Case: National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States Department of Agriculture

3:26-cv-04406 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: May 13, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case challenging the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) communications to employees regarding religion.  On May 13, 2026, the National Federation of Federal Employees and a group of multifaith and nonreligious USDA employees filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs sued the USDA and its Secretary, in her official capacity, asserting violations of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and the Admini…

This is a case challenging the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) communications to employees regarding religion. 

On May 13, 2026, the National Federation of Federal Employees and a group of multifaith and nonreligious USDA employees filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs sued the USDA and its Secretary, in her official capacity, asserting violations of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Represented by Democracy Forward, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and Bryan Schwartz Law, P.C., the plaintiffs alleged that the Secretary repeatedly sent official emails containing proselytizing Christian messages to the entire USDA workforce. The plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief barring the Secretary from sending or otherwise communicating proselytizing Christian messages to USDA employees, a vacatur of the Secretary’s policy of subjecting agency employees to proselytizing messages, and attorney’s fees. The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler.

On May 19, 2026, one plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his individual claims without prejudice. The dismissal left the remaining plaintiffs' claims intact.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Alexis Gil (7/10/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73334088/parties/national-federation-of-federal-employees-v-united-states-department-of/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:26-cv-04406

Complaint For Declaratory And Injunctive Relief

May 13, 2026

May 13, 2026

Complaint
20

3:26-cv-04406

Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal As To Plaintiff Adam Diamond Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(I)

May 19, 2026

May 19, 2026

Other

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73334088/national-federation-of-federal-employees-v-united-states-department-of/

Last updated Sept. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m.

Docket for: National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States Department of Agriculture
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 13, 2026

COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21978135.). Injunction against the US government/official or APA vacatur requested. Filed by Anne Poopatanapong, Lanette Dietrich, Ethan Roberts, Adam Diamond, Jennifer Wolfe, Thomas MaGee, National Federation of Federal Employees, Ashley Miller. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

Clearinghouse
2 May 13, 2026

Proposed Summons. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
3 May 13, 2026

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/27/2026. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
4 May 13, 2026

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Amy Tai ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21978934.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Tai, Amy) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
5 May 13, 2026

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21979263.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing for DC Bar)(Daiute, Elias) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing for DC Bar

View on PACER

RECAP
6 May 13, 2026

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21979369.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Samuels, Jennifer) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

1 Certificate of Good Standing

View on PACER

RECAP
7 May 13, 2026

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2026. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2026 11:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
8 May 13, 2026

Summons Issued as to United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
9 May 13, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 4 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
10 May 13, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 5 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
11 May 13, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
12 May 13, 2026

First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21982036.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Good Standing Certificate)(Markert, Rebecca) (Filed on 5/13/2026) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
May 13, 2026

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

13 May 15, 2026

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21989462.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Goetz, Sarah) (Filed on 5/15/2026) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

1 Certificate of Good Standing

View on PACER

RECAP
14 May 15, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Sarah Goetz. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2026) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

RECAP
15 May 18, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 12 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2026) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

RECAP
16 May 18, 2026

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21996704.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Goldstein, Elena) (Filed on 5/18/2026) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing

View on PACER

RECAP
17 May 18, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Elena Goldstein. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2026) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

RECAP
18 May 19, 2026

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-21999248.) filed by Adam Diamond, Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit (Certificate of Good Standing))(Khan, Ayesha) (Filed on 5/19/2026) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

RECAP
19 May 19, 2026

Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Ayesha N. Khan. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2026) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

RECAP
20 May 19, 2026

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Adam Diamond (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 5/19/2026) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

Clearinghouse
21 May 21, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe.. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 5/21/2026) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
22 May 21, 2026

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anne Poopatanapong, Lanette Dietrich, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe, Thomas MaGee, National Federation of Federal Employees, Ashley Miller. All Defendants. (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 5/21/2026) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
23 May 21, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe re 21 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 20 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, and Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 5/21/2026) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
24 July 22, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance filed by Elisabeth Neylan on behalf of Brooke L Rollins, United States Department of Agriculture (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

RECAP
25 July 22, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/5/2026. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

RECAP
26 July 22, 2026

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay Under 5 U.S.C. § 705 with Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts. Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2026 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 8/5/2026. Replies due by 8/12/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Elias W.H. Daiute in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 2 Declaration of Anne Poopatanapong in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 3 Declaration of Ashley Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 4 Declaration of Ethan Roberts in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 5 Declaration of Jennifer Wolfe in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 6 Declaration of Lanette Dietrich in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 7 Declaration of Thomas MaGee in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 8 Declaration of Yvette Piacsek in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 9 Declaration of John A. Ragosta, Ph.D and Expert Report in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 10 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay Under 5 U.S.C. § 705)(Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

1 Declaration of Elias W.H. Daiute in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preli

View on RECAP

2 Declaration of Anne Poopatanapong in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prel

View on RECAP

3 Declaration of Ashley Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prelimina

View on RECAP

4 Declaration of Ethan Roberts in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prelimina

View on RECAP

5 Declaration of Jennifer Wolfe in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prelimin

View on RECAP

6 Declaration of Lanette Dietrich in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prelim

View on RECAP

7 Declaration of Thomas MaGee in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminar

View on PACER

8 Declaration of Yvette Piacsek in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Prelimin

View on RECAP

9 Declaration of John A. Ragosta, Ph.D and Expert Report in Support of Plaintiffs&

View on RECAP

10 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and S

View on RECAP

RECAP
27 July 22, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/29/2026. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

RECAP
28 July 22, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: In light of the pending motion, the court resets the Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 8/13/2026 to 10/15/2026 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/8/2026. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb Civ LR 77-3(d). Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://cand.uscourts.gov/zoom.(ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

RECAP
July 22, 2026

Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

July 22, 2026

Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination

July 22, 2026

1 - Terminate Hearings AND Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom

29 July 23, 2026

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Plaintiffs' ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/23/2026) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

RECAP
30 July 23, 2026

Certificate of Interested Entities by Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe (Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/23/2026) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

RECAP
31 July 24, 2026

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order for Combined Briefing of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Lanette Dietrich, Thomas MaGee, Ashley Miller, National Federation of Federal Employees, Anne Poopatanapong, Ethan Roberts, Jennifer Wolfe. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Sarah Goetz in Support of Joint Stipulation for Combined Briefing of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Schwartz, Bryan) (Filed on 7/24/2026) (Entered: 07/24/2026)

RECAP
32 July 27, 2026

ORDER re 31 Joint Stipulation Scheduling Order for Combined Briefing of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants to file a combined Motion to Dismiss and opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 8/21/2026. Plaintiffs to file a combined opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and reply in support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 9/21/2026. Defendants to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by 10/5/2026. Motion Hearing 26 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay Under 5 U.S.C. § 705 with Memorandum of Points and Authorities set for 10/29/2026 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 8/21/2026. Replies due by 9/21/2026. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 10/15/2026 is reset to 12/10/2026 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2026. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 07/27/2026. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2026) (Entered: 07/27/2026)

RECAP
33 July 28, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brooke L Rollins, United States Department of Agriculture.. (Neylan, Elisabeth) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
34 July 28, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
35 July 28, 2026

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned using a proportionate, random and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Trina L Thompson. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
36 July 28, 2026

CLERKS NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Trina L. Thompson upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Thompson's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2026 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/24/2026.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/tlt/thompson-trina-lCiv LR 77-3(d). Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
37 July 28, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing as to 26 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay Under 5 U.S.C. § 705 with Memorandum of Points and Authorities. The Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2026 is re-set for 10/27/2026 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before Judge Trina L Thompson. The briefing schedule is maintained. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
July 28, 2026

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

July 28, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

July 28, 2026

Clerk's Notice Continuing Motion Hearing AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

July 28, 2026

Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing

38 Aug. 21, 2026

Cross MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction Motion filed by Brooke L Rollins, United States Department of Agriculture. Motion Hearing set for 10/27/2026 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before Judge Trina L Thompson. Responses due by 9/21/2026. Replies due by 10/5/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Neylan, Elisabeth) (Filed on 8/21/2026) (Entered: 08/21/2026)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
39 Sept. 21, 2026

Opposition/Response to Motion

RECAP
40 Sept. 24, 2026

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options

RECAP
41 Sept. 24, 2026

Case Management Statement

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 13, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs are a group of multifaith and nonreligious U.S. Department of Agriculture employees.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Democracy Forward

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Secretary of Agriculture

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Establishment Clause

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 3:26-cv-04406

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Religious programs / policies

Affected Religion(s):

Christianity

Recommended Citation