Case: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Check City Partnership, LLC

2:23-cv-00939 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada

Filed Date: June 12, 2023

Closed Date: April 23, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the Trump administration's mass rollback of the Biden administration’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) enforcement actions, culminating in the dismissal of a petition to compel a payday lender's compliance with a civil investigative demand. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) brought this individual petition to compel a payday lender to comply with a civil investigative demand (CID), but the case was stayed for over a year while the U.S. Supreme Cour…

This case challenged the Trump administration's mass rollback of the Biden administration’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) enforcement actions, culminating in the dismissal of a petition to compel a payday lender's compliance with a civil investigative demand.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) brought this individual petition to compel a payday lender to comply with a civil investigative demand (CID), but the case was stayed for over a year while the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a challenge to the constitutionality of the Bureau's funding structure in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited (CFPB v. CFSAA), 601 U.S. 416 (2024). Ultimately, this case was dismissed with prejudice as part of the Trump administration's mass rollback of CFPB enforcement actions in early 2025. 

On June 12, 2023, the CFPB filed this petition in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada under the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. § 5562(e), seeking a court order directing Check City Partnership, LLC (Check City), a Utah-based company that provides short-term, small-dollar, and installment loans to consumers, to show cause as to why it should not be compelled to comply with the Bureau's civil investigative demand (CID). The CFPB, represented by its own enforcement attorneys, sought an order compelling full compliance with the CID, as well as costs. The case was assigned to Senior District Judge James C. Mahan and referred to Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. Check City was represented by private counsel from Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP and Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP.

The CFPB had issued the CID to Check City in late 2022 as part of an investigation into possible violations of the CFPA related to Check City's lending practices. The CID required Check City to respond to six interrogatories, four requests for written reports, and twenty-one document requests. Check City initially complied with the CID, but in March 2023 it moved the Bureau to stay its investigation after the U.S. Supreme Court granted cert in CFPB v. CFSAA, No. 22-448, a case challenging the constitutionality of the Bureau's funding mechanism under the Appropriations Clause. When Check City ceased compliance, the CFPB filed the instant petition.

On July 28, 2023, District Judge James C. Mahan issued an order to show cause directing Check City to explain in writing within 21 days why an order compelling compliance with the CID should not be granted. Check City then filed a motion to stay the case pending the Supreme Court's decision in CFPB v. CFSAA, 601 U.S. 416 (2024) as well as a motion to vacate its response deadline to the Bureau's petition. The CFPB opposed the stay, arguing that the Supreme Court's forthcoming decision might not require dismissal of its enforcement actions and that the delay would prejudice the public interest. On November 3, 2023, District Judge James C. Mahan granted the stay. ECF No. 23. District Judge James C. Mahan reasoned that the Fifth Circuit's 2022 decision holding the Bureau's funding mechanism unconstitutional, Cmty. Fin. Servs. Ass'n of Am., Ltd. v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, 51 F.4th 616 (5th Cir. 2022) (cert. granted), cast sufficient doubt on the Bureau's enforcement authority to justify a stay. The court found that the stay would not be indefinite because CFPB v. CFSAA was fully briefed and argued, and that a brief stay would avoid wasteful litigation on a matter that might require dismissal. District Judge James C. Mahan also vacated all pending deadlines and denied as moot Check City's motion for leave to file supplemental authority.

On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court decided CFPB v. CFSAA, 601 U.S. 416 (2024), upholding the constitutionality of the Bureau's funding structure in a 7-2 decision. On June 17, 2024, District Judge James C. Mahan lifted the stay, noting that the parties had agreed that the Supreme Court's ruling eliminated the basis for staying the case and that they had set a production schedule for Check City to comply with the CID. ECF No. 25. The court ordered the parties to submit joint status reports and continued to defer Check City's obligation to respond to the original order to show cause.

Over the following months, the parties filed a series of joint status reports (in August 2024, October 2024, and January 2025), apparently reflecting ongoing negotiations over Check City's compliance with the CID. In February 2025, shortly after the change in presidential administration, Check City filed a consent motion for a temporary 60-day stay of the case, to which the CFPB agreed. District Judge James C. Mahan granted the stay on February 25, 2025, staying the case until April 28, 2025. On April 18, 2025, the CFPB filed a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). District Judge James C. Mahan granted the dismissal on April 23, 2025, closing the case. The dismissal was consistent with a broader pattern in which the Trump administration's CFPB, under acting Director in its official capacity, dismissed dozens of pending enforcement actions inherited from the prior administration.

This case is closed. As of June 2025, no appeal had been filed, and because the dismissal was with prejudice, the Bureau cannot refile this CID enforcement action.

Summary Authors

Simon Jillson (6/24/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67507572/parties/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-v-check-city-partnership-llc/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

2:23-cv-00939

Petition to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

Petition to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand (CID)

June 12, 2023

June 12, 2023

Complaint
5

2:23-cv-00939

Order Show Cause AND Order on Motion to Show Cause

July 28, 2023

July 28, 2023

Order/Opinion
23

2:23-cv-00939

Order Staying Case AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND Order on Motion to Stay Case AND Order on Motion to Vacate

Nov. 3, 2023

Nov. 3, 2023

Order/Opinion
25

2:23-cv-00939

Order AND ~Util - Case Stay Lifted

June 17, 2024

June 17, 2024

Order/Opinion
38

2:23-cv-00939

Order Dismissing Case AND Order on Stipulation

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67507572/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-v-check-city-partnership-llc/

Last updated July 22, 2026, 3:07 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

MOTION Petition to Enforce Civil Investigation Demand and Supporting Memorandum by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Responses due by 6/26/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Cover Sheet, # 13 Attorney List)(ALZ) (misc) (nondispositive) (Entered: 06/14/2023)

1 Exhibit List

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit A

View on PACER

3 Exhibit B

View on PACER

4 Exhibit C

View on PACER

5 Exhibit D

View on PACER

6 Exhibit E

View on PACER

7 Exhibit F

View on PACER

8 Exhibit G

View on PACER

9 Exhibit H

View on PACER

10 Exhibit I

View on PACER

11 Exhibit J

View on PACER

12 Cover Sheet

View on PACER

13 Attorney List

View on PACER

June 12, 2023

June 12, 2023

Clearinghouse
2

DECLARATION of E. Vanessa Assae-Bille re 1 Petition, by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (ALZ) (Entered: 06/14/2023)

June 12, 2023

June 12, 2023

3

Proposed Order to Show Cause to 1 Motion, by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (ALZ) Modified on 6/15/2023 (AF). (Entered: 06/14/2023)

June 12, 2023

June 12, 2023

4

NOTICE that this case, formerly Misc. Case No. 2:23-ms-00035, having become a contested proceeding on 06/12/2023, has been converted to the regular civil docket and has been assigned case number 2:23-cv-00939. All future pleadings must be filed in the civil action and must bear said civil case number. (ALZ) (Entered: 06/15/2023)

June 15, 2023

June 15, 2023

Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (ALZ)

June 15, 2023

June 15, 2023

5

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS ORDERED that Respondent shall show cause in writing, within 21 days of service of this Order, why an Order Compelling Compliance with CID should not be granted in accordance with the Petition filed by the Bureau. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF) (Entered: 07/28/2023)

July 28, 2023

July 28, 2023

Clearinghouse
6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for 1 Motion, 5 Order on Motion for Order to Show Cause,,, 2 Declaration by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.. (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/10/2023)

Aug. 10, 2023

Aug. 10, 2023

7

MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. Responses due by 9/11/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Reilly, Patrick) (Entered: 08/28/2023)

Aug. 28, 2023

Aug. 28, 2023

8

MOTION to Vacate Check City's Deadline to Respond to CFPB Petition Stay Case by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. Responses due by 9/11/2023. (Reilly, Patrick) Modified motion event type on 9/6/2023 - NEF regenerated (CJS). (Entered: 08/28/2023)

Aug. 28, 2023

Aug. 28, 2023

9

MOTION to Admit Government Attorney Stephanie B. Garlock by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/30/2023)

Aug. 30, 2023

Aug. 30, 2023

10

REFER to ECF No. 13 Notice of Corrected Image/Document - MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Sarah T. Reise and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Patrick J. Reilly (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number ANVDC-7411089) by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (CAH) Modified on 9/5/2023 (CJS). (Entered: 08/30/2023)

Aug. 30, 2023

Aug. 30, 2023

11

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 8/30/2023. By Deputy Clerk: A. Reyes. Re: 10 Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice - Verified Petition IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a ruling on Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and Designation of Local Counsel 10 is DEFERRED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner, Sarah T. Reise, shall provide a current Certificate of Good Standing from EACH state in which Petitioner has been admitted to practice law, in accordance with the instruction set forth on Page 2, No. 3, of the Verified Petition.Petitioner shall have 14 days from the entry of this order to file the corrected Verified Petition using the "Notice of Corrected Image/Document" event and link to 10 . Failure to timely remedy this deficiency will result in the denial of the Verified Petition, and Petitioner will be required to refile and to repay the filing fee. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) (Entered: 08/30/2023)

Aug. 30, 2023

Aug. 30, 2023

Minute Order

Aug. 30, 2023

Aug. 30, 2023

12

RESPONSE to 8 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Replies due by 9/8/2023. (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 09/01/2023)

Sept. 1, 2023

Sept. 1, 2023

13

NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re 10 Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice - Verified Petition for attorney Sarah T. Reise, by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (Service of corrected image is attached.). (Reilly, Patrick) (Entered: 09/05/2023)

Sept. 5, 2023

Sept. 5, 2023

14

ORDER Granting 10 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Sarah T. Reise and approving Designation of Local Counsel Attorney Patrick J. Reilly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/6/2023. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website www.pacer.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RGDG) (Entered: 09/06/2023)

Sept. 6, 2023

Sept. 6, 2023

15

REPLY to Response to 8 Motion to Vacate by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (Reilly, Patrick) (Entered: 09/08/2023)

Sept. 8, 2023

Sept. 8, 2023

16

RESPONSE to 7 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Replies due by 9/18/2023. (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 09/11/2023)

Sept. 11, 2023

Sept. 11, 2023

17

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 9/15/2023. Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau moves the court to admit government attorney Stephanie B. Garlock to practice in the District of Nevada for all matters related to this case, pursuant to local rule IA 11-3. 9 .Plaintiff represents that Ms. Garlock is an attorney of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal agency, and is a member of good standing with the bar of the District of Columbia. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiffs motion to admit government attorney Stephanie B. Garlock to practice 9 is GRANTED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered: 09/15/2023)

Sept. 15, 2023

Sept. 15, 2023

18

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) To File Reply Memorandum re 7 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (Reilly, Patrick) (extend) (nondispositive) (Entered: 09/15/2023)

Sept. 15, 2023

Sept. 15, 2023

Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Admit Government Attorney

Sept. 15, 2023

Sept. 15, 2023

19

ORDER granting 18 Stipulation EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO STAY, 7 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery. Replies due by 9/25/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 9/18/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 09/18/2023)

Sept. 18, 2023

Sept. 18, 2023

RECAP
20

REPLY to Response to 7 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (Reilly, Patrick) (Entered: 09/25/2023)

Sept. 25, 2023

Sept. 25, 2023

21

MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority re 7 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. Responses due by 11/13/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Reilly, Patrick) (misc) (nondispositive) (Entered: 10/30/2023)

Oct. 30, 2023

Oct. 30, 2023

22

RESPONSE to 21 Motion, by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Replies due by 11/8/2023. (Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 11/01/2023)

Nov. 1, 2023

Nov. 1, 2023

23

ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Stay Case, Granting 8 Motion to Vacate, and Denying as Moot 21 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. The court ORDERS this case stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in CFPB v. CFSAA and VACATES all pending deadlines. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/3/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RGDG) (Entered: 11/03/2023)

Nov. 3, 2023

Nov. 3, 2023

Clearinghouse
24

Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 06/05/2024)

June 5, 2024

June 5, 2024

25

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the stay in this case is LIFTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties submit a second joint status report by August 28, 2024, notifying the court of the status of this case and whether any disputes remain. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Check City Partnership, LLC is not required to respond to the court's previous Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 5 ) until and unless instructed by the court. Joint Status Report due by 8/28/2024. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/17/2024. Case stay lifted. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 06/17/2024)

June 17, 2024

June 17, 2024

Clearinghouse
26

Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (Reilly, Patrick) (Entered: 08/27/2024)

Aug. 27, 2024

Aug. 27, 2024

27

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan, on September 6, 2024.The parties filed a second joint status report on August 27, 2024, informing the court that the parties are resolving remaining document request disputes. (ECF No. 26 ). The parties also request permission to file an updated status report by October 15, 20204, and ask the court to delay Check City Partnership, LLC's deadline to respond on the previous Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 5 ). The court finds sufficient cause to delay the defendant's deadline on the Order to Show Cause until after the parties file an updated status report.ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must submit a third joint status report by October 15, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Check City Partnership, LLC is not required to respond to the court's previous Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 5 ) until instructed by the court. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) (Entered: 09/06/2024)

Sept. 6, 2024

Sept. 6, 2024

Minute Order

Sept. 6, 2024

Sept. 6, 2024

28

Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/11/2024)

Oct. 11, 2024

Oct. 11, 2024

29

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 12/5/2024. By Deputy Clerk: C. Torres. The parties filed a third joint status report on October 11, 2024, apprising the court of their status in the Bureau's investigation. (ECF No. 28). Based on the parties' representations, the court finds good cause to extend its prior order. Accordingly,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must submit a fourth status report by January 24, 2025, informing the court of any remaining disputes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Check City Partnership, LLC is not required to respond to the court's previous Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 5) until and unless instructed by the court. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) (Entered: 12/05/2024)

Dec. 5, 2024

Dec. 5, 2024

Minute Order

Dec. 5, 2024

Dec. 5, 2024

30

Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. (Reise, Sarah) (Entered: 01/16/2025)

Jan. 16, 2025

Jan. 16, 2025

31

Consent MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant Check City Partnership, LLC. Responses due by 2/26/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Reilly, Patrick) (Entered: 02/12/2025)

Feb. 12, 2025

Feb. 12, 2025

32

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 2/25/2025. MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 2/25/2025. By Deputy Clerk: C. Torres. WHEREAS, on February 12, 2025, respondent Check City Partnership, LLC moved to temporarily stay the case for 60 days. (ECF No. 31). Petitioner Consumer Financial Protection Bureau consents to the motion. (Id.).Accordingly, the court GRANTS Check Citys motion (ECF No. 31) under Local Rule 7-2(d), and ORDERS that this case be temporarily STAYED for 60 days until April 28, 2025. The parties may move to lift the stay at any time if circumstances change. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) (Entered: 02/25/2025)

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Stay Case

Feb. 25, 2025

Feb. 25, 2025

33

STIPULATION of withdrawal of Stephanie B. Garlock as counsel by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Garlock, Stephanie) (other) (attorney) (Entered: 03/13/2025)

March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

34

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/14/2025. By Judicial Assistant: E. Santiago.Before the Court is the Stipulation of Withdrawal of Stephanie B. Garlock as Counsel for Petitioner. ECF No. 33 . Counsel for Plaintiff states that Ms. Garlock's "last day of employment with the Bureau is March 14, 2025." Id. Plaintiff will continue to be represented by attorneys E. Vanessa Assae-Bille and Benjamin Clark of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Thus, the Stipulation is not to withdraw, but to terminate Ms. Garlock from the list of counsel for Plaintiff and from the electronic service system as she is no longer with the firm retained as Plaintiff's counsel. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mistitled Stipulation of Withdrawal of Stephanie B. Garlock as Counsel for Petitioner (ECF No. 33 ) is GRANTED to the extent that the Clerk of Court must terminate Stephanie B. Garlock's name from CM/ECF and the docket so that she no longer receives electronic service of materials filed in this case.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ES) (Entered: 03/14/2025)

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

Minute Order AND Order on Stipulation AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys

March 14, 2025

March 14, 2025

35

STIPULATION TO DISMISS with Prejudice Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Clark, Benjamin) (dismiss) (Entered: 04/18/2025)

April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025

36

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 4/18/2025. By Deputy Clerk: C. Torres. re: 35 Stipulation.ERROR: Document not filed pursuant to LR 16 4. Missing Judge's Signature box.Attorney Benjamin Clark is advised to filed properly formatted Stipulation in accordance with LR 16 4; using the correct event Notice of Corrected Image/Document, pursuant to LR IC 2 2(c) and properly link newly filed Notice to the appropriate document 35 . (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CT) (Entered: 04/18/2025)

April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025

Minute Order

April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025

37

NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re 35 Stipulation by Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Clark, Benjamin) (Entered: 04/21/2025)

April 21, 2025

April 21, 2025

38

ORDER Granting 35 Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/23/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JG) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

Nevada

Case Type(s):

Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Reversing Course on Existing Litigation

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 12, 2023

Closing Date: April 23, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal independent agency within the Federal Reserve System.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-DOJ federal government plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Check City Partnerships, LLC

Defendant Type(s):

Bank or credit provider

Facility Type(s):

Non-government for-profit

Case Details

Constitutional Clause(s):

Spending/Appropriations Clauses

Other Dockets:

District of Nevada 2:23-ms-00035

District of Nevada 2:23-cv-00939

Special Case Type(s):

Warrant or subpoena application (or protection)

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Document/Information

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

General/Misc.:

Other Banking

Predatory lending

Discrimination Area:

Lending

Recommended Citation