Case: Barbosa Da Cunha v. Moniz

6:25-cv-06532 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York

Filed Date: Oct. 2, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is one of several lawsuits in which a federal court of appeals has addressed whether the mandatory detention (without bond) provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) applies to noncitizens present in the United States.  Petitioner, a noncitizen from Brazil, entered the United States without inspection and admission around 2005 and had lived in the United States ever since. He applied for asylum in 2016 and was granted a valid work permit, but in September 2025, the government arrested him on a…

This is one of several lawsuits in which a federal court of appeals has addressed whether the mandatory detention (without bond) provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) applies to noncitizens present in the United States. 

Petitioner, a noncitizen from Brazil, entered the United States without inspection and admission around 2005 and had lived in the United States ever since. He applied for asylum in 2016 and was granted a valid work permit, but in September 2025, the government arrested him on an administrative warrant, placed him in removal proceedings, and detained him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A). Petitioner filed this habeas action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York on September 26, 2025, after an immigration judge found that he was subject to mandatory detention under Section 1225(b)(2)(A). 

On October 20, 2025, the district court granted the petition, concluding that Section 1225(b)(2)(A) did not apply to petitioner and that, instead, his detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), under which he was eligible for release on bond. The district court ordered the government to either provide petitioner with a bond hearing or release him. An immigration judge held a hearing and, after determining that Petitioner did not present a flight risk or danger, ordered him released on bond on October 29, 2025.  On November 25, 2025, the district court issued a decision and order memorializing its reasons for denying the government's motion to dismiss and granting the petitioner's application for habeas relief, and closing the case. 2025 WL 3280575. The government appealed. 

In a decision issued on April 28, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court, holding that the plain text of Sections 1225(b)(2)(A) and 1226(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”) make clear that only Section 1226(a), which establishes a discretionary detention scheme with the opportunity for release on bond, applies to a noncitizen like petitioner. By contrast, the mandatory detention scheme of Section 1225(b)(2)(A) does not apply to noncitizens like petitioner who are present in the United States after entering the country without inspection and admission, and who were not apprehended at or near the border at the time of entry.  The court explained that its conclusion was further supported by the statute’s context, structure, history, and purpose, comported with the Supreme Court’s established understanding of the relevant provisions, reflected Executive Branch practice over thirty years and across five Presidential administrations, and explained why Congress has never challenged that settled practice despite making numerous amendments to the immigration laws. Finally, the court cited its obligation to construe statutes at issue to avoid the serious constitutional questions that would underlie what would be a broad mass-detention-without-bond mandate for millions of noncitizens under the government's proposed interpretation of the statutes. 2026 WL 1146044. 

Summary Authors

Clearinghouse (5/13/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71530564/parties/barbosa-da-cunha-v-moniz/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
31

6:25-cv-06532

Decision and Order

Da Cunha v. Freden

Nov. 25, 2025

Nov. 25, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 3280575

78

25-03141

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York

Barbosa Da Cunha v. Freden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

April 28, 2026

April 28, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 1146044

79

25-03141

[Untitled]

Da Cunha v. Moniz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

April 28, 2026

April 28, 2026

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71530564/barbosa-da-cunha-v-moniz/

Last updated June 7, 2026, 3:07 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11264825 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Barbosa Da Cunha. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Fried, Syrie) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/26/2025)

Sept. 26, 2025

Sept. 26, 2025

2

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. EMERGENCY ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (CM) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/26/2025)

Sept. 26, 2025

Sept. 26, 2025

RECAP
3

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (CM) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/29/2025)

Sept. 29, 2025

Sept. 29, 2025

4

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CAM) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/29/2025)

Sept. 29, 2025

Sept. 29, 2025

5

Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (CAM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2025: # 1 Appendix) (CAM). [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/29/2025)

Sept. 29, 2025

Sept. 29, 2025

6

Copies of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 4 General Order 19-02 and 5 Service Order - 2241 Petition sent to matthew.lyons@usdoj.gov, USAMA.CivilProcess@usdoj.gov, and leah.foley@usdoj.gov. on 9/29/2025. (CAM) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/29/2025)

Sept. 29, 2025

Sept. 29, 2025

7

NOTICE of Appearance by Julio Cortes del Olmo on behalf of Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa Da Cunha (Cortes del Olmo, Julio) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

8

AMENDED Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) . (Cortes del Olmo, Julio) Modified text on 9/30/2025 (SEC). [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

9

NOTICE of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar on behalf of Patricia Hyde, Michael Krol, Todd M Lyons, Antone D. Moniz, Kristi Noem (Farquhar, Rayford) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

10

Assented to MOTION to Transfer Case to Western District of New York. by Patricia Hyde, Michael Krol, Todd M Lyons, Antone D. Moniz.(Farquhar, Rayford) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 10/01/2025)

Oct. 1, 2025

Oct. 1, 2025

11

Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER granting Assented to Motion to Transfer Habeas Petition to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York 10 . (SEC) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 10/02/2025)

Oct. 2, 2025

Oct. 2, 2025

12

Case transferred to Western District of New York. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet sent to Clerk in that district. (SEC) [Transferred from mad on 10/2/2025.] (Entered: 10/02/2025)

Oct. 2, 2025

Oct. 2, 2025

13

Case transferred in from District of Massachusetts; Case Number 1:25-cv-12797. (Entered: 10/02/2025)

Oct. 2, 2025

Oct. 2, 2025

Case assigned to Hon. Meredith A. Vacca. Notification to Chambers of electronic case transfer. (CGJ)

Oct. 2, 2025

Oct. 2, 2025

Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (CGJ)

Oct. 2, 2025

Oct. 2, 2025

14

NOTICE of Appearance by Paul J O'Dwyer on behalf of Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa Da Cunha (O'Dwyer, Paul) (Entered: 10/03/2025)

Oct. 3, 2025

Oct. 3, 2025

15

Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa Da Cunha.(O'Dwyer, Paul) (Entered: 10/03/2025)

Oct. 3, 2025

Oct. 3, 2025

16

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. File Pro Hac Vice Admission/secure local counsel by 10/7/2025. Second Amended Petition due by 10/7/2025. Status Conference (virtual) set for 10/8/2025 10:00 AM before Hon. Meredith A. Vacca. Respondent Responses due by 10/14/2025. Petitioner Reply due by 10/16/2025. See Order for complete details. Signed by Hon. Meredith A. Vacca on 10/3/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Petition)(DMK)This was mailed to: Syrie D. Fried, Julio Cortes del Olmo, Rayford A. Farquhar. (Entered: 10/03/2025)

1 Amended Petition

View on RECAP

Oct. 3, 2025

Oct. 3, 2025

17

NOTICE of Appearance by Adam A. Khalil on behalf of Patricia Hyde, Michael Krol, Todd M. Lyons, Antone D. Moniz, Kristi Noem (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 10/06/2025)

Oct. 6, 2025

Oct. 6, 2025

18

Letter filed by Patricia Hyde, Michael Krol, Todd M. Lyons, Antone D. Moniz, Kristi Noem stipulating to custodians. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 10/06/2025)

Oct. 6, 2025

Oct. 6, 2025

19

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Meredith A. Vacca: Status Conference held on 10/8/2025. Appearances: Paul J. O'Dwyer, Esq., on behalf of Plaintiff; Adam A. Khalil, AUSA, on behalf of Defendants. Parties advise Court of status and immigration proceedings. Response and Reply deadlines remain in effect as previously ordered in 16 . Show Cause Hearing set for 10/20/2025 02:00 PM in via video conference before Hon. Meredith A. Vacca. (Court Reporter Joony Odenbach.) (KSP) (Entered: 10/08/2025)

Oct. 8, 2025

Oct. 8, 2025

20

TEXT ORDER. On October 6, 2025, Respondent's counsel stipulated to substitution of Joseph E. Freden, Deputy Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as Petitioner's present custodian. ECF No. 18. Further, the Court granted Defendant's counsel's oral motion at the October 8, 2025 status conference to the termination of attorneys Syrie D. Fried and Julio Cortes del Olmo as attorneys to be noticed on this case.Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to substitute "Joseph E. Freden, Deputy Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement" for "John Doe, Facility Director, Buffalo Detention Facility" on the docket, and update the docket to reflect that Mr. Freden is a "Respondent" not a "Defendant." Further, Attorney Fried and Attorney Cortes del Olmo are to be terminated as attorneys to be noticed on this case.SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Meredith A. Vacca on 10/10/2025. (JCL)Clerk to Follow up Modified on 10/10/2025 to fix a typo: the reference to "ECF No. 81" was changed to "ECF No. 18." (JCL). (Entered: 10/10/2025)

Oct. 10, 2025

Oct. 10, 2025

21

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Pamela Bondi, Joseph E. Freden, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support)(Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 10/14/2025)

Oct. 14, 2025

Oct. 14, 2025

22

Letter filed by Pamela Bondi, John Doe, Joseph E. Freden, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem with immigration documents. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 10/16/2025)

Oct. 16, 2025

Oct. 16, 2025

23

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 21 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa Da Cunha. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit ICE July 2025 guidance regarding detention, # 2 Exhibit Pages 1 - 9 of Supreme Court argument transcript in Jennings v Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281 (2018))(O'Dwyer, Paul) (Entered: 10/16/2025)

Oct. 16, 2025

Oct. 16, 2025

24

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Meredith A. Vacca: Show Cause Hearing held virtually via Teams on 10/20/2025. Appearances: Paul J. O'Dwyer, Esq., on behalf of Plaintiff; Adam A. Khalil, AUSA, on behalf of Defendants. The Court hears oral arguments from both parties. The Court reserves decision and will issue a written decision at a future date. (Court Reporter Joony Odenbach.) (KSP) (Entered: 10/20/2025)

Oct. 20, 2025

Oct. 20, 2025

25

TEXT ORDER denying 21 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and granting Petitioner's request for a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge.On October 3, 2025, Petitioner filed his First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, contending, inter alia, that his detention is unlawful under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) because he "has not been, and will not be, provided with a bond hearing by Respondents as required by law." ECF No. 15 (citing 8 C.F.R. 236.1(a) and 1003.19(a)-(f)). The Court held a status conference on October 8 at which the parties agreed that the matter involved only legal issues and did not require Petitioner's physical presence. ECF No. 19. Thereafter, Respondents moved to dismiss the First Amended Petition, arguing that Petitioner is lawfully detained under 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(A), and therefore not entitled to a bond hearing. ECF No. 21. The Court heard oral argument from counsel for both parties on October 20, 2025. ECF No. 24. After considering the parties' papers and the arguments of counsel, the Court concludes that Petitioner is being detained under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). Furthermore, because all three of the factors set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) weigh in Petitioner's favor, the Court finds that the denial of a bond hearing violates his procedural due process rights. Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing. See 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) (stating that non-citizens detained under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) may be released "on... bond" or "conditional parole"); 8 C.F.R. 1236.1(d)(1); 8 C.F.R. 1003.19(a) ("Custody and bond determinations made by the service pursuant to 8 CFR part 1236 may be reviewed by an Immigration Judge pursuant to 8 CFR part 1236."). For the reasons stated above and in a forthcoming written decision that will fully discuss the Court's rationale, Respondents' Motion to Dismiss 21 is denied and the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 15 is granted to the extent that Respondents shall conduct a constitutionally adequate bond hearing within ten (10) days of the date of this order, where the Government bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner's continued detention is justified based on his dangerousness to the community or risk of flight. Velasco Lopez v. Decker, 978 F.3d 842, 855-57 (2d Cir. 2020). If such bond hearing is not conducted within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Petitioner shall be released from custody. Respondents shall file a status report no later than November 7, 2025 confirming that Petitioner has either been granted a bond hearing within ten (10) days or released from custody, in compliance with this Order.SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Meredith A. Vacca on 10/20/2025. (JCL) (Entered: 10/20/2025)

Oct. 20, 2025

Oct. 20, 2025

26

STATUS REPORT re bond hearing by Pamela Bondi, John Doe, Joseph E. Freden, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 10/28/2025)

Oct. 28, 2025

Oct. 28, 2025

27

STATUS REPORT of Petitioner's non-release from ICE custody by Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa Da Cunha. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit IJ Bond Order, # 2 Exhibit ICE bond portal stating that bond order will not be honored, # 3 Exhibit ICE bond portal stating that no bond payment requests will be accepted)(O'Dwyer, Paul) (Entered: 10/28/2025)

Oct. 28, 2025

Oct. 28, 2025

28

TEXT SCHEDULING ORDER. Status conference set for 10 AM on Thursday, October 30, 2025 through Microsoft Teams. Access information to be sent to counsel by email. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Meredith A. Vacca on 10/29/2025. (JCL) (Entered: 10/29/2025)

Oct. 29, 2025

Oct. 29, 2025

29

STATUS REPORT confirming release by Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa Da Cunha. (O'Dwyer, Paul) (Entered: 10/29/2025)

Oct. 29, 2025

Oct. 29, 2025

30

TEXT ORDER CANCELING STATUS CONFERENCE. Petitioner's status report of October 29, 2025 indicates that a conference is no longer required in this matter. Accordingly, the status conference scheduled for 10/30/2025 at 10 AM is canceled. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Meredith A. Vacca on 10/30/2025. (JCL) Modified on 10/31/2025 to correct a spelling error. (JCL) (Entered: 10/30/2025)

Oct. 30, 2025

Oct. 30, 2025

31

DECISION AND ORDER memorializing its reasons for denying Respondent's motion to dismiss [ECF No. 21] and granting Petitioner's application for habeas relief [ECF No. 1] to the extent that the Court finds he was detained under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) and therefore entitled to a bond hearing under the relevant regulations.The Court notes that consistent with the Court's text order (ECF No. 25), a bond hearing was held for Petitioner on October 28, 2025. ECF No. 26. After some initial difficulty with the process of posting bond, Petitioner's counsel confirmed that Petitioner was released on bond as of October 29, 2025. ECF No. 29. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Meredith A. Vacca on 11/25/2025. (JCL)Clerk to Follow up (Entered: 11/25/2025)

Nov. 25, 2025

Nov. 25, 2025

Clearinghouse
32

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 25 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 31 Decision and Order, by Pamela Bondi, John Doe, Joseph E. Freden, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

Dec. 11, 2025

Dec. 11, 2025

Within 14 days of filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant is required to electronically file with the District Court an index of filed documents it wishes the Court of Appeals to consider, called Designation of Record on Appeal. After receipt, the Clerks Office will certify and transmit the index to the Circuit.Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1 of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Forms C and D must be completed within 14 days after the filing of a notice of appeal. Forms C and D can be obtained at www.ca2.uscourts.gov. (TF)

Dec. 12, 2025

Dec. 12, 2025

33

DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by Pamela Bondi, John Doe, Joseph E. Freden, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem re 32 Notice of Appeal CLERK TO FOLLOW UP (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

Dec. 16, 2025

Dec. 16, 2025

34

CLERKS CERTIFICATE filed and electronically sent to Court of Appeals re 33 DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal. (TF) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

Dec. 17, 2025

Dec. 17, 2025

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 2, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A noncitizen detained without opportunity for bond.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2253; 2254; 2255

Other Dockets:

Western District of New York 6:25-cv-06532

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 25-03141

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Habeas

Relief Granted:

Habeas relief

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

Immigration/Border:

Detention - bond

Recommended Citation