deposition by Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (cmm) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

RECAP
27 Jan. 30, 2026

COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document 26 MOTION to Substitute Attorney Sara Margolis filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been filed. For future reference, please note : Proposed orders are not to be published on CM/ECF, only indicated ath one was submitted to chambers. Please refer to the ECF User Manual and ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (jae) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

RECAP
28 Jan. 30, 2026

TEXT ORDER granting 26 Motion to Substitute Assistant U.S. Attorney. The United States' motion requesting substitution of Jordan Carpenter for Sara Margolis as its counsel of record is granted.Jordan Carpenter is ordered to file a Notice of Appearance on the docket.This matter has been added to the electronic filing system for preservation only. No new activity is expected in this closed case.Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/30/2026. (jpw) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

RECAP
31 Feb. 11, 2026

ORDER GRANTING 30 JOINT MOTION FOR DECLARATION OF UNITARY STATUS AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 2/11/26. (shl)

Clearinghouse
32 Feb. 12, 2026

JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 2/12/26. (shl)

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

Tennessee

Case Type(s):

School Desegregation

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Reversing Course on Existing Litigation

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 25, 1966

Closing Date: Feb. 12, 2026

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The United States, originally via Attorney General Katzenbach.

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Defendant Type(s):

Elementary/Secondary School

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title IV, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000c et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Western District of Tennessee 2:66-cv-00241

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General/Misc.:

Education

Juveniles

Pattern or Practice

Racial segregation

School/University Facilities

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Impact

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Recommended Citation