|
1
|
May 22, 2026
|
COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, DEPUTY DOCKERY, DOES 101-500, SERGEANT IBARRA, KATHERINE JOHNSON, PAUL MIYAMOTO, DEPUTY MUSTOS, DEPUTY NG, SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S OFFICE ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22014472.). Filed by SILVIA MONTOYA, LISA GONZALES, GIOVANNA RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ, JAYLA GLASER, MARILYN SAHAGUN LOPEZ, MARY O'NEAL, TAYLOR ROSS, COURTNEY BOSSE, JAZMIN MENDEZ, LASONYA WELLS, ALEXCIS HERRERA, DAMENA PAGE, SARAH WALLS, DEPHINA SYKES, CANTRAIL MURPHY, ADRIANA GONZALEZ OCHOA, SALLY BATES, LACARLA CARR, MELISSA PERNA, VICTORIA CHEW. (Label, Anthony) (Filed on 5/22/2026) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
|
Clearinghouse
|
|
2
|
May 22, 2026
|
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/5/2026. (mxg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2026) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
May 22, 2026
|
~Util - Case Assigned by Intake
|
|
|
3
|
May 27, 2026
|
Proposed Summons. (Label, Anthony) (Filed on 5/27/2026) (Entered: 05/27/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
4
|
May 28, 2026
|
Summons Issued as to City and County of San Francisco, Dockery, Ibarra, Katherine Johnson, Paul Miyamoto, Mustos, Ng, San Francisco Sheriff's Office. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2026) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
May 28, 2026
|
Electronic filing error re : 1 Complaint filed by Taylor Ross, Sarah Walls, Mary O'Neal, Jayla Glaser, Victoria Chew, Adriana Gonzalez Ochoa, Giovanna Ramirez-Hernandez, Jazmin Mendez, Lacarla Carr, Dephina Sykes, Courtney Bosse, Sally Bates, Cantrail Murphy, Lisa Gonzales, Lasonya Wells, Alexcis Herrera, Melissa Perna, Silvia Montoya, Marilyn Sahagun Lopez, Damena Page. Parties added to action incorrectly. Counsel is reminded not to add parties in ALL CAPS. For future reference, please refer to https://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening. See Guide to E-Filing New Civil Cases (Section III.c Case Opening Part II: Adding Parties; Data Entry Rules for Adding Parties). Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2026)
|
|
|
May 28, 2026
|
Electronic Filing Error
|
|
|
5
|
June 4, 2026
|
First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 3-12 filed by Sally Bates, Courtney Bosse, Lacarla Carr, Victoria Chew, Jayla Glaser, Lisa Gonzales, Alexcis Herrera, Marilyn Sahagun Lopez, Jazmin Mendez, Silvia Montoya, Cantrail Murphy, Mary O'Neal, Adriana Gonzalez Ochoa, Damena Page, Melissa Perna, Giovanna Ramirez-Hernandez, Taylor Ross, Dephina Sykes, Sarah Walls, Lasonya Wells. Responses due by 6/8/2026. (Label, Anthony) (Filed on 6/4/2026) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
6
|
June 4, 2026
|
Declaration of Anthony Label in Support of 5 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 3-12 filed bySally Bates, Courtney Bosse, Lacarla Carr, Victoria Chew, Jayla Glaser, Lisa Gonzales, Alexcis Herrera, Marilyn Sahagun Lopez, Jazmin Mendez, Silvia Montoya, Cantrail Murphy, Mary O'Neal, Adriana Gonzalez Ochoa, Damena Page, Melissa Perna, Giovanna Ramirez-Hernandez, Taylor Ross, Dephina Sykes, Sarah Walls, Lasonya Wells. (Related document(s) 5 ) (Label, Anthony) (Filed on 6/4/2026) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
7
|
June 5, 2026
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER by Judge Susan van Keulen on 6/5/26: Plaintiffs' 5 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related seeks relation of this case to the earlier-filed cases Doe v. City and County of San Francisco, et al., Case No. 26-cv-00783-KAW, and Hewitt v. City and County of San Francisco, et al., Case No. 26-cv-00371-KAW. The administrative motion at Dkt. 5 is TERMINATED for failure to comply with Civil Local Rule 3-12(b), which requires that a motion to relate cases must be filed in the lowest-numbered case. Note that if Plaintiffs re-file the motion in the lowest-numbered case, Civil Local Rule 3-12(b) requires that they file a copy of the motion in each apparently related action using the ECF event Notice (Other). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (svklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2026) (Entered: 06/05/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
8
|
June 5, 2026
|
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sally Bates, Courtney Bosse, Lacarla Carr, Victoria Chew, Jayla Glaser, Lisa Gonzales, Alexcis Herrera, Marilyn Sahagun Lopez, Jazmin Mendez, Silvia Montoya, Cantrail Murphy, Mary O'Neal, Adriana Gonzalez Ochoa, Damena Page, Melissa Perna, Giovanna Ramirez-Hernandez, Taylor Ross, Dephina Sykes, Sarah Walls, Lasonya Wells.. (Label, Anthony) (Filed on 6/5/2026) (Entered: 06/05/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
June 5, 2026
|
Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11
|
|
|
9
|
June 11, 2026
|
RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/11/2026. (ccf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2026) (Entered: 06/11/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
10
|
June 12, 2026
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mxg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2026) (Entered: 06/12/2026)
|
RECAP
|
|
June 12, 2026
|
Case Assigned/Reassigned
|
|
|
11
|
June 23, 2026
|
Certificate/Proof of Service
|
RECAP
|
|
12
|
June 26, 2026
|
Certificate/Proof of Service
|
RECAP
|
|
June 26, 2026
|
Electronic Filing Error
|
|
|
13
|
June 28, 2026
|
Summons Returned Executed
|
RECAP
|
|
14
|
July 14, 2026
|
Stipulation without Proposed Order
|
RECAP
|
|
15
|
July 14, 2026
|
Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge
|
RECAP
|
|
Aug. 14, 2026
|
Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing
|
|