Case: State of Minnesota v. U.S. Department of Justice

1:26-cv-01007 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 24, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 24, 2026, the State of Minnesota, Hennepin County Attorney, and Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Superintendent filed suit against federal agencies and officials in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit arose from three shootings involving federal agents during "Operation Metro Surge," a large-scale immigration enforcement operation conducted in Minnesota. On January 7, 2026, ICE Agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed 37-year-old U.S. citizen Renee Goo…

On March 24, 2026, the State of Minnesota, Hennepin County Attorney, and Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Superintendent filed suit against federal agencies and officials in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit arose from three shootings involving federal agents during "Operation Metro Surge," a large-scale immigration enforcement operation conducted in Minnesota. On January 7, 2026, ICE Agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed 37-year-old U.S. citizen Renee Good. Seven days later, on January 14, 2026, a federal immigration agent shot and wounded Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis. Ten days after that incident, on January 24, 2026, federal immigration agents shot and killed U.S. citizen Alex Jeffrey Pretti. The plaintiffs alleged that federal officials departed from longstanding cooperative practices by blocking Minnesota investigators from accessing evidence and conducting their investigation into these shootings⁻⁻. The complaint asserted four counts against the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Attorney General Pamela Bondi, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem⁻. These included Administrative Procedure Act (APA) claims alleging arbitrary and capricious action and violations of statutory authority, an alternative APA claim for unlawfully withheld agency action, and a Tenth Amendment claim alleging violation of state sovereignty in criminal law enforcement. The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief, orders compelling compliance with evidence requests, access to testimony and records related to the shootings, and attorneys' fees.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Vedant Vamshidhar (7/2/2026)

Claire Pollard (3/27/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72590076/parties/state-of-minnesota-v-us-department-of-justice/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:26-cv-01007

Complaint

State of Minnesota et al. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al.

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

Complaint
17

1:26-cv-01007

Amended Complaint

June 18, 2026

June 18, 2026

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72590076/state-of-minnesota-v-us-department-of-justice/

Last updated July 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12317154) filed by STATE OF MINNESOTA, DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - DHS Touhy Demand re: Good, # 2 Exhibit 2 - DOJ Touhy Demand re: Good, # 3 Exhibit 3 - DHS Touhy Demand re: Pretti, # 4 Exhibit 4 - DOJ Touhy Demand re: Pretti, # 5 Exhibit 5 - DHS Touhy Demand re: Sosa-Celis, # 6 Exhibit 6 - DOJ Touhy Demand re: Sosa-Celis, # 7 Exhibit 7 - ICE Email Exchange, # 8 Exhibit 8 - DHS Touhy Response re: Good, # 9 Civil Cover Sheet, # 10 Summons, # 11 Summons, # 12 Summons, # 13 Summons)(Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

1 Exhibit 1 - DHS Touhy Demand re: Good

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 2 - DOJ Touhy Demand re: Good

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit 3 - DHS Touhy Demand re: Pretti

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit 4 - DOJ Touhy Demand re: Pretti

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit 5 - DHS Touhy Demand re: Sosa-Celis

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit 6 - DOJ Touhy Demand re: Sosa-Celis

View on RECAP

7 Exhibit 7 - ICE Email Exchange

View on RECAP

8 Exhibit 8 - DHS Touhy Response re: Good

View on RECAP

9 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

10 Summons

View on RECAP

11 Summons

View on RECAP

12 Summons

View on RECAP

13 Summons

View on RECAP

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

Clearinghouse
2

NOTICE of Appearance by Nathaniel Avi Gideon Zelinsky on behalf of MARY F. MORIARTY (Zelinsky, Nathaniel) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

3

CIVIL COVER SHEET by STATE OF MINNESOTA, DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY re 1 Complaint,, filed by STATE OF MINNESOTA, DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY. Related document: 1 Complaint,, filed by DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA.(Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

4

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE to U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General filed by STATE OF MINNESOTA, DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY. Related document: 1 Complaint,, filed by DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

5

SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

1 Notice and Consent

View on PACER

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

Notice of Error- New Case

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR The following error(s) need correction: Incorrect civil cover sheet. Please locate the Civil Cover Sheet (JS44) form at www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms & file using the event Civil Cover Sheet. Missing summonses- U.S. government. When naming a U.S. government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmtm)

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (zmtm)

March 24, 2026

March 24, 2026

6

NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Svendsen on behalf of DREW EVANS, STATE OF MINNESOTA (Svendsen, Kimberly) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

March 25, 2026

March 25, 2026

7

NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Robert Richie on behalf of DREW EVANS, STATE OF MINNESOTA (Richie, Joseph) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

March 25, 2026

March 25, 2026

8

NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Farrell on behalf of DREW EVANS, STATE OF MINNESOTA (Farrell, Peter) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

March 25, 2026

March 25, 2026

9

NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan David Kunz on behalf of MARY F. MORIARTY (Kunz, Morgan) (Entered: 03/27/2026)

March 27, 2026

March 27, 2026

RECAP
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Davis on behalf of MARY F. MORIARTY (Davis, Sarah) (Entered: 03/27/2026)

March 27, 2026

March 27, 2026

11

NOTICE of Appearance by Clare A. Diegel on behalf of MARY F. MORIARTY (Diegel, Clare) (Entered: 03/30/2026)

March 30, 2026

March 30, 2026

12

STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 03/31/26. (Attachment: # 1 Exhibit 1) (mac) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

March 31, 2026

March 31, 2026

RECAP
13

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/24/2026. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 5/23/2026. (Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

April 8, 2026

April 8, 2026

14

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General April 6, 2026. (Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

April 8, 2026

April 8, 2026

15

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PAMELA BONDI served on 4/6/2026; KRISTI NOEM served on 4/3/2026; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 4/3/2026; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 4/6/2026 (Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

April 8, 2026

April 8, 2026

RECAP
16

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by PAMELA BONDI, KRISTI NOEM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Anon, Pierce) (Entered: 05/20/2026)

May 20, 2026

May 20, 2026

RECAP

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

May 21, 2026

May 21, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting 16 Motion to Extend. The following deadlines shall govern this matter: (1) Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' February 2026 letters and produce an administrative record to Plaintiffs by 6/4/2026; (2) Plaintiffs will amend their complaint to address the 6/4/2026 letters by 6/18/2026; (3) Defendants and Plaintiffs shall file their respective cross-dispositive motions by 6/25/2026; (4) The parties' oppositions and replies shall be filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7. The schedule is subject to the following proviso: Neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants waive any arguments by agreeing to the foregoing schedule. Plaintiffs do not oppose this requested relief, with the caveat that they "reserve the position that Defendants have already made denial decisions that constitute final agency action, and that any letters produced after the filing of the Complaint would represent Defendants' post-hoc litigating position; and their agreement does not constitute an admission or agreement that the administrative record that will be filed June 4, 2026, represents the operative administrative record in this matter." Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 5/21/2026. (lcegs1)

May 21, 2026

May 21, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines

May 22, 2026

May 22, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant Response and Administrative Record due by 6/4/2026. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint due by 6/18/2026. Plaintiffs and Defendants Dispositive Cross Motions due by 6/25/2026. (mac)

May 22, 2026

May 22, 2026

17

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by STATE OF MINNESOTA, DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - DHS Good Touhy Demand, # 2 Exhibit 2 - DOJ Good Touhy Demand, # 3 Exhibit 3 - DHS Pretti Touhy Demand, # 4 Exhibit 4 - DOJ Pretti Touhy Demand, # 5 Exhibit 5 - DHS Sosa-Celis Touhy Demand, # 6 Exhibit 6 - DOJ Sosa-Celis Touhy Demand, # 7 Exhibit 7 - ICE Feb. 18, 2026 email, # 8 Exhibit 8 - ICE Good Response #1, # 9 Exhibit 9 - ICE Good Response #2, # 10 Exhibit 10 - ICE Pretti Response, # 11 Exhibit 11 - ICE Sosa-Celis Response, # 12 Exhibit 12 - CBP Pretti Response, # 13 Exhibit 13 - DOJ Good Response, # 14 Exhibit 14 - DOJ Pretti Response, # 15 Exhibit 15 - DOJ Sosa-Celis Response, # 16 Exhibit 16 - USAO 6.2.26 Letter to Superintendent Evans, # 17 Exhibit 17 - Evans 2026.06.03 Letter to USAO, # 18 Exhibit 18 - Redline (Submitted per Standing Order))(Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

1 Exhibit 1 - DHS Good Touhy Demand

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2 - DOJ Good Touhy Demand

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 3 - DHS Pretti Touhy Demand

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 4 - DOJ Pretti Touhy Demand

View on PACER

5 Exhibit 5 - DHS Sosa-Celis Touhy Demand

View on PACER

6 Exhibit 6 - DOJ Sosa-Celis Touhy Demand

View on PACER

7 Exhibit 7 - ICE Feb. 18, 2026 email

View on PACER

8 Exhibit 8 - ICE Good Response #1

View on PACER

9 Exhibit 9 - ICE Good Response #2

View on PACER

10 Exhibit 10 - ICE Pretti Response

View on PACER

11 Exhibit 11 - ICE Sosa-Celis Response

View on PACER

12 Exhibit 12 - CBP Pretti Response

View on PACER

13 Exhibit 13 - DOJ Good Response

View on PACER

14 Exhibit 14 - DOJ Pretti Response

View on PACER

15 Exhibit 15 - DOJ Sosa-Celis Response

View on PACER

16 Exhibit 16 - USAO 6.2.26 Letter to Superintendent Evans

View on PACER

17 Exhibit 17 - Evans 2026.06.03 Letter to USAO

View on PACER

18 Exhibit 18 - Redline (Submitted per Standing Order)

View on PACER

June 18, 2026

June 18, 2026

Clearinghouse
18

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Cross-Dispositive Motions by DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. (Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

June 22, 2026

June 22, 2026

RECAP

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

June 26, 2026

June 26, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines

June 26, 2026

June 26, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting 18 motion for extension of time. Plaintiffs and Defendants shall file their respective cross-dispositive motions by 7/6/2026. The parties' oppositions and replies shall be filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7. The Court reminds counsel of the obligation to file a proposed order with each motion. See LCvR 7(c). Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 6/26/2026. (lcegs1)

June 26, 2026

June 26, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiffs and Defendants Respective Cross-Dispositive Motions by 7/6/2026. (mac)

June 26, 2026

June 26, 2026

19

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by Patrick Keating on behalf of All Defendants Substituting for attorney Pierce J. Anon (Keating, Patrick) (Entered: 06/30/2026)

June 30, 2026

June 30, 2026

20

Joint MOTION to Modify Briefing Schedule by DREW EVANS, MARY F. MORIARTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Freeny, Kyle) (Entered: 06/30/2026)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 30, 2026

June 30, 2026

RECAP

MINUTE ORDER granting 20 motion to modify briefing schedule. The deadlines established in the Minute Order of May 21, 2026 are VACATED. The defendants shall respond to the Amended Complaint by no later than August 20, 2026. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 7/1/2026. (lcegs1)

July 1, 2026

July 1, 2026

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 24, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State of Minnesota and Hennepin County

Plaintiff Type(s):

City/County Plaintiff

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Federalism (including 10th Amendment)

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-01007

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Immigration/Border:

Criminal prosecution

Recommended Citation